Search

Objective: In polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), glucocorticoids (GCs) relieve pain and stiffness, but fatigue may persist. We aimed to explore the effect of disease, GCs and PMR symptoms in the metabolite signatures of peripheral blood from patients with PMR or the related disease, giant cell arteritis (GCA)., Methods: Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was performed on serum from 40 patients with untreated PMR, 84 with new-onset confirmed GCA, and 53 with suspected GCA who later were clinically confirmed non-GCA, and 39 age-matched controls. Further samples from PMR patients were taken one and six months into glucocorticoid therapy to explore relationship of metabolites to persistent fatigue. 100 metabolites were identified using Chenomx and statistical analysis performed in SIMCA-P to examine the relationship between metabolic profiles and, disease, GC treatment or symptoms., Results: The metabolite signature of patients with PMR and GCA differed from that of age-matched non-inflammatory controls (R 2  > 0.7). There was a smaller separation between patients with clinically confirmed GCA and those with suspected GCA who later were clinically confirmed non-GCA (R 2  = 0.135). In PMR, metabolite signatures were further altered with glucocorticoid treatment (R 2  = 0.42) but did not return to that seen in controls. Metabolites correlated with CRP, pain, stiffness, and fatigue (R 2  ≥ 0.39). CRP, pain, and stiffness declined with treatment and were associated with 3-hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate, but fatigue did not. Metabolites differentiated patients with high and low fatigue both before and after treatment (R 2  > 0.9). Low serum glutamine was predictive of high fatigue at both time points (0.79-fold change)., Conclusion: PMR and GCA alter the metabolite signature. In PMR, this is further altered by glucocorticoid therapy. Treatment-induced metabolite changes were linked to measures of inflammation (CRP, pain and stiffness), but not to fatigue. Furthermore, metabolite signatures distinguished patients with high or low fatigue., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest SLM has conducted consultancy on behalf of her institution for Roche/Chugai, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, AbbVie and Pfizer; was supported by Roche to attend EULAR 2019 and by Pfizer to register for virtual attendance at ACR2021. AWM has received research funding from Roche and has conducted consultancy on behalf of her institution for Roche/Chugai, Sanofi, Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Vifor. JEM and HMM have received research funding from Novartis. HMM has received funding from Roche and Pfizer. RL has received funding from Celgene, Pfizer, Roche and Vifor. Other authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: SLM reports consultancy on behalf of her institution for Roche/Chugai, Sanofi, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer; serving as an investigator on clinical trials for Sanofi, GSK, and Sparrow; speaking or lecturing on behalf of her institution for Roche/Chugai, Vifor, Pfizer, UCB, Novartis, and AbbVie; serving as chief investigator on the STERLING-PMR trial, funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR); and serving as patron of the charity PMRGCAuk. No personal remuneration was received for any of the above activities. SLM also reports support from Roche/Chugai to attend EULAR2019 in person and from Pfizer to attend ACR Convergence 2021 virtually. SLM is supported in part by the NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, the National Health Service or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. RB declares no competing interests.

Introduction: Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain widely used. However, the impact of GCs from the perspective of the patient, rather than of the clinician, remains relatively unexplored. Additionally, no general patient reported outcome measure has been developed to assess the effects of GCs across rheumatological conditions. The aim of this literature review was to identify the adverse effects of systemic GC use that are of importance to patients., Methods: OVID EMBASE, OVID MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL was searched relating to three concepts: GCs, the patient perspective and adverse effects. A meta-synthesis of the qualitative data was performed separately by two independent researchers before qualitative metasummary was utilized to quantitatively aggregate the findings (combining quantitative and qualitative results), including the derivation of frequency and intensity effect sizes to identify those outcomes most prominently featured across all reviewed articles., Results: The initial search retrieved 1,356 articles, of which 25 (18 quantitative, 7 qualitative) were deemed suitable for quality assessment and data extraction. Four major themes emerged amongst the 71 discrete outcomes: physical symptoms (44), psychological symptoms (18), effect on participation (6) and contextual factors (3)., Conclusions: Patients with a broad range of inflammatory diseases and demographic features describe key cross-cutting themes in relation to GCs and their impact on health-related quality of life. This work will inform the development of a core domain set for clinical trials involving GCs and a patient reported outcome to measure impact of GCs from the patient's perspective., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, there is a lack of -estimates of glucocorticoid dose-response diabetes risk that consider changes in prescribed dose over time and disease activity., Research Design and Methods: Population-based longitudinal analysis of electronic health records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to hospital admissions and the mortality registry (1998-2017). We included 100 722 adult patients without diabetes history, diagnosed with giant cell arteritis or polymyalgia rheumatica (n=32 593), inflammatory bowel disease (n=29 272), rheumatoid arthritis (n=28 365), vasculitis (n=6082), or systemic lupus erythematosus (n=4410). We estimated risks and HRs of type 2 diabetes associated with time-variant daily and total cumulative prednisolone-equivalent glucocorticoid dose using Cox regression methods., Results: Average patient age was 58.6 years, 65 469 (65.0%) were women and 8858 (22.6%) had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m 2 . Overall, 8137 (8.1%) people developed type 2 diabetes after a median follow-up of 4.9 years. At 1 year, the cumulative risk of diabetes increased from 0.9% during periods of non-use to 5.0% when the daily prednisolone-equivalent dose was ≥25.0 mg. We found strong dose-dependent associations for all immune-mediated diseases, BMI levels and underlying disease duration, even after controlling for periods of active systemic inflammation. Adjusted HR for a <5.0 mg daily dose versus non-use was 1.90, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.50; range 1.70 for rheumatoid arthritis to 2.93 for inflammatory bowel disease., Conclusions: We report dose-dependent risks of type 2 diabetes associated with glucocorticoid use for six common immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. These results underline the need for regular diabetic risk assessment and testing during glucocorticoid therapy in these patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors declare no support from any organization for the submitted work except for SLM who received: salary support from NIHR (Clinician Scientist Fellowship) during the period of work reported here; advisory board fees from Roche in 2015 and conference attendance from Roche in 2019; investigator or subinvestigatory on industry-sponsored clinical trials (Sanofi, Roche, GSK) and consultancy on behalf of the University of Leeds (without receiving personal income) to Roche and Sanofi. SLM is patron of the patient support charity PMRGCAuk., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To understand the effects of glucocorticoids (GC), which are of importance to patients., Methods: The results of 2 literature reviews, a patient survey, and a qualitative study were presented., Results: No validated instrument exists to evaluate GC effect on patients. Survey data revealed skin thinning/bruising, sleep disturbance, and weight gain as the most frequent adverse effects. The qualitative research yielded rich data covering rapid benefits and physical and emotional consequences of GC., Conclusion: It was agreed that a patient-reported outcome to measure GC effect was required and a research agenda was developed for this goal.

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore, from the patient's perspective, the beneficial and adverse effects (AEs) of glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with rheumatic diseases, to be used in the development of a patient-reported outcome measure., Methods: A cross-sectional survey, capturing benefits and AEs of GC use, was administered to 2 groups of patients: (1) those attending a tertiary rheumatology clinic with various rheumatic diseases who had used GCs within the past year and (2) patients from the Hospital for Special Surgery rheumatoid arthritis database., Results: Cohort 1 had 55 GC users, and cohort 2 had 95 GC users and 29 nonusers. The majority of GC users in both cohorts reported at least 1 AE (100%, 86%). The AE prevalence per person was 50% higher in cohort 1 compared with GC users in cohort 2 (7.7 vs. 5.3; AE ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.7) and 2-fold greater in cohort 2 GC users compared with GC nonusers (5.3 vs. 2.6; AE ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.6). In both cohorts, AEs identified as "worst" by GC users included skin thinning/easy bruising, sleep disturbance, mood disturbance, and change in facial shape. Most felt GCs helped their disease "a lot" (78%/62%) and that the benefits were greater than the AEs (55%/64%). Many AEs were more frequent in GC users than in nonusers., Conclusions: Patients receiving GC therapy for rheumatic conditions report a large number of AEs and those that have the greatest life impact are often difficult for physicians to measure. These results will inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure to capture the effects of GCs from the patient's perspective.

Objective: The need for a standardized instrument to measure the effect of glucocorticoid (GC) therapy has been well documented in the literature. The aim of the first GC Special Interest Group was to define a research agenda around the development of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in this area., Methods: The results of a background literature search and the preliminary results of a pilot survey and 2 qualitative studies were presented to facilitate the development of a research agenda., Results: It was agreed that there was a need for a data-driven PROM that identified both positive and negative effects of GC therapy to be used across all inflammatory indications for systemic GC use in adults. A research agenda was developed, consisting of further qualitative work to assess the effect of GC across different groups including various indications for GC use, different age groups, different dosages, and duration of treatment., Conclusion: There was agreement on the need for a PROM in this area and a research agenda was set.

Objectives: Clinical management of giant cell arteritis (GCA) involves balancing the risks and burdens arising from the disease with those arising from treatment, but there is little research on the nature of those burdens. We aimed to explore the impact of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and its treatment on patients' lives., Methods: UK patients with GCA participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Inductive thematic analysis was employed., Results: 24 participants were recruited (age: 65-92 years, time since diagnosis: 2 months to >6 years). The overarching themes from analysis were: ongoing symptoms of the disease and its treatment; and 'life-changing' impacts. The overall impact of GCA on patients' lives arose from a changing combination of symptoms, side effects, adaptations to everyday life and impacts on sense of normality. Important factors contributing to loss of normality were glucocorticoid-related treatment burdens and fear about possible future loss of vision., Conclusions: The impact of GCA in patients' everyday lives can be substantial, multifaceted and ongoing despite apparent control of disease activity. The findings of this study will help doctors better understand patient priorities, legitimise patients' experiences of GCA and work with patients to set realistic treatment goals and plan adaptations to their everyday lives., Competing Interests: Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare the following interests: CDM and RB had support from the National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research (NIHR SPCR) for the submitted work. SLM received an honorarium for serving on a Medical Advisory Board for Chugai Roche Pharmaceuticals. All the authors have no other financial relationships with any organisation that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Objectives Glucocorticoids (GCs) ('steroids') are used to treat rheumatic diseases but adverse effects are common. We aimed to explore the impact of GC therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), to inform the development of a treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for use in clinical trials and practice. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients from the UK, USA and Australia, treated for a rheumatic condition with GCs in the last 2 years. Purposive sampling was used to select participants with a range of demographic and disease features. An initial conceptual framework informed interview prompts and cues. Interviews elicited GC-related physical and psychological symptoms and salient aspects of HRQoL in relation to GC therapy. Interview data were analysed inductively to develop initial individual themes and domains. Candidate questionnaire items were developed and refined. Results Sixty semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted (UK n  = 34, USA n  = 10, Australia n  = 16). The mean age was 58 years; 39/60 were female; and 18 rheumatic diseases were represented. Some 126 individual themes were identified and organized into six domains: physical symptoms; psychological symptoms; psychological impact of steroids; impact of steroids on participation; impact of steroids on relationships; and benefits of steroids. Candidate questionnaire items were tested and refined by piloting with patient research partners, iterative rounds of cognitive interviews and linguistic translatability assessment, informing a draft questionnaire. Conclusion We describe an international qualitative study to develop candidate items for a treatment-specific PROM for patients with rheumatic diseases. A future survey will enable the validation of a final version of the PROM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Glucocorticoid (GC) Impact Working Group has been working to develop a core domain set to measure the impact of GCs on patients living with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. The mandatory domains previously identified for inclusion in all clinical trials measuring the GC effects include infection, bone fragility, mood disturbance, hypertension, diabetes, weight, fatigue, and mortality. Before progressing to instrument selection, the Working Group sought to establish precise definitions of all mandatory domains within the core domain set. OMERACT methodology was applied with the use of evidence and consensus-based decision making of all stakeholder groups (patient research partners, health care professionals, clinician researchers, industry members and methodologists) to develop detailed definitions for the broad domain, target domain and domain components, taking into consideration sources of variability that could affect measurement of the domain. The working group synthesized prior qualitative studies, quantitative work, and results from Delphi rounds, to develop a rich definition of 'what' is to be measured. Between 2021 and 2023, the OMERACT Working Group on GC Impact conducted virtual meetings to establish domain definitions. First, we mapped each domain onto an OMERACT Core Area. All domains were primarily represented within the Pathophysiological Manifestations Core Area, except from Fatigue which was primarily Life Impact and Weight which spanned both Core Areas. Sources of variability included cultural factors, age, gender, education level, socioeconomic status, personal experiences, emotional state, and language barriers. The domain definitions will form the foundation for instrument selection and the initial step of domain / concept match and content validity in the OMERACT pillar of 'truth' before moving on to feasibility and discrimination. The OMERACT GC Impact Working Group has developed and agreed upon detailed domain definitions for core domains. Future steps of the working group are to select instruments and develop the core outcome measurement set for clinical trials measuring the impact of GC on patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses updates on giant cell arteritis (GCA) treatment and management. Topics explored include the approval of tocilizumab (TCZ) by the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and National Health Service (NHS) England for treating patients with GCA, the clinical guidelines for GCA diagnosis, and the challenges associated with disease activity assessment during therapeutic administration of TCZ.

We report five cases of glucocorticoid-responsive mouth symptoms in polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis (GCA); three cases of tongue pain exacerbated by hot/spicy food, a case of scalp pain made worse by eating hot/spicy food and a case of sore tongue as a presenting feature of GCA. These cases emphasize the importance of asking about mouth symptoms and changes in taste when evaluating patients with suspected GCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]