Search

Megacrystalline uraninite (up to one centimeter in size) represents one of the most important discoveries in uranium mineralogy in the western margin of the Yangtze Block and even in China in recent years. However, the genesis of megacrystalline uraninite remains controversial. In this study, the megacrystalline uraninite found in the felsic and quartz veins in the Haita area is examined for the first time. The study examined the geochemical characteristics of uraninite in the two veins and resulted in two primary findings. (1) The genesis of the uraninite was likely intrusive and was closely related to partial melting. (2) The quartz vein and feldspar vein are cogenetic and have a simple differentiation evolution relationship. Therefore, the partial melting of felsic materials during migmatization may be the most important mechanism of uranium mineralization in the study area. Furthermore, further simple fractional crystallization may be another important mechanism for the formation of megacrystalline uraninite. This study enriches the REE database of uraninite in uranium deposits worldwide, which is meaningful for studying the genesis of megacrystalline uraninite. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Au and As in pyrite are positively correlated, with higher Au content in pyrite from granite dykes. • Co/Ni ratios in pyrite indicate the dominance of magmatic hydrothermal action in the early stage and metamorphic fluid action in the main stage of ore formation. • The mixing of ore-forming fluids may be the key factor controlling gold mineralization. The Devonian Sanhekou Group phyllite in the Yangshan gold belt includes multiple stages of pyrite development, and Au is mainly distributed within the pyrite. Bodies within the Gaoloushan ore section of the gold belt are located in the broken and altered carbonaceous phyllite and granitic rock dykes, where quartz vein-type gold ores are more common as compared to other ore sections (Anba, Getiaowan). Studying the trace element distribution characteristics of gold-bearing and non-gold-bearing pyrite can constrain the evolution of ore-forming fluids and the types of ore deposit genesis. Based on detailed fieldwork and microscopic identification, 48 pyrite samples from the 69th exploration line of the Gaoloushan ore section were analyzed in situ by LA-ICP-MS. The following conclusions were drawn: (1) The gold-bearing pyrite formed during the ore-forming stage while the non-gold-bearing pyrite formed during the sedimentary and metamorphic period. The morphology of the pyrites differs, with gold-bearing pyrite mainly characterized by medium-fine grains, impregnation, fine veins, and reticulate structure, with crystal morphology mainly pentagonal dodecahedra or pentagonal octahedra, whereas non-gold-bearing pyrite is mainly characterized by a medium or medium-coarse grains, with stellate, strawberry, or cluster structures, and crystal morphology mainly in the form of cubes or pentagonal octahedra; (2) The As and Te content of the sedimentary pyrite is low, locally below the detection limit, and the Co and Ni contents and ratios vary greatly, with a distribution of 117–945 ppm and ratio distribution of 0.11–1.92. Pyrite from the ore-forming stage is primarily characterized by high As, Pb, Co, Ni, Cu, Sb, Zn, and Se concentrations, with Bi, Au, and trace amounts of Tl, Te, and Sn observed in later formations; (3) Au and As are positively correlated. The average Au content of 60.53 ppm in pyrite from granite dykes is higher than the average Au 15.97 ppm in carbonaceous phyllite. Pyrite particles with Au contents below the detection limit are sourced in carbonaceous phyllite. In addition, the higher As enrichment is observed in pyrite from granite dykes, averaging 35 770.60 ppm with a maximum value of 72 930.19 ppm. In comparison, the average As content in carbonaceous phyllite is 8974.66 ppm, with a maximum of 69 800.50 ppm, and the Au-As diagram indicates that gold in the Gaoloushan ore section is mainly in the form of solid solution gold within the pyrite lattice; (4) Statistical analysis of the Co/Ni ratio variation in the different lithologies and pyrite stages reveals an initial increase followed by a decrease. The median Co/Ni ratio variations during the mineralization stages of Py1s (0.51–0.7), Py1m (1.35–2.25), Py2 (1.43–1.87), Py1-2 m (1.53), Py2a (1.59), Py2b (1.4), Py2s (1.2), Py2m (1.63), and Py3 (0.19–1.40) suggest that magmatic-hydrothermal fluids dominated during the early stage of mineralization in the gold belt and metamorphic fluids during the main mineralization stage, with deep-seated metamorphic fluids playing a significant role in the late mineralization stage. The varying proportions of ore-forming fluids are likely to have been crucial in controlling gold mineralization in the Yangshan gold belt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Co-existing pyrite and calcite with uranium minerals play a significant role in ISL of uranium. • Gypsum produced by pyrite and calcite in CO 2 + O 2 environment disadvantages the leaching of uranium. • Secondary hexavalent uranium minerals will be produced in the ore layer of a neutral environment. Oxidative weathering of pyrite, a widespread iron sulfide mineral, is crucial for the uranium mineralization in sandstone-hosted uranium deposits and the ore utilization leaching under manual intervention. To understand the behavior of pyrite under CO 2 + O 2 leaching conditions in sandstone-hosted uranium deposits, samples of uranium ore from the mineralized zone of the Qianjiadian IV uranium deposit located in the lower section of the Yaojia Formation were collected for this study. The stirring leaching experiment was carried out through the processes of the pyrite-bearing uranium ore samples thinned before and after the reaction, followed by an optical microscopic study and the TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analyzer analysis, and finally, the thermodynamic simulation by making use of PHREEQC3.0. The results revealed the following: (1) The dissolution particles of pyrite become smaller, which may increase the porosity of the ore layer and the exposure ratio of uranium minerals. And more soluble pyrite with a high free surface will be more competitive with uranium minerals for the consumption of O 2. (2) The ion (Fe2+) produced by the dissolution of pyrite will be oxidized to Fe3+ by excess O 2 (4 mol), which provides an oxidant for the oxidation of uranium minerals, and the generated SO 4 2- will combine with the Ca2+ released from calcite to form a permanent precipitate of gypsum, which may block pores and cover the uranium ore. (3) Pyrite and calcite will consume O 2 and CO 2 in the injection system, thus jointly inhibiting the leaching of uranium minerals. After the injection of excessive CO 2 and O 2 , the concentration of Ca2+, SO 4 2-, Fe3+, UO 2 2+, and HCO 3 – in the system will continue to accumulate, resulting in the secondary precipitation of calcite, co-precipitation of gypsum, iron minerals, colloids, and hexavalent uranium minerals, resulting in plugging pores and seriously affecting the effective leaching of uranium. This study contributes to the understanding of the behavior of pyrite during uranium recovery through CO 2 + O 2 leaching. It also contributes to the understanding of quantitative uranium mineralization in sandstone-hosted uranium deposits and process parameters in in-situ leaching (ISL) of uranium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurately constraining the age and source of primary U mineralization is commonly difficult as diverse U minerals are affected by α-recoils and subjected to overprints of multi-stage fluids. Titanite has a good potential in revealing rock-forming and metallogenic information, and widely occurs in magmatic, metamorphic, and hydrothermal U deposits. However, the textural and chemical characteristics of titanite from these U deposits are poorly documented and little is known about the relationship between titanite and U mineralization. At the western margin of the Yangtze Block, a series of U occurrences and uraninite-predominant ores are hosted in the leucocratic dykes, ranging from fine-grained (albitised) monzogranite to pegmatitic quartz vein. The genesis of U mineralization remains unclear largely because of the uncertainties as to the timing of mineralization and the origin of metals. Here, we present comprehensive U Pb and Sm Nd isotopic data, and major and trace element compositions for metamorphic (Ttn-I) and magmatic/hydrothermal (Ttn-II) titanites from the leucocratic dykes and/or amphibolitic wall rocks. Ttn-I is in direct contact with metamorphic hornblende and plagioclase or occurs as xenoliths hosted in the leucocratic dykes, and is thus inferred to result from amphibolite facies metamorphism. Chemically, Ttn-I is characterized by low Fe/Al ratios, LREE-depleted patterns and weakly negative to positive Eu anomalies. By contrast, magmatic/hydrothermal Ttn-II crystals intergrown with uraninite in the leucocratic dykes generally display flatter REE patterns, more negative Eu anomalies, higher Fe/Al ratios, and U, Nb, REE and Y contents, which could be applied as an indicator for U exploration. LA-ICP-MS U Pb dating on Ttn-I yielded ages of ∼860 Ma for amphibolite facies metamorphism. Instead, U Pb dating on syn -ore Ttn-II yielded ages of ∼786–779 Ma for U mineralization, which is coeval with the emplacement of leucocratic dykes. Uraninite and intergrown Ttn-II have uniform, negative εNd(t) values (−5.7 to −15.5), indicating the initial melts were predominantly sourced from the old crustal materials (T DM2 = ∼1.9–2.7 Ga). Considering the occurrences as dykes, feldspar-quartz-dominant lithologies, and wide textural and compositional variations of leucocratic dykes, we infer that low-degree partial melting of U-rich protolith is the main factor controlling U concentration in the melt. Variable REE patterns and ThO 2 contents in different uraninite types seem to imply there have been multi-stage U mineralization. • Dyke-hosted U mineralization at the western margin of the Yangtze Block formed at ∼786–779 Ma. • The uraniferous leucogranitic magma was derived from old crust with a T DM2 of ∼1.9–2.7 Ga. • Low-degree partial melting process may be the main factor controlling U concentration. • Titanite with high REE, Y, Nb, and U contents could be applied as an indicator for U exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Pyrite hosting visible gold is low in Au and As. • Gold-bearing pyrite was subject to brittle rather than ductile deformation. • Visible gold in pyrite did not result from remobilization of lattice gold. • Visible gold in pyrite was introduced by evolved ore fluids after host pyrite. Pyrite (FeS 2) is one of the most common hosts for gold (Au) in different types of gold deposits, including visible and invisible gold. For visible gold in pyrite, it remains unclear whether it resulted from remobilization of invisible gold in the gold-hosting pyrite or from external input. This paper reports a case study from the Zhaoxian gold deposit, which is the deep extension of the well-known Jiaojia gold deposit, in the Jiaodong gold province. The texture and composition of Au-bearing pyrite from the Zhaoxian deposit were studied with petrographic, Electron Back-Scattered Diffraction (EBSD) mapping, and Laser Ablation – Inductively Coupled Plasma – Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) methods. Four types of pyrite (Py-1 to Py-4), corresponding to four generations of veins, i.e., the pre-ore V1, syn -ore V2 and V3, and post-ore V4, were distinguished. Py-2 is volumetrically the most abundant among the four, and is the main host of visible gold. LA-ICP-MS analyses of pyrite indicate that gold contents in most analysis points are below the detection limit, with measured Au contents ranging from 0.02 to 0.17 ppm (median 0.09 ppm) in Py-1, and 0.03 to 2.45 ppm (median 0.07 ppm) in Py-2. EBSD analyses indicate that pyrite (Py-2) display brittle deformation features including microstructures, lattice dislocation, and grain boundary displacement. Visible gold in Py-2 occurs in micro-fractures, cavities, and grain boundaries. The generally low contents of Au in pyrite, including Py-2, and the brittle deformation features, suggest that the visible gold grains did not result from remobilization of invisible gold from pyrite. Rather, the majority of gold was introduced by fluids after the formation of the gold-hosting pyrite. These fluids were derived from the same sources as those precipitating the gold-hosting pyrite, but were more evolved and enriched in Au. Circulation of these auriferous ore-forming fluids in microfractures of pyrite and interstitial space resulted in precipitation of visible gold. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]