1. Function-guided differences of arcuate fascicle and inferior fronto-occipital fascicle tractography as diagnostic indicators for surgical risk stratification.
- Author
-
Kram L, Schroeder A, Meyer B, Krieg SM, and Ille S
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Adult, Aged, Brain Mapping methods, Neural Pathways diagnostic imaging, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Risk Assessment, Language, White Matter diagnostic imaging, Frontal Lobe diagnostic imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging methods, Brain Neoplasms surgery, Brain Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Glioma surgery, Glioma diagnostic imaging, Glioma pathology, Aphasia etiology, Aphasia diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Background: Several patients with language-eloquent gliomas face language deterioration postoperatively. Persistent aphasia is frequently associated with damage to subcortical language pathways. Underlying mechanisms still need to be better understood, complicating preoperative risk assessment. This study compared qualitative and quantitative functionally relevant subcortical differences pre- and directly postoperatively in glioma patients with and without aphasia., Methods: Language-relevant cortical sites were defined using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) language mapping in 74 patients between 07/2016 and 07/2019. Post-hoc nTMS-based diffusion tensor imaging tractography was used to compare a tract's pre- and postoperative visualization, volume and fractional anisotropy (FA), and the preoperative distance between tract and lesion and postoperative overlap with the resection cavity between the following groups: no aphasia (NoA), tumor- or previous resection induced aphasia persistent pre- and postoperatively (TIA_P), and surgery-induced transient or permanent aphasia (SIA_T or SIA_P)., Results: Patients with NoA, TIA_P, SIA_T, and SIA_P showed distinct fasciculus arcuatus (AF) and inferior-fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) properties. The AF was more frequently reconstructable, and the FA of IFOF was higher in NoA than TIA_P cases (all p ≤ 0.03). Simultaneously, SIA_T cases showed higher IFOF fractional anisotropy than TIA_P cases (p < 0.001) and the most considerable AF volume loss overall. While not statistically significant, the four SIA_P cases showed complete loss of ventral language streams postoperatively, the highest resection-cavity-AF-overlap, and the shortest AF to tumor distance., Conclusion: Functionally relevant qualitative and quantitative differences in AF and IFOF provide a pre- and postoperative pathophysiological and clinically relevant diagnostic indicator that supports surgical risk stratification., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflicts of interest: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This trial was funded entirely by institutional grants from the Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar. BM received honoraria, consulting fees, and research grants from Medtronic (Meerbusch, Germany), Icotec AG (Altstätten, Switzerland), Nexstim Plc (Helsinki, Finland), and Relievant Medsystems Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA, USA), honoraria, and research grants from Ulrich Medical (Ulm, Germany), honoraria and consulting fees from Spineart Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany) and DePuy Synthes (West Chester, PA, USA), and royalties from Spineart Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany). SMK is consultant for Ulrich Medical (Ulm, Germany), and Need Inc. (Santa Monica, CA, USA), and received honoraria from Nexstim Plc (Helsinki, Finland), Spineart Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany), Medtronic (Meerbusch, Germany) and Carl Zeiss Meditec (Oberkochen, Germany). SMK and BM received research grants and are consultants for Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany). SI is consultant for Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany) and received honoraria and consulting fees from Icotec AG (Altstätten, Switzerland), Carl Zeiss Meditec (Oberkochen, Germany), and Nexstim Plc (Helsinki, Finland). All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the materials used as well as the results presented in this study. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Institutional Review Board: The study was conducted in line with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Technical University of Munich (reference number: 192/18S, date of approval: 09/20/2018). Informed consent: Informed consent for inclusion was obtained from all subjects before they participated in the study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF