Search

Copyright of Avances is the property of Instituto de Informacion Cientifica y Tecnologica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Governance reflects the transformation of relations between government and society, starting with the emergence of a more active role for civil society in public action by detaching it from traditional dependency from government. However, although governance as a concept has been used vigorously in the discursive strategies of the doctrines of New Public Management (NPM) in conjunction with discourses of innovation as a justifying purpose; it is also possible to trace discourses that can be grouped in a framework called Post-New Public Management (P-NGP) which proposes new conceptions about governance and innovation; Conceptions that articulate a shift in the ways of conceiving and understanding organizational forms, public management and the State itself in its interaction with society. This paper analyzes the changes in the concept of governance brought by the P-NGP, which implies taking as a starting point the governance descriptions of NPM discursive areas, and then contrasting these descriptions with references to the P-NGP. This implies a reflection on the reconstruction of the dynamics of public action that, from the approach of governance based on P-NGP discussion referents, propose new logics for the implementation of policies from public innovation, such as the emerging case of public and private organizational forms like crowdsourcing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

La gobernanza refleja la transformación de las relaciones entre el Gobierno y la sociedad a partir de la emergencia de un papel más activo de la sociedad civil en la acción pública al desligarla de la tradicional dependencia gubernamental. Empero, si bien la Gobernanza como concepción ha sido empleada de manera vigorosa en las estrategias discursivas de las doctrinas de la Nueva Gestión Pública (NGP) en conjunción con discursos de innovación como finalidad justificante, en la actualidad también es posible rastrear discursos que pueden agruparse en un marco denominado Pos- Nueva Gestión Pública (P-NGP) que propone nuevas concepciones acerca de la gobernanza y la innovación; concepciones que articulan un giro en las maneras de concebir y comprender las formas organizacionales, la gestión pública y al Estado mismo en su interacción con la sociedad. Este trabajo analiza los cambios en el concepto de gobernanza desde la P-NGP, lo que implica tomar como punto de partida las descripciones de la gobernanza a partir de ámbitos discursivos NGP, para luego contrastar dichas descripciones con referencias a la P-NGP. Lo anterior lleva implícita una reflexión en torno a la recomposición de las dinámicas de acción pública que, desde el enfoque de la gobernanza con base en referentes discusivos P-NGP, plantean nuevas lógicas para la implementación de políticas desde la innovación pública, como es el caso de las formas organizacionales público/ privadas emergentes tipo crowdsourcing.

Copyright of Revista do Serviço Público (Civil Service Review) is the property of Revista do Servico Publico and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

En el debate público se presentan como términos contradictorios y mutuamente excluyentes los modelos de desarrollo cimentados en el Estado benefactor (Welfare State) y en el Estado neoliberal. A ellos corresponden, respectivamente, los modelos de administración pública conocidos como la Administración Pública Tradicional (APT) y la Nueva Gerencia Pública (NGP). De acuerdo con autores como John Benington, estos binomios están firmemente asentados en doctrinas sociales y económicas, como el fabianismo y el neoliberalismo. Lo que este artículo destaca es que esa dualidad no es insustituible: hay una Tercera Vía como modelo de desarrollo económico que tiene como su correspondiente modelo administrativo la Gobernanza mediante Redes Comunitarias. Lo que también se destaca aquí es que —al contrario de lo que opina Benington— la Tercera Vía sí tiene una firme base de sustentación teórica. Para mantener esta tesis se mencionan varios autores de renombre que han producido obras de gran relieve teórico, pero que también han brindado grandes aportaciones empíricas.

This article explores the relationship between the concepts of Social Innovation and Public Innovation. The article shows and expands on the links between Public Innovation and Social Innovation, also analysing the way in which such links are produced, especially through the Governance processes and the Public Administration Innovation. Finally, the paper emphasises the idea that all public innovation represents a particular form of social innovation and vice versa. Social innovation can contribute to improving the ways in which public innovation is undertaken. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the public debate there is a couple of concepts that seem to dominate the landscape. It means, they apparently do not permit the presence of other member on the ground: Welfare State and Minimal State. Each of them has a specific administrative model: the Welfare State corresponds to the Traditional Public Administration (TPA); the Minimal State corresponds to New Public Administration (NPM). In addition, on the one hand, the interventionist model had a strong theoretical background with the complex of social-democrat ideas. On the other hand, the libertarian model has had a powerful system of ideas. This paper challenges the perception that there is just one binomial of models. In contrast, there is a Third Way which in the administrative dimension corresponds to governance through community networks. And they both have, as I will show, a heavy support of ideas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of 3C Empresa is the property of Area de Innovacion y Desarrollo, SL and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)