Search

An obstacle to effective uniform treatment of glioblastoma, especially at recurrence, is genetic and cellular intertumoral heterogeneity. Hence, personalized strategies are necessary, as are means to stratify potential targeted therapies in a clinically relevant timeframe. Functional profiling of drug candidates against patient-derived glioblastoma organoids (PD-GBO) holds promise as an empirical method to preclinically discover potentially effective treatments of individual tumors. Here, we describe our establishment of a PD-GBO-based functional profiling platform and the results of its application to four patient tumors. We show that our PD-GBO model system preserves key features of individual patient glioblastomas in vivo. As proof of concept, we tested a panel of 41 FDA-approved drugs and were able to identify potential treatment options for three out of four patients; the turnaround from tumor resection to discovery of treatment option was 13, 14, and 15 days, respectively. These results demonstrate that this approach is a complement and, potentially, an alternative to current molecular profiling efforts in the pursuit of effective personalized treatment discovery in a clinically relevant time period. Furthermore, these results warrant the use of PD-GBO platforms for preclinical identification of new drugs against defined morphological glioblastoma features.

Aims: The methylation status of the O6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter region is essential in evaluating the prognosis and predicting the drug response in patients with glioblastoma. In this study, we evaluated the utility of using nanopore long‐read sequencing as a method for assessing methylation levels throughout the MGMT CpG‐island, compared its performance to established techniques and demonstrated its clinical applicability. Methods: We analysed 165 samples from CNS tumours, focusing on the MGMT CpG‐island using nanopore sequencing. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION and PromethION flow cells were employed for single sample or barcoded assays, guided by a CRISPR/Cas9 protocol, adaptive sampling or as part of a whole genome sequencing assay. Methylation data obtained through nanopore sequencing were compared to results obtained via pyrosequencing and methylation bead arrays. Hierarchical clustering was applied to nanopore sequencing data for patient stratification. Results: Nanopore sequencing displayed a strong correlation (R2 = 0.91) with pyrosequencing results for the four CpGs of MGMT analysed by both methods. The MGMT‐STP27 algorithm's classification was effectively reproduced using nanopore data. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering revealed distinct patterns in methylated and unmethylated samples, providing comparable survival prediction capabilities. Nanopore sequencing yielded high‐confidence results in a rapid timeframe, typically within hours of sequencing, and extended the analysis to all 98 CpGs of the MGMT CpG‐island. Conclusions: This study presents nanopore sequencing as a valid and efficient method for determining MGMT promotor methylation status. It offers a comprehensive view of the MGMT promoter methylation landscape, which enables the identification of potentially clinically relevant subgroups of patients. Further exploration of the clinical implications of patient stratification using nanopore sequencing of MGMT is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]