Search

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of the intraocular pressure ( IOP) measured by healthy subjects with icare® Home and to observe the IOP fluctuation and pattern of IOP fluctuation in healthy subjects over three consecutive days. Methods Sixty healthy subjects were recruited to the study. IOP was measured by the subjects themselves and by study staff using icare® Home tonometers on visits 1 and 2, as well as by study staff using Goldmann applanation tonometry ( GAT). Furthermore, the subjects measured their IOP at home for three consecutive days. Results Twenty-three per cent of the study eyes were excluded in the statistical analysis due to dropout or non-compliance to the schedule. Approximately 70% of the icare® Home measurements were within 3 mmHg of the GAT measurements. Ten to 16% of the study eyes had IOP peaks outside office hours. Sixty-three per cent of the study eyes had different IOP patterns on consecutive days. Conclusion Rebound self-tonometry appears to be accurate and could be used to monitor short- and long-term IOP variations. The difference between IOP patterns on consecutive days raises questions as to the certainty of a single IOP measurement as a measure of treatment effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to determine a threshold waveform score (WS) for the best score value (BSV) in the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Methods: Retrospective study. One hundred and thirty-three healthy adults were recruited. Measurements were done with the ORA 2.04. Results: Two hundred and sixty-six eyes were analyzed. Mean age was 56.49 ± 15.97 years. The mean waveform score of the BSV was 7.39 ± 1.32. The waveform scores ranged from 2.8 to 9.7. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality was significant ( p ≤ 0.0001). Linear regression showed a significant positive correlation between IOPg (measured with the ORA) and IOP measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry ( p ≤ 0.0001), as well as significant negative correlation between the difference IOPg-IOP Goldmann and waveform score of the BSV values. Threshold estimation considering 95 % confidence interval was 7.23. Meanwhile, threshold estimation considering the difference IOPg-IOP Goldmann, for 3 mmHg, was 6.7. Conclusions: When using the ORA device, we recommend that clinicians try to obtain several waveform score measurements of 7 or above. Waveform scores lower than 7 may render less reliable results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the effect of different levels of visual field defect in glaucoma on utilities and to test if utilities could be assessed using a general questionnaire such as the EQ-5D. Methods: A cross-sectional study in 199 patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma grouped into 5 severity stages according to visual field defects was performed in 4 specialized ophthalmic centres. Descriptive analysis was performed for the sample and by stage, and the effect of vision loss on utility was investigated with multiple step-wise regression analysis. Results: The mean age of the sample was 70 and the mean MD in the worse eye was −13.1 dB (SD 10.2). Visual acuity (VA) was 0.63 and 0.87 in the worse and better eye, respectively, and the mean utility was 0.80 (SD 0.23). Utility decreased with increasing glaucomatous damage, ranging from 0.84 for mild disease to 0.72 for severe damage (MD −2.5 to −28.1), but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant when controlling for co-morbidity, except for the most severe stage (p < 0.01). In multiple regression analysis, visual field in the better eye was significantly correlated with utility, and there was an indirect correlation between visual field in the worse eye and utility: the effect of total VA on utility was significant, and MD in the worse eye was correlated with total VA. Conclusions: Utility is strongly correlated with overall vision. Our results suggest a relationship between glaucomatous damage and utility, and patients with severe damage have a significantly lower utility. However, this should be further investigated in larger samples that include more patients with moderate-severe bilateral damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]