Search

Genome sequencing (GS) has demonstrated high diagnostic yield in pediatric patients with complex, clinically heterogeneous presentations. Emerging evidence shows generally favorable experiences for patients and families receiving GS. As a result, implementation of GS in pediatrics is gaining momentum. To inform implementation, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the personal utility of GS for parents of children with medical complexity (CMC). GS was performed at an academic tertiary-care center for CMC for whom a genetic etiology was suspected. Following the return of GS results, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 parents about their child's diagnostic journey. Of the children whose parents were interviewed, six children received a diagnosis, two received a possible diagnosis, and six did not receive a diagnosis. A predominantly deductive thematic analysis approach to the interview data was used by applying Kohler's personal utility framework to understand affective, cognitive, behavioral and social impacts of GS. Both the diagnosed and undiagnosed groups experienced enhanced emotion-focused coping (affective). The diagnosed group experienced favorable utility related to knowledge of condition (cognitive) and communication with relatives (behavioral). A domain beyond Kohler's framework related to the presence or absence of GS impact on medical management was also described by parents. The deployment of GS late in the diagnostic odyssey and the limited knowledge available for the rare genetic disorders diagnosed in this cohort appeared to diminish the perceived utility of GS. As GS capabilities continue to evolve at a rapid pace and become available earlier in the diagnostic journey, it is important to consider the impact and timing of testing on parents of CMC.

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder caused by loss or deficient expression of UBE3A on the maternally inherited allele. In 10-15% of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of AS, a molecular diagnosis cannot be established with conventional testing. We describe a 13-year-old male with an atypical presentation of AS, who was found to have a novel, maternally inherited, intronic variant in UBE3A (c.3-12T>A) using genome sequencing (GS). Targeted sequencing of RNA isolated from blood confirmed the creation of a new acceptor splice site. These GS results ended a six-year diagnostic odyssey and revealed a 50% recurrence risk for the unaffected parents. This case illustrates a previously unreported splicing variant causing AS. Intronic variants identifiable by GS may account for a proportion of individuals who are suspected of having well-known genetic disorders despite negative prior genetic testing.

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as a first-tier diagnostic test could transform medical genetic assessments, but there are limited data regarding its clinical use. We previously showed that WGS could feasibly be deployed as a single molecular test capable of a higher diagnostic rate than current practices, in a prospectively recruited cohort of 100 children meeting criteria for chromosomal microarray analysis. In this study, we report on the added diagnostic yield with re-annotation and reanalysis of these WGS data ~2 years later. Explanatory variants have been discovered in seven (10.9%) of 64 previously undiagnosed cases, in emerging disease genes like HMGA2. No new genetic diagnoses were made by any other method in the interval period as part of ongoing clinical care. The results increase the cumulative diagnostic yield of WGS in the study cohort to 41%. This represents a greater than 5-fold increase over the chromosomal microarrays, and a greater than 3-fold increase over all the clinical genetic testing ordered in practice. These findings highlight periodic reanalysis as yet another advantage of genomic sequencing in heterogeneous disorders. We recommend reanalysis of an individual’s genome-wide sequencing data every 1–2 years until diagnosis, or sooner if their phenotype evolves.

Purpose: RAC3 is an underexamined member of the Rho GTPase gene family that is expressed in the developing brain and linked to key cellular functions. De novo missense variants in the homolog RAC1 were recently associated with developmental disorders. In the RAC subfamily, transforming missense changes at certain shared residues have been observed in human cancers and previously characterized in experimental studies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether constitutional dysregulation of RAC3 is associated with human disease. Methods: We discovered a RAC3 variant in the index case using genome sequencing, and searched for additional variants using international data-sharing initiatives. Functional effects of the variants were assessed using a multifaceted approach generalizable to most clinical laboratory settings. Results: We rapidly identified five individuals with de novo monoallelic missense variants in RAC3, including one recurrent change. Every participant had severe intellectual disability and brain malformations. In silico protein modeling, and prior in vivo and in situ experiments, supported a transforming effect for each of the three different RAC3 variants. All variants were observed in databases of somatic variation in cancer. Conclusions: Missense variants in RAC3 cause a novel brain disorder, likely through a mechanism of constitutive protein activation.