Search

Cangialosi, Alegría, and Colmenero have made a comment on a paper of ours [Polym. Eng. Sci. 2022:1–13], in which we discussed the concern that the enthalpy recovery data reported by Cangialosi and co‐workers [Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;111(9):095701] for polystyrene aged up to 15 K below glass transition temperature was anomalous and contradicted existing experimental results from the literature over a similar range of aging conditions. Their response shifts the focus away from the raised questions about their experimental results and attempts to invalidate the data that we cited in support of our argument. Here we respond to the comment and add additional analysis that suggests the structural recovery response of glassy materials exhibits smooth behavior over the full range of measurements, up to 7 or 8 logarithmic decades. We do this by referring to the work on the intrinsic isotherm down‐jump and memory responses of poly(vinyl acetate) between 40°C and 15°C over six logarithmic decades by Kovacs [Fortsch. Hochpolym. Fo. 1963;3(1/2):394–508], the small‐strain tensile creep of poly(vinyl chloride) quenched from 90°C to 40°C (approximately 40°C below Tg) over seven logarithmic decades from Struik [Polym Eng. Sci., 1977;17:165–173], and the volume recovery behavior for aging times up to 3 months in a temperature range between 95°C and −50°C by Greiner and Schwarzl [Rheol. Acta. 1984;23(4):378–395]. We also add discussion that an isothermal aging procedure using a vacuum oven is highly vulnerable to temperature errors due to the problem of good temperature control when the heat transfer mechanism is primarily radiative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent efforts, fostered by a pioneering work by us, have shown the of multiple steps in the recovery of equilibrium of glasses. Jin and McKenna raise concerns regarding the validity of such scenario alleging that the multiple recovery steps would be an artifact arising from poor temperature control in the oven used for isothermal glass equilibration. We critically discuss Jin and McKenna arguments from both the viewpoints of scrutinizing previous literature data and that of the temperature control in the oven. In doing so, we provide compelling arguments that Jin and McKenna conjectures are unjustified and point out the need for efforts to describe glass dynamics significantly below the glass transition temperature, Tg, by accounting for the presence of different relaxation mechanisms active in glass equilibration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is considerable interest in data reported by Cangialosi et al. [Cangialosi, D., Boucher, V. M., Alegría, A., & Colmenero, J. (2013). Physical Review Letters, 111(9), 095701] that purportedly showed unusual irregular responses in the isothermal structural recovery behavior of glasses because the observation challenges the general view of the dynamics being smooth functions of time as observed in extensive dilatometric experiments by Kovacs [Kovacs, A. J. (1964). In Fortschritte der Hochpolymeren‐Forschung, 3, 394–507. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.] in the 1960s. The reported data show an apparent two mechanism structural (enthalpy) recovery at aging temperatures ranging from 6 to 17 K below Tg which is also controversial as it could not be reproduced in work from Koh and Simon [Koh, Y. P., & Simon, S. L. (2013). Macromolecules, 46(14), 5815–5821.] where a second plateau observed in the enthalpy loss curve was not reproduced in nearly 1‐year‐long experiments at 15 K below Tg. Therefore, it is important to determine what might be possible reasons for the apparent non‐smooth relaxations. Here, we examine the possibility that the poor temperature control of a typical vacuum oven could explain the anomalous results. We used the Tool–Narayanaswamy–Moynihan (TNM) model of structural recovery to calculate the effect of typical vacuum oven temperature variation on the structural recovery of polystyrene and find that we can reproduce the reported experimental results. The issue of temperature control using a vacuum oven is discussed, and data from thermocouple measurements of temperature at various locations inside a vacuum oven are shown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The structural recovery of amorphous glassy materials is nonlinear and nonexponential, and the relaxation process can be described by the phenomenological Tool-Narayanaswamy-Moynihan and Kovacs-Aklonis-Hutchinson-Ramos models. The nonlinearity parameter x in these models can be determined by several methods, including inflectional analysis, time-temperature superposition, and a new modified temperature-jump method, the latter a modification of the two-step Lagasse et al.'s method. The activation energy ∆ h/ R can also be determined by the first two methods. In this paper, the applicability of these methods for determining x and ∆ h/ R is analyzed using simulated structural recovery data as a function of aging time, after cooling at high rates such as those obtainable experimentally using Flash DSC. The results indicate that the activation energy obtained by the time-temperature superposition method is slightly better than that estimated by the inflectional analysis method. The results also indicate that the nonlinearity parameter x can be obtained by the inflectional analysis method for β = 1.0 and for low x and high β. On the other hand, the new modified temperature-jump method works for a broader range of x and β. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]