Search

International consensus supports the development of standardized protocols for measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) to facilitate the integration of mGFR testing in both clinical and research settings. To this end, the European Kidney Function Consortium convened an international group of experts with relevant experience in mGFR. The working group performed an extensive literature search to inform the development of recommendations for mGFR determination using 1-compartment plasma clearance models and iohexol as the exogenous filtration marker. Iohexol was selected as it is non-radio labeled, inexpensive, and safe, can be assayed at a central laboratory, and the other commonly used non-radio-labeled tracers have been (inulin) or are soon to be (iothalamate) discontinued. A plasma clearance model was selected over urine clearance as it requires no urine collection. A 1 compartment was preferred to 2 compartments as it requires fewer samples. The recommendations are based on published evidence complemented by expert opinion. The consensus paper covers practical advice for patients and health professionals, preparation, administration, and safety aspects of iohexol, laboratory analysis, blood sample collection and sampling times using both multiple and single-sample protocols, description of the mGFR mathematical calculations, as well as implementation strategies. Supplementary materials include patient and provider information sheets, standard operating procedures, a study protocol template, and support for mGFR calculation., (Copyright © 2024 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The fluorescent compound relmapirazin has been rationally designed for use in point-of-care measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), with attributes including negligible protein binding, negligible metabolites in vivo, negligible tubular secretion, and excellent chemical and photo stability. Twenty-four nonclinical assays were performed in accordance with FDA requirements yielding negligible toxicology concerns. Here, a clinical study was performed to validate relmapirazin as a GFR tracer in patients by comparison to iohexol. This was evaluated in 120 adults at three clinical sites with eGFR values ranging from normal to Stage 4 chronic kidney disease. Relmapirazin and iohexol were administered intravenously in consecutive boluses to each subject and serial blood samples obtained over the subsequent 12 hours. Plasma concentrations were measured and the corresponding plasma GFR for each agent was determined using a standard two-compartment pharmacokinetic assessment. Urine from each subject was collected for the entire 12-hour study period to measure the amount of administered dose appearing in the urine. A near perfect linear regression correlation was observed between the GFRs measured by these two tracers (r 2 =0.99). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed agreement between these two measures of GFR (limits of agreement -7.0 to +5.6 mL/min; mean of -0.7 mL/min). The GFR determined by relmapirazin was independent of GFR stratification by chronic kidney disease stage, and importantly by race. The percent of the administered relmapirazin dose recovered in the urine was greater than or equal to that of iohexol with no reported severe adverse events. Thus, relmapirazin may be used as a GFR tracer agent in humans., (Copyright © 2024 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Implementing shortened one-compartment iohexol plasma clearance models for GFR measurement is crucial since the gold standard inulin renal clearance technique and the reference two-compartment, 10-hour, 16-samplings iohexol plasma clearance method are clinically unfeasible. Inulin may precipitate anaphylactic shock. Four-hour and 8-hour one-compartment iohexol plasma clearance models with Bröchner-Mortensen correction provide accurate GFR measurements in patients with estimated GFR (eGFR) > or ≤40 mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. We compared the performance of the simplified 5-hour, 4-samplings, two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model (popPK) with the performance of the reference two-compartment 10-hour iohexol method in 16 patients with GFR 15.2 to 56.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. We also compared the performance of shortened (5, 6 and 7-hour) one-compartment models with the performance of the standard 8-hour one-compartment model in 101 patients with eGFR ≤40 mL/min/1.73 m2. The performance of popPK and shortened methods versus reference methods was evaluated by total deviation index (TDI), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and coverage probability (CP). TDI <10%, CCC ≥0.9 and CP >90% indicated adequate performance. TDI, CCC and CP of popPK were 11.11%, 0.809 and 54.10%, respectively. All shortened, one-compartment models overestimated the GFR (p <0.0001 for all) as compared to the 8-hour model. TDI, CCC and CP were 7.02%, 0.815, and 75.80% for the 7-hour model, 7.26%, 0.803, and 74.20% for the 6-hour model, and 8.85%, 0.729 and 64.70% for the 5-hour model. The agreement of popPK model was comparable to that obtained with the Chronic-Kidney-Disease-Collaboration-Epidemiology (CKD-Epi) and the Modification-of-Diet-in-Renal-Disease (MDRD) serum-creatinine based equations for GFR estimation. PopPK model is remarkably unreliable for GFR measurement in stage III-IV CKD patients. In patients with eGFR ≤40 mL/min/1.73m2, shortened one-compartment models, in particular the 5-hour model, are less performant than the reference 8-hour model. For accurate GFR measurements, the iohexol plasma clearance should be measured with appropriate protocols. Over-simplified procedures should be avoided., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Carrara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is considered the best overall index for the renal function. Currently, one of the most promising exogenous markers for GFR assessment is iohexol. In this study, the suitability of volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) as alternative for the conventional blood sampling and quantification of iohexol in paediatric plasma was assessed. Therefore, a new, fully validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed. Subsequently, the clinical suitability was evaluated in 20 paediatric patients by comparing plasma iohexol concentrations and associated GFR values obtained by the VAMS method with those obtained by conventional blood sampling and quantification of iohexol in plasma. The developed, simple and cost-effective LC-MS/MS-method fulfilled all pre-set validation acceptance criteria. Iohexol could be accurately quantified within a haematocrit range of 20-60% and long-term stability of iohexol in VAMS was demonstrated up to 245 days under different storage temperatures. Both iohexol plasma concentrations (r = 0.98, mean bias: -4.20%) and derived GFR values (r = 0.99; mean bias: 1.31%), obtained by a conventional plasma and the VAMS method, demonstrated good correlation and acceptable bias. The agreement between the two methods was especially good for GFR values higher than 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Nevertheless, for GFR values <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 the accuracy compared to the plasma method was lower. However, small adjustments to the sampling protocol could probably solve this problem., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare estimated glomerular filtration rate using classical static and kinetic equations with measured glomerular filtration rate assessed by plasma iohexol clearance in a mixed population of critical care patients., Patients: Unselected patients older than 18 and admitted to a general ICU., Design: Interventional prospective single center study., Intervention: Measurement of glomerular filtration rate by the plasma clearance of an IV single dose of iohexol and estimation of glomerular filtration rate with creatinine or cystatin C-based standard and kinetic equations as well as urinary creatinine clearance., Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-three patients were included with a median age of 66 years old. The median measured glomerular filtration rate was 51 mL/min/1.73 m (interquartile range, 19-85 mL/min/1.73 m). All used equations displayed significant biases, high errors, and poor accuracy when compared with measured glomerular filtration rate, overestimating renal function. The highest accuracy and lowest error were observed with cystatin C-based chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equations. Both modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations displayed the lowest performance. Kinetic models did not improve performances, except in patients with unstable creatinine levels. Creatinine- but not cystatin C-based estimations largely derived over ICU stay, which appeared more related to sarcopenia than fluid balance. Finally, estimated glomerular filtration rate misclassified patients according to classical glomerular filtration rate categories in approximately half of the studied cases., Conclusions: All known estimated glomerular filtration rate equations displayed high biases and unacceptable errors when compared with measured glomerular filtration rate in a mixed ICU population, with the lowest performance related to creatinine-based equations compared with cystatin C. In the ICU, we advocate for caution when using creatinine based estimated glomerular filtration rate equations. Drifting of serum creatinine levels over time should also be taken into consideration when assessing renal function in the ICU.

Background Plasma iohexol clearance (CLiohexol) is a reference technique for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determination. In routine practice, CLiohexol is calculated using one of several formulas, which have never been evaluated in kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to model iohexol pharmacokinetics in this population, evaluate the predictive performance of three simplified formulas and evaluate whether a Bayesian algorithm improves CLiohexol estimation. Methods After administration of iohexol, six blood samples were drawn from 151 patients at various time points. The dataset was split into two groups, one to develop the population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) model (n = 103) and the other (n = 48) to estimate the predictive performances of the various GFR estimation methods. GFR reference values (GFRref) in the validation dataset were obtained by non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. Predictive performances of each method were evaluated in terms of bias (ME), imprecision (root mean square error [RMSE]) and number of predictions out of the ±10% or 15% error interval around the GFRref. Results A two-compartment model best fitted the data. The Bayesian estimator with samples drawn at 30, 120 and 270 min allowed accurate prediction of GFRref (ME = 0.47%, RMSE = 3.42%), as did the Brøchner-Mortensen (BM) formula (ME = - 0.0425%, RMSE = 3.40%). With both methods, none of the CL estimates were outside the ±15% interval and only 2.4% were outside the ±10% for the BM formula (and none for the Bayesian estimator). In patients with GFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2, the BM formula performed very well, while the Bayesian method could not be evaluated in depth due to too small a number of patients with adequate sampling times. Conclusions GFR can be estimated with acceptable accuracy in kidney transplant patients using the BM formula, but also using a Bayesian algorithm.

Direct measurement methods of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are considered as the gold standard to assess kidney function. Following the withdrawal of the Proinuline Serb® specialty by the French National Health Surveillance Agency, iohexol remains the most suitable marker to replace inulin as the marker for GFR in France. The assay is performed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with ultraviolet (UV) detection or by mass spectrometry. Plasma clearance measurement is the protocol of choice: single-sample protocols dominate, but multiple-sample protocols may be more accurate in specific situations to improve accuracy. In some cases, urinary clearance protocols may be proposed. National and international recommendations suggest using a GFR measurement as a confirmatory test in cases where the creatinine-based estimated GFR is inappropriate, ie clinical situations characterized by a significant alteration of muscle mass or volume distribution. The indications retained by the working group were graded according to the level of recommendations. The essential indications are the evaluation of living kidney donor, the monitoring of kidney allograft function at one year post-transplantation, drugs with narrow therapeutic range (anticoagulant, chemotherapy) in patients with inadequate estimation of GFR by creatinine and clinical research.

Background Glomerular filtration is the most important kidney function. The most accurate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates are based on the clearance of exogenous filtration markers. Of these, iohexol is the only exogenous marker that is included in an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of the European laboratories participating in Equalis' EQA scheme for iohexol. Methods Weighed amounts of iohexol (Omnipaque) were added to plasma samples and distributed to laboratories participating in the EQA scheme for iohexol. All laboratories performed the assays in a blinded fashion. Results The number of participating laboratories varied between 27 and 34 during the study period. Iohexol was determined by HPLC in 77% of the laboratories and by UPLC/MS/MS methods in 15% of the laboratories. The mean interlaboratory coefficient of variation was 4.7% for the HPLC methods and 6.4% for the UPLC/MS/MS methods. The mean bias between calculated and measured iohexol values was -1.3 mg/L (95% confidence interval ±0.3) during the first part of the study period and 0.1 mg/L (±0.3) during the later part. Conclusions The low interlaboratory variation demonstrates that iohexol can be measured reliably by many laboratories and supports the use of iohexol as a GFR marker when there is a need for high quality GFR measurements.

Background: Measurement of glomerular filtration rate by iohexol disappearance (iGFR) has become a gold standard in the pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. The need for serial phlebotomy can be difficult and minimizing venipunctures would be beneficial. Furthermore, finger stick collection for dried blood spot (DBS) may be more tolerable in the pediatric population, and equivalence between these two methods may further simplify the process., Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in children and adolescents 1 to 21 years with stages I-IV CKD. Iohexol was infused and blood drawn 10, 30, 120, and 300 min later. Blood spots on filter paper were collected by finger stick after each of the latter two blood draws. The rate of iohexol plasma disappearance was used to calculate GFR. Pearson's correlation coefficient and bias, Students t test, and Bland-Altman graphical representations were used to compare methods., Results: Forty-one patients were recruited. The mean creatinine was 1.13 mg/dL (SD 0.45), the mean 4-point iGFR was 73.2 ml/min/1.73m 2 (SD 27.5) and the mean 2-point iGFR was 75.6 ml/min/1.73m 2 (SD 27.3). Correlation between 2-point and 4-point venous GFR was r = 0.97; p < 0.001. The correlation between the DBS and the 2-point venous GFR was r = 0.95; p < 0.001, with no significant bias. Ninety-four percent of the 2-point GFR's were within 10% of the 4-point GFR's and 80% of DBS-GFRs were within 10% of the 2-point GFR's., Conclusions: The 2-point iGFR was highly correlated and agreed well with the 4-point iGFR. The same was true for the DBS method and the 2-point venous method. DBS sampling by finger stick sampling at 2 time points after iohexol infusion gave an acceptably accurate measurement of GFR.

Objectives: To evaluate concordance between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates (Cockcroft and Gault, modification of diet in renal diseases, chronic kidney disease epidemiology study group equations) for drug dosing in HIV-infected patients., Patients and Methods: We performed a monocentric study. GFR was measured using the gold standard method (plasma clearance of iohexol) in 230 HIV-infected patients. Concordance rate was evaluated between measured GFR (mGFR) and estimated GFR (eGFR) for different GFR categories (GFR>90 mL/min, GFR<90 mL/min, GFR>70 mL/min, and GFR<70 mL/min). MDRD and CKD-EPI were used with and without indexation to body surface area (BSA)., Results: Mean age was 48±10 years, mean mGFR was 101±26 mL/min. Concordance between mGFR and eGFR estimated with CG, CKD-EPI (indexed and not indexed to BSA), or MDRD equations (not indexed to BSA) was similar (73%, 73%, 74%, and 73% respectively) for a breakpoint value of 90 mL/min for GFR. At this value, the concordance rate between mGFR and MDRD indexed to BSA was significantly lower (65%, P<0.05). Using 70 mL/min of GFR as the breakpoint value, all equations had similar concordance rates with mGFR (with or without indexation to BSA)., Conclusion: CKD-EPI equation has the same concordance with GFR and with CG when used for drug dosing., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Over the last few decades, the prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically. This increase has been mirrored by a rise in the risk of a number of health conditions, including hypertension, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Although the weight loss following bariatric surgery has been shown to relieve the severity of diabetes and reduce hypertension, the effect on renal function has been less extensively evaluated., Objective: The aims of the present study were to: (i) compare the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, using the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations) and the calculated glomerular filtration rate (using the 24-hour urine volume) with the measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) assessed with the plasma iohexol clearance method in severely obese patients, and (ii) evaluate the effect of weight loss on the mGFR 6 months after bariatric surgery., Methods: Before and six months after bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy), eligible patients for bariatric surgery were admitted as day cases to the nephrology unit, where they underwent a plasma iohexol clearance test. The GFR was also estimated using the MDRD and CKDEPI equations and the 24-hour urine method. Changes in eGFR and mGFR were compared using a Wilcoxon test for paired data., Results: Data from 16 patients with severe obesity (mean ± standard deviation of Body Mass Index [BMI]: 43.9 ± 7.3 kg/m 2 ) were analyzed. At baseline, 12 (75%) presented with hypertension and 10 (63%) presented with diabetes. The median [range] iohexol clearance rate was 109 [57-194] mL/min. The plasma iohexol clearance test evidenced hyperfiltration (mGFR>120 mL/min) in 7 patients. In contrast, the eGFR values generated by the MDRD equation, the CKDEPI equation and the GFR MFR calculated with the 24-hour urine method only identified hyperfiltration in 1, 0 and 5 patients, respectively. Six months after surgery, the mean BMI had fallen significantly (P<0.0012), and the severity of diabetes (according to the HbA 1c level) had decreased significantly from 6.6 [6.0-9.8] % to 5.7 [5.2-8.6] % (P=0.025). The iohexol clearance rate increased slightly after bariatric surgery. Changes in BMI after surgery do not seem to be correlated with the changes in iohexol clearance. In patients displaying hyperfiltration at baseline, the mGFR fell significantly (n=7; P=0.01) and returned to near normal values. No significant changes in the eGFR were observed., Conclusion: Our results suggest that MDRD and CKD-EPI equations do not provide accurate estimates of the true GFR in severely obese patients (particularly in those with hyperfiltration). Iohexol clearance or other methods for determining mGFR should constitute the gold standard for the accurate evaluation of renal function in this context. Renal function (as evaluated by the mGFR) improved 6 months after bariatric surgery in severely obese individuals particularly in patients displaying hyperfiltration at baseline. However, these observations must be confirmed in a larger study with a longer follow-up period., (Copyright © 2016 Association Société de néphrologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cystatin C may add explanatory power for associations with mortality in combination with other filtration markers, possibly indicating pathways other than glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, this has not been firmly established since interpretation of associations independent of measured GFR (mGFR) is limited by potential multicollinearity between markers of GFR. The primary aim of this study was to assess associations between cystatin C and mortality, independent of mGFR. A secondary aim was to evaluate the utility of combining cystatin C and creatinine to predict mortality risk., Methods: Cox regression was used to assess the associations of cystatin C and creatinine with mortality in 1157 individuals referred for assessment of plasma clearance of iohexol., Results: Since cystatin C and creatinine are inversely related to mGFR, cystatin C - 1 and creatinine - 1 were used. After adjustment for mGFR, lower cystatin C - 1 (higher cystatin C concentration) and higher creatinine - 1 (lower creatinine concentration) were independently associated with increased mortality. When nested models were compared, avoiding the potential influence of multicollinearity, the independence of the associations was supported. Among models combining the markers of GFR, adjusted for demographic factors and comorbidity, cystatin C - 1 and creatinine - 1 combined explained the largest proportion of variance in associations with mortality risk ( R 2  = 0.61). Addition of mGFR did not improve the model., Conclusions: Our results suggest that both creatinine and cystatin C have independent associations with mortality not explained entirely by mGFR and that mGFR does not offer a more precise mortality risk assessment than these endogenous filtration markers combined., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in unstable critically ill patients. In this context, serum creatinine concentration is an imperfect tool for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR), an index of renal function. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of measuring iohexol clearance for GFR assessment in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure at intensive care unit (ICU) admission., Methods: ICU patients were prospectively included within 12 h of acute circulatory failure; a non-toxic dose of iohexol (5 mL) was infused intravenously and iohexol plasma concentration decrease was measured over 24 h. Urinary iohexol concentration was measured in urine samples collected four times, every 6 h for 24 h. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome score, measuring AKI, was calculated each day., Results: Among 18 patients with acute circulatory failure, AKI developed in 15; 14 showed decreased serum creatinine concentration during the first 24 h even though 10 presented AKI. The absolute variation in serum creatinine concentration was correlated with fluid balance over 24 h. Median [min; max] plasma clearance of iohexol was 39.4 mL/min [6.1; 154.0] and iohexol urinary clearance 32.8 mL/min [0.8-170.4]. The correlation between plasma and urinary clearance was ρ=0.97, p<0.0001., Conclusions: GFR may be estimated by plasma iohexol clearance in unstable critically ill patients. This method is reliable, correlates very well with urinary iohexol clearance and does not depend on input/output fluid balance and fluid infusion, as compared with serum creatinine concentration.

Although hypertension is a risk factor for end-stage renal disease, this complication develops in only a minority of hypertensive patients. Whether non-malignant hypertension itself is sufficient to cause reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is unclear. Therefore, we investigated whether elevated blood pressure (BP) was associated with accelerated GFR decline in the general population. The study was based on the Renal Iohexol Clearance Survey in Tromsø 6 (RENIS-T6), which included a representative sample of 1594 individuals aged 50 to 62 years from the general population without baseline diabetes or kidney or cardiovascular disease. GFR was measured as iohexol clearance at baseline and follow-up after a median observation time of 5.6 years. BP was measured according to a standardized procedure. The mean (SD) GFR decline rate was 0.95 (2.23) ml/min/yr. In multivariable adjusted linear mixed regressions with either baseline systolic or diastolic BP as the independent variable, there were no statistically significant associations with GFR decline. Thus, elevated BP is not associated with accelerated mean GFR decline in the general middle-aged population. Hence, additional genetic and environmental factors are probably necessary for elevated BP to develop manifest chronic kidney disease in some individuals., (Copyright © 2016 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial because the GFR value defines the stage of chronic kidney disease and determines the adjustment of drug dosage. The aim was to investigate a new method for the accurate determination of GFR in older adults based on the combination of an exogenous filtration marker, iohexol, and an endogenous marker, serum creatinine or cystatin C., Methods: We combined variables for the estimation of GFR with a reduced set of measurements of the marker iohexol. In a population-based sample of 570 subjects (≥70 years old) from the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS), we investigated the following: (i) the BIS1 and BIS2 equations based on age, gender and serum creatinine with or without serum cystatin C; (ii) equations based on one or two iohexol measurements; and (iii) equations based on the combination of variables from BIS1 or BIS2 with iohexol measurements. The reference standard was based on eight iohexol measurements. The cut-off value of 60 ml min(-1) (1.73 m)(-2) was chosen to assess accuracy. Equations were constructed using a learning sample (n = 285) and an independent validation sample (n = 285)., Results: Misclassification rates were 17.2% (BIS1), 11.6% (BIS2), 14.7% [iohexol measurement at 240 min (iohexol240 )], 7.0% (iohexol240 combined with variables included in BIS1) and 6.7% (iohexol240 combined with variables included in BIS2). Misclassification rates did not decrease significantly after inclusion of two or three iohexol measurements., Conclusions: Combined strategies for the determination of GFR lead to a relevant increase of diagnostic validity., (© 2014 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background/aims: Identifying the best method to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in bariatric surgery patients has important implications for the clinical care of obese patients and research into the impact of obesity and weight reduction on kidney health. We therefore performed such an analysis in patients before and after surgical weight loss., Methods: Fasting measured GFR (mGFR) by plasma iohexol clearance before and after bariatric surgery was obtained in 36 severely obese individuals. Estimated GFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation using serum creatinine only, the CKD-EPI equation using serum cystatin C only and a recently derived equation that uses both serum creatinine and cystatin C (CKD-EPIcreat-cystC) and then compared to mGFR., Results: Participants were primarily middle-aged white females with a mean baseline body mass index of 46 ± 9, serum creatinine of 0.81 ± 0.24 mg/dl and mGFR of 117 ± 40 ml/min. mGFR had a stronger linear relationship with inverse cystatin C before (r = 0.28, p = 0.09) and after (r = 0.38, p = 0.02) surgery compared to the inverse of creatinine (before: r = 0.26, p = 0.13; after: r = 0.11, p = 0.51). mGFR fell by 17 ± 35 ml/min (p = 0.007) following surgery. The CKD-EPIcreat-cystC was unquestionably the best overall performing estimating equation before and after surgery, revealing very little bias and a capacity to estimate mGFR within 30% of its true value over 80% of the time. This was true whether or not mGFR was indexed for body surface area., Conclusions: In severely obese bariatric surgery patients with normal kidney function, cystatin C is more strongly associated with mGFR than is serum creatinine. The CKD-EPIcreat-cystC equation best predicted mGFR both before and after surgery.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) methods are not sufficiently reliable in renal transplant recipients (RTR) and should be replaced by iohexol plasma clearance measurement. However, this method has poor availability in health centers. The aim of our study was to develop a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for plasma iohexol measurement in routine practice and to evaluate its plasma clearance as a reference of GFR. We developed an HPLC method using UV detection. We evaluated sample storage conditions to provide recommendations for routine practice. Then, we compared GFRbased on plasma iohexol clearance (GFR-iohexol) to eGFR using modification of diet in renal disease, Cockcroft and Gault, and CDK-EPIequations in 40 RTR. The method was validated over a concentration range of 15-300 μg/l. Excellent linearity (r > 0.998), inter- and intraday precision (CV < 3.3%), and accuracy (>96.8%) were complied with ICH guidelines. We also demonstrated excellent samples stability (9 days). Although eGFR methods are not references in RTR, we found a correct concordance between eGFR and GFR-iohexol in our population. To conclude, our method is simple, rapid, accurate, and reliable for routine clinical and research use especially in RTR., (© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The goal of this study was to evaluate a commercially available assay for gadolinium diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for use in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in cats (Gd-DTPA GFR) with a wide range of GFRs. Eighteen adult cats (11 healthy and seven with chronic kidney disease) were included. Plasma concentrations of Gd-DTPA following intravenous injection were measured with an ELISA kit (FIT-GFR). Results for Gd-DTPA GFR were compared with simultaneously obtained values for plasma clearance of iohexol (iohexol GFR), plasma blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine concentrations. A negative correlation existed between iohexol GFR and plasma concentrations of BUN and creatinine. A positive correlation existed between Gd-DTPA GFR and iohexol GFR. There was no correlation between Gd-DTPA GFR and plasma concentrations of BUN and creatinine. In this study plasma clearance of Gd-DTPA assayed by FIT-GFR did not appear to provide a sufficiently accurate estimation of GFR in cats when compared with plasma clearance of iohexol, and plasma concentrations of BUN and creatinine., (Copyright © 2010 ISFM and AAFP. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Identifying methods to accurately measure the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in obese individuals without kidney overt kidney disease is necessary to understanding the pathophysiology and natural history of obesity-related kidney disease., Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, iohexol clearance and disposition was measured, an optimal sampling schedule was identified, and the reliability of GFR-estimating methods was described in 29 obese individuals with normal serum creatinine levels. Iohexol disposition was measured using population pharmacokinetics. The agreement with GFR-estimating equations was assessed by intraclass coefficients., Results: Mean age was 44 ± 10 years, body mass index 45 ± 10, creatinine 0.7 ± 0.2 mg/dl (62 ± 18 μmol/l) , and cystatin C 0.83 ± 0.18 mg/dl (8.3 ± 1.8 mg/l). Iohexol disposition fit a two-compartment model and 5 sampling windows were identified over a 4-hour period to optimize model accuracy and minimize blood draws. Precision was not compromised with this sampling design. Neither creatinine nor cystatin C were linearly correlated with the measured GFR though cystatin C was independent of body composition. Agreement was fair to poor between the measured GFR and GFR-estimating equations., Conclusion: This study offers a rigorous method to study obesity-related kidney disease and improve upon suboptimal GFR-estimating methods., (Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

In the present study we evaluated two commonly used iodinated contrast agents, iohexol and iodixanol, as potential markers of impaired renal function. A reversed phase LC-MS method has been developed in order to separate and quantify the two substances. The assay was linear between 0.02 and 9.7 micromol/L for iohexol and between 0.4 and 49.3 micromol/L for iodixanol (r(2) > 0.998). The recovery during sample preparation ranged from 89.1 to 112.4%. The intra- and inter-assay RSD values were 3.06-13.6% for iohexol and 4.32-12.7% for iodixanol. The validated method was subsequently applied to 17 patients scheduled for angiographic procedure displaying normal and impaired renal function. A mixture of iohexol and iodixanol was intra-arterially injected and their corresponding plasma levels were determined periodically over a 24h period following administration. The elimination of both contrast agents followed by the LC-MS approach allowed us to discriminate between patients with normal and impaired renal function at 4, 8 and 24h after administration. Our preliminary results support the predictive value of iohexol and/or iodixanol clearance in a clinical environment to screen and identify patients at risk of developing CIN.

Objective: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is generally accepted as the best overall index of renal function. Thus, all potential live kidney donors are tested to ensure that they have a normal GFR before they are eligible for kidney transplantation. The choice of GFR test is very much dependent on local traditions and may include iohexol, 51Cr-EDTA, inulin, or creatinine clearance based on urine collection, and creatinine clearance calculated from the Cockcroft-Gault or Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation as well as cystatin C. The aim of this study was to compare the results of GFR measurements performed in all actual live kidney donors who have undergone live donor nephrectomy at the University Hospital in Uppsala, Sweden, between the years 2000 and 2004., Material and Methods: The patients were selected from all parts of Sweden and the measurements were performed at their local hospital., Results: We found large discrepancies between repeated iohexol measurements in these presumably healthy individuals. There was also a poor correlation between iohexol clearance and calculated creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault (R2=0.046) or MDRD formula (R2=0.045)., Conclusions: The study shows that the standardization and quality of GFR measurements in Sweden have to be improved.

A simple and rapid ( approximately 4 min) method for the measurement of iohexol in serum for assessing the glomerular filtration rate is described. It is based on direct serum injection on the capillary by MEKC. The method is linear between 8 and 260 mg/L, with an RSD of peak height of 2.9%. Several simple steps have contributed to an improved daily precision, such as choosing a high pH buffer, increasing the SDS concentration, frequent standardization, and eliminating any sample pretreatment.

Development of an outpatient finger-prick glomerular filtration rate (GFR) procedure suitable for epidemiological studies. In clinical practice, reference GFR procedures are rarely used; in large-scale research studies, a great deal of effort and experience is required to obtain them, which is a considerable disincentive to using GFR as an end point. The major problem for both clinical staff and the subject is the length of time that the procedure takes, requiring continuous attendance in the outpatient clinic or its vicinity. Using iohexol as a marker, we therefore propose an alternative approach, which addresses this fundamental deterrent to a more widespread use of GFR measurement. Eighty-two GFR measurements were performed in a mixture of healthy subjects and patients with differing degrees of renal impairment with a wide range of GFRs. Serum was obtained from blood samples to enable a reference GFR to be calculated. Blood spots were collected on filter paper at the same intervals (120, 180, and 240 min), allowed to dry, and then sent through the post. Serum and blood spots were analyzed simultaneously for each individual by automated reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. Standard linear regression analyses confirmed a good agreement (r2 = 0.953) between the iohexol serum GFR and iohexol blood spots GFR. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed that there was no concentration bias. Paired comparisons (Wilcoxon's paired signed rank test) showed no significant difference between the two measurements. Capillary sampling is simple, effective, and significantly reduces the time and costs of performing plasma clearance GFR measurements. This approach will make the GFR measurement more accessible for clinical practice and large-scale epidemiological studies may become feasible.

In the present study, we explore the role of decreased renal function and a genetic polymorphism on the recently discovered protein resistin, apparently able to inhibit hepatic insulin action in mice. We also investigate possible links with inflammation and the insulin resistance present in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This is a post hoc, cross-sectional study comparing 239 prevalent CKD patients with varying degrees of renal function impairment with an age- and gender-matched randomly selected control group of 25 individuals. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated by the mean of urea and creatinine clearance (24-h urine samples) (n=204) or by iohexol clearance (n=60). Plasma analysis of blood lipids, insulin, glucose, inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, vascular cellular adhesion molecule, intercellular adhesion molecule) and resistin (kit from LINCO Research, St Charles, MS) was performed using commercially available assays or routine methods. Insulin resistance was estimated by quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI) and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Genotyping of a C/G promoter single nucleotide polymorphism (n=168) at position -180 of the resistin gene was performed by PyroSequencing. Serum levels of resistin were markedly elevated in the CKD patients with both advanced (39.9+/-1.3 ng/ml) and mild to moderate (23.2+/-1.0 ng/ml) renal function impairment, as compared to controls (8.5+/-0.7 ng/ml; P<0.001). In a multiple linear regression model in patients (adjusted r(2)=0.60), only GFR (beta=3.4; P<0.0001), lean body mass (beta=2.2; P<0.001) and the inflammatory markers were independently associated with circulating resistin levels. There was a weak but significant impact of -180 C/G genotype on plasma levels of resistin (median 43.0+/-2.4 ng/ml in CC, 37.5+/-2.0 ng/ml in CG, and 41.1+/-4.9 ng/ml in GG; P<0.05). Univariate analysis of non-diabetic patients and controls showed that serum resistin was associated with markers of glucose metabolism. However, in a multiple regression model, resistin, as well as all the measured markers of inflammation, was only associated with insulin resistance if GFR was not taken into account. Circulating resistin levels are strongly associated with both GFR and inflammatory biomarkers in CKD. As the significant relationship between plasma resistin levels and insulin resistance was lost following the correction for GFR, resistin is not a likely mediator of insulin resistance in patients with CKD. Renal function is an important factor to take into account in clinical studies relating insulin sensitivity to inflammatory biomarkers in CKD as well as in patients with diabetes mellitus, who often have an impaired renal function.

A simple high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed for the simultaneous determination of iohexol, iothalamate, p-aminohippuric acid (PAH) and n-acetyl-p-aminohippuric acid (n-acetyl-PAH) in human plasma and urine. A C(18) column at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with an aqueous mobile phase of trifluoroacetic acid (0.1% TFA in deionized water (pH 2.2), v/v) and methanol gradient was used for component separation. The plasma and urine assay demonstrated linearity from 10 to 50 microg/ml for iohexol and iothalamate, 5 to 40 microg/ml for PAH and 2.5 to 40 microg/ml for n-acetyl-PAH. The HPLC plasma and urine results obtained for PAH were used to calculate the subject kidney effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and the iohexol results were used to calculate the subject kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The HPLC results for PAH were then compared to an alternative colorimetric method for analyzing PAH to determine if subject metabolism (acetylation) of PAH affected the ERPF results obtained using the colorimetric method, the subsequent ERPF/GFR ratio and clinical impression of subject patient kidney function. The method was utilized in several different clinical studies evaluating the effect of kidney function from medications (phase IV evaluations) marketed for patients with cardiovascular disease.

Purpose: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be measured by iopromide plasma clearance. As an injection of 120 ml nonionic contrast medium is expensive and especially in patients with nephropathy potentially nephrotoxic, we investigated whether iopromide plasma clearance could be measured using a tenth of that dose as 'low-dose' clearance., Material and Methods: Fifty adult patients scheduled for CT were recruited. Iopromide 300 mg I/ml was used for GFR measurement. Prior to CT, low-dose clearance was measured by injecting 12 ml iopromide per 75 kg b.w. At 3, 4 and 5 h after injection, plasma samples were obtained and the iodine concentration was measured by X-ray fluorescence analysis. Immediately after the last blood sample, CT was again performed following injection of 120 ml iopromide per 75 kg b.w. A further 3 plasma samples were then obtained 3, 4, and 5 h after CT and used for the determination of high-dose clearance., Results: Low-dose clearance ranged from 20 ml/min to 141 ml/min (mean 78.3 ml/min). High-dose and low-dose clearance correlated excellently, with clearance (high-dose) = 1.4 + 0.994 clearance (low-dose); the correlation coefficient was r = 0.944, the standard deviation SDxy= 9.3 ml/min., Conclusion: Plasma clearance of iopromide is dose-independent on use of iodine amounts of 3.6 g and 36 g I/75 kg b.w. The GFR can be determined by high-dose and low-dose iopromide plasma clearance with identical accuracy.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been used as an alternative to the isotopic method to calculate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). With the HPLC method, serum iohexol or iothalamate levels are measured, and the plasma clearance rate of the compound is used as a surrogate for GFR. However, HPLC is a labor-intensive procedure, which limits its usefulness in the clinical setting. Capillary electrophoresis, a newer technique in which electrophoretic separations are performed in capillary tubes, is easier and faster than HPLC. We used capillary electrophoresis for the determination of serum iohexol levels and the calculation of GFR. Patients underwent a simultaneous 125I-iothalamate clearance test and a plasma iohexol clearance test to determine GFR. Mean GFR (+/-SD) was 70.9 +/- 29.9 mL/min (range, 14.5 to 131 mL/min) in 52 patients as determined by standard iothalamate clearance methods. For iohexol clearance, the correlation coefficient and standard error were 0.93 and 10.9 mL/min, respectively, using capillary electrophoresis compared with the iothalamate method. Capillary electrophoresis is a simple, rapid method that can be used to calculate GFR and provides results at least as accurate as those obtained by HPLC and x-ray fluorescence.

Glomerular filtration rate can be conveniently quantified by monitoring the plasma clearance of iohexol. In this study we have evaluated the possibility of further simplifying the investigation by using capillary sampling. Eight women and two men were given a single injection of iohexol (5 ml Omnipaque). Three to 4 h after the injection plasma and capillary samples were taken. Iohexol concentrations in whole blood and in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography after precipitation with perchloric acid. Iohexol in blood was quantitatively distributed to the plasma compartment. Plasma concentrations of iohexol calculated from the capillary blood concentration and erythrocyte volume fraction were in good agreement with actual plasma concentrations (r = 0.98). The imprecision of iohexol determination in capillary samples was 3.5% (CV) and clearance measurements using venous and capillary sampling also agreed well.

We present a method for the quantification of the contrast agent iohexol in serum. Iohexol is deiodinated by alkaline hydrolysis and the released iodine subsequently measured according to the ceric arsenite method. The assay requires 50 microliters of serum and has a high capacity as it involves few analytical steps. The high precision (2% CV) and sensitivity make the method applicable to the recently developed procedure for the determination of glomerular filtration rate, which is based on the assessment of the clearance of iohexol from serum. The method is simple and rapid and requires no expensive equipment.