Search

INTRODUCTION Although much effort has been devoted to studying yeast in the past few decades, our understanding of this model organism is still limited. Rapidly developing DNA synthesis techniques have made a “build-to-understand” approach feasible to reengineer on the genome scale. Here, we report on the completion of a 770-kilobase synthetic yeast chromosome II (synII). SynII was characterized using extensive Trans-Omics tests. Despite considerable sequence alterations, synII is virtually indistinguishable from wild type. However, an up-regulation of translational machinery was observed and can be reversed by restoring the transfer RNA (tRNA) gene copy number. RATIONALE Following the “design-build-test-debug” working loop, synII was successfully designed and constructed in vivo. Extensive Trans-Omics tests were conducted, including phenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, chromosome segregation, and replication analyses. By both complementation assays and SCRaMbLE (synthetic chromosome rearrangement and modification by loxP -mediated evolution), we targeted and debugged the origin of a growth defect at 37°C in glycerol medium. RESULTS To efficiently construct megabase-long chromosomes, we developed an I- Sce I–mediated strategy, which enables parallel integration of synthetic chromosome arms and reduced the overall integration time by 50% for synII. An I- Sce I site is introduced for generating a double-strand break to promote targeted homologous recombination during mitotic growth. Despite hundreds of modifications introduced, there are still regions sharing substantial sequence similarity that might lead to undesirable meiotic recombinations when intercrossing the two semisynthetic chromosome arm strains. Induction of the I- Sce I–mediated double-strand break is otherwise lethal and thus introduced a strong selective pressure for targeted homologous recombination. Since our strategy is designed to generate a markerless synII and leave the URA3 marker on the wild-type chromosome, we observed a tenfold increase in URA3 -deficient colonies upon I- Sce I induction, meaning that our strategy can greatly bias the crossover events toward the designated regions. By incorporating comprehensive phenotyping approaches at multiple levels, we demonstrated that synII was capable of powering the growth of yeast indistinguishably from wild-type cells (see the figure), showing highly consistent biological processes comparable to the native strain. Meanwhile, we also noticed modest but potentially significant up-regulation of the translational machinery. The main alteration underlying this change in expression is the deletion of 13 tRNA genes. A growth defect was observed in one very specific condition—high temperature (37°C) in medium with glycerol as a carbon source—where colony size was reduced significantly. We targeted and debugged this defect by two distinct approaches. The first approach involved phenotype screening of all intermediate strains followed by a complementation assay with wild-type sequences in the synthetic strain. By doing so, we identified a modification resulting from PCRTag recoding in TSC10 , which is involved in regulation of the yeast high-osmolarity glycerol (HOG) response pathway. After replacement with wild-type TSC10 , the defect was greatly mitigated. The other approach, debugging by SCRaMbLE, showed rearrangements in regions containing HOG regulation genes. Both approaches indicated that the defect is related to HOG response dysregulation. Thus, the phenotypic defect can be pinpointed and debugged through multiple alternative routes in the complex cellular interactome network. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that synII segregates, replicates, and functions in a highly similar fashion compared with its wild-type counterpart. Furthermore, we believe that the iterative “design-build-test-debug” cycle methodology, established here, will facilitate progression of the Sc2.0 project in the face of the increasing synthetic genome complexity. SynII characterization. ( A ) Cell cycle comparison between synII and BY4741 revealed by the percentage of cells with separated CEN2-GFP dots, metaphase spindles, and anaphase spindles. ( B ) Replication profiling of synII (red) and BY4741 (black) expressed as relative copy number by deep sequencing. ( C ) RNA sequencing analysis revealed that the significant up-regulation of translational machinery in synII is induced by the deletion of tRNA genes in synII.

INTRODUCTION Total synthesis of designer chromosomes and genomes is a new paradigm for the study of genetics and biological systems. The Sc2.0 project is building a designer yeast genome from scratch to test and extend the limits of our biological knowledge. Here we describe the design, rapid assembly, and characterization of synthetic chromosome VI (synVI). Further, we investigate the phenotypic, transcriptomic, and proteomic consequences associated with consolidation of three synthetic chromosomes–synVI, synIII, and synIXR—into a single poly-synthetic strain. RATIONALE A host of Sc2.0 chromosomes, including synVI, have now been constructed in discrete strains. With debugging steps, where the number of bugs scales with chromosome length, all individual synthetic chromosomes have been shown to power yeast cells to near wild-type (WT) fitness. Testing the effects of Sc2.0 chromosome consolidation to uncover possible synthetic genetic interactions and/or perturbations of native cellular networks as the number of designer changes increases is the next major step for the Sc2.0 project. RESULTS SynVI was rapidly assembled using nine sequential steps of SwAP-In (switching auxotrophies progressively by integration), yielding a ~240-kb synthetic chromosome designed to Sc2.0 specifications. We observed partial silencing of the left- and rightmost genes on synVI, each newly positioned subtelomerically relative to their locations on native VI. This result suggests that consensus core X elements of Sc2.0 universal telomere caps are insufficient to fully buffer telomere position effects. The synVI strain displayed a growth defect characterized by an increased frequency of glycerol-negative colonies. The defect mapped to a synVI design feature in the essential PRE4 gene ( YFR050C ), encoding the β7 subunit of the 20 S proteasome. Recoding 10 codons near the 3′ end of the PRE4 open reading frame (ORF) caused a ~twofold reduction in Pre4 protein level without affecting RNA abundance. Reverting the codons to the WT sequence corrected both the Pre4 protein level and the phenotype. We hypothesize that the formation of a stem loop involving recoded codons underlies reduced Pre4 protein level. Sc2.0 chromosomes (synI to synXVI) are constructed individually in discrete strains and consolidated into poly-synthetic (poly-syn) strains by “endoreduplication intercross.” Consolidation of synVI with synthetic chromosomes III (synIII) and IXR (synIXR) yields a triple-synthetic (triple-syn) strain that is ~6% synthetic overall—with almost 70 kb deleted, including 20 tRNAs, and more than 12 kb recoded. Genome sequencing of double-synthetic (synIII synVI, synIII synIXR, synVI synIXR) and triple-syn (synIII synVI synIXR) cells indicates that suppressor mutations are not required to enable coexistence of Sc2.0 chromosomes. Phenotypic analysis revealed a slightly slower growth rate for the triple-syn strain only; the combined effect of tRNA deletions on different chromosomes might underlie this result. Transcriptome and proteome analyses indicate that cellular networks are largely unperturbed by the existence of multiple synthetic chromosomes in a single cell. However, a second bug on synVI was discovered through proteomic analysis and is associated with alteration of the HIS2 transcription start as a consequence of tRNA deletion and loxPsym site insertion. Despite extensive genetic alterations across 6% of the genome, no major global changes were detected in the poly-syn strain “omics” analyses. CONCLUSION Analyses of phenotypes, transcriptomics, and proteomics of synVI and poly-syn strains reveal, in general, WT cell properties and the existence of rare bugs resulting from genome editing. Deletion of subtelomeres can lead to gene silencing, recoding deep within an ORF can yield a translational defect, and deletion of elements such as tRNA genes can lead to a complex transcriptional output. These results underscore the complementarity of transcriptomics and proteomics to identify bugs, the consequences of designer changes in Sc2.0 chromosomes. The consolidation of Sc2.0 designer chromosomes into a single strain appears to be exceptionally well tolerated by yeast. A predictable exception to this is the deletion of tRNAs, which will be restored on a separate neochromosome to avoid synthetic lethal genetic interactions between deleted tRNA genes as additional synthetic chromosomes are introduced. Debugging synVI and characterization of poly-synthetic yeast cells. ( A ) The second Sc2.0 chromosome to be constructed, synVI, encodes a “bug” that causes a variable colony size, dubbed a “glycerol-negative growth-suppression defect.” ( B ) Synonymous changes in the essential PRE4 ORF lead to a reduced protein level, which underlies the growth defect. ( C ) The poly-synthetic strain synIII synVI synIXR directs growth of yeast cells to near WT fitness levels.

INTRODUCTION The overall organization of budding yeast chromosomes is driven and regulated by four factors: (i) the tethering and clustering of centromeres at the spindle pole body; (ii) the loose tethering of telomeres at the nuclear envelope, where they form small, dynamic clusters; (iii) a single nucleolus in which the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) cluster is sequestered from other chromosomes; and (iv) chromosomal arm lengths. Hi-C, a genomic derivative of the chromosome conformation capture approach, quantifies the proximity of all DNA segments present in the nuclei of a cell population, unveiling the average multiscale organization of chromosomes in the nuclear space. We exploited Hi-C to investigate the trajectories of synthetic chromosomes within the Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleus and compare them with their native counterparts. RATIONALE The Sc2.0 genome design specifies strong conservation of gene content and arrangement with respect to the native chromosomal sequence. However, synthetic chromosomes incorporate thousands of designer changes, notably the removal of transfer RNA genes and repeated sequences such as transposons and subtelomeric repeats to enhance stability. They also carry loxPsym sites, allowing for inducible genome SCRaMbLE (synthetic chromosome rearrangement and modification by loxP -mediated evolution) aimed at accelerating genomic plasticity. Whether these changes affect chromosome organization, DNA metabolism, and fitness is a critical question for completion of the Sc2.0 project. To address these questions, we used Hi-C to characterize the organization of synthetic chromosomes. RESULTS Comparison of synthetic chromosomes with native counterparts revealed no substantial changes, showing that the redesigned sequences, and especially the removal of repeated sequences, had little or no effect on average chromosome trajectories. Sc2.0 synthetic chromosomes have Hi-C contact maps with much smoother contact patterns than those of native chromosomes, especially in subtelomeric regions. This improved “mappability” results directly from the removal of repeated elements all along the length of the synthetic chromosomes. These observations highlight a conceptual advance enabled by bottom-up chromosome synthesis, which allows refinement of experimental systems to make complex questions easier to address. Despite the overall similarity, differences were observed in two instances. First, deletion of the HML and HMR silent mating-type cassettes on chromosome III led to a loss of their specific interaction. Second, repositioning the large array of rDNA repeats nearer to the centromere cluster forced substantial genome-wide conformational changes—for instance, inserting the array in the middle of the small right arm of chromosome III split the arm into two noninteracting regions. The nucleolus structure was then trapped in the middle between small and large chromosome arms, imposing a physical barrier between them. In addition to describing the Sc2.0 chromosome organization, we also used Hi-C to identify chromosomal rearrangements resulting from SCRaMbLE experiments. Inducible recombination between the hundreds of loxPsym sites introduced into Sc2.0 chromosomes enables combinatorial rearrangements of the genome structure. Hi-C contact maps of two SCRaMbLE strains carrying synIII and synIXR chromosomes revealed a variety of cis events, including simple deletions, inversions, and duplications, as well as translocations, the latter event representing a class of trans SCRaMbLE rearrangements not previously observed. CONCLUSION This large data set is a resource that will be exploited in future studies exploring the power of the SCRaMbLE system. By investigating the trajectories of Sc2.0 chromosomes in the nuclear space, this work paves the way for future studies addressing the influence of genome-wide engineering approaches on essential features of living systems. Synthetic chromosome organization. ( A ) Hi-C contact maps of synII and native (wild-type, WT) chromosome II. Red arrowheads point to filtered bins (white vectors) that are only present in the native chromosome map. kb, kilobases. ( B ) Three-dimensional (3D) representations of Hi-C maps of strains carrying rDNA either on synXII or native chromosome III. ( C ) Contact maps and 3D representations of synIXR (yellow) and synIII (pink) before (left) and after (right) SCRaMbLE . Translocation breakpoints are indicated by green and blue arrowheads.

INTRODUCTION The Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2.0 project (Sc2.0) aims to modify the yeast genome with a series of densely spaced designer changes. Both a synthetic yeast chromosome arm (synIXR) and the entirely synthetic chromosome (synIII) function with high fitness in yeast. For designer genome synthesis projects, precise engineering of the physical sequence to match the specified design is important for the systematic evaluation of underlying design principles. Yeast can maintain nuclear chromosomes as rings, occurring by chance at repeated sequences, although the cyclized format is unfavorable in meiosis given the possibility of dicentric chromosome formation from meiotic recombination. Here, we describe the de novo synthesis of synthetic yeast chromosome V (synV) in the “Build-A-Genome China” course, perfectly matching the designer sequence and bearing loxPsym sites, distinguishable watermarks, and all the other features of the synthetic genome. We generated a ring synV derivative with user-specified cyclization coordinates and characterized its performance in mitosis and meiosis. RATIONALE Systematic evaluation of underlying Sc2.0 design principles requires that the final assembled synthetic genome perfectly match the designed sequence. Given the size of yeast chromosomes, synthetic chromosome construction is performed iteratively, and new mutations and unpredictable events may occur during synthesis; even a very small number of unintentional nucleotide changes across the genome could have substantial effects on phenotype. Therefore, precisely matching the physical sequence to the designed sequence is crucial for verification of the design principles in genome synthesis. Ring chromosomes can extend those design principles to provide a model for genomic rearrangement, ring chromosome evolution, and human ring chromosome disorders. RESULTS We chemically synthesized, assembled, and incorporated designer chromosome synV (536,024 base pairs) of S. cerevisiae according to Sc2.0 principles, based on the complete nucleotide sequence of native yeast chromosome V (576,874 base pairs). This work was performed as part of the “Build-A-Genome China” course in Tianjin University. We corrected all mutations found—including duplications, substitutions, and indels—in the initial synV strain by using integrative cotransformation of the precise desired changes and by means of a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9)–based method. Altogether, 3331 corrected base pairs were required to match to the designed sequence. We generated a strain that exactly matches all designer sequence changes that displays high fitness under a variety of culture conditions. All corrections were verified with whole-genome sequencing; RNA sequencing revealed only minor changes in gene expression—most notably, decreases in expression of genes relocated near synthetic telomeres as a result of design. We constructed a functional circular synV (ring_synV) derivative in yeast by precisely joining both chromosome ends (telomeres) at specified coordinates. The ring chromosome showed restoration of subtelomeric gene expression levels. The ring_synV strain exhibited fitness comparable with that of the linear synV strain, revealed no change in sporulation frequency, but notably reduced spore viability. In meiosis, heterozygous or homozygous diploid ring_wtV and ring_synV chromosomes behaved similarly, exhibiting substantially higher frequency of the formation of zero-spore tetrads, a type that was not seen in the rod chromosome diploids. Rod synV chromosomes went through meiosis with high spore viability, despite no effort having been made to preserve meiotic competency in the design of synV. CONCLUSION The perfect designer-matched synthetic chromosome V provides strategies to edit sequence variants and correct unpredictable events, such as off-target integration of extra copies of synthetic DNA elsewhere in the genome. We also constructed a ring synthetic chromosome derivative and evaluated its fitness and stability in yeast. Both synV and synVI can be circularized and can power yeast cell growth without affecting fitness when gene content is maintained. These fitness and stability phenotypes of the ring synthetic chromosome in yeast provide a model system with which to probe the mechanism of human ring chromosome disorders. Synthesis, cyclization, and characterization of synV . ( A ) Synthetic chromosome V (synV, 536,024 base pairs) was designed in silico from native chromosome V (wtV, 576,874 base pairs), with extensive genotype modification designed to be phenotypically neutral. ( B ) CRISPR/Cas9 strategy for multiplex repair. ( C ) Colonies of wtV, synV, and ring_synV strains.

INTRODUCTION It has long been an interesting question whether a living cell can be constructed from scratch in the lab, a goal that may not be realized anytime soon. Nonetheless, with advances in DNA synthesis technology, the complete genetic material of an organism can now be synthesized chemically. Hitherto, genomes of several organisms including viruses, phages, and bacteria have been designed and constructed. These synthetic genomes are able to direct all normal biological functions, capable of self-replication and production of offspring. Several years ago, a group of scientists worldwide formed an international consortium to reconstruct the genome of budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae . RATIONALE The synthetic yeast genome, designated Sc2.0, was designed according to a set of arbitrary rules, including the elimination of transposable elements and incorporation of specific DNA elements to facilitate further genome manipulation. Among the 16 S. cerevisiae chromosomes, chromosome XII is unique as one of the longest yeast chromosomes (~1 million base pairs) and additionally encodes the highly repetitive ribosomal DNA locus, which forms the well-organized nucleolus. We report on the design, construction, and characterization of chromosome XII, the physically largest chromosome in S. cerevisiae. RESULTS A 976,067–base pair linear chromosome, synXII, was designed based on the native chromosome XII sequence of S. cerevisiae , and chemically synthesized. SynXII was assembled using a two-step method involving, successive megachunk integration to produce six semisynthetic strains, followed by meiotic recombination–mediated assembly, yielding a full-length functional chromosome in S. cerevisiae. Minor growth defect “bugs” detected in synXII were caused by deletion of tRNA genes and were corrected by introducing an ectopic copy of a single tRNA gene. The ribosomal gene cluster (rDNA) on synXII was left intact during the assembly process and subsequently replaced by a modified rDNA unit. The same synthetic rDNA unit was also used to regenerate rDNA at three distinct chromosomal locations. The rDNA signature sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), often used to determine species identity by standard DNA barcoding procedures, were swapped to generate a Saccharomyces synXII strain that would be identified as S. bayanus. Remarkably, these substantial DNA changes had no detectable phenotypic consequences under various laboratory conditions. CONCLUSION The rDNA locus of synXII is highly plastic; not only can it be moved to other chromosomal loci, it can also be altered in its ITS region to masquerade as a distinct species as defined by DNA barcoding, used widely in taxonomy. The ability to perform “species morphing” reported here presumably reflects the degree of evolutionary flexibility by which these ITS regions change. However, this barcoding region is clearly not infinitely flexible, as only relatively modest intragenus base changes were tolerated. More severe intergenus differences in ITS sequence did not result in functional rDNAs, probably because of defects in rRNA processing. The ability to design, build, and debug a megabase-sized chromosome, together with the flexibility in rDNA locus position, speaks to the remarkable overall flexibility of the yeast genome. Hierarchical assembly and subsequent restructuring of synXII. SynXII was assembled in two steps: First, six semisynthetic synXII strains were built in which segments of native XII DNA were replaced with the corresponding designer sequences. Next, the semisynthetic strains were combined withmultiple rounds ofmating/sporulation, eventually generating a single strain encoding fulllength synXII.The rDNA repeats were removed, modified, and subsequently regenerated at distinct chromosomal locations for species morphing and genome restructuring.