Search

Objective To determine the prevalence and types of mutations in deafness-related genes in Xianyang, providing a theoretical basis and data support for clinical counselling on deafness prevention and treatment. Methods A total of 27 660 newborns born in our hospital between January 2019 and February 2023 were screened for hearing and deafness-related genes using otoacoustic emission, automated auditory brainstem response, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting 15 mutation sites of the common deafness genes (GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4 and MT-RNR1), as well as validation through Sanger sequencing for positive samples. Results Among the 27 660 newborns, 1 183(4.27%) were carriers of deafness gene mutations, including 570 (2.06%) of GJB2 gene mutations, 528 (1.91%) of SLC26A4 gene mutations, and 16 (0.06%) of GJB3 gene mutations, and MT-RNR1 gene mutation found in 50 cases (0.18%). There were also compound heterozygous mutation (15 cases, 0.05%) and homozygous mutation (4 cases, 0.01%). Three cases of hearing loss were detected, including two cases with GJB2 c.235delC homozygous mutation and one case with SLC26A4 c. 919- 2 A>G homozygous mutation. Conclusion The high prevalence rate of sensorineural deafness among the newborns in the area is mainly attribute to GJB2 and SLC26A4 gene mutations. Screening for these genetic defects can provide valuable advice to families affected by hearing loss gene, thereby reducing the incidence of hearing loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preconception or prenatal carrier screening plays an important role in reproductive decision-making, but current research on hereditary deafness is limited. This study aimed to investigate the carrier frequencies of common deafness genes in the Chinese population who underwent carrier screening and to follow up on pregnancy outcomes in high-chance couples. Methods: Individual females or couples in preconception or early pregnancy were recruited from two hospitals in China. Carrier screening for common deafness genes in the Chinese population, including the GJB2 and SLC26A4 genes, was performed using next-generation sequencing technology. Genetic counseling was provided to subjects before and after testing. Results: Of the 9,993 subjects screened, the carrier rate was 2.86% for the GJB2 gene and 2.63% for the SLC26A4 gene. The variant with the highest carrier frequency in GJB2 was c.235delC (1.89%), and c.919-2A>G (1.08%) in SLC26A4. Of the six high-chance couples, four made alternative reproductive decisions (three with prenatal diagnosis and one with preimplantation genetic testing), with consequent termination of the birth of two affected fetuses. Conclusion: These findings confirmed the clinical utility of preconception or prenatal carrier screening for hereditary deafness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hearing loss is found in more than 5 % of cases worldwide. Hearing loss is divided into three types: Sensorineural hearing loss, Combined hearing loss and Conductive hearing loss. Among them, no less than 50 % of pediatric cases of sensorineural hearing loss are genetic. In Henan, China, there are no statistics on the allele frequency of deafness gene variants. Methods: We divided 2178 subjects enrolled at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou College from January 2019 to March 2021 into a hearing loss group and a normal control group. We performed array and pathogenicity classification for screening the 15 deafness gene variants, calculated and compared the allele frequency of the deafness gene variants, and then compared the hearing loss diagnosis rate between the hearing loss group and the normal control group. Results: We found that in the hearing loss group, the overall allele frequency of all detected variants was 16.6 %. Comparative analysis showed that the allele frequencies of GJB2 c.235delC variant, GJB3 c.538C > T variant and SLC26A4 c.919-2A > G variant were significantly higher than those of the East Asian population average in the gnomAD database. At the same time, our study confirmed that GJB3 c.538C > T variant may not be the disease-causing variant of hearing loss. Conclusions: These results support genetic counseling and rational prediction of risk for deafness.

Background: Nonsyndromic autosomal recessive hearing loss (DFNB) is an etiologically heterogeneous disorder group showing a wide spectrum of onset ages and severity. DFNB genes are very diverse in their types and functions, making molecular diagnosis difficult. DFNB is particularly frequent in Pakistan, which may be partly due to consanguinity. Objective: This study was performed to determine the genetic causes in Pakistani DFNB families with prelingual onset and to establish genotype-phenotype correlation. Methods: Whole exome sequencing and subsequent genetic analysis were performed for 11 Pakistani DFNB families including eight consanguineous families. Results: We identified eight pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in LOXHD1, GJB2, SLC26A4, MYO15A, and TMC1 from six families. The GJB2 mutations were identified in two families each with compound heterozygous mutations and a homozygous mutation. The compound heterozygous mutations in LOXHD1 ([p.D278Y] + [p.D1219E]) and GJB2 [p.M1?] + [p.G12Vfs*2]) were novel. The four missense or start-loss mutations were located at well conserved residues, and most in silico analysis predicted their pathogenicity. In addition to causative mutations, we found compound heterozygous mutations in PTPRQ as variants of uncertain significance. Conclusion: This study identified biallelic mutations as the underlying cause of early onset DFNB in six Pakistani families. This study will be helpful in providing an exact molecular diagnosis and treatment of prelingual onset deafness patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Genetic etiology was clarified in 54 families, with a positive rate of 48%. • 19 novel P/LP variants and 22 VUS variants were identified. All of these findings broadened the mutation spectrum of hearing loss genes. Hearing loss is a group of diseases with high genetic heterogeneity. About 160 genes have been reported to be associated with hereditary hearing loss. 113 families with hearing loss were collected, and WES was used to detect SNV, InDel, CNV and mitochondrial gene variants. For some probands with negative WES test results, the copy number of STRC and OTOA were determined by using real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were found in 54 probands, of which 98% (53/54) were SNVs or InDels and 2% (1/54) were CNVs, a positive rate of 48%. 16 families (14%) were detected with candidate variants of uncertain significance. 19 novel pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and 22 candidate variants of uncertain significance were identified in this study. The most common hearing loss gene in the families was GJB2 , accounting for 28% (15/53), followed by SLC26A4 and MYO15A , accounting for 21% (11/53) and 11% (6/53), respectively. Heterozygous gene deletion was detected in 3 probands, including 2 with STRC and 1 with OTOA in 43 families with WES negative test. Genetic etiology was clarified in 54 families. All of these findings broadened the mutation spectrum of hearing loss genes, thus providing new variant information for the future diagnosis of patients with hearing loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Congenital hearing loss is one of the most common birth defects. Early identification and management play a crucial role in improving patients’ communication and language acquisition. Previous studies demonstrated that genetic screening complements newborn hearing screening in clinical settings. Methods We developed a multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay to sequence the full coding region of the GJB2 gene, the most pathogenic variants of the SLC26A4 gene, and hotspot variants in the MT-RNR1 gene. The sensitivity, specificity, and reliability were validated via samples with known genotypes. Finally, a pilot study was performed on 300 anonymous dried blood samples. Results Of 103 samples with known genotypes, the multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay accurately identified all the variants, demonstrating a 100% sensitivity and specificity. The consistency is high in the analysis of the test–retest reliability and internal consistency reliability. In the pilot study, 12.3% (37/300) of the newborns were found to carry at least one pathogenic variant, including 24, 10, and 3 from the GJB2, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 gene, respectively. With an allele frequency of 2.2%, the NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.109G>A was the most prevalent variant in the study population. Conclusion The multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay is an accurate and reliable test to detect hearing loss variants in the GJB2, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 genes. It can be used to screen genetic hearing loss in newborns.

Background: Congenital hearing loss is one of the most common birth defects. Early identification and management play a crucial role in improving patients' communication and language acquisition. Previous studies demonstrated that genetic screening complements newborn hearing screening in clinical settings. Methods: We developed a multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay to sequence the full coding region of the GJB2 gene, the most pathogenic variants of the SLC26A4 gene, and hotspot variants in the MT-RNR1 gene. The sensitivity, specificity, and reliability were validated via samples with known genotypes. Finally, a pilot study was performed on 300 anonymous dried blood samples. Results: Of 103 samples with known genotypes, the multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay accurately identified all the variants, demonstrating a 100% sensitivity and specificity. The consistency is high in the analysis of the test–retest reliability and internal consistency reliability. In the pilot study, 12.3% (37/300) of the newborns were found to carry at least one pathogenic variant, including 24, 10, and 3 from the GJB2, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 gene, respectively. With an allele frequency of 2.2%, the NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.109G>A was the most prevalent variant in the study population. Conclusion: The multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay is an accurate and reliable test to detect hearing loss variants in the GJB2, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 genes. It can be used to screen genetic hearing loss in newborns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sensorineural hearing impairment is a common sensory deficit in children and more than 50% of these cases are caused by genetic etiologies, that is, hereditary hearing impairment (HHI). Recent advances in genomic medicine have revolutionized the diagnostics of, and counseling for, HHI, including preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), thus providing parents-to-be with better reproductive choices. Over the past decade, we have performed PGD using the amplification refractory mutation system quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) technique in 11 couples with a history of HHI, namely eight with GJB2 variants, one with OTOF variants, one with SLC26A4 variants, and one with an MITF variant. We demonstrated that PGD can be successfully applied to HHI of different inheritance modes, namely autosomal dominant or recessive, and phenotypes, namely syndromic or non-syndromic HHI. However, certain ethical concerns warrant scrutiny before PGD can be widely applied to at-risk couples with a history of HHI.

Copyright of Journal of China Medical University is the property of Journal of China Medical University Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The molecular etiology of non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) in Southeastern China (Fujian) has not been precisely identified. our study selected patients with NSHL and analyzed their causative genes, which helped to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of hereditary hearing loss (HHL) and its treatment. 251 unrelated patients who attended the otolaryngology clinic of Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital with hearing loss were enrolled to our study. All patients had genetic tests and listening tests, of which 251 were diagnosed with NSHL. In addition, we used whole-exome sequencing (WES) in a patient who has a significant family history of HHL but negative for gene chip testing, as well as in his family members. Among of 251 patients, Nucleotide changes were found in 63 cases (25.09%), including 34 located in GJB2(13.5%, including 235delC and 299_300delAT), 13 located in SLC26A4(5.18%, including c.919-2G > A and 2168 A > G), 1 located in GJB3(0.4%,538C > T) and 16 located in mtDNA12SrRNA (6.37%,1555 A > G). In addition, we discuss the process of identifying novel PLS1 mutations from 251 patients. Our results demonstrate the conventional deafness gene mutation in 251 NSHL patients in Fujian, China. Compared with the other area of China, we have a lower detection rate, but GJB2 235delC remains the most common mutation in Fujian. In addition, we discuss the process of discovering novel mutation locus for deafness, which provides an understanding for deafness diagnosis and genetic testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The frequency and spectrum of mutations in deafness-causing genes differs significantly according to the ethnic population and region under investigation. The molecular etiology of nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) in Wenzhou, China, has not yet been systematically elucidated. To provide accurate genetic testing and counseling in this area, we investigated the molecular etiology of NSHL in a deaf population from Wenzhou. A total 506 unrelated patients with NSHL were enrolled in this study. Nine hotspot mutations in four major deafness genes were investigated by sequencing (Group I: 187 patients enrolled between 2011 and 2015) or allele-specific PCR-based universal array (Group II: 319 patients enrolled between 2016 and 2017). The investigated genes included GJB2 (c.35delG, c.176_191del16, c.235delC, c.299-300delAT), SLC26A4 (c.2168A > G, c.919-2A > G), mtDNA 12SrRNA (m.1555A > G, m.1494C > T), and GJB3 (c.538C > T). Furthermore, whole coding region sequencing or improved multiplex ligation detection reaction (IMLDR) were performed for patients who carried mono-allelic variants of GJB2 and SLC26A4, in order to detect other mutations among these patients. GJB2 mutations were detected in 22.92% (116/506) of the entire cohort and SLC26A4 mutations were found in 6.52% (33/506) of the cohort. GJB3 mutations were detected in 0.79% (4/506) of the cohort. The mutation rate of mitochondrial DNA 12SrRNA in our patients was 17.40% (88/506), including 17.00% (86/506) with the m.1555A > G mutation and 0.40% (2/506) with the m.1494C > T mutation. The allelic frequency of the c.235delC mutation was 14.62% (148/1012), which is significantly higher than that of c.109G > A (33/1012, 3.26%), c.299_300delAT (13/1012, 1.28%), and c.176_191del16 (6/1012, 0.59%). The most common pathogenic mutation of SLC26A4 was the c.919-2A > G mutation (37/1012, 3.66%), followed by c.2168A > G (6/1012, 0.59%), and c.1229C > T (4/1012, 0.40%). Moreover, five rare pathogenic variants of GJB2 and eight rare pathogenic variants of SLC26A4 were identified. GJB2 is the primary deafness-causing gene in deaf patients from Wenzhou, China; this is consistent with what is observed in most Chinese populations. However, the surprisingly high rate of the m.1555A > G mutation (17.00%) in patients from Wenzhou was significantly higher than in other populations in China. These findings highlight the specificity of the common deafness-causing gene mutation spectrum in the Wenzhou area. This information may be of benefit for genetic counseling and risk assessment for deaf patients from this area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract In order to investigate essential molecular causes for hearing loss and mutation frequency of deafness-related genes, 1315 newborns who did not pass the Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) (audio-no-pass) and 1000 random-selected infants were subjected to detection for 101 hotspot mutations in 18 common deafness-related genes. Totally, 23 alleles of 7 deafness genes were detected out. Significant difference (χ2 = 25.320, p = 0.000) existed in causative mutation frequency between audio-no-pass group (81/1315, 6.160%) and random-selected cohort (18/1000, 1.80%). Of the genes detected out, GJB2 gene mutation was with significant difference (χ2 = 75.132, p = 0.000) between audio-no-pass group (417/1315, 31.711%) and random-selected cohort (159/1000, 15.900%); c.109G > A was the most common allele, as well as the only one with significantly different allele frequency (χ2 = 79.327, p = 0.000) between audio-no-pass group (392/1315, 16.84%) and random-selected cohort (140/1000, 7.55%), which suggested c.109G > A mutation was critical for newborns' hearing loss. This study performed detection for such a large scale of deafness-associated genes and for the first time compared mutations between audio-no-pass and random-recruited neonates, which not only provided more reliable DNA diagnosis result for medical practioners and enhanced clinical care for the newborns, but gave more accurate estimation for mutation frequency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hearing impairment is one of the most common neurosensory disorders afflicting humans. Approximately half of all cases have a genetic etiology. The distribution and frequency of genetic mutations that cause deafness differ significantly by ethnic group and geographic region. Methods: 130 sporadic nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) children from the Henan province were subjected to microarray-based mutation detection. Nine pathogenic mutations were detected in four of the most common deafness-related genes (GJB2,GJB3,SLC26A4, and MT-RNA1). Results: Fifty percent of the analyzed patients (65/130) were shown to have genetic defects known to be related to deafness. Slightly >30% (41/130) had biallelic pathogenic mutations. One patient had pathogenic mutations in their mitochondrial genes (MT-RNA1); no mutations were detected in the GJB3 gene. Twenty-three (17.69%) patients were carriers of a single mutation in a recessive gene; these findings alone, however, cannot be interpreted as a cause of hearing loss. Utilizing this molecular strategy, we were able to arrive at a conclusive diagnosis for 42 of the NSHL children. Conclusion: Genetic factors play a major role in sporadic NSHL patients from the Henan province, but it is clear that our screen needs to be expanded to include additional genes and alleles. Screening of potential pathogenic genes is important for patient risk assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There are 15000 hearing-impaired children are born in Vietnam every year. Early detection of common deafness mutations is a key factor for diagnosing, helping hearing-loss children to develop their language and awareness normally. Objective: To identify the carrier rate of common deafness mutations in Vietnamese population. Objects and Methods: 80 hearing-impaired and 100 normal children from Viet Nam. Apply technology of next generation sequencing to detect 100 mutations of 18 deafness genes, namely GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4, MT-RNR1, MT-CO1, MT-TL1, MT-TS1, MT-TH, DSPP, GPR98, DFNA5, TMC1, MYO7A, TECTA, DIABLO, COCH, MYO15A and PRPS1. Result: The DNA microarray analysis revealed that identify 6 cases with deafness mutations (account for 10%). Identify by the next-generation sequencing method 18 mutations of deafness genes of 17 hearing-impaired patients (account for 22.5% in total), including 10 cases of mutations of genes GJB2 (8 heterozygous cases: c.299-300delAT, c.512insAACG, c.235delC and 2 homozygous cases: c.512insAACG); SLC26A4 (c.2168A>G, 3 cases); TMC1 (c.1334G>A); MT-RNR1 (m.827A>G, m.961delTinsC); MT-TH(m.12201T>C); MT-TL1 (m.3243A>G). No mutations were identified in the control group. Conclusion: The incidence of deafness mutations in hearing-loss group is 22.5%. Mutations of GJB2 cover the largest proportion (12.5%) among 18 genes investigated. In this review, we describe commonly used genomic technologies as well as the application of these technologies to the genetic diagnosis of deafness and to the discovery of novel genes for syndromic and nonsyndromic deafness.

Objectives To provide appropriate genetic testing and counseling for non-syndromic hearing impairment patients in Hainan Province, an island in the South China Sea. Methods 299 unrelated students with non-syndromic hearing loss who attended a special education school in Hainan Province were enrolled in this study. Three prominent deafness-related genes ( GJB2 , SLC26A4 , and mtDNA 12S rRNA ) were analyzed using Sanger sequencing. Results GJB2 mutations were detected in 32.78% (98/299) of the entire cohort; however, only 5.69% (17/299) had two confirmed pathogenic mutations. The most common mutation observed in this population was c.109G > A in the GJB2 gene, with an allelic frequency of 15.05% (90/598), which is significantly higher than that reported in previous cohorts. A total of 16 patients had two confirmed pathogenic SLC26A4 gene mutations, and 16 patients had one. The IVS7-2A > G mutation was the most commonly observed, with an allelic frequency of 3.51% (21/598). Three patients had a m.1555A > G mutation in the mtDNA 12S rRNA gene. Conclusions These results reveal that genetic etiology occurred in 11.71% (35/299) of patients, suggesting that Hainan province have a different mutational spectrum compare to Mainland China in non-syndromic deafness patients, which provide useful information to genetic counseling in Hainan province. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the occurrence and carrying status of mutant loci related to nonsyndromic sensorineural healing loss in newborns of Heilongjiang province. Methods: Genomic DNAs were isolated from blood specimens obtained from 1036 neonates boms in our hospital between June 2014 and March 2015. the products of 3 deafness-associated genes (GJB2. SLC26A4 and mitochondrial DNA 12SrRNA) were amplified by PC'R and then used for mutation screening by directed sequencing. Results: Among 1036 neonates. 64cases had mutant loci which referred as positive results, the positive rate was6.18%.In these mutation positive neonates. 47cases were found with GJB2 gene mutation. 1 Teases presented SLC26A4 gene mutation. 2 cases were found with 12SrRNA gene mutation. Among 1036 neonates. 63cases had family history. 1 Teases were found with deafness-rated suscepibility genes, the positive rate was 27.0%. Conclusions: GJB2 235 and SLC26A4 IVS7-2 were two typical pathogenic mutant sites in Heilongjiang province. Our results suggested that deafness can be detected by new bom molecular genetic screening. Also, pre pregnancy tests for the parents can help making corresponding intervention measures to prevent or reduce the incidence of deafness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study aimed to investigate the molecular etiology of nonsyndromic hearing impairment (HI) in hearing impaired populations of Hui, Tibetan, and Tu ethnicities in northwest China. A total of 283 unrelated subjects with HI who attended special education schools in northwest China were enrolled in the present study. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in three common deafness‑related genes, gap junction protein β2 (GJB2), solute carrier family 26 member 4 (SLC26A4) and mitochondrially encoded 12S RNA (mtDNA12SrRNA), were detected using a SNPscan technique. GJB2 mutations were detected in 14.89% of Hui patients, 9.37% of Tibetan patients and 11.83% of Tu patients. The most prevalent GJB2 mutation in the Hui and Tu patients was c.235delC. In the Tibetan patients, the c.109G>A SNP exhibited the highest allele frequency. SLC26A4 mutations were detected in 10.64% of Hui patients, 6.25% of Tibetan patients, and 8.6% of Tu patients. The most common SLC26A4 mutation was c.919‑2A>Gin the Hui, Tibetan, and Tu patients, and the second most common SLC26A4 mutations in these patients were c.1517T>G, c.1226G>A andc.2168A>G, respectively. The mutation rates ofmtDNA12SrRNA in the Hui, Tibetan, and Tu patients were 1.06, 5.21, and 5.38%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that the mutation spectra of these deafness‑related genes are unique amongst these three ethnic groups. This information will be helpful in designing a protocol for genetic testing for deafness and for achieving accurate molecular diagnoses in northwest China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mutations of GJB2, SLC26A4, and mtDNA12SrRNA are the most common inherited causes of nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss (NSHL) in China, yet previous genetic screenings were mainly carried on patients with moderate-to-profound impairment. We aimed to detect the mutation frequencies in NSHL population within a more specified range of severity. Patients with profound NSHL who had undergone cochlear implantation in the Shandong Provincial Hospital (Shandong, China) were recruited. The majority ( n = 472) were between 0.7 and 6 years old, and the remaining ( n = 63) were between 6 and 70 years old. In total, 115 mutation alleles of the three genes were screened with SNP scan assay. Of the patients, 19.44% (104/535) were found to have GJB2 mutations, and the most common allele was c.235delC, followed by c.299_300delAT and c.109G>A. SLC26A4 mutations were detected in 13.46% patients (72/535), and the most common allele was c.919-2A>G (IVS7-2A>G), followed by c.1174A>T and c.2168A>G. Seven patients (1.31%) carried mutations in mtDNA12SrRNA, with the alleles of m.1555A>G and m.1494C>T. We found the allele frequency of c.109G>A ( GJB2) was relatively lower in the profound NSHL population in comparison to the moderate-to-profound ones, and the c.1174A>T ( SLC26A4) relatively higher. It suggests those mutations may be connected with the degree of deafness, which needs more observations and analyses to support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We retrospectively analyzed newborns with deafness gene mutations and summarized the relationship between genotype and phenotype to provide a basis for genetic counseling. We studied 582 subjects positive for deafness gene mutations that were treated in the otology outpatient department of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, between April 2012 and April 2016. The subjects were divided into 3 categories: a diagnosed group (group A), which was further subdivided into subgroups A1 (homozygous and compound heterozygous GJB2 mutations) and A2 (homozygous and compound heterozygous SLC26A4 mutations); a drug-induced deafness group (group B, mitochondrial (Mt) gene mutations); and a mutation carrier group (group C), which was further subdivided into the subgroups C1 (GJB2 heterozygous mutations), C2 (SLC26A4 heterozygous mutations), C3 (GJB3 heterozygous mutations), and C4 (double gene mutations). Partial sequences positive for GJB2 or SLC26A4 were sequenced and analyzed for mutations. Subjects underwent otoscopic examination and comprehensive audiological evaluation, and temporal bone computerized tomography and/or inner ear magnetic resonance imaging were performed. GJB2 235delC was the most common mutation locus. The highest proportion of deafness detected during universal newborn hearing screening was for drug-induced deafness, whereas the lowest was for the diagnosed group. GJB2 gene mutations mainly resulted in flat-type, profound-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). SLC26A4 gene mutation was mainly associated with high-frequency drop-type and profound-severe SNHL and was closely related to enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conclusion: Most of the cases with gene mutations of intra-cochlear etiology showed relatively good CI outcomes. To progress toward more solid evidence-based CI intervention, a greater number of reports including CI outcomes for specific gene mutations are desired. Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) is the most important and effective treatment for patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, the outcomes of CI vary among patients. One of the reasons of this heterogeneous outcome for cochlear implantation is thought to be the heterogeneous nature of hearing loss. Indeed, genetic factors, the most common etiology in severe-to-profound hearing loss, might be one of the key determinants of outcomes for CI and electric acoustic stimulation (EAS). Patients with genetic causes involving an 'intra-cochlear etiology show good CI/EAS outcomes. Review: This review article aimed to summarize the reports on CI/EAS outcomes in patients with special genetic causes as well as to assist in future clinical decision-making. Most of the cases were suspected of an intra-cochlear etiology, such as those with GJB2, SLC26A4, and OTOF mutations, which showed relatively good CI outcomes. However, there have only been a limited number of reports on patients with other gene mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The molecular etiology of nonsyndromic deafness in Chinese population has not been investigated systematically, our study is aim to investigate the molecular etiology of nonsyndromic deafness patients from Northern China (Heilongjiang province), in order to provide genetic test and counseling to families. Methods 380 unrelated patients with hearing loss who attended to the Department of Otolaryngology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were enrolled to our study. All patients were diagnosed with nonsyndromic deafness by audiologic evaluation, 202 normal-hearing individuals were taken as controls. Mutations in three common deafness-causing genes ( GJB2, SLC26A4 and 12S rRNA ) were screened by direct sequencing. Results Mutations (homozygote or compound heterozygote) in GJB2 accounted for 8.9% (34/380) of the patients, mutations in SLC26A4 accounted for 10.0% (38/380) of the patients screened. Only one case was found to carry 12S rRNA 1555A > G (1/380, 0.26%). Five types of mutations in GJB2 were identified, GJB2 235delC was the most prevalent mutation in our patient group (76/380, 20.0%), followed by 299-300delAT with a frequency of 7.4% (28/380). Two types of mutations in SLC26A4 were detected in our patient group (IVS7-2A > G and 2168A > G). IVS7-2A > G was identified in 27 patients (27/380, 7.1%) and 2168A > G was identified in 14 patients (14/380, 3.7%). Conclusions Our results demonstrate that 19.2% patients with nonsyndromic deafness were caused by mutations in three common deafness genes ( GJB2, SLC26A4 and 12S rRNA ) in our northern China patient group. GJB2 235delC was the most prevalent mutation, same as in the most Asian populations. These data enrich the database of deafness mutations and provide the standard for clinical diagnose, treatment and genetic counseling in Northern China population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hearing loss is the most common human genetic disorder caused by mutations in various genes. Current study was initiated to analyze the 20 most common mutations by MALDI-TOF-MS method in deafness-associated genes (GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4 and mitochondrial 12SrRNA) in 3,331 newborns from Anhui Province of China. The analysis of data revealed that variations in GJB2 has high frequency 2.82% while SLC26A4, GJB3, and mitochondrial 12SrRNA were found to have 2.49%, 0.42%, and 0.33% respectively. This study is conducted for the first time on newborns in Anhui province, China which confirms the significant role of mutations in etiology of deafness in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genetically caused nonsyndromic hearing loss is highly heterogeneous. Inspite of this large heterogeneity, mutations in the genes GJB2 , GJB6 and SLC26A4 are major contributors. The mutation spectrum of these genes varies among different ethnic groups. Only a handful of studies focused on the altered genetic signature of these genes in different demographic regions of India but never focused on the eastern part of the country. Our study for the first time aimed to characterize the mutation profile of these genes in hearing loss patients of West Bengal state, India. Mutations in GJB2 , GJB6 and SLC26A4 genes were screened by bidirectional sequencing from 215 congenital nonsyndromic hearing loss patients. Radiological diagnosis was performed in patients with SLC26A4 mutations by temporal bone CT scan. The study revealed that 4.65% and 6.97% patients had monoallelic and biallelic GJB2 mutations respectively. Six mutations were identified, p.W24X being the most frequent one accounting for 71.05% of the mutated alleles. Mutations in GJB6 including the previously identified deletion mutation (GJB6-D13S1830) were not identified in our study. Further, no patients harbored biallelic mutations in the SLC26A4 gene or the common inner ear malformation Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct (EVA). The mutation profile of GJB2 in our study is distinct from other parts of India, suggesting that the mutation spectrum of this gene varies with ethnicity and geographical origin. The absence of GJB6 mutations and low frequency of SLC26A4 mutations suggest that additional genetic factors may also contribute to this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conclusions: In the study population in northwest China, a total of 33.06% of deaf patients have inherited hearing impairment caused by GJB2, SLC26A4, and mtDNA 1555A>G mutations. The mutation frequencies of GJB2, SLC26A4, and mtDNA 1555A>G genes were 16.12%, 10.54%, and 6.4%, respectively, in our study cohort. Thus, screening is conventionally performed for GJB2, SLC26A4, and mtDNA 1555A>G in these populations. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the mutations of GJB2, mitochondrial DNA 12S rRNA1555A>G, and SLC26A4 genes in Han Chinese, Hui people, and Tibetan ethnicities in patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) in northwest China. Methods: A total of 484 unrelated subjects with hearing loss who attended special education schools in northwest China were enrolled in this study. Three prominent deafness-related genes, GJB2, SLC26A4, and mtDNA 1555A>G, were screened for mutations in our study cohort. Results: The mutation frequencies of GJB2, SLC26A4, and mtDNA 1555A>G genes were 16.12%, 10.54%, and 6.4%, respectively. The prevalence of GJB2 mutations was 17.52%, 15.35%, and 11.43% in Han Chinese, Hui people, and Tibetan participants, respectively. c.235delC was the most prevalent mutation, accounting for 65.71% of all GJB2 mutant alleles. The prevalence of SLC26A4 mutations was 12.39%, 8.84%, and 8.57% in Han Chinese, Hui people, and Tibetan participants, respectively. The c.919-2 A>G mutation was the most common form, accounting for 60.47% of all SLC26A4 mutant alleles. The prevalence of the homoplasmic mtDNA 1555A>G mutation was 8.97%, 3.72%, and 5.71% in Han Chinese, Hui people, and Tibetan participants, respectively, which represents a statistically significant difference between the Han Chinese and Hui people (χ2 = 5.118, p < 0.05). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hearing loss (HL) is a common genetically heterogeneous sensory disorder, occurring in 1 to 3 per 1000 live births. In spite of the extraordinary genetic heterogeneity, variants in GJB2, MT-RNR1, and SLC26A4 genes have been considered as the main reasons of nonsyndromic hearing loss in Chinese population. We developed a rapid multiplex genetic screening system called the SNPscan assay technique which could detect the 115 mutations of the above three genes. This technique is a high-throughput and cost-saving SNP genotyping method. We found that the carrier rate of mutations in the GJB2 gene, MT-RNR1 gene, and SLC26A4 gene was 26.21%, 1.86%, and 25.46% of the patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss, respectively. Using this method, up to 50% of the patients in our study were identified to have hereditary HL caused by mutations in the three genes. It is applicable to not only genetic diagnosis of HL, but also molecular screening of other inherited diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conclusions: The GJB2 gene mutation characteristic of Dongxiang was the interaction result of ethnic background and geographical environment, and Yugur exhibited the typical founder effect. The SLC26A4 gene mutation characteristic of Dongxiang was related to caucasian backgrounds and selection of purpose exons, i.e. ethnic background and the penetrance of ethnic specificity caused the low mtDNA1555A>G mutation frequency in Dongxiang. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of GJB2 and SLC26A4 genes and mtDNA1555A>G mutations and analyze the ethnic specificity in the non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (NSHL) of unique ethnic groups in Gansu Province. Methods: Peripheral blood samples were obtained from Dongxiang, Yugur, Bonan, and ethnic Han groups with moderately severe to profound NSHL in Gansu Province. Bidirectional sequencing (or enzyme digestion) was applied to identify the sequence variations. Results: The pathogenic allele frequency of the three gene mutations was different. The frequency of the GJB2 gene among the Dongxiang, Yugur, Bonan, and ethnic Han groups was 9.03%, 12.5%, 5.88%, and 12.17%, respectively. No difference was found between the ethnic groups. The frequencies of the SLC26A4 genes were 3.23%, 8.33%, 0%, and 9.81%, respectively. The mutation frequency of mtDNA1555A>G was 0%, 0%, 0%, and 6.03%, respectively. No difference was found between the ethnic groups, except for the Dongxiang and ethnic Han groups, both in SLC26A4 gene and mtDNA1555A>G. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The frequency and distribution of genetic mutations that cause deafness differ significantly according to ethnic group and region. Zhejiang is a province in the southeast of China, with an exceptional racial composition of the population caused by mass migration in ancient China. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prevalence and spectrum of gap junction-β2 (GJB2), solute carrier family 26 (anion exchanger) member 4 (SLC26A4) and GJB3 mutations in patients with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss (ARNHL) in this area. A total of 176 unrelated pediatric patients with ARNHL were enrolled in the study. A genomic DNA sample was extracted from the peripheral blood. Polymerase chain reaction was employed, and the products were sequenced to screen for mutations in GJB2. In addition, a SNaPshot sequencing method was utilized to detect four hotspot mutations in SLC26A4 (IVS7-2A>G and c.2168A>G) and GJB3 (c.538C>T and c.547G>A). All patients were subjected to a temporal bone computed tomography scan to identify enlarged vestibular aqueducts (EVA). In total, 14 different mutations, including two new mutations (p.W44L and p.D66N) of GJB2, were detected. The most common pathogenic mutation of GJB2 was c.235delC (15.1%), followed by c.176-191del16 (1.7%), c.299-300delAT (1.7%), c.508-511dup (0.85%) and c.35delG (0.28%) of the total alleles. Mutation analysis of SLC26A4 demonstrated that 13.6% (24/176) of patients carried at least one mutant allele. The patients with EVA (84.2%) had SLC26A4 mutations, and 31% had homozygous mutations. Only one patient carried a heterozygous mutation of GJB3 (c.538C>T). Compared with the other regions of China, in the present population cohort, the prevalence and spectrum of mutations in GJB2 was unique, and in patients with EVA the frequency of a homozygous mutation in SLC26A4 was significantly lower. These findings may be of benefit in genetic counseling and risk assessment for families from this area of China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Racial and regional factors are important for the clinical diagnosis of non-syndromic hearing impairment. Comprehensive genetic analysis of deaf patients in different regions of China must be performed to provide effective genetic counseling. To evaluate the mutational spectrum of south Chinese families, we performed genetic analysis for non-syndromic hearing impairment in this population. Methods: Complete clinical evaluations were performed on 701 unrelated patients with non-syndromic hearing impairment from six provinces in south China. Each subject was screened for common mutations, including SLC26A4 c.IVS7-2A > G, c.2168A > G; mitochondrial DNA m.1555A > G, m.1494C > T, m.7444G > A, m.7445A > G; GJB3 c.538C > T, c.547G > A; and WFS1 c.1901A > C, using pyrosequencing. GJB2 and SLC26A4 coding region mutation detection were performed using Sanger sequencing. Results: Genetic analysis revealed that among the etiology of non-syndromic hearing impairment, GJB2, SLC26A4, and mitochondrial m.1555A > G mutations accounted for 18.0%, 13.1%, and 0.9%, respectively. Common mutations included GJB2 c.235delC, c.109G > A, SLC26A4 c.IVS7-2A > G, c.1229 T > C, and mitochondrial m.1555A > G. The total mutation rate was 45.1% in all patients examined in south China. Overall, the clear contribution of GJB2, SLC26A4, and mitochondrial m.1555A > G to the etiology of the non-syndromic deafness population in south China was 32.0%. Conclusions: Our study is the first genetic analysis of non-syndromic hearing impairment in south China, and revealed that a clear genetic etiology accounted for 32.0% of non-syndromic hearing cases in patients from these regions. The mutational spectrum of non-syndromic hearing impairment in the south Chinese population provides useful and targeted information to aid in genetic counseling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: Newborn hearing screening (NHS) is used worldwide due to its feasibility and cost-efficiency. However, neonates with late-onset and progressive hearing impairment will be missed by NHS. Genetic factors account for an estimated 60% of congenital profound hearing loss. Our previous cohort studies were carried out in an innovative mode, i.e. hearing concurrent genetic screening, in newborns to improve the abilities or early diagnosis and intervention for the hearing defects. In this study, we performed the first clinical practice of this mode in Tianjin city. Methods: A large cohort of 58,397 neonates, born between December 2011 and December 2012, in 44 hospitals in Tianjin, were screened for 20 hot spot hearing loss associated mutations from GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4 and MTRNR1(12S rRNA). The data of genetic screening results was comprehensively analyzed with newborn hearing screening (NHS) results. Results: We developed an accurate, high throughput genetic screening method and applied it to a total of 58,397 newborns in Tianjin. 3225 (5.52%) infants were detected to carry at least one mutation allele in GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4 or MTRNR1. 34 (0.58‰) infants were positive for hearing loss caused by GJB2 or SLC26A4 mutations (homozygote or compound heterozygote). 54(0.93‰) infants are heterozygous of various genes. 109(1.87‰) infants had the pathological mitochondrial DNA mutation. Conclusion: Accurate, comprehensive hearing loss associated genetic screening can facilitate genetic counseling and provides valuable prognostic information to affected infants. This united screening mode of this study was a promising clinical practice. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: Previous epidemiological studies indicate that GJB2, SLC26A4 or mtDNA 12S rRNA mutations were chiefly responsible for the hearing loss in children. A cost-effective method for screening deafness-associated mutations at early age is needed. This study aimed to develop a simple kit for screening of high risk deafness-associated mutations in newborns using tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system PCR. Methods: The screening kit was designed to detect high risk deafness-associated mutations (GJB2 c.235delC, SLC26A4 c.919-2A>G, mtDNA 12S rRNA mt.1555A>G and mt.1494C>T). The kit was able to amplify both wild-type and mutant alleles with a control fragment. The proposed method was conducted to genotype the above four deafness gene mutations in four PCR reactions. Each mutation was genotyped by a set of four primers, two allele-specific inner primers, and two common outer primers. A mismatch at the penultimate or antepenult nucleotide of the 3′ terminus was introduced in order to maximize specificity. The 16 primers were used for the amplification of genomic DNA as a template. Amplified fragments were separated by electrophoresis. We designed and validated the kit with wild and mutant type DNA samples that had been previously been confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Then 1181 newborns were enrolled, and those samples with mutations were further validated with sequencing too. Results: Among 1181 newborns, 29 individuals had one or two mutant alleles, with the carrier rate being 2.46% (29/1181). For GJB2 c.235delC mutation, one case was homozygote and 12 cases were heterozygote carriers. For SLC26A4 c.919-2A>G mutation, 12 cases were heterozygotes carriers, and no homozygotes were found; for mtDNA 12S rRNA mt.1555A>G mutation, one case was identified; three cases of mtDNA 12S rRNA mt.1494C>T mutation were detected. All mutations were detected with high specificity. Mutation samples were confirmed via Sanger sequencing. No false positive was found. Conclusion: A user-friendly screening kit for deafness-associated mutations was successfully developed. It provided rapid, reproducible, and cost-effective detection of deafness gene mutation without special equipment. The kit allowed the detection of the four high risk deafness-associated mutations with only 4 single tube PCR reactions. In the future, the kit could be applied to large population-based epidemiological studies for newborn hearing defects screening. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Copyright of HNO is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of combining newborn hearing screening with screening for genetic mutations associated with deafness. Methods: Ten thousand forty-three newborn babies, born between December 2009 and April 2011 in Gansu province, China, were screened for hearing loss using the otoacoustic emissions test or automatic auditory brainstem response test and genetic mutations associated with deafness using a standard protocol. Results: In the hearing screening, the referral rate for hearing loss in the first-step screening was 14.4% (1409/9786), decreasing significantly to 3.8% (362/9506) upon retesting. After the second-step screening, a total of 537 newborns were lost to follow-up. The genetic screening found that about 2.29% (230/10,043) individuals carried one or more recessive risk alleles or the mitochondrial mutation. Among them, 18 babies had the pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutation, 92 babies were SLC26A4 heterozygote carriers, one case with both SLC26A4 and 12S rRNA 1555A>G mutation, 117 babies were GJB2 heterozygote carriers, and two babies were GJB2 homozygote carriers. However, 83.5% (192/230) neonates passed the conventional hearing screening among these carriers. Conclusions: It might be effective to complement the conventional hearing screening with gene screening for the purpose of early diagnosis and discovery of the late-onset hearing loss. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective. Bilateral nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss associated with inner ear malformation is closely related to genetics. SLC26A4 is considered to be the major involved gene. Recently, FOXI1 and KCNJ10 mutations have been linked to enlarged vestibular aqueducts and GJB2 mutations linked to temporal bone malformation. The authors aimed to investigate the mutation spectrums of these genes in Chinese patients with bilateral hearing impairment associated with inner ear malformation.Study Design. Cross-sectional study.Setting. Affiliated hospital of the university.Subjects and Methods. The authors analyzed the GJB2, SLC26A4, FOXI1, and KCNJ10 gene sequences in 43 patients presenting with bilateral hearing impairment associated with inner ear malformation using pyrosequencing and direct DNA sequencing.Results. In total, 74.4% (32/43) of patients carried at least 1 of 14 pathogenic SLC26A4 mutations, including 6 novel mutations and 4 polymorphisms. Patients with enlarged vestibular aqueducts had a higher rate of SLC26A4 mutation than Mondini dysplasia patients. No FOXI1 or KCNJ10 potential pathogenic mutation was present, and GJB2 biallelic pathogenic mutations were uncommon (2.3%; 1/43). No significant correlation was observed between the genotype and phenotype of SLC26A4 mutations.Conclusion. SLC26A4 accounts for 74.4% of inner ear malformations in our cohort, whereas FOXI1, KCNJ10, and GJB2 mutations are not common. Other possible genes or external factors may contribute to this multibranch abnormality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the molecular etiologic causes of sporadic nonsyndromic hearing loss in Chinese children. Methods: 179 sporadic nonsyndromic hearing loss children were subjected to microarray-based mutation detection for nine hot spot mutations in four of the most common deafness-related genes, including GJB2, SLC26A4, GJB3, and 12s rRNA. Results: The incidence of positive genetic errors was 43.58% with the current set of target genes in sporadic nonsyndromic hearing loss children. Among them, 25.14% of cases had genetic defects in GJB2, 16.76% of cases had pathogenic mutations in SLC26A4, 1.12% of cases were caused by 12s rRNA mutations, and GJB3 mutation was detected in 0.56% of this group of patients. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that genetic factors were important causes for sporadic nonsyndromic hearing loss in Chinese pediatric cases. Mutations of GJB2 and SLC26A4 are two major genetic causes, whereas mutations of GJB3 and 12s rRNA result in the development of hearing loss in a small percentage of sporadic nonsyndromic hearing loss cases. Microarray testing is a helpful and instrumental screening method in the diagnosis of genetic hearing loss. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Conclusions: Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of bilateral and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in children, accounting for 9.0% of SNHL cases. The diagnostic rate using combined genetic deafness test and CMV DNA detection test was determined to be 46.4% in bilateral profound SNHL. Objectives. The present study investigated the prevalence of congenital CMV infection diagnosed retrospectively by detection of CMV DNA in dried umbilical cord specimens from children with unilateral or bilateral SNHL up to the age of 12 years. Methods: Preserved dried umbilical cords were collected from 134 children with bilateral (46 children) or unilateral (88 children) SNHL. DNA was extracted from the dried umbilical cords and CMV DNA was detected by quantitative PCR. Genetic deafness tests based on the invader assay were performed in children with bilateral SNHL. Results: CMV DNA from the dried umbilical cords was detected in 8.7% of the bilateral SNHL and 9.1% of unilateral SNHL. Deafness gene mutations were identified in 21.7% (10/46) of children with bilateral SNHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Hearing loss is the most frequent sensory disorder involving a multitude of factors, and at least 50% of cases are due to genetic etiology. To further characterize the molecular etiology of hearing loss in the Chinese population, we recruited a total of 135 unrelated patients with nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss (NSHL) for mutational screening of GJB2, GJB3, GJB6, SLC26A4, SLC26A5 IVS2 2A>G and mitochondrial 12SrRNA, tRNASer(UCN) by PCR amplification and direct DNA sequencing. The carrier frequencies of deafness causing mutations in these patients were 35.55% in GJB2, 3.70% in GJB6, 15.56% in SLC26A4 and 8.14% in mitochondrial 12SrRNA, re spectively. The results indicate the necessity of genetic screening for mutations of these causative genes in Chi nese population with nonsyndromic hearing loss. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives/Hypothesis: To explore the genetic characteristics of children with cochlear implants (CIs) and to correlate the auditory performance after implantation to the genetic diagnosis of children with CIs. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: Mutations of four common deafness-associated genes, GJB2, SLC26A4, the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene, and OTOF, were screened in 743 unrelated children with idiopathic sensorineural hearing impairment, including 180 and 563 children with and without CIs, respectively. The allele frequencies and audiologic features were compared between both groups. The Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) scores at 3 years after implantation were then analyzed according to the genotypes. Results: A definitive genetic diagnosis was made in 37 (20.6%) of the 180 CI children. A significant difference in allele frequencies between CI and non-CI children was found inGJB2 mutations (chi-square test, P < .01), but not in SLC26A4 mutations, mitochondrial 12S rRNA mutations, or OTOF mutations (all P > .05). Further analysis revealed that the difference might have resulted from distinct audiological features in each group. Among the 110 CI children who had received more than 3 years of rehabilitation after implantation, the 35 children with mutations had better CAP scores than the 75 children withoutmutations. Conclusions: A significant prevalence of genetic mutations was identified in children with CIs, suggesting the need for routine genetic assessments. The frequencies of common deafness-associated mutations were different between children with and without CIs. The presence of genetic mutations was associated with an excellent long-term auditory performance outcome after implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: Newborn hearing screening has been widely adopted and made an achievement to some degree. Current screening protocols rely solely on detecting existing auditory disorders at the time of screening and are unable to identify individuals susceptible to auditory disorders in later life. Even if the hearing loss newborn is referred, most cases could not be diagnosed until 6–12 months old with no etiology being elucidated. This study reports the first effort to combine traditional hearing screening with genetic screening to improve the efficacy of newborn hearing screening. Methods: This study was undertaken in 12 regional hospitals located in 11 provinces of China. 14,913 newborn babies received hearing concurrent genetic screening. The hearing screening was performed with OAE or AABR. Blood sample was collected with a universal newborn genetic screening card. And three common gene, mtDNA 12S rRNA, GJB2 and SLC26A4 were screened with standard protocol. Results: Among all the 14,913 newborns, 86.1% (12,837/14,913) individuals passed the first-step hearing screening, 7.8% (1168/14,913) babies passed only one side, and the other 6.1% (908/14,913) were bilaterally referred. Gene screening found 306 individuals had one or two mutant alleles, the carrier rate is 2.05% (306/14,913) among the entire newborn population. The risk for hearing loss was 100% (7/7) for those newborns carrying causative GJB2 or SLC26A4 mutations (homozygotes or compound heterozygotes), 14.4% (23/160) for GJB2 heterozygote carriers, 12.3% (15/122) for SLC26A2 heterozygous carriers, and the total prevalence of referral hearing screening was approximately 14.7% (45/306). However, 85.3% (261/306) newborns passed hearing screening among these carriers including 18 newborns with 12S rRNA mt.1555A>G pathogenic mutation, who would suffer from sudden hearing loss once applying aminoglycoside drugs. Conclusion: The cohort studies provided the essential population parameters for developing effective programs for hearing care of newborns in China. Hearing concurrent gene screening in newborns may confirm the abnormal results from hearing screening tests, help to find the etiologic of the hearing loss, and better recognize infants at risk for late-onset hearing loss occurring prior to speech and language development. In conclusion, a survey on 14,913 Chinese newborns proved that concurrent genetic screening could improve newborn hearing screening for hearing defects. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Hearing loss (HL) is the most prevalent sensory defect affecting 1 in 500 neonates. Genetic factors are involved in half of the cases. The extreme heterogeneity of HL makes it difficult to analyze and determine the accurate genetic causes of the impairment. Up to now, 10 genes, namely, GJB2, GJB6, SLC26A4, TECTA, PJVK, Col11A2, Myo15A, TMC1, RDX and microRNA (miR-183), have been studied in an Iranian population. The prevalence of HL in Iran was estimated to be 2-3 times higher than that in other parts of the world. Here, the most common bases of congenital nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) are discussed. We reviewed GJB2, GJB6 (large deletion), TECTA, SLC26A4 and PEJVK mutations, and studied their frequencies and distributions in different ethnic groups in 1934, 500, 121, 80 and 34 unrelated families throughout Iran, respectively. GJB2 mutation was the most common factor causing NSHL, with a mean frequency of 18.17% in the Iranian population. The importance of Iran's geographical location in the migration pathway from west to east through the silk route was also highlighted. SLC26A4 and TECTA mutations were the second and third main reasons of HL and accounted for up to 10 and 4% of prelingual HL in Iran, respectively. Mutations in GJB2, SLC26, TECTA and PJVK genes have an important role in HL in Iran and a screening test should be generated for better intervention and diagnosis programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sensorineural hearing impairment is a common sensory deficit in children and more than 50% of these cases are caused by genetic etiologies, that is, hereditary hearing impairment (HHI). Recent advances in genomic medicine have revolutionized the diagnostics of, and counseling for, HHI, including preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), thus providing parents-to-be with better reproductive choices. Over the past decade, we have performed PGD using the amplification refractory mutation system quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) technique in 11 couples with a history of HHI, namely eight with GJB2 variants, one with OTOF variants, one with SLC26A4 variants, and one with an MITF variant. We demonstrated that PGD can be successfully applied to HHI of different inheritance modes, namely autosomal dominant or recessive, and phenotypes, namely syndromic or non-syndromic HHI. However, certain ethical concerns warrant scrutiny before PGD can be widely applied to at-risk couples with a history of HHI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hearing loss (HL) is the most common neurosensory defect in humans that affects the normal communication. Disease is clinically and genetically heterogeneous, rendering challenges for the molecular diagnosis of affected subjects. This study highlights the phenotypic and genetic complexity of inherited HL in a large consanguineous Pakistan kindred. Audiological evaluation of all affected individuals revealed varying degree of mild to profound sensorineural HL. Whole exome (WES) of four family members followed by Sanger sequencing revealed candidate disease-associated variants in five known deafness genes: GJB2 (c.231G>A; p.(Trp77 *)), SLC26A4 (c.1337A>G; p.(Gln446Arg)), CDH23 (c.2789C>T; p.(Pro930Leu)), KCNQ4 (c.1672G>A; p.(Val558Met)) and MPDZ (c.4124T>C; p.(Val1375Ala)). All identified variants replaced evolutionary conserved residues, were either absent or had low frequencies in the control databases. Our in silico and 3-Dimensional (3D) protein topology analyses support the damaging impact of identified variants on the encoded proteins. However, except for the previously established "pathogenic" and "likely pathogenic" categories for the c.231G>A (p.(Trp77 *)) allele of GJB2 and c.1377A>G (p.(Gln446Arg)) of SLC26A4, respectively, all the remaining identified variants were classified as "uncertain significance" based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant pathogenicity guidelines. Our study highlights the complexity of genetic traits in consanguineous families, and the need of combining the functional studies even with the comprehensive profiling of multiple family members to improve the genetic diagnosis in complex inbred families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate epidemiological data on common deafness genes are essential to improve the efficiency and to reduce the cost of molecular diagnosis. They may depend on several factors, including a clear delineation of the source of patients being studied. In the present study, we hypothesize that patients with idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss recruited from different sources might reveal discrepancies in the epidemiological results of genetic screening, because patients from different sources might demonstrate distinct clinical or audiologic features and thus result in biased selection of subjects. To elucidate the relative importance of common deafness genes in Taiwanese and to verify our hypothesis, we conducted a prospective project screening mutations in GJB2, SLC26A4 and mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene in a total of 420 Taiwanese families with idiopathic bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, of which 325 families were recruited from hospitals and 95 from hearing rehabilitation facilities. Allele frequencies of common mutations in these three genes and distributions of the corresponding genotypes were then compared between the two groups. The allele frequencies of mutations in SLC26A4, GJB2 and mitochondrial 12S rRNA in the probands of the 420 families were 14.4, 21.7 and 3.8%, respectively. The allele frequency of SLC26A4 mutations in the hospital group was significantly higher than that in the rehabilitation facility group (16.2 vs. 8.4%, χ2-test, p < 0.05), whereas no difference in the frequencies of GJB2 mutations and mitochondrial 12S rRNA mutations was found between the two groups. Distributions of probands classified by SLC26A4 genotypes were also different between the two groups (χ2-test, p < 0.05). Accordingly, a discrepancy in the genetic screening results might exist between different sources of idiopathic hearing-impaired patients. Further analysis of audiological results and construction of a logistic regression model showed that different audiological features, namely hearing levels and hearing loss patterns, might be responsible for the unequal distributions of mutations and probands between the hospital and rehabilitation facility groups. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discovery of deafness genes has progressed but clinical application lags because of the genetic heterogeneity. To establish clinical application strategy, we reviewed the frequency and spectrum of mutations found in Japanese hearing loss patients and compared them to those in populations of European ancestry. Screening revealed that in Japanese, mutations in GJB2, SLC26A4, and CDH23, and the mitochondrial 12S rRNA are the major causes of hearing loss. Also, mutations in KCNQ4, TECTA, COCH, WFS1, CRYM, COL9A3, and KIAA1199 were found in independent autosomal dominant families. Interestingly, spectrums of GJB2, SLC26A4, and CDH23 mutations in Japanese were quite different from those in Europeans. Simultaneous screening of multiple deafness mutations based on the mutation spectrum of a corresponding population using an Invader panel revealed that approximately 30% of subjects could be diagnosed. This assay will enable us to detect deafness mutations in an efficient and practical manner in the clinical platform. We conclude that specific racial populations may have unique deafness gene epidemiologies; therefore, ethnic background should be considered when genetic testing is performed. Simultaneous examination of multiple mutations based on a population's spectrum may be appropriate and effective for detecting deafness genes, facilitating precise clinical diagnosis, appropriate counseling, and proper management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe temporal bone findings on computed tomography (CT) imaging in GJB2-related hearing loss (HL). We asked whether evaluation of the temporal bone is required in individuals with biallelic GJB2 mutations. Study Design: Randomized, blinded, controlled, prospective measurement. Methods: Blood from 264 pediatric cochlear implant users was analyzed for mutations in the GJB2 gene. Thirty-six aspects of the temporal bone on CT imaging were evaluated in 53 individuals (106 ears) with biallelic disease causing GJB2 mutations. A subset of patients was age matched and compared with normally hearing individuals. Subjects with biallelic GJB2 mutations were tested for mutations in the SLC26A4 gene to rule out Pendred syndrome as a confounding cause of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Results: Approximately 53% of ears of subjects (72% of subjects) with biallelic GJB2 mutations had at least one temporal bone anomaly. The most common findings were 1) dilated endolymphatic fossa (28%); 2) hypoplastic modiolus (25%); 3) large vestibular aqueduct (8%); 4) hypoplastic horizontal semicircular canal (8%); 5) hypoplastic cochlea (4%). Compared with normally hearing individuals, the GJB2 group had hypoplasia of the cochlear nerve canal, lateral semicircular canal vestibule, internal auditory canal ( t tests, P < .001), and were 11 times more likely to have a hypoplastic modiolus. Dilated endolymphatic fossae were 1.4 times more common in the GJB2 group, and large vestibular aqueducts were 3 times more common in the GJB2 group, as compared with normally hearing controls. Conclusions: Temporal bone anomalies are common in GJB2-related HL, and imaging of the temporal bone should be included in routine evaluation of these individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent advances in the molecular biology of hearing and deafness are being transferred from the research laboratory to the clinical arena. This transfer of knowledge will enhance patient care by making the diagnosis of hereditary deafness easier; however physicians and audiologists must clearly identify that subset of the deaf and hearing populations best served by this knowledge. It is also essential for physicians and audiologists to understand the limitations of genetic testing for deafness, and it is imperative that these limitations be appropriately explained to patients and their families.: Learning outcomesThe reader will be introduced to the concept of genetic testing for deafness. Two genes that make appreciable contributions to the autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness (ARNSD) genetic load will be reviewed, GJB2 and SLC26A4. In addition, the unique aspects of genetic counseling for deafness and recurrence chance estimates are explained. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]