Search

This study evaluate the potential of plasmatic CXCL-10 (pCXCL-10) as a pre&post transplantation prognostic and diagnostic biomarker of T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and subclinical rejection (SCR) risk in adult kidney recipients considering BKV and CMV infections as possible clinical confounder factors. Twenty-eight of 100 patients included experienced rejection (TCMR:14; ABMR:14); 8 SCR; 13 and 16 were diagnosed with BKV and CMV infection, respectively. Pre-transplantation pCXCL-10 was significantly increased in TCMR and ABMR and post-transplantation in TCMR, ABMR and SCR compared with nonrejectors. All CMV + patients showed pCXCL-10 levels above the cutoff values established for rejection whereas the 80% of BKV + patients showed pCXCL-10 concentration < 100 pg/mL. pCXCL-10 could improve pre-transplantation patient stratification and immunosuppressive treatment selection according to rejection risk; and after kidney transplantation could be a potential early prognostic biomarker for rejection. Clinical confounding factor in BKV + and particularly in CMV + patients must be discarded., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Previous results from our group and others have shown that urinary pellet expression of miR155-5p and urinary CXCL-10 production could play a key role in the prognosis and diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplantation patients. Here, a logistic regression model was developed using NONMEM to quantify the relationships of miR155-5p urinary expression, CXCL-10 urinary concentration and tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure with the probability of AR in adult kidney transplant patients during the early post-transplant period. Owing to the contribution of therapeutic drug monitoring to achieving target exposure, neither tacrolimus nor MPA cumulative exposure was identified as a predictor of AR in the studied population. Even though CXCL-10 urinary concentration showed a trend, its effect on AR was not significant. In contrast, urinary miR155-5p expression was prognostic of clinical outcome. Monitoring miR155-5p urinary pellet expression together with immunosuppressive drug exposure could be very useful during routine clinical practice to identify patients with a potential high risk of rejection at the early stages of the post-transplant period. This early risk assessment would allow for the optimization of treatment and improved prevention of AR., Competing Interests: This work was funded by TEVA Pharmaceuticals, a commercial company. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, marketed products or products in development associated with this research. Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB) (Research Center of Hospital Clínic of Barcelona) acted as promoter of the study and was responsible for starting and managing of the study, but did not provide financial support.

Background and Aims: News strategies for the accurate assessment of the state of immunosuppression (IS) in liver transplant recipients are needed to prevent rejection and minimize drug-related side effects. miRNAs can potentially be used as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers in transplant patients. This study evaluated the capacity of a plasmatic miRNA panel (miR-155-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-181a-5p, and miR148-3p) as an early non-invasive prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for T cell-mediated acute rejection (TCMAR) and subclinical rejection (SCR) in adult liver recipients. Methods: A total of 145 liver recipients were included. All patients received a calcineurin inhibitor with or without mycophenolate mofetil and methylprednisolone. Plasmatic miRNA expression was assessed by qPCR before and at different time-points after liver transplantation. Results: Seventeen patients experienced TCMAR, and eight were diagnosed with SCR during the protocol biopsy at the 3rd month post-transplantation. Pre-transplantation, miR-155-5p expression was significantly higher in TCMAR patients and in SCR patients than in non-rejectors, and miR-181a-5p expression was also significantly higher in SCR patients than in non-rejectors. Post-transplantation, before transaminase-level modification, significantly increased miR-181a-5p, miR-155-5p, and miR-122-5p expression was observed in TCMAR and SCR patients. Binary logistic regression analyses showed, post-transplantation, that TCMAR risk was better predicted by individual expression of miR-181a-5p (LOGIT = -6.35 + 3.87 * miR-181a-5p), and SCR risk was better predicted by the combination of miR-181a-5p and miR-155-5p expression (LOGIT = -5.18 + 2.27 * miR-181a-5p+1.74 * miR-155-5p). Conclusions: Pre-transplantation plasmatic miR-155-5p expression may be useful for stratifying low-immunologic-risk patients, and post-transplantation miR-181a-5p and miR-155-5p may be candidates for inclusion in early, non-invasive prognostic biomarker panels to prevent TCMAR or SCR and better identify patient candidates for IS minimization. Large prospective randomized multicenter trials are needed to refine the cut-off values and algorithms and validate the clinical usefulness of these biomarkers.

Background: The progression from acute to chronic antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients is usually not prevented by current therapeutic options. Here, we investigated whether the use of tofacitinib (TOFA), a Janus kinase 3 inhibitor, was capable of preventing the progression of allograft dysfunction in a Fisher-to-Lewis rat model of kidney transplantation., Methods: Rats were treated from the third week after transplantation to allow the development of rejection. Treatment was based on cyclosporin A, rapamycin or TOFA. Renal function was assessed at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after transplantation, whereas rat survival, histological lesions, and infiltrating lymphocytes were analyzed at 12 weeks., Results: Tofacitinib prolonged graft survival, preserved tubular and glomerular structures and reduced humoral damage characterized by C4d deposition. Tofacitinib was able to reduce donor-specific antibodies. In addition, T and natural killer cell graft infiltration was reduced in TOFA-treated rats. Although rapamycin-treated rats also showed prolonged graft survival, glomerular structures were more affected. Moreover, only TOFA treatment reduced the presence of T, B and natural killer cells in splenic parenchyma., Conclusions: Tofacitinib is able to reduce the immune response generated in a rat model of kidney graft rejection, providing prolonged graft and recipient survival, better graft function, and less histological lesions.

Objective: Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) metabolizes about half of all drugs on the market; however, the impact of CYP3A4 loss-of-function variants on drug exposures remains poorly characterized. Here, we report the effect of the CYP3A4*20 frameshift allele in two Spanish liver transplant patients treated with tacrolimus., Patients and Methods: A series of 90 transplanted patients (with DNA available for 89 of the recipients and 76 of the liver donors) treated with tacrolimus were included in the study. The genotypes of liver donors and of the recipients for CYP3A4*20 (rs67666821), CYP3A4*22 (rs35599367) and CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) were compared with weight-adjusted tacrolimus dose (D), tacrolimus trough concentration (C0), and dose-adjusted tacrolimus trough concentrations (C0/D) using the Mann-Whitney U-nonparametric test., Results: The CYP3A4*20 allele was detected in two of the liver donors. This genotype yielded at all times higher C0/D (2.6-fold, average) than intermediate CYP3A metabolizers (CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*3/*3) (P=0.045, 90 days after transplantation). CYP3A4*22 carriers showed a 1.9-fold average increase in C0/D (P=0.047, 0.025, and 0.053; at days 7, 14, and 30 after transplantation, respectively) compared with intermediate metabolizers. In terms of recipients' genotype, CYP3A5*1 had reduced (P=0.025) and CYP3A4*22 increased C0/D (P=0.056) 7 days after transplantation. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 0, 12, and 20% for livers with poor, intermediate, and extensive CYP3A-metabolizing capacity, respectively (P=0.0995)., Conclusion: This first description of CYP3A4*20 null genotype in liver-transplanted patients, supports the relevance of CYP3A genotyping in tacrolimus therapy.

Aims: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) may be useful biomarkers of rejection and allograft outcome in kidney transplantation. Elevated urinary CXCL10 levels have been associated with acute rejection (AR) and may predict allograft failure. We examined the correlation of miRNA, CXCL10 levels and immunosuppressive drug exposure with AR and graft function in kidney transplant recipients., Methods: Eighty de novo kidney transplant recipients were recruited from four European centres. All patients received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. Urinary pellet expression of miR-142-3p, miR-210-3p and miR-155-5p was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and urinary CXCL10 levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at the 1 st week and the 1 st , 2 nd , 3 rd and 6 th months post-transplantation., Results: Eight patients experienced AR. Before and during AR, patients showed a significant increase of urinary miR-142-3p, miR-155-5p and CXCL10 levels and a decrease of miR-210-3p levels. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that miR-155-5p (area under the curve = 0.875; P = 0.046) and CXCL10 (area under the curve = 0.865; P = 0.029) had excellent capacity to discriminate between rejectors and nonrejectors. The optimal cut-off values for the prognosis of AR were 0.51, with 85% sensitivity and 86% specificity for miR-155-5p and 84.73 pg ml -1 , with 84% sensitivity and 80% specificity for CXCL10. miR-155-5p and CXCL10 levels correlated with glomerular filtration rate. Levels of both biomarkers normalized after recovery of graft function., Conclusions: The regular early post-transplantation monitoring of urinary miR-155-5p and CXCL10 can help in the prognosis of AR and graft dysfunction. Large prospective randomized multicentre trials are warranted to refine our cut-off values and validate the clinical usefulness of these biomarkers., (© 2017 The British Pharmacological Society.)

The mayor goal still outstanding into the solid organ transplantation field involves the search of surrogate biomarkers able to predict several clinical events, such as acute rejection (AR) or opportunistic infection. In the present multicenter study, a series of interesting surface antigens with important activator or inhibitory immune functions on cultured peripheral T cells were monitored in liver transplant recipients drawn at baseline and up to one year after transplantation. Sixty-four patients were included in the multicenter study during 3 years. Pre- and post-transplantation surface antigens levels displayed significant differences between AR and non acute rejection (NAR) groups, and also this differential expression was used to construct a risk predictive model based on a composite panel of outcome biomarkers (CD38, CD69, CD95 and CD154). The model was able to stratify these patients at high risk of AR. These preliminary results could provide basic information to improve the immunosuppressive treatment and it might better help to predict AR episodes., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

The use of biomarkers to tailor immunosuppression and to predict graft and patient outcomes using biological samples obtained by non-invasive tests is one of the main objectives in solid organ transplantation. Although biopsies give the most accurate information, they are clearly invasive and are associated with potentially adverse effects. To date, regulatory T cells have been shown to play a role in allograft protection; for this reason, extensive research has been performed to define them as biomarkers. However, studies of the measurement of these cells in peripheral blood as biomarkers in solid organ transplantation have been very limited and still not validated in prospective randomized large cohorts with the use of standardized methodology. Such poor evidence has been almost exclusively obtained in renal transplantation. Available data summarized here point for their use as biomarkers in different clinical settings with discordant data in many cases.

With current treatment regimens, a relatively high proportion of transplant recipients experience underimmunosuppression or overimmunosuppression. Recently, several promising biomarkers have been identified for determining patient alloreactivity, which help in assessing the risk of rejection and personal response to the drug; others correlate with graft dysfunction and clinical outcome, offering a realistic opportunity for personalized immunosuppression. This consensus document aims to help tailor immunosuppression to the needs of the individual patient. It examines current knowledge on biomarkers associated with patient risk stratification and immunosuppression requirements that have been generally accepted as promising. It is based on a comprehensive review of the literature and the expert opinion of the Biomarker Working Group of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. The quality of evidence was systematically weighted, and the strength of recommendations was rated according to the GRADE system. Three types of biomarkers are discussed: (1) those associated with the risk of rejection (alloreactivity/tolerance), (2) those reflecting individual response to immunosuppressants, and (3) those associated with graft dysfunction. Analytical aspects of biomarker measurement and novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models accessible to the transplant community are also addressed. Conventional pharmacokinetic biomarkers may be used in combination with those discussed in this article to achieve better outcomes and improve long-term graft survival. Our group of experts has made recommendations for the most appropriate analysis of a proposed panel of preliminary biomarkers, most of which are currently under clinical evaluation in ongoing multicentre clinical trials. A section of Next Steps was also included, in which the Expert Committee is committed to sharing this knowledge with the Transplant Community in the form of triennial updates.

Over the last decade, several biomarkers and surrogate markers have surfaced as promising predictive markers of risk of rejection in solid organ transplantation. The monitoring of these markers can help to improve graft and recipient care by personalizing immunomodulatory therapies. The complex immune system response against an implanted graft can change during long-term follow-up, and the dynamic balance between effector and regulatory T-cell populations is a crucial factor in antidonor response, risk of rejection, and immunosuppression requirements. Therefore, at any time before and after transplantation, T-effector activity, which is associated with increased production and release of proinflammatory cytokines, can be a surrogate marker of the risk of rejection and need for immunosuppression. In addition, immunosuppressive drugs may have a different effect in each individual patient. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs show high interpatient variability, and pharmacodynamic markers, strongly associated with the specific mechanism of action, can potentially be used to measure individual susceptibility to a specific immunosuppressive agent. The monitoring of a panel of valid biomarkers can improve patient stratification and the selection of immunosuppressive drugs. After transplantation, therapy can be adjusted based on the prediction of rejection episodes (maintained alloreactivity), the prognosis of allograft damage, and the individual's response to the drugs. This review will focus on current data indicating that changes in the T-cell production of the intracellular cytokines interferon-γ and interleukin-2 could be used to predict the risk of rejection and to guide immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients.

Several studies have analyzed the potential of T regulatory cells (Treg cells) as biomarkers of acute rejection (AR). The aim of the present multicenter study was to correlate the percentage of peripheral Treg cells in liver graft recipients drawn at baseline up to 12 months after transplantation with the presence of AR. The percentage of central memory (cm) Treg cells (CD4(+)CD25(high)CD45RO(+)CD62L(+)) was monitored at pre-transplant and at 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months and 1 year post-transplantation. The same validation standard operating procedures were used in all participating centers. Fifteen patients developed AR (23.4%). Hepatitis C virus recurrence was observed in 16 recipients, who displayed low peripheral blood cmTreg levels compared with patients who did not. A steady increase of cmTregs was observed during the first month after transplantation with statistically significant differences between AR and non-AR patients. The high frequency of memory Treg cells allowed us to monitor rejection episodes during the first month post-transplantation. On the basis of these data, we developed a prediction model for assessing risk of AR that can provide clinicians with useful information for managing patients individually and customizing immunosuppressive therapies., (© The Japanese Society for Immunology. 2015. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The aim of this study was to find noninvasive T-cell markers able to predict rejection or infection risk after kidney transplantation. We prospectively examined T-lymphocyte subsets after cell culture stimulation (according to CD38, CD69, CD95, CD40L, and CD25 expression) in 79 first graft recipients from four centers, before and after transplantation. Patients were followed up for one year. Patients who rejected within month-1 (n=10) showed high pre-transplantation and week-1 post-transplantation percentages of CD95(+), in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells (P<0.001 for all comparisons). These biomarkers conferred independent risk for early rejection (HR:5.05, P=0.061 and HR:75.31, P=0.004; respectively). The cut-off values were able to accurately discriminate between rejectors and non-rejectors and Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly different free-of-rejection time rates (P<0.005). Patients who rejected after the month-1 (n=4) had a higher percentage of post-transplantation CD69(+) in CD8(+) T-cells than non-rejectors (P=0.002). Finally, patients with infection (n=41) previously showed higher percentage of CD38(+) in CD8(+) T-cells at all post-transplantation times evaluated, being this increase more marked in viral infections. A cut-off of 59% CD38(+) in CD8(+) T-cells at week-1, week-2 and month-2 reached 100% sensitivity for the detection of subsequent viral infections. In conclusion, predictive biomarkers of rejection and infection risk after transplantation were detected that could be useful for the personalized care of kidney recipients., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Activated regulatory T cells (aTregs) are nowadays a hot topic in organ transplantation to establish their role during acute rejection (AR) episodes. The aim of this multi-center study was to monitor the frequency of aTregs within the first year after transplantation in a cohort of first-time liver transplant recipients enrolled from 2010 to 2012. aTregs frequency was analyzed by means of flow cytometry. Patients who had AR showed higher levels of aTregs during first year after transplantation in comparison with patients who did not have higher levels. High levels of aTregs in liver recipients might be used as a biomarker of AR; however, further studies must be done to address the potential role of aTregs as biomarkers of AR in liver transplantation., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prognostic biomarkers of acute rejection (AR) in solid organ transplantation have been addressed in multiple small retrospective studies, and there is a critical need for multicenter studies. Because of their tolerogenic properties, regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an important role in transplant outcome., Methods: In the present multicenter study, we have retrospectively examined different Treg subpopulations in an independent cohort of kidney transplant patients within first year after kidney transplantation. All participating centers used identical flow cytometry standard operating procedures., Results: Seventy-five renal transplant patients were included, and six of them experienced an AR episode. The activated Treg (aTreg) subpopulation (CD4CD25CD62LCD45RO) was increased in the AR group before transplantation, and an aTreg percentage higher than 1.46% before kidney transplantation conferred an increased risk of AR. The univariate logistic regression model achieved an area under the curve of 81.6%. By including recipient age and thymoglobulin induction as variables in a multivariate logistic regression model, the prediction of AR improved to 92.4%., Conclusion: The evaluation of CD4CD25CD62LCD45RO aTreg cells may be useful as pretransplantation predictive biomarker of AR in kidney transplant patients. Definitive confirmation of our results awaits tests in validation groups.

Acute rejection (AR) remains a major challenge in organ transplantation, and there is a need for predictive biomarkers. In the present multicenter study, we prospectively examined a series of biomarkers in liver and kidney recipients. Intracellular expression of IFN-γ, IL-17 and IL-2 and IL-17 soluble production were evaluated both pre-transplantation and post-transplantation (1st and 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month). 142 transplant patients (63 liver/79 kidney) were included in the study. Twenty-eight recipients (14 liver/14 kidney) developed AR. Pre- and post-transplantation intracellular expression of %IFN-γ(+) in CD4(+)CD69(+) and in CD8(+)CD69(+) and soluble IL17 identified liver and kidney transplant patients at high risk of AR. Pre-transplantation, %IL-2(+) in CD8(+)CD69(+) also identified kidney patients at high risk. We constructed pre- and post-transplantation risk prediction models, based on a composite panel of biomarkers, which could provide the basis for future studies and will be a useful tool for the selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive treatments., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Studies of liver transplant (LT) patients, mainly in Asians, have evaluated the influence of the CYP3A5*1 allele and P-glycoprotein gene ABCB1 on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics or biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) incidence, with no conclusive results. To investigate these issues, 98 Caucasian Spanish LT patients with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids and 88 cadaveric donors were genotyped for the SNPs CYP3A5 6986G>A, ABCB1 1236C>T, ABCB1 2677G>A/T and ABCB1 3435C>T;. On day 7 post-LT, patients with a native CYP3A5*1 allele had significantly lower tacrolimus trough concentrations C0 (P = .03) and dose-adjusted concentrations C0 /D (P = .02) than CYP3A5 *3/*3 homozygotes. Three months post-LT, patients carrying a liver with CYP3A5*1 had significantly lower C0 /D (P = .03) and took significantly higher tacrolimus doses (P = .03) than the corresponding *3/*3 homozygotes. ABCB1 SNPs showed no significant association with tacrolimus variables. The 3-month incidence of BPAR was 10.2%, with no statistically significant differences related to CYP3A5 (14.3% in expresser vs. 9.5% in non-expresser) or ABCB1 genotype of either patient or donor. We conclude that in Caucasian Spanish LT patients, a native or graft-borne CYP3A5*1 allele tends to lower tacrolimus concentrations and increase dosage needs, but has no significant impact on the incidence of BPAR., (© 2013, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Biomarker monitoring is needed in transplantation to reflect individual response to immunosuppressive drugs and graft outcome. We evaluated intracellular expression and soluble production of interferon-(IFN)-γ and interleukin-(IL)-2 as predictive biomarkers of acute rejection (AR) and personal drug response. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profiles were determined in 47 de novo liver recipients treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Of the 47 patients, AR occurred in nine. There were no differences in drug concentrations between rejectors and non-rejectors. A pre-transplantation cut-off value of 55.80% for %CD8(+)-IFN-γ(+) identified patients at high risk of AR with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 82%. In the first week post-transplantation, patients with a % inhibition for soluble IFN-γ, %CD8(+)-IFN-γ(+) and %CD8(+)-IL2(+) lower than 40% developed AR, showing low susceptibility to immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, effector-T-cell response monitoring may help physicians to identify personal response to treatment and patients at high risk of AR., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: If pancreas transplantation is a validated alternative for type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease, the management of patients who have lost their primary graft is poorly defined. This study aims at evaluating pancreas retransplantation outcome., Methods: Between 1976 and 2008, 569 pancreas transplantations were performed in Lyon and Geneva, including 37 second transplantations. Second graft survival was compared with primary graft survival of the same patients and the whole population. Predictive factors of second graft survival were sought. Patient survival and impact on kidney graft function and survival were evaluated., Results: Second pancreas survival of the 17 patients transplanted from 1995 was close to primary graft survival of the whole population (71% vs. 79% at 1 year and 59% vs. 69% at 5 years; P=0.5075) and significantly better than their first pancreas survival (71% vs. 29% at 1 year and 59% vs. 7% at 5 years; P=0.0008) regardless of the cause of first pancreas loss. The same results were observed with all 37 retransplantations. Survival of second simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantations was better than survival of second pancreas after kidney. Patient survival was excellent (89% at 5 years). Pancreas retransplantation had no impact on kidney graft function and survival (100% at 5 years)., Conclusion: Pancreas retransplantation is a safe procedure with acceptable graft survival that should be proposed to diabetic patients who have lost their primary graft.

Background: It is unknown whether kidney transplant patients who receive rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) become immunized against rabbit antibodies, leading to reduced efficacy, or are at higher risk of cytomegalovirus infection or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) on retreatment. The efficacy and tolerance of rATG when used as induction for the second time in patients undergoing retransplantation have not been evaluated., Methods: In a retrospective case-control study, 54 retransplanted patients who received rATG (Thymoglobulin) induction for the second time during 2004-2010 were compared to a matched cohort of 108 patients receiving rATG induction for a first kidney transplantation during the same period. Maintenance treatment was similar in both groups., Results: Median follow-up was 45.8 months and 47.3 months in the second and first treatment groups, respectively. No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of leukocyte, lymphocyte or platelet depletion. Dose and duration of rATG treatment were similar in both groups, suggesting a similar tolerance profile. Cytomegalovirus infection (including primoinfection and reactivation) occurred in 4/54 retreated patients versus 22/108 controls (p=0.108). Use of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis was similar between groups. PTLD occurred in one control patient and no retreated patients., Conclusion: A second course of rATG induction results in similar lymphocyte depletion and is as well tolerated as a first course. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease was not increased during retreatment. Further studies are required to evaluate specific T cell subpopulation depletion and compare long-term outcome in patients receiving a second induction with rATG., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Clinical use of valid biomarkers enables the prediction of alloreactive response (risk of rejection) and personal susceptibility to immunosuppressive treatment could lead to personalized immunosuppressive therapy. In clinical transplantation, it has been reported that cytokine production and secretion could be modified by immunosuppressive drugs, as well as during the rejection process. Some cytokines such as interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-10, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β have been identified as candidate biomarkers that correlate with graft outcome and personal response to immunosuppressive agents. This review will focus on the current state of knowledge, indicating that monitoring changes in cytokine production could be used to predict the risk of rejection and to guide immunosuppression therapy in transplant recipients. In addition, many questions regarding the characteristics and standardization of the methods used for cytokine monitoring (ELISA; ELISPOT; Flow Cytometry) that need to be addressed before these assays can be clinically applied will be discussed in light of recent studies showing an association between the expression of some cytokines and genetic variants, the impact of immunosuppression, and the incidence of rejection. The clinical implementation of cytokine monitoring should be tested in prospective multicenter clinical trials with standard operating procedures and objective interpretation of the results obtained., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: This article summarizes part of a consensus meeting about mycophenolate (MPA) therapeutic drug monitoring held in Rome under the auspices of The Transplantation Society in November 2008 (Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:341-358). This part of the meeting focused on the clinical pharmacokinetics of MPA and included discussion on how to measure MPA (active drug) exposure and the differences between the currently available formulations., Summary Points: Because of variability in the dose-concentration relationship, MPA exposure should be measured and doses should be adjusted accordingly to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. Suggested therapeutic exposures derived for MPA from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may differ to those that could be useful for MPA from enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), particularly if limited sampling strategies or single concentration, especially trough concentrations, is used, as the concentration-time profiles of MPA from the 2 formulations are quite different. The 2 MPA formulations cannot be considered as bioequivalent. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC 0-12) is considered the criterion standard for monitoring of MPA, which is a reflection of exposure to the drug over the entire dosing period. If a limited sampling protocol coupled with multilinear regression or Bayesian estimation is used to estimate this parameter, it should be used only for the population in which the model has been developed and should preferably include at least one time point after 4 hours (preferably around 8 or 9 hours after MMF dosing). If a single time point is to be used as a surrogate for an AUC 0-12, trough concentration of MPA may be the most practical but, from a pharmacokinetic standpoint, is not the most informative time point to choose. Because limited sampling strategies to estimate MPA exposure from EC-MPS have not yet been well developed and fully evaluated, nor have accurate Bayesian estimators been reported, AUC 0-12 measurement is still necessary to obtain reliable estimates of MPA exposure in patients treated with EC-MPS. The measurement of MPA trough concentrations should not be used at all for MPA exposure assessment following administration of EC-MPS. Because limited sampling strategies to estimate MPA exposure from EC-MPS have not yet been well developed and fully evaluated, nor have accurate Bayesian estimators been reported, AUC 0-12 measurement is still necessary to obtain reliable estimates of MPA exposure in patients treated with EC-MPS. The measurement of MPA trough concentrations should not be used at all for MPA exposure assessment following administration of EC-MPS. Lower (or higher) than expected total MPA exposure in patients with severe renal impairment may still indicate sufficient free MPA exposure. Mycophenolate free exposure measurement/estimation is likely to be beneficial in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance b25 mL/min) to guide dosage estimation, especially because renal function changes over time after transplant, while recognizing that robust prospective studies to show the clinical advantage of measuring free MPA exposure are still required. Lower total measured MPA exposure in patients with hypoalbuminemia may still indicate sufficient free MPA exposure. Mycophenolate free concentration measurement and estimation of exposure are likely to be beneficial in patients with a serum albumin less than or equal to 31 g/L to guide interpretation of MPA exposure. A 1.5-g twice-daily starting dose of MMF rather than a 1-g twice-daily starting dose of MMF is more likely to achieve the minimum target MPA exposure in adult transplant recipients receiving concomitant cyclosporine therapy. Because the cyclosporine dose is progressively tapered following transplantation, MPA exposure should be measured repeatedly and MMF should be doses adjusted accordingly to achieve optimal clinical outcome. Mycophenolate exposure should be measured in the first week after transplant, then each week for the first month, each month until month 3, and subsequently every 3 months up to 1 year with appropriate dosage adjustment, as AUC is likely to increase over time. After 1 year, if dosage requirement has stabilized, MPA exposure can be assessed each time the immunosuppressive regimen is changed or a potentially interacting drug is introduced or withdrawn. Assessment of UGT1A9 single nucleotide polymorphisms (-275TNA, -2152CNT, -440CNT, -331TNC) should be considered before transplantation to assist in dosing decisions to achieve optimal MPA exposure immediately after transplant. Consideration of the points summarized above should lead to more effective dosage adjustment based on sound applied pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical data are lacking concerning therapeutic action and systemic exposure of tacrolimus (TAC) and everolimus (EVL) in a combined regimen in renal transplantation., Methods: A prospective randomized phase II pharmacokinetic study was conducted comparing two fixed EVL dosages (0.75 mg two times per day (BID), group A, or 1.5 mg BID, group B) in combination with standard TAC dose. Complete 12-hr pharmacokinetic curves of both drugs were performed at days 4, 14, and 42 posttransplant., Results: A higher TAC Cmin was observed with EVL dose of 0.75 mg BID (TAC 11.1+/-6.4 group A vs. 9.4+/-5.0 ng/mL group B, P=0.03), with equivalent TAC area under the curves (162+/-61 vs. 171+/-75). The exposure to TAC was lower in group B despite higher TAC doses were required to maintain target concentrations (day 14: 9.5 vs. 12.5 mg and day 42: 6 vs. 9 mg, P<0.05). Cmin-TAC/dose and area under the curve-TAC/dose ratios were significantly lower, from day 4 to day 42, in group B. Both groups achieved good graft function and acute rejection rate was similar (20% and 15%, respectively)., Conclusions: We conclude that in adult renal transplant recipients, EVL significantly decreases TAC oral bioavailability in a dose-dependent manner. Doses higher than 1.5 mg BID would be probably needed for TAC-minimization strategies because 3 mg/day is not enough to achieve levels more than 3 ng/mL during the first 2 weeks. Therapeutic drug monitoring is mandatory to adjust the dose and prevent low TAC exposure. This regimen of low EVL exposure plus standard TAC exposure avoids wound healing problems with good efficacy.

Nowadays, monitoring of the immunosuppressive therapy received by solid organ transplant recipients is based on measuring drug blood levels to achieve concentrations within the established therapeutic range. This strategy largely prevents the toxicity associated with this kind of treatment but is insufficient to determine the individual response in each patient or to tailor the dose to each patient's real requirements. In the field of solid organ transplantation, new approaches able to reflect the individual responses produced in each patient are required to monitor immunosuppressive therapy and to improve the efficacy and safety of treatment. Thus, in the last few years, preliminary studies evaluating new specific biomarkers of the biologic effect of immunosuppressive drugs (pharmacodynamic monitoring) have been carried out. The results of these pilot studies show the potential of monitoring of these specific biomarkers to improve the safety and efficacy of immunosuppression, although the complexity of these analyses and the lack of standardized methodologies currently limit the routine application of this technique. Based on the previous studies performed to date on biomarkers, which included a small number of patients, no conclusions can be drawn as to which are the most appropriate biomarkers to prevent organ rejection or adverse events. Consequently, these biomarkers need to be validated in multicenter clinical trials. The present article reviews some biomarkers that have been proposed to evaluate currently approved immunosuppressants, such as target enzymes, cytokines, lymphocyte activation biomarkers, and cellular immune response, as well as the most promising results in this field.

Introduction: Efficacious prophylaxis of acute rejection episodes (ARE) requires adequate exposure to each component of the immunosuppressive treatment from the first days after renal transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation between cyclosporine (CsA) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure based upon pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) and 6-month biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) episodes and chronic allograft nephropathy on 6 month protocol biopsies., Patients and Methods: We examined twenty-two first or second de novo renal transplant recipients treated with steroids, Sandimmune Neoral (CsA) and Myfortic (720 mg twice a day). PK (C0, C2, and AUC(0-12h)) for both drugs were determined on days 7, 90, and 180. Calcineurin activity, interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma synthesis as well as %CEM were tested at days 7 and 180. CsA dosages were adjusted by C2 monitoring. Collected data included: BPAR during the first 6 months and Banff histological parameters on the 6-month protocol biopsies., Results: Eighteen of 22 patients completed 1 year follow-up under treatment. The 6-month BPAR was 18% (4/22). Six-month protocol biopsies in 50% of 14 recipients showed chronic allograft nephropathy 1. At day 7, CsA C2 and AUC median values were 138 ng/mL and 6377 ng x h/mL, while C0 MPA was 1.0 microg/mL and AUC = 23.9 microg x h/mL. CsA C2 medians at 3 and 6 months were 1468 and 1720 ng/mL. MPA-AUC reached therapeutic targets at 3 months (32.3 microg x h/mL) and was 48.3 microg x h/mL at 6 months. Patients with BPAR showed lower CsA AUC (P = .06) and a significantly lower baseline inhibition of calcineurin activity (P < .005) than patients with no BPAR. An increase in mesangial matrix in 6-month protocol biopsies correlated with higher CsA C2 (P = .01). All biomarkers evaluated were significantly inhibited compared with the standard population., Conclusions: When Myfortic is administered together with CsA, it is advisable to begin with higher doses (720 mg x 3 days) to reach adequate PK targets and improve BPAR rates. To prevent chronic allograft nephropathy, lower CsA C2 should be targeted from 3 months.

Purpose: We assessed the cumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy in our population of patients who underwent transplantation and those in whom the transplant failed due to immunological causes. Transplant nephrectomy indications, morbidity and mortality were analyzed to establish the most appropriate time for graft removal., Materials and Methods: We included all patients who underwent transplantation and graft removal at our institution from January 1, 1970 through January 1, 2000. We estimated the noncumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy, morbidity and mortality. The cumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves., Results: Of the 631 renal transplants performed in 598 patients we studied a total of 91 transplant nephrectomies in 85 patients. The cumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy 15 years after the date of transplantation was 25% (95% CI 14 to 40). The cumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy at 10 years after the date of return to dialysis was 74% (95% CI 49 to 90). The main indication for transplant nephrectomy was graft related complications associated with chronic rejection in 58.2% of cases. The morbidity rate was 48.3% (95% CI 37.7 to 59). Hemorrhagic events were the chief complication. In 7 patients there was a total of 10 reoperations (10.9%, 95% CI 5.3 to 19.2). The mortality rate was 7% (95% CI 2.6 to 14.7). These patients died of sepsis. Urgent transplant nephrectomies had statistically higher morbidity and mortality (p <0.01 and 0.002, respectively)., Conclusions: Most transplant nephrectomies were performed within 2 years of the transplant date and almost half were done within year 1 after the return to dialysis. The advent of cyclosporine significantly decreased the transplant nephrectomy rate at the expense of fewer graft failures but not at the expense of a lower amount of graft related symptoms after patients returned to dialysis. Bleeding was the leading cause of morbidity and infection was the main cause of mortality. Considering the high morbidity and mortality of transplant nephrectomy, and the potential benefits of leaving nonfunctioning grafts in situ our current policy is to remove the graft only in cases of failed transplants that cause intractable complications.

The aim of the Multicentric Liver Transplant Spanish Study was to evaluate tacrolimus therapy at the reduced, initial oral dose of 0.1 mg/kg per day to maintain the immunosuppressive potency of the drug and to avoid toxicity. The dosage of tacrolimus (D), the trough blood concentrations (C), and the evolution of the ratio (D/C) were followed up for 2 years after transplantation in 50 adult patients (38 men, 12 women) undergoing liver allograft transplantation. A total of 1732 samples were analyzed using the IMx tacrolimus method. The overall mean+/-SD concentrations were 10.84 ng/ml+/-5.32 ng/ml. During the first month, the median of the tacrolimus levels was 8.40 ng/ml, and 73.1% of the analyzed samples were within the established therapeutic range. The median oral tacrolimus dose was progressively reduced from 0.12 mg/kg per day during the first month to 0.058 mg/kg per day at the end of study period. A significant negative association was observed between the ratio of D/C and the post-transplantation period (r=-0.3624; p < 0.001). The median D/C ratio ranged from 0.0144 at the end of the first month to 0.0053 at 1 year. Significant declines in D/C were observed after the first and the third months after transplantation. The decrease in corticosteroid doses and the increase in serum albumin may explain the reduction in clearance with time.