Search

Simple Summary: The size of the reference population is critical to the accuracy of genomic prediction. In addition, joining the reference populations from different breeding organizations is a convenient and effective method by which to enlarge reference populations. By adding the Nordic Holstein reference population to the Chinese Holstein reference population, we found that the accuracy of genomic prediction in the Chinese Holstein population was improved substantially for the traits with high or moderate genetic correlation between the two populations; however, the low-genetic-correlation traits did not improve. These findings are important for the purposes of multi-country joint genomic evaluation. The size of the reference population is critical in order to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction. Indeed, improving genomic prediction accuracy by combining multinational reference populations has proven to be effective. In this study, we investigated the improvement of genomic prediction accuracy in seven complex traits (i.e., milk yield; fat yield; protein yield; somatic cell count; body conformation; feet and legs; and mammary system conformation) by combining the Chinese and Nordic Holstein reference populations. The estimated genetic correlations between the Chinese and Nordic Holstein populations are high with respect to protein yield, fat yield, and milk yield—whereby these correlations range from 0.621 to 0.720—and are moderate with respect to somatic cell count (0.449), but low for the three conformation traits (which range from 0.144 to 0.236). When utilizing the joint reference data and a two-trait GBLUP model, the genomic prediction accuracy in the Chinese Holsteins improves considerably with respect to the traits with moderate-to-high genetic correlations, whereas the improvement in Nordic Holsteins is small. When compared with the single population analysis, using the joint reference population for genomic prediction in younger animals, results in a 2.3 to 8.1 percent improvement in accuracy. Meanwhile, 10 replications of five-fold cross-validation were also implemented in order to evaluate the performance of joint genomic prediction, thereby resulting in a 1.6 to 5.2 percent increase in accuracy. With respect to joint genomic prediction, the bias was found to be quite low. However, for traits with low genetic correlations, the joint reference data do not improve the prediction accuracy substantially for either population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A better understanding of the genetic architecture underlying complex traits (e.g., the distribution of causal variants and their effects) may aid in the genomic prediction. Here, we hypothesized that the genomic variants of complex traits might be enriched in a subset of genomic regions defined by genes grouped on the basis of "Gene Ontology" (GO), and that incorporating this independent biological information into genomic prediction models might improve their predictive ability. Results: Four complex traits (i.e., milk, fat and protein yields, and mastitis) together with imputed sequence variants in Holstein (HOL) and Jersey (JER) cattle were analysed. We first carried out a post-GWAS analysis in a HOL training population to assess the degree of enrichment of the association signals in the gene regions defined by each GO term. We then extended the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model (GBLUP) to a genomic feature BLUP (GFBLUP) model, including an additional genomic effect quantifying the joint effect of a group of variants located in a genomic feature. The GBLUP model using a single random effect assumes that all genomic variants contribute to the genomic relationship equally, whereas GFBLUP attributes different weights to the individual genomic relationships in the prediction equation based on the estimated genomic parameters. Our results demonstrate that the immune-relevant GO terms were more associated with mastitis than milk production, and several biologically meaningful GO terms improved the prediction accuracy with GFBLUP for the four traits, as compared with GBLUP. The improvement of the genomic prediction between breeds (the average increase across the four traits was 0.161) was more apparent than that it was within the HOL (the average increase across the four traits was 0.020). Conclusions: Our genomic feature modelling approaches provide a framework to simultaneously explore the genetic architecture and genomic prediction of complex traits by taking advantage of independent biological knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]