Author: "Dörk, Thilo" / Topic: genetics - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"Dörk, Thilo"' showing total 221 results

Start Over Author "Dörk, Thilo" Topic genetics

221 results on '"Dörk, Thilo"'

1. Genome-wide association analyses of ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary debulking surgery identify candidate genes for residual disease

Author: Ramachandran, Dhanya, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Kommoss, Stefan, DeFazio, Anna, Riggan, Marjorie J, Webb, Penelope M, Fasching, Peter A, Lambrechts, Diether, García, María J, Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina, Goodman, Marc T, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Høgdall, Estrid, Goode, Ellen L, Cliby, William A, Kumar, Amanika, Wang, Chen, Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Monteiro, Alvaro N, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Titus, Linda, Bjorge, Line, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Pejovic, Tanja, Høgdall, Claus K, McNeish, Iain A, May, Taymaa, Huntsman, David G, Pfisterer, Jacobus, Canzler, Ulrich, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Schröder, Willibald, Belau, Antje, Hanker, Lars, Harter, Philipp, Sehouli, Jalid, Kimmig, Rainer, de Gregorio, Nikolaus, Schmalfeldt, Barbara, Baumann, Klaus, Hilpert, Felix, Burges, Alexander, Winterhoff, Boris, Schürmann, Peter, Speith, Lisa-Marie, Hillemanns, Peter, Berchuck, Andrew, Johnatty, Sharon E, Ramus, Susan J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dörk, Thilo, and Heitz, Florian
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Women's Health, Human Genome, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Orphan Drug, Clinical Research, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, AOCS Group, OPAL Study Group, Medical biotechnology
Abstract: Survival from ovarian cancer depends on the resection status after primary surgery. We performed genome-wide association analyses for resection status of 7705 ovarian cancer patients, including 4954 with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSOC), to identify variants associated with residual disease. The most significant association with resection status was observed for rs72845444, upstream of MGMT, in HGSOC (p = 3.9 × 10-8). In gene-based analyses, PPP2R5C was the most strongly associated gene in HGSOC after stage adjustment. In an independent set of 378 ovarian tumours from the AGO-OVAR 11 study, variants near MGMT and PPP2R5C correlated with methylation and transcript levels, and PPP2R5C mRNA levels predicted progression-free survival in patients with residual disease. MGMT encodes a DNA repair enzyme, and PPP2R5C encodes the B56γ subunit of the PP2A tumour suppressor. Our results link heritable variation at these two loci with resection status in HGSOC.
Published: 2024

2. A Likelihood Ratio Approach for Utilizing Case‐Control Data in the Clinical Classification of Rare Sequence Variants: Application to BRCA1 and BRCA2

Author: Zanti, Maria, O′Mahony, Denise G, Parsons, Michael T, Li, Hongyan, Dennis, Joe, Aittomäkkiki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Brown, Melissa A, Buys, Saundra S, Canzian, Federico, Caputo, Sandrine M, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Collaborators, GC-HBOC study, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, De Nicolo, Arcangela, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giele, Willemina RR Geurts-, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Goldberg, Mark S, Garcia, Encarna B Gómez, Güendert, Melanie, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Houdayer, Claude, Houlston, Richard S, Howell, Anthony, Investigators, ABCTB, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, Jernström, Helena, John, Esther M, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Léoné, Melanie, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Lush, Michael, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Monteiro, Alvaro N, Murphy, Rachel A, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Offit, Kenneth, Park, Sue K, James, Paul, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Punie, Kevin, Radice, Paolo, Rashid, Muhammad U, Rennert, Gad, Romero, Atocha, Rosenberg, Efraim H, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, and Shu, Xiao-Ou
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Biotechnology, Genetic Testing, Prevention, Cancer, Human Genome, Women's Health, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Humans, Case-Control Studies, BRCA2 Protein, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Female, BRCA1 Protein, Breast Neoplasms, Likelihood Functions, Genetic Variation, Penetrance, GC-HBOC study Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, ACMG/AMP, BRCA, PS4, VUS, case-control, likelihood ratio, variant classification, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, Clinical sciences
Abstract: A large number of variants identified through clinical genetic testing in disease susceptibility genes, are of uncertain significance (VUS). Following the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), the frequency in case-control datasets (PS4 criterion), can inform their interpretation. We present a novel case-control likelihood ratio-based method that incorporates gene-specific age-related penetrance. We demonstrate the utility of this method in the analysis of simulated and real datasets. In the analyses of simulated data, the likelihood ratio method was more powerful compared to other methods. Likelihood ratios were calculated for a case-control dataset of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), and compared with logistic regression results. A larger number of variants reached evidence in favor of pathogenicity, and a substantial number of variants had evidence against pathogenicity - findings that would not have been reached using other case-control analysis methods. Our novel method provides greater power to classify rare variants compared to classical case-control methods. As an initiative from the ENIGMA Analytical Working Group, we provide user-friendly scripts and pre-formatted excel calculators for implementation of the method for rare variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and other high-risk genes with known penetrance.
Published: 2023

3. Ovarian cancer pathology characteristics as predictors of variant pathogenicity in BRCA1 and BRCA2

Author: O’Mahony, Denise G, Ramus, Susan J, Southey, Melissa C, Meagher, Nicola S, Hadjisavvas, Andreas, John, Esther M, Hamann, Ute, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Andrulis, Irene L, Sharma, Priyanka, Daly, Mary B, Hake, Christopher R, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Jakubowska, Anna, Godwin, Andrew K, Arason, Adalgeir, Bane, Anita, Simard, Jacques, Soucy, Penny, Caligo, Maria A, Mai, Phuong L, Claes, Kathleen BM, Teixeira, Manuel R, Chung, Wendy K, Lazaro, Conxi, Hulick, Peter J, Toland, Amanda E, Pedersen, Inge Sokilde, Neuhausen, Susan L, Vega, Ana, de la Hoya, Miguel, Nevanlinna, Heli, Dhawan, Mallika, Zampiga, Valentina, Danesi, Rita, Varesco, Liliana, Gismondi, Viviana, Vellone, Valerio Gaetano, James, Paul A, Janavicius, Ramunas, Nikitina-Zake, Liene, Nielsen, Finn Cilius, van Overeem Hansen, Thomas, Pejovic, Tanja, Borg, Ake, Rantala, Johanna, Offit, Kenneth, Montagna, Marco, Nathanson, Katherine L, Domchek, Susan M, Osorio, Ana, García, María J, Karlan, Beth Y, De Fazio, Anna, Bowtell, David, McGuffog, Lesley, Leslie, Goska, Parsons, Michael T, Dörk, Thilo, Speith, Lisa-Marie, dos Santos, Elizabeth Santana, da Costa, Alexandre André BA, Radice, Paolo, Peterlongo, Paolo, Papi, Laura, Engel, Christoph, Hahnen, Eric, Schmutzler, Rita K, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Easton, Douglas F, Tischkowitz, Marc, Singer, Christian F, Tan, Yen Yen, Whittemore, Alice S, Sieh, Weiva, Brenton, James D, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Fostira, Florentia, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Soukupova, Jana, Vocka, Michal, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Pharoah, Paul DP, Antoniou, Antonis C, Goldgar, David E, Spurdle, Amanda B, and Michailidou, Kyriaki
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Humans, Female, Virulence, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Breast Neoplasms, HEBON Investigators, GEMO Study Collaborators, AOCS Group, CZECANCA Consortium, Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2, Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles Consortium, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundThe distribution of ovarian tumour characteristics differs between germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers and non-carriers. In this study, we assessed the utility of ovarian tumour characteristics as predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity, for application using the American College of Medical Genetics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant classification system.MethodsData for 10,373 ovarian cancer cases, including carriers and non-carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants, were collected from unpublished international cohorts and consortia and published studies. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated for the association of ovarian cancer histology and other characteristics, with BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Estimates were aligned to ACMG/AMP code strengths (supporting, moderate, strong).ResultsNo histological subtype provided informative ACMG/AMP evidence in favour of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Evidence against variant pathogenicity was estimated for the mucinous and clear cell histologies (supporting) and borderline cases (moderate). Refined associations are provided according to tumour grade, invasion and age at diagnosis.ConclusionsWe provide detailed estimates for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity based on ovarian tumour characteristics. This evidence can be combined with other variant information under the ACMG/AMP classification system, to improve classification and carrier clinical management.
Published: 2023

4. Aggregation tests identify new gene associations with breast cancer in populations with diverse ancestry

Author: Mueller, Stefanie H, Lai, Alvina G, Valkovskaya, Maria, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Abu-Ful, Zomoruda, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baert, Thais, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Buys, Saundra S, Castelao, Jose E, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Chung, Wendy K, Colonna, Sarah V, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Yu-Tang, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Genkinger, Jeanine, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Grassmann, Felix, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Harkness, Elaine F, Harrington, Patricia A, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Hartman, Mikael, Hein, Alexander, Ho, Weang-Kee, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Houlston, Richard S, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Huo, Dezheng, Ito, Hidemi, Iwasaki, Motoki, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Khusnutdinova, Elza K, Kim, Sung-Won, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Kwong, Ava, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, and Le Marchand, Loic
Subjects: Breast Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Black People, Genetic Testing, Genome-Wide Association Study, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Formins, Breast cancer susceptibility, Diverse ancestry, Rare variants, Gene regulation, Genome-wide association study, NBCS Collaborators, CTS Consortium, ABCTB Investigators, Clinical Sciences
Abstract: BackgroundLow-frequency variants play an important role in breast cancer (BC) susceptibility. Gene-based methods can increase power by combining multiple variants in the same gene and help identify target genes.MethodsWe evaluated the potential of gene-based aggregation in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium cohorts including 83,471 cases and 59,199 controls. Low-frequency variants were aggregated for individual genes' coding and regulatory regions. Association results in European ancestry samples were compared to single-marker association results in the same cohort. Gene-based associations were also combined in meta-analysis across individuals with European, Asian, African, and Latin American and Hispanic ancestry.ResultsIn European ancestry samples, 14 genes were significantly associated (q
Published: 2023

5. Copy Number Variants Are Ovarian Cancer Risk Alleles at Known and Novel Risk Loci

Author: DeVries, Amber A, Dennis, Joe, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Peng, Pei-Chen, Coetzee, Simon G, Reyes, Alberto L, Plummer, Jasmine T, Davis, Brian D, Chen, Stephanie S, Dezem, Felipe Segato, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Berchuck, Andrew, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bogdanova-Markov, Nadja, Brenton, James D, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cook, Linda S, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Giles, Graham G, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Webb, P, DeFazio, A, Friedlander, M, Obermair, A, Grant, P, Nagle, C, Beesley, V, Chevenix-Trench, G, Bowtell, D, Blomfield, P, Brand, A, Davis, A, Leung, Y, Nicklin, J, Quinn, M, Livingstone, K, O'Neill, H, Williams, M, Black, A, Hadley, A, Glasgow, A, Garrett, A, Rao, A, Shannon, C, Steer, C, Allen, D, Neesham, D, Otton, G, Au-Yeung, G, Goss, G, Wain, G, Gard, G, Robertson, G, Lombard, J, Tan, J, McNeilage, J, Power, J, Coward, J, Miller, J, Carter, J, Lamont, J, Wong, KM, Reid, K, Perrin, L, Milishkin, L, Nascimento, M, Buck, M, Bunting, M, Harrison, M, Chetty, N, Hacker, N, McNally, O, Harnett, P, Beale, P, Awad, R, Mohan, R, Farrell, R, McIntosh, R, Rome, R, Sayer, R, Houghton, R, Hogg, R, Land, R, Baron-Hay, S, and Paramasivum, S
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Genetic Testing, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Women's Health, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Female, Humans, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Genome-Wide Association Study, Alleles, DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Ovarian Neoplasms, OPAL Study Group, AOCS Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundKnown risk alleles for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) account for approximately 40% of the heritability for EOC. Copy number variants (CNVs) have not been investigated as EOC risk alleles in a large population cohort.MethodsSingle nucleotide polymorphism array data from 13 071 EOC cases and 17 306 controls of White European ancestry were used to identify CNVs associated with EOC risk using a rare admixture maximum likelihood test for gene burden and a by-probe ratio test. We performed enrichment analysis of CNVs at known EOC risk loci and functional biofeatures in ovarian cancer-related cell types.ResultsWe identified statistically significant risk associations with CNVs at known EOC risk genes; BRCA1 (PEOC = 1.60E-21; OREOC = 8.24), RAD51C (Phigh-grade serous ovarian cancer [HGSOC] = 5.5E-4; odds ratio [OR]HGSOC = 5.74 del), and BRCA2 (PHGSOC = 7.0E-4; ORHGSOC = 3.31 deletion). Four suggestive associations (P
Published: 2022

6. Physical activity, sedentary time and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomisation study

Author: Dixon-Suen, Suzanne C, Lewis, Sarah J, Martin, Richard M, English, Dallas R, Boyle, Terry, Giles, Graham G, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Investigators, ABCTB, Ahearn, Thomas U, Ambrosone, Christine B, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Auvinen, Päivi, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brenner, Hermann, Brüning, Thomas, Buys, Saundra S, Camp, Nicola J, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Cessna, Melissa H, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Goldberg, Mark S, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Häberle, Lothar, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hart, Steven N, Harvie, Michelle, Hillemanns, Peter, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Loibl, Sibylle, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, and Manoochehri, Mehdi
Subjects: Aging, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Clinical Research, Cancer, Prevention, Female, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Exercise, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, Sedentary Behavior, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Breast, Physical activity, Sedentary Behaviour, Engineering, Medical and Health Sciences, Education, Sport Sciences
Abstract: ObjectivesPhysical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are associated with higher breast cancer risk in observational studies, but ascribing causality is difficult. Mendelian randomisation (MR) assesses causality by simulating randomised trial groups using genotype. We assessed whether lifelong physical activity or sedentary time, assessed using genotype, may be causally associated with breast cancer risk overall, pre/post-menopause, and by case-groups defined by tumour characteristics.MethodsWe performed two-sample inverse-variance-weighted MR using individual-level Breast Cancer Association Consortium case-control data from 130 957 European-ancestry women (69 838 invasive cases), and published UK Biobank data (n=91 105-377 234). Genetic instruments were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated in UK Biobank with wrist-worn accelerometer-measured overall physical activity (nsnps=5) or sedentary time (nsnps=6), or accelerometer-measured (nsnps=1) or self-reported (nsnps=5) vigorous physical activity.ResultsGreater genetically-predicted overall activity was associated with lower breast cancer overall risk (OR=0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.83 per-standard deviation (SD;~8 milligravities acceleration)) and for most case-groups. Genetically-predicted vigorous activity was associated with lower risk of pre/perimenopausal breast cancer (OR=0.62; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.87,≥3 vs. 0 self-reported days/week), with consistent estimates for most case-groups. Greater genetically-predicted sedentary time was associated with higher hormone-receptor-negative tumour risk (OR=1.77; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.92 per-SD (~7% time spent sedentary)), with elevated estimates for most case-groups. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses examining pleiotropy (including weighted-median-MR, MR-Egger).ConclusionOur study provides strong evidence that greater overall physical activity, greater vigorous activity, and lower sedentary time are likely to reduce breast cancer risk. More widespread adoption of active lifestyles may reduce the burden from the most common cancer in women.
Published: 2022

7. Correction: Polygenic risk modeling for prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer risk

Author: Dareng, Eileen O, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Barnes, Daniel R, Jones, Michelle R, Yang, Xin, Aben, Katja KH, Adank, Muriel A, Agata, Simona, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Aravantinos, Gerasimos, Arun, Banu K, Augustinsson, Annelie, Balmaña, Judith, Bandera, Elisa V, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Bjorge, Line, Black, Amanda, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Brenton, James D, Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Cai, Hui, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Cannioto, Rikki, Cassingham, Hayley, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Kexin, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Colonna, Sarah, Cook, Linda S, Couch, Fergus J, Daly, Mary B, Dao, Fanny, Davies, Eleanor, de la Hoya, Miguel, de Putter, Robin, Dennis, Joe, DePersia, Allison, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Doherty, Jennifer A, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, Heather A, Engel, Christoph, Evans, Gareth D, Fasching, Peter A, Flanagan, James M, Fortner, Renée T, Machackova, Eva, Friedman, Eitan, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Gensini, Francesca, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Goodman, Marc T, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas VO, Harris, Holly R, Hartman, Mikael, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Hopper, John L, Huang, Ruea-Yea, Huff, Chad, Hulick, Peter J, Huntsman, David G, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Isaacs, Claudine, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul A, and Janavicius, Ramunas
Subjects: GEMO Study Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, OPAL Study Group, AOCS Group, KConFab Investigators, HEBON Investigators, OCAC Consortium, CIMBA Consortium, Genetics, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Published: 2022

8. Polygenic risk modeling for prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer risk

Author: Dareng, Eileen O, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Barnes, Daniel R, Jones, Michelle R, Yang, Xin, Aben, Katja KH, Adank, Muriel A, Agata, Simona, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Aravantinos, Gerasimos, Arun, Banu K, Augustinsson, Annelie, Balmaña, Judith, Bandera, Elisa V, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Bjorge, Line, Black, Amanda, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Brenton, James D, Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Cai, Hui, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Cannioto, Rikki, Cassingham, Hayley, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Kexin, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Colonna, Sarah, Cook, Linda S, Couch, Fergus J, Daly, Mary B, Dao, Fanny, Davies, Eleanor, de la Hoya, Miguel, de Putter, Robin, Dennis, Joe, DePersia, Allison, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Doherty, Jennifer A, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, Heather A, Engel, Christoph, Evans, Gareth D, Fasching, Peter A, Flanagan, James M, Fortner, Renée T, Machackova, Eva, Friedman, Eitan, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Gensini, Francesca, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Goodman, Marc T, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas VO, Harris, Holly R, Hartman, Mikael, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Hopper, John L, Huang, Ruea-Yea, Huff, Chad, Hulick, Peter J, Huntsman, David G, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Isaacs, Claudine, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul A, and Janavicius, Ramunas
Subjects: Prevention, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Good Health and Well Being, Bayes Theorem, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Male, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, GEMO Study Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, OPAL Study Group, AOCS Group, KConFab Investigators, HEBON Investigators, OCAC Consortium, CIMBA Consortium, Genetics, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have the potential to improve risk stratification. Joint estimation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) effects in models could improve predictive performance over standard approaches of PRS construction. Here, we implemented computationally efficient, penalized, logistic regression models (lasso, elastic net, stepwise) to individual level genotype data and a Bayesian framework with continuous shrinkage, "select and shrink for summary statistics" (S4), to summary level data for epithelial non-mucinous ovarian cancer risk prediction. We developed the models in a dataset consisting of 23,564 non-mucinous EOC cases and 40,138 controls participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) and validated the best models in three populations of different ancestries: prospective data from 198,101 women of European ancestries; 7,669 women of East Asian ancestries; 1,072 women of African ancestries, and in 18,915 BRCA1 and 12,337 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestries. In the external validation data, the model with the strongest association for non-mucinous EOC risk derived from the OCAC model development data was the S4 model (27,240 SNPs) with odds ratios (OR) of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.28-1.48, AUC: 0.588) per unit standard deviation, in women of European ancestries; 1.14 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19, AUC: 0.538) in women of East Asian ancestries; 1.38 (95% CI: 1.21-1.58, AUC: 0.593) in women of African ancestries; hazard ratios of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.29-1.43, AUC: 0.592) in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.35-1.64, AUC: 0.624) in BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Incorporation of the S4 PRS in risk prediction models for ovarian cancer may have clinical utility in ovarian cancer prevention programs.
Published: 2022

9. Common variants in breast cancer risk loci predispose to distinct tumor subtypes

Author: Ahearn, Thomas U, Zhang, Haoyu, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Lush, Michael, Wang, Qin, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baten, Adinda, Becher, Heiko, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, J Margriet, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Alnæs, Grethe I Grenaker, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Holleczek, Bernd, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kauppila, Saila, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela N, Krüger, Ute, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Kyriacou, Kyriacos, Lambrechts, Diether, Lee, Derrick G, Lindblom, Annika, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, Lo, Wing-Yee, MacInnis, Robert J, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, and McLean, Catriona
Subjects: Human Genome, Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Biomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Receptor, ErbB-2, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Risk, Breast cancer, Etiologic heterogeneity, Genetic predisposition, Common breast cancer susceptibility variants, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Receptor, erbB-2, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple common breast cancer susceptibility variants. Many of these variants have differential associations by estrogen receptor (ER) status, but how these variants relate with other tumor features and intrinsic molecular subtypes is unclear.MethodsAmong 106,571 invasive breast cancer cases and 95,762 controls of European ancestry with data on 173 breast cancer variants identified in previous GWAS, we used novel two-stage polytomous logistic regression models to evaluate variants in relation to multiple tumor features (ER, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and grade) adjusting for each other, and to intrinsic-like subtypes.ResultsEighty-five of 173 variants were associated with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate
Published: 2022

10. Rare germline copy number variants (CNVs) and breast cancer risk

Author: Dennis, Joe, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Walker, Logan C, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Dorling, Leila, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brenner, Hermann, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, J Margriet, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Johnson, Nichola, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Nicole L, Linet, Martha, Ogrodniczak, Alicja, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Milne, Roger L, Muranen, Taru A, Murphy, Rachel A, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olson, Janet E, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Perou, Charles M, Peterlongo, Paolo, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Pylkäs, Katri, Rennert, Gad, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, Shibli, Rana, Smeets, Ann, and Soucy, Penny
Subjects: Human Genome, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Genome, Human, Genome-Wide Association Study, Germ Cells, Humans, Risk Factors, NBCS Collaborators, CTS Consortium, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators
Abstract: Germline copy number variants (CNVs) are pervasive in the human genome but potential disease associations with rare CNVs have not been comprehensively assessed in large datasets. We analysed rare CNVs in genes and non-coding regions for 86,788 breast cancer cases and 76,122 controls of European ancestry with genome-wide array data. Gene burden tests detected the strongest association for deletions in BRCA1 (P = 3.7E-18). Nine other genes were associated with a p-value
Published: 2022

11. Association of germline genetic variants with breast cancer-specific survival in patient subgroups defined by clinic-pathological variables related to tumor biology and type of systemic treatment

Author: Morra, Anna, Escala-Garcia, Maria, Beesley, Jonathan, Keeman, Renske, Canisius, Sander, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Brüning, Thomas, Buys, Saundra S, Caan, Bette, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Clarke, Christine L, Colonna, Sarah V, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Sáenz, José A, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hart, Steven N, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Hartmann, Arndt, He, Wei, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey Y, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keupers, Machteld, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Linet, Martha, Luben, Robert N, Lubiński, Jan, Lush, Michael, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martens, John WM, Martinez, Maria Elena, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Muranen, Taru A, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, and Nielsen, Sune F
Subjects: Clinical Research, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Common germline genetic variants, Breast cancer-specific survival, Patient subgroups, Tumor biology, Systemic treatment, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundGiven the high heterogeneity among breast tumors, associations between common germline genetic variants and survival that may exist within specific subgroups could go undetected in an unstratified set of breast cancer patients.MethodsWe performed genome-wide association analyses within 15 subgroups of breast cancer patients based on prognostic factors, including hormone receptors, tumor grade, age, and type of systemic treatment. Analyses were based on 91,686 female patients of European ancestry from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, including 7531 breast cancer-specific deaths over a median follow-up of 8.1 years. Cox regression was used to assess associations of common germline variants with 15-year and 5-year breast cancer-specific survival. We assessed the probability of these associations being true positives via the Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP
Published: 2021

12. Mendelian randomisation study of smoking exposure in relation to breast cancer risk

Author: Park, Hanla A, Neumeyer, Sonja, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baten, Adinda, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Han, Sileny, Harkness, Elaine F, Hart, Steven N, He, Wei, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hopper, John L, Hunter, David J, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Koppert, Linetta B, Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lo, Wing-Yee, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Meindl, Alfons, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Muranen, Taru A, and Nevanlinna, Heli
Subjects: Genetics, Cancer, Substance Misuse, Clinical Research, Human Genome, Prevention, Drug Abuse (NIDA only), Breast Cancer, Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke and Health, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Cigarette Smoking, Female, Genetic Pleiotropy, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotyping Techniques, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundDespite a modest association between tobacco smoking and breast cancer risk reported by recent epidemiological studies, it is still equivocal whether smoking is causally related to breast cancer risk.MethodsWe applied Mendelian randomisation (MR) to evaluate a potential causal effect of cigarette smoking on breast cancer risk. Both individual-level data as well as summary statistics for 164 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reported in genome-wide association studies of lifetime smoking index (LSI) or cigarette per day (CPD) were used to obtain MR effect estimates. Data from 108,420 invasive breast cancer cases and 87,681 controls were used for the LSI analysis and for the CPD analysis conducted among ever-smokers from 26,147 cancer cases and 26,072 controls. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to address pleiotropy.ResultsGenetically predicted LSI was associated with increased breast cancer risk (OR 1.18 per SD, 95% CI: 1.07-1.30, P = 0.11 × 10-2), but there was no evidence of association for genetically predicted CPD (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.78-1.19, P = 0.85). The sensitivity analyses yielded similar results and showed no strong evidence of pleiotropic effect.ConclusionOur MR study provides supportive evidence for a potential causal association with breast cancer risk for lifetime smoking exposure but not cigarettes per day among smokers.
Published: 2021

13. Germline variants and breast cancer survival in patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis.

Author: Escala-Garcia, Maria, Canisius, Sander, Keeman, Renske, Beesley, Jonathan, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Couch, Fergus J, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Easton, Douglas F, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Geisler, Jürgen, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Hunter, David J, Jacot, William, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey Y, Kaaks, Rudolf, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Koppert, Linetta B, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Luben, Robert N, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Muranen, Taru A, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Patel, Alpa V, Peterlongo, Paolo, Pharoah, Paul DP, Punie, Kevin, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Rennert, Hedy S, Romero, Atocha, Roylance, Rebecca, Rüdiger, Thomas, Ruebner, Matthias, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Scott, Christopher, Southey, Melissa C, Surowy, Harald, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Tamimi, Rulla M, Teras, Lauren R, Thomas, Emilie, Tomlinson, Ian, Troester, Melissa A, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert, and Wolk, Alicja
Subjects: kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Cancer, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
Abstract: Breast cancer metastasis accounts for most of the deaths from breast cancer. Identification of germline variants associated with survival in aggressive types of breast cancer may inform understanding of breast cancer progression and assist treatment. In this analysis, we studied the associations between germline variants and breast cancer survival for patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis. We used data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) including 1062 women of European ancestry with metastatic breast cancer, 606 of whom died of breast cancer. We identified two germline variants on chromosome 1, rs138569520 and rs146023652, significantly associated with breast cancer-specific survival (P = 3.19 × 10-8 and 4.42 × 10-8). In silico analysis suggested a potential regulatory effect of the variants on the nearby target genes SDE2 and H3F3A. However, the variants showed no evidence of association in a smaller replication dataset. The validation dataset was obtained from the SNPs to Risk of Metastasis (StoRM) study and included 293 patients with metastatic primary breast cancer at diagnosis. Ultimately, larger replication studies are needed to confirm the identified associations.
Published: 2021

14. Identification of a Locus Near ULK1 Associated With Progression-Free Survival in Ovarian Cancer

Author: Quinn, Michael CJ, McCue, Karen, Shi, Wei, Johnatty, Sharon E, Beesley, Jonathan, Civitarese, Andrew, O'Mara, Tracy A, Glubb, Dylan M, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Armasu, Sebastian M, Ong, Jue-Sheng, Gharahkhani, Puya, Lu, Yi, Gao, Bo, Patch, Ann-Marie, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Edwards, Digna R Velez, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Garcia, Maria J, Goodman, Marc T, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten, du Bois, Andreas, Pfisterer, Jacobus, Bauman, Klaus, Group, for the AGO Study, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Cunningham, Julie M, Larson, Melissa C, McCauley, Bryan M, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Hogdall, Claus K, Hogdall, Estrid, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Riggan, Marjorie J, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Bjorge, Line, Webb, Penelope M, Group, for the OPAL Study, Friedlander, Michael, Pejovic, Tanja, Moffitt, Melissa, Glasspool, Rosalind, May, Taymaa, Ene, Gabrielle EV, Huntsman, David G, Woo, Michelle, Carney, Michael E, Hinsley, Samantha, Heitz, Florian, Fereday, Sian, Kennedy, Catherine J, Edwards, Stacey L, Winham, Stacey J, deFazio, Anna, Group, for Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Pharoah, Paul DP, Goode, Ellen L, MacGregor, Stuart, and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prevention, Human Genome, Cancer, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Autophagy-Related Protein-1 Homolog, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Gene Knockout Techniques, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Progression-Free Survival, AGO Study Group, OPAL Study Group, for Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract: BackgroundMany loci have been found to be associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, although there is considerable variation in progression-free survival (PFS), no loci have been found to be associated with outcome at genome-wide levels of significance.MethodsWe carried out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of PFS in 2,352 women with EOC who had undergone cytoreductive surgery and standard carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy.ResultsWe found seven SNPs at 12q24.33 associated with PFS (P < 5 × 10-8), the top SNP being rs10794418 (HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.34; P = 1.47 × 10-8). High expression of a nearby gene, ULK1, is associated with shorter PFS in EOC, and with poor prognosis in other cancers. SNP rs10794418 is also associated with expression of ULK1 in ovarian tumors, with the allele associated with shorter PFS being associated with higher expression, and chromatin interactions were detected between the ULK1 promoter and associated SNPs in serous and endometrioid EOC cell lines. ULK1 knockout ovarian cancer cell lines showed significantly increased sensitivity to carboplatin in vitro.ConclusionsThe locus at 12q24.33 represents one of the first genome-wide significant loci for survival for any cancer. ULK1 is a plausible candidate for the target of this association.ImpactThis finding provides insight into genetic markers associated with EOC outcome and potential treatment options.See related commentary by Peres and Monteiro, p. 1604.
Published: 2021

15. Functional annotation of the 2q35 breast cancer risk locus implicates a structural variant in influencing activity of a long-range enhancer element

Author: Baxter, Joseph S, Johnson, Nichola, Tomczyk, Katarzyna, Gillespie, Andrea, Maguire, Sarah, Brough, Rachel, Fachal, Laura, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Cai, Qiuyin, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Clarke, Christine L, Collaborators, NBCS, Colonna, Sarah, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Chi, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Ghoussaini, Maya, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hatse, Sigrid, Hauke, Jan, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Hou, Ming-Feng, Investigators, kConFab, Investigators, ABCTB, Ito, Hidemi, Iwasaki, Motoki, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Joseph, Vijai, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kim, Sung-Won, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Kwong, Ava, and Lacey, James V
Subjects: Human Genome, Genetics, Cancer, Estrogen, Prevention, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast Neoplasms, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Cell Line, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Variation, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 5, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Risk Factors, Sequence Deletion, NBCS Collaborators, kConFab Investigators, ABCTB Investigators, breast cancer risk, functional annotation, risk locus, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: A combination of genetic and functional approaches has identified three independent breast cancer risk loci at 2q35. A recent fine-scale mapping analysis to refine these associations resulted in 1 (signal 1), 5 (signal 2), and 42 (signal 3) credible causal variants at these loci. We used publicly available in silico DNase I and ChIP-seq data with in vitro reporter gene and CRISPR assays to annotate signals 2 and 3. We identified putative regulatory elements that enhanced cell-type-specific transcription from the IGFBP5 promoter at both signals (30- to 40-fold increased expression by the putative regulatory element at signal 2, 2- to 3-fold by the putative regulatory element at signal 3). We further identified one of the five credible causal variants at signal 2, a 1.4 kb deletion (esv3594306), as the likely causal variant; the deletion allele of this variant was associated with an average additional increase in IGFBP5 expression of 1.3-fold (MCF-7) and 2.2-fold (T-47D). We propose a model in which the deletion allele of esv3594306 juxtaposes two transcription factor binding regions (annotated by estrogen receptor alpha ChIP-seq peaks) to generate a single extended regulatory element. This regulatory element increases cell-type-specific expression of the tumor suppressor gene IGFBP5 and, thereby, reduces risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.77, 95% CI 0.74-0.81, p = 3.1 × 10-31).
Published: 2021

16. Pleiotropy-guided transcriptome imputation from normal and tumor tissues identifies candidate susceptibility genes for breast and ovarian cancer.

Author: Kar, Siddhartha P, Considine, Daniel PC, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Plummer, Jasmine T, Chen, Stephanie, Dezem, Felipe S, Barbeira, Alvaro N, Rajagopal, Padma S, Rosenow, Will T, Moreno, Fernando, Bodelon, Clara, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, deFazio, Anna, Dörk, Thilo, Ekici, Arif B, Ewing, Ailith, Fountzilas, George, Goode, Ellen L, Hartman, Mikael, Heitz, Florian, Hillemanns, Peter, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jensen, Allan, Karlan, Beth Y, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Kjaer, Susanne K, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Köbel, Martin, Li, Jingmei, Liebrich, Clemens, May, Taymaa, Olsson, Håkan, Permuth, Jennifer B, Peterlongo, Paolo, Radice, Paolo, Ramus, Susan J, Riggan, Marjorie J, Risch, Harvey A, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Simard, Jacques, Szafron, Lukasz M, Titus, Linda, Thompson, Cheryl L, Vierkant, Robert A, Winham, Stacey J, Zheng, Wei, Doherty, Jennifer A, Berchuck, Andrew, Lawrenson, Kate, Im, Hae Kyung, Manichaikul, Ani W, Pharoah, Paul DP, Gayther, Simon A, and Schildkraut, Joellen M
Subjects: Biotechnology, Genetics, Prevention, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract: Familial, sequencing, and genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and genetic correlation analyses have progressively unraveled the shared or pleiotropic germline genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. In this study, we aimed to leverage this shared germline genetics to improve the power of transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) to identify candidate breast cancer and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. We built gene expression prediction models using the PrediXcan method in 681 breast and 295 ovarian tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas and 211 breast and 99 ovarian normal tissue samples from the Genotype-Tissue Expression project and integrated these with GWAS meta-analysis data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (122,977 cases/105,974 controls) and the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (22,406 cases/40,941 controls). The integration was achieved through application of a pleiotropy-guided conditional/conjunction false discovery rate (FDR) approach in the setting of a TWASs. This identified 14 candidate breast cancer susceptibility genes spanning 11 genomic regions and 8 candidate ovarian cancer susceptibility genes spanning 5 genomic regions at conjunction FDR < 0.05 that were >1 Mb away from known breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility loci. We also identified 38 candidate breast cancer susceptibility genes and 17 candidate ovarian cancer susceptibility genes at conjunction FDR < 0.05 at known breast and/or ovarian susceptibility loci. The 22 genes identified by our cross-cancer analysis represent promising candidates that further elucidate the role of the transcriptome in mediating germline breast and ovarian cancer risk.
Published: 2021

17. A case-only study to identify genetic modifiers of breast cancer risk for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Author: Coignard, Juliette, Lush, Michael, Beesley, Jonathan, O'Mara, Tracy A, Dennis, Joe, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Barnes, Daniel R, McGuffog, Lesley, Leslie, Goska, Bolla, Manjeet K, Adank, Muriel A, Agata, Simona, Ahearn, Thomas, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Augustinsson, Annelie, Azzollini, Jacopo, Barrowdale, Daniel, Baynes, Caroline, Becher, Heiko, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campa, Daniele, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, Collée, J Margriet, Conroy, Don M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Fostira, Florentia, Friedman, Eitan, Fritschi, Lin, Frost, Debra, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, Garber, Judy, Garcia-Barberan, Vanesa, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Gayther, Simon A, Gehrig, Andrea, Georgoulias, Vassilios, Giles, Graham G, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Greene, Mark H, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A, Hart, Steven N, He, Wei, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hollestelle, Antoinette, and Hopper, John L
Subjects: GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, KConFab Investigators, HEBON Investigators, ABCTB Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Risk Factors, Genotype, Linkage Disequilibrium, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alleles, Quantitative Trait Loci, Adult, Middle Aged, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Genetic Testing, Human Genome, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract: Breast cancer (BC) risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers varies by genetic and familial factors. About 50 common variants have been shown to modify BC risk for mutation carriers. All but three, were identified in general population studies. Other mutation carrier-specific susceptibility variants may exist but studies of mutation carriers have so far been underpowered. We conduct a novel case-only genome-wide association study comparing genotype frequencies between 60,212 general population BC cases and 13,007 cases with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. We identify robust novel associations for 2 variants with BC for BRCA1 and 3 for BRCA2 mutation carriers, P
Published: 2021

18. CYP3A7*1C allele: linking premenopausal oestrone and progesterone levels with risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers

Author: Johnson, Nichola, Maguire, Sarah, Morra, Anna, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Tomczyk, Katarzyna, Jones, Michael E, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Gilham, Clare, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baynes, Caroline, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A, Hart, Steven N, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Linet, Martha, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martens, John WM, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Mayes, Rebecca, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Nielsen, Sune F, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Obi, Nadia, Olshan, Andrew F, and Olson, Janet E
Subjects: Estrogen, Human Genome, Clinical Research, Cancer, Aging, Breast Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Alleles, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A, Estrone, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Pregnanediol, Premenopause, Progesterone, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, NBCS Collaborators, AOCS Group, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundEpidemiological studies provide strong evidence for a role of endogenous sex hormones in the aetiology of breast cancer. The aim of this analysis was to identify genetic variants that are associated with urinary sex-hormone levels and breast cancer risk.MethodsWe carried out a genome-wide association study of urinary oestrone-3-glucuronide and pregnanediol-3-glucuronide levels in 560 premenopausal women, with additional analysis of progesterone levels in 298 premenopausal women. To test for the association with breast cancer risk, we carried out follow-up genotyping in 90,916 cases and 89,893 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. All women were of European ancestry.ResultsFor pregnanediol-3-glucuronide, there were no genome-wide significant associations; for oestrone-3-glucuronide, we identified a single peak mapping to the CYP3A locus, annotated by rs45446698. The minor rs45446698-C allele was associated with lower oestrone-3-glucuronide (-49.2%, 95% CI -56.1% to -41.1%, P = 3.1 × 10-18); in follow-up analyses, rs45446698-C was also associated with lower progesterone (-26.7%, 95% CI -39.4% to -11.6%, P = 0.001) and reduced risk of oestrogen and progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, P = 6.9 × 10-8).ConclusionsThe CYP3A7*1C allele is associated with reduced risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer possibly mediated via an effect on the metabolism of endogenous sex hormones in premenopausal women.
Published: 2021

19. Breast Cancer Risk Genes — Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women

Author: Dorling, Leila, Carvalho, Sara, Allen, Jamie, González-Neira, Anna, Luccarini, Craig, Wahlström, Cecilia, Pooley, Karen A, Parsons, Michael T, Fortuno, Cristina, Wang, Qin, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Keeman, Renske, Alonso, M Rosario, Álvarez, Nuria, Herraez, Belen, Fernandez, Victoria, Núñez-Torres, Rocio, Osorio, Ana, Valcich, Jeanette, Li, Minerva, Törngren, Therese, Harrington, Patricia A, Baynes, Caroline, Conroy, Don M, Decker, Brennan, Fachal, Laura, Mavaddat, Nasim, Ahearn, Thomas, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arnold, Norbert, Arveux, Patrick, Ausems, Margreet GEM, Auvinen, Päivi, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bogdanova-Markov, Nadja, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Bremer, Michael, Briceno, Ignacio, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cameron, David A, Camp, Nicola J, Campbell, Archie, Carracedo, Angel, Castelao, Jose E, Cessna, Melissa H, Chanock, Stephen J, Christiansen, Hans, Collée, J Margriet, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Cornelissen, Sten, Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Ekici, Arif B, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Försti, Asta, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Georgoulias, Vassilios, Gil, Fabian, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Garcia, Encarna B Gómez, Alnæs, Grethe I Grenaker, Guénel, Pascal, Hadjisavvas, Andreas, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Hartman, Mikael, He, Wei, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Ho, Weang Kee, Hooning, Maartje J, Howell, Anthony, Humphreys, Keith, Idris, Faiza, Jakubowska, Anna, and Jung, Audrey
Subjects: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Genetics, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Humans, Logistic Models, Middle Aged, Mutation, Missense, Odds Ratio, Risk, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Young Adult, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Medical and Health Sciences, General & Internal Medicine
Abstract: BackgroundGenetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility is widely used, but for many genes, evidence of an association with breast cancer is weak, underlying risk estimates are imprecise, and reliable subtype-specific risk estimates are lacking.MethodsWe used a panel of 34 putative susceptibility genes to perform sequencing on samples from 60,466 women with breast cancer and 53,461 controls. In separate analyses for protein-truncating variants and rare missense variants in these genes, we estimated odds ratios for breast cancer overall and tumor subtypes. We evaluated missense-variant associations according to domain and classification of pathogenicity.ResultsProtein-truncating variants in 5 genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2) were associated with a risk of breast cancer overall with a P value of less than 0.0001. Protein-truncating variants in 4 other genes (BARD1, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were associated with a risk of breast cancer overall with a P value of less than 0.05 and a Bayesian false-discovery probability of less than 0.05. For protein-truncating variants in 19 of the remaining 25 genes, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio for breast cancer overall was less than 2.0. For protein-truncating variants in ATM and CHEK2, odds ratios were higher for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease than for ER-negative disease; for protein-truncating variants in BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D, odds ratios were higher for ER-negative disease than for ER-positive disease. Rare missense variants (in aggregate) in ATM, CHEK2, and TP53 were associated with a risk of breast cancer overall with a P value of less than 0.001. For BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53, missense variants (in aggregate) that would be classified as pathogenic according to standard criteria were associated with a risk of breast cancer overall, with the risk being similar to that of protein-truncating variants.ConclusionsThe results of this study define the genes that are most clinically useful for inclusion on panels for the prediction of breast cancer risk, as well as provide estimates of the risks associated with protein-truncating variants, to guide genetic counseling. (Funded by European Union Horizon 2020 programs and others.).
Published: 2021

20. Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Association Study of Endometrial Cancer and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Identifies Genetic Risk Regions Associated with Risk of Both Cancers

Author: Glubb, Dylan M, Thompson, Deborah J, Aben, Katja KH, Alsulimani, Ahmad, Amant, Frederic, Annibali, Daniela, Attia, John, Barricarte, Aurelio, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Bischof, Katharina, Bjorge, Line, Bodelon, Clara, Brand, Alison H, Brenton, James D, Brinton, Louise A, Bruinsma, Fiona, Buchanan, Daniel D, Burghaus, Stefanie, Butzow, Ralf, Cai, Hui, Carney, Michael E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Chu, Chen, Xiao Qing, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cunningham, Julie M, De Vivo, Immaculata, deFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dunning, Alison M, Dürst, Matthias, Edwards, Todd, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Ewing, Ailith, Fasching, Peter A, Ferguson, Sarah, Flanagan, James M, Fostira, Florentia, Fountzilas, George, Friedenreich, Christine M, Gao, Bo, Gaudet, Mia M, Gawełko, Jan, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harris, Holly R, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Holliday, Elizabeth G, Huntsman, David G, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Jones, Michael E, Karlan, Beth Y, Karnezis, Anthony, Kelley, Joseph L, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Killeen, Jeffrey L, Kjaer, Susanne K, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Köbel, Martin, Konopka, Bozena, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kopperud, Reidun K, Koti, Madhuri, Kraft, Peter, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Melissa C, Le Marchand, Loic, Lele, Shashikant, Lester, Jenny, Li, Andrew J, Liang, Dong, Liebrich, Clemens, Lipworth, Loren, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Lingeng, Lu, Karen H, Macciotta, Alessandra, Mattiello, Amalia, May, Taymaa, McAlpine, Jessica N, and McGuire, Valerie
Subjects: Epidemiology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Uterine Cancer, Genetics, Biotechnology, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Endometrial Neoplasms, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Quantitative Trait Loci, Risk Factors, OPAL Study Group, AOCS Group, Medical and Health Sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract: BackgroundAccumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers.MethodsUsing LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data.ResultsGenetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10-5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (P Bonferroni < 2.4 × 10-9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P < 5 × 10-7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation.ConclusionsUsing cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis.ImpactOur research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.
Published: 2021

21. Gene-Environment Interactions Relevant to Estrogen and Risk of Breast Cancer: Can Gene-Environment Interactions Be Detected Only among Candidate SNPs from Genome-Wide Association Studies?

Author: Park, JooYong, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Choi, Jaesung, Chung, Seokang, Song, Nan, Park, Sue K, Han, Wonshik, Noh, Dong-Young, Ahn, Sei-Hyun, Lee, Jong Won, Kim, Mi Kyung, Jee, Sun Ha, Wen, Wanqing, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Shah, Mitul, Conroy, Don M, Harrington, Patricia A, Mayes, Rebecca, Czene, Kamila, Hall, Per, Teras, Lauren R, Patel, Alpa V, Couch, Fergus J, Olson, Janet E, Sawyer, Elinor J, Roylance, Rebecca, Bojesen, Stig E, Flyger, Henrik, Lambrechts, Diether, Baten, Adinda, Matsuo, Keitaro, Ito, Hidemi, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Keeman, Renske, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Wu, Anna H, Tseng, Chiu-Chen, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, kConFab Investigators, Andrulis, Irene L, Hopper, John L, Southey, Melissa C, Wu, Pei-Ei, Shen, Chen-Yang, Fasching, Peter A, Ekici, Arif B, Muir, Kenneth, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Brenner, Hermann, Arndt, Volker, Jones, Michael E, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Hoppe, Reiner, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Hartman, Mikael, Li, Jingmei, Mannermaa, Arto, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Benitez, Javier, González-Neira, Anna, Haiman, Christopher A, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Teo, Soo Hwang, Mohd Taib, Nur Aishah, Fletcher, Olivia, Johnson, Nichola, Grip, Mervi, Winqvist, Robert, Blomqvist, Carl, Nevanlinna, Heli, Lindblom, Annika, Wendt, Camilla, Kristensen, Vessela N, Nbcs Collaborators, Tollenaar, Rob AEM, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Radice, Paolo, Bonanni, Bernardo, Hamann, Ute, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Lacey, James V, Martinez, Maria Elena, Dunning, Alison M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Easton, Douglas F, Yoo, Keun-Young, and Kang, Daehee
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Estrogen, Prevention, Aging, Genetics, Women's Health, Clinical Research, Cancer, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, breast cancer, estrogen, gene-environment interaction, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: In this study we aim to examine gene-environment interactions (GxEs) between genes involved with estrogen metabolism and environmental factors related to estrogen exposure. GxE analyses were conducted with 1970 Korean breast cancer cases and 2052 controls in the case-control study, the Seoul Breast Cancer Study (SEBCS). A total of 11,555 SNPs from the 137 candidate genes were included in the GxE analyses with eight established environmental factors. A replication test was conducted by using an independent population from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), with 62,485 Europeans and 9047 Asians. The GxE tests were performed by using two-step methods in GxEScan software. Two interactions were found in the SEBCS. The first interaction was shown between rs13035764 of NCOA1 and age at menarche in the GE|2df model (p-2df = 1.2 × 10-3). The age at menarche before 14 years old was associated with the high risk of breast cancer, and the risk was higher when subjects had homozygous minor allele G. The second GxE was shown between rs851998 near ESR1 and height in the GE|2df model (p-2df = 1.1 × 10-4). Height taller than 160 cm was associated with a high risk of breast cancer, and the risk increased when the minor allele was added. The findings were not replicated in the BCAC. These results would suggest specificity in Koreans for breast cancer risk.
Published: 2021

22. Transcriptome‐wide association study of breast cancer risk by estrogen‐receptor status

Author: Feng, Helian, Gusev, Alexander, Pasaniuc, Bogdan, Wu, Lang, Long, Jirong, Abu‐full, Zomoroda, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Antoniou, Antonis C, Arason, Adalgeir, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Asseryanis, Ella, Auer, Paul L, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barnes, Daniel R, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Blanco, Ana, Blomqvist, Carl, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Briceno, Ignacio, Broeks, Annegien, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cai, Qiuyin, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Canisius, Sander, Campa, Daniele, Carter, Brian D, Carter, Jonathan, Castelao, Jose E, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Christiansen, Hans, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Collaborators, GC‐HBOC study, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, de la Hoya, Miguel, De Leeneer, Kim, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ellberg, Carolina, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fostira, Florentia, Friedman, Eitan, Fritschi, Lin, Frost, Debra, Gabrielson, Marike, Ganz, Patricia A, Gapstur, Susan M, Garber, Judy, García‐Closas, Montserrat, García‐Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González‐Neira, Anna, and Greene, Mark H
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Health Sciences, Genetics, Cancer, Biotechnology, Prevention, Clinical Research, Human Genome, Estrogen, Breast Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogens, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genomics, Humans, Receptors, Estrogen, Risk Assessment, Transcriptome, Vesicular Transport Proteins, breast cancer subtype, causal gene, GWAS, TWAS, GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, GC-HBOC study Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, HEBON Investigators, BCFR Investigators, OCGN Investigators, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Abstract: Previous transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) have identified breast cancer risk genes by integrating data from expression quantitative loci and genome-wide association studies (GWAS), but analyses of breast cancer subtype-specific associations have been limited. In this study, we conducted a TWAS using gene expression data from GTEx and summary statistics from the hitherto largest GWAS meta-analysis conducted for breast cancer overall, and by estrogen receptor subtypes (ER+ and ER-). We further compared associations with ER+ and ER- subtypes, using a case-only TWAS approach. We also conducted multigene conditional analyses in regions with multiple TWAS associations. Two genes, STXBP4 and HIST2H2BA, were specifically associated with ER+ but not with ER- breast cancer. We further identified 30 TWAS-significant genes associated with overall breast cancer risk, including four that were not identified in previous studies. Conditional analyses identified single independent breast-cancer gene in three of six regions harboring multiple TWAS-significant genes. Our study provides new information on breast cancer genetics and biology, particularly about genomic differences between ER+ and ER- breast cancer.
Published: 2020

23. Genome-wide association study identifies 32 novel breast cancer susceptibility loci from overall and subtype-specific analyses.

Author: Zhang, Haoyu, Ahearn, Thomas U, Lecarpentier, Julie, Barnes, Daniel, Beesley, Jonathan, Qi, Guanghao, Jiang, Xia, O'Mara, Tracy A, Zhao, Ni, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dunning, Alison M, Dennis, Joe, Wang, Qin, Ful, Zumuruda Abu, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Auer, Paul L, Azzollini, Jacopo, Barrowdale, Daniel, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bialkowska, Katarzyna, Blanco, Ana, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Bondavalli, Davide, Borg, Ake, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Briceno, Ignacio, Broeks, Annegien, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Byers, Helen, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Calvello, Mariarosaria, Campa, Daniele, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Christiaens, Melissa, Christiansen, Hans, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Foretova, Lenka, Fostira, Florentia, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, Garber, Judy, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Gayther, Simon A, Giles, Graham G, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Guénel, Pascal, Häberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Hake, Christopher R, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, and Hillemanns, Peter
Subjects: kConFab Investigators, ABCTB Investigators, EMBRACE Study, GEMO Study Collaborators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, Case-Control Studies, Linkage Disequilibrium, Mutation, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Human Genome, Cancer, Prevention, Genetics, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Developmental Biology, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract: Breast cancer susceptibility variants frequently show heterogeneity in associations by tumor subtype1-3. To identify novel loci, we performed a genome-wide association study including 133,384 breast cancer cases and 113,789 controls, plus 18,908 BRCA1 mutation carriers (9,414 with breast cancer) of European ancestry, using both standard and novel methodologies that account for underlying tumor heterogeneity by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and tumor grade. We identified 32 novel susceptibility loci (P
Published: 2020

24. Cross-cancer genome-wide association study of endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer identifies genetic risk regions associated with risk of both cancers

Author: Glubb, Dylan M, Thompson, Deborah J, Aben, Katja KH, Alsulimani, Ahmad, Amant, Frederic, Annibali, Daniela, Attia, John, Barricarte, Aurelio, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Bischof, Katharina, Bjorge, Line, Bodelon, Clara, Brand, Alison H, Brenton, James D, Brinton, Louise, Bruinsma, Fiona, Buchanan, Daniel D, Burghaus, Stefanie, Butzow, Ralf, Cai, Hui, Carney, Michael E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Chu, Chen, Xiao Qing, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cunningham, Julie M, De Vivo, Immaculata, deFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dunning, Alison M, Dürst, Matthias, Edwards, Todd, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Ewing, Ailith, Fasching, Peter A, Ferguson, Sarah, Flanagan, James M, Fostira, Florentia, Fountzilas, George, Friedenreich, Christine M, Gao, Bo, Gaudet, Mia M, Gawełko, Jan, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Group, OPAL Study, Group, AOCS, Harris, Holly R, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Holliday, Elizabeth G, Huntsman, David G, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Jones, Michael E, Karlan, Beth Y, Karnezis, Anthony, Kelley, Joseph L, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Killeen, Jeffrey L, Kjaer, Susanne K, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Köbel, Martin, Konopka, Bozena, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kopperud, Reidun K, Koti, Madhuri, Kraft, Peter, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Melissa C, Le Marchand, Loic, Lele, Shashikant B, Lester, Jenny, Li, Andrew J, Liang, Dong, Liebrich, Clemens, Lipworth, Loren, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Lingeng, Lu, Karen H, Macciotta, Alessandra, Mattiello, Amalia, and May, Taymaa
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Epidemiology, Health Sciences, Statistics, Mathematical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Aging, Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Cancer, Uterine Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Biotechnology, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract: Abstract: Accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer. For example, endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer share epidemiological risk factors and molecular features observed across histotypes are held in common (e.g. serous, endometrioid and clear cell). Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. Using GWAS summary statistics, we explored the shared genetic etiology between endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer. Genetic correlation analysis using LD Score regression revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10−5). To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e. inverse-variance meta-analysis, co-localization, and M-values), and performed analyses by stratified by subtype. We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (PBonferroni < 2.4 × 10−9). In addition, four novel regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12 and 11q13.3 were identified at a sub-genome wide threshold (P < 5 × 10−7). Integration with promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and epithelial ovarian cell lines, and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation.
Published: 2020

25. Fine-mapping of 150 breast cancer risk regions identifies 191 likely target genes.

Author: Fachal, Laura, Aschard, Hugues, Beesley, Jonathan, Barnes, Daniel R, Allen, Jamie, Kar, Siddhartha, Pooley, Karen A, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Turman, Constance, Soucy, Penny, Lemaçon, Audrey, Lush, Michael, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Ghoussaini, Maya, Moradi Marjaneh, Mahdi, Jiang, Xia, Agata, Simona, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alonso, M Rosario, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arason, Adalgeir, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Auber, Bernd, Auer, Paul L, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Blanco, Amie M, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Bosse, Kristin, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Briceno, Ignacio, Brock, Ian W, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Cai, Qiuyin, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Camp, Nicola J, Campbell, Ian, Canzian, Federico, Carroll, Jason S, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Christiansen, Hans, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, Collée, J Margriet, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, de la Hoya, Miguel, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Dite, Gillian S, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Droit, Arnaud, Dubois, Stéphane, Dumont, Martine, Duran, Mercedes, Durcan, Lorraine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Floris, Giuseppe, and Flyger, Henrik
Subjects: GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, KConFab Investigators, HEBON Investigators, ABCTB Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Bayes Theorem, Risk Factors, Chromosome Mapping, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Biomarkers, Tumor, Genetic Testing, Prevention, Genetics, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, Biotechnology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Developmental Biology, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have identified breast cancer risk variants in over 150 genomic regions, but the mechanisms underlying risk remain largely unknown. These regions were explored by combining association analysis with in silico genomic feature annotations. We defined 205 independent risk-associated signals with the set of credible causal variants in each one. In parallel, we used a Bayesian approach (PAINTOR) that combines genetic association, linkage disequilibrium and enriched genomic features to determine variants with high posterior probabilities of being causal. Potentially causal variants were significantly over-represented in active gene regulatory regions and transcription factor binding sites. We applied our INQUSIT pipeline for prioritizing genes as targets of those potentially causal variants, using gene expression (expression quantitative trait loci), chromatin interaction and functional annotations. Known cancer drivers, transcription factors and genes in the developmental, apoptosis, immune system and DNA integrity checkpoint gene ontology pathways were over-represented among the highest-confidence target genes.
Published: 2020

26. Population based targeted sequencing of 54 candidate genes identifies PALB2 as a susceptibility gene for high grade serous ovarian cancer

Author: Song, Honglin, Dicks, Ed, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Intermaggio, Maria, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Bowtell, David D, Traficante, Nadia, Group, AOCS, Brenton, James D, Goranova, Teodora, Hosking, Karen, Piskorz, Anna, Van Oudenhove, Elke, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Harris, Holly R, Rossing, Mary Anne, Dürst, Matthias, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Odunsi, Kunle, Ness, Roberta B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Jensen, Allan, Kjaer, Susanne K, Høgdall, Estrid, Campbell, Ian, Lazaro, Conxi, Pujana, Miquel Angel, Cunningham, Julie M, Vierkant, Robert A, Winham, Stacey J, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Huff, Chad, Li, Donghui, Wu, Xifeng, Yu, Yao, Permuth, Jennifer B, Levine, Douglas A, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Riggan, Marjorie J, Berchuck, Andrew, Webb, Penelope M, Group, OPAL Study, Cybulski, Cezary, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Alsop, Jennifer, Harrington, Patricia A, Chan, Isaac, Menon, Usha, Pearce, Celeste L, Wu, Anna H, de Fazio, Anna, Kennedy, Catherine J, Goode, Ellen L, Ramus, Susan J, Gayther, Simon A, and Pharoah, Paul DP
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Orphan Drug, Clinical Research, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology
Abstract: Abstract: Purpose: The known EOC susceptibility genes account for less than 50% of the heritable risk of ovarian cancer suggesting other susceptibility genes exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution to ovarian cancer susceptibility of rare deleterious germline variants in a set of candidate genes. Methods: We sequenced the coding region of 54 candidate genes in 6385 invasive EOC cases and 6115 controls of broad European ancestry. Genes with an increased frequency of putative deleterious variants in cases verses controls were further examined in an independent set of 14,146 EOC cases and 28,661 controls from the ovarian cancer association consortium and the UK Biobank. For each gene, we estimated the EOC risks and evaluated associations between germline variant status and clinical characteristics. Results: The odds ratios (OR) associated for high-grade serous ovarian cancer were 3.01 for PALB2 (95% CI 1.59 – 5.68; P = 0.00068), 1.99 for POLK (95% CI 1.15 – 3.43; P = 0.014), and 4.07 for SLX4 (95% CI 1.34-12.4; P = 0.013). Deleterious mutations in FBXO10 were associated with a reduced risk of disease (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07 −1.00, P=0.049). However, based on the Bayes false discovery probability, only the association for PALB2 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer is likely to represent a true positive. Conclusions: We have found strong evidence that carriers of PALB2 deleterious mutations are at increased risk of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Whether the magnitude of risk is sufficiently high to warrant the inclusion of PALB2 in cancer gene panels for ovarian cancer risk testing is unclear; much larger sample sizes will be needed to provide sufficiently precise estimates for clinical counselling.
Published: 2019

27. Two truncating variants in FANCC and breast cancer risk.

Author: Dörk, Thilo, Peterlongo, Paolo, Mannermaa, Arto, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Canzian, Federico, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, Couch, Fergus J, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Chi, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hauke, Jan, Hein, Alexander, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Howell, Tony, Huo, Dezheng, Ito, Hidemi, Iwasaki, Motoki, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kim, Sung-Won, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kwong, Ava, Lambrechts, Diether, Marchand, Loic Le, Li, Jingmei, Lindström, Sara, Linet, Martha, Lo, Wing-Yee, Long, Jirong, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Lubiński, Jan, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Elena, Matsuo, Keitaro, Mavroudis, Dimitris, and Meindl, Alfons
Subjects: ABCTB Investigators, NBCS Collaborators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Fanconi Anemia, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Case-Control Studies, Sequence Deletion, Female, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group C Protein, Genetic Variation, Clinical Research, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Other Physical Sciences
Abstract: Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder with 22 disease-causing genes reported to date. In some FA genes, monoallelic mutations have been found to be associated with breast cancer risk, while the risk associations of others remain unknown. The gene for FA type C, FANCC, has been proposed as a breast cancer susceptibility gene based on epidemiological and sequencing studies. We used the Oncoarray project to genotype two truncating FANCC variants (p.R185X and p.R548X) in 64,760 breast cancer cases and 49,793 controls of European descent. FANCC mutations were observed in 25 cases (14 with p.R185X, 11 with p.R548X) and 26 controls (18 with p.R185X, 8 with p.R548X). There was no evidence of an association with the risk of breast cancer, neither overall (odds ratio 0.77, 95%CI 0.44-1.33, p = 0.4) nor by histology, hormone receptor status, age or family history. We conclude that the breast cancer risk association of these two FANCC variants, if any, is much smaller than for BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations. If this applies to all truncating variants in FANCC it would suggest there are differences between FA genes in their roles on breast cancer risk and demonstrates the merit of large consortia for clarifying risk associations of rare variants.
Published: 2019

28. Associations of obesity and circulating insulin and glucose with breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis.

Author: Shu, Xiang, Wu, Lang, Khankari, Nikhil K, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Wang, Thomas J, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Milne, Roger L, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Pharoah, Paul DP, Andrulis, Irene L, Hunter, David J, Simard, Jacques, Easton, Douglas F, Zheng, Wei, Alicia, Beeghly-Fadiel J, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Barrdahl, Myrto, Baynes, Caroline, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cai, Qiuyin, Caldés, Trinidad, Canzian, Federico, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, David Cheng, Ting-Yuan, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, David G, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Doheny, Kimberly F, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Earp, H Shelton, Eccles, Diana M, Heather Eliassen, A, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Gareth Evans, D, Fachal, Laura, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Ghoussaini, Maya, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, He, Wei, Hein, Alexander, Hicks, Belynda, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogervorst, Frans B, Hollestelle, Antoinette, and Hoover, Robert N
Subjects: Clinical Research, Diabetes, Prevention, Nutrition, Obesity, Cancer, Aging, Breast Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Metabolic and endocrine, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Mass Index, Breast Neoplasms, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Insulin, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Middle Aged, Obesity, Abdominal, Waist-Hip Ratio, Breast cancer, insulin, glucose, obesity, genetics, Mendelian randomization analysis, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Abstract: BackgroundIn addition to the established association between general obesity and breast cancer risk, central obesity and circulating fasting insulin and glucose have been linked to the development of this common malignancy. Findings from previous studies, however, have been inconsistent, and the nature of the associations is unclear.MethodsWe conducted Mendelian randomization analyses to evaluate the association of breast cancer risk, using genetic instruments, with fasting insulin, fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, body mass index (BMI) and BMI-adjusted waist-hip-ratio (WHRadj BMI). We first confirmed the association of these instruments with type 2 diabetes risk in a large diabetes genome-wide association study consortium. We then investigated their associations with breast cancer risk using individual-level data obtained from 98 842 cases and 83 464 controls of European descent in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.ResultsAll sets of instruments were associated with risk of type 2 diabetes. Associations with breast cancer risk were found for genetically predicted fasting insulin [odds ratio (OR) = 1.71 per standard deviation (SD) increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26-2.31, p = 5.09 × 10-4], 2-h glucose (OR = 1.80 per SD increase, 95% CI = 1.3 0-2.49, p = 4.02 × 10-4), BMI (OR = 0.70 per 5-unit increase, 95% CI = 0.65-0.76, p = 5.05 × 10-19) and WHRadj BMI (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.91, p = 9.22 × 10-6). Stratified analyses showed that genetically predicted fasting insulin was more closely related to risk of estrogen-receptor [ER]-positive cancer, whereas the associations with instruments of 2-h glucose, BMI and WHRadj BMI were consistent regardless of age, menopausal status, estrogen receptor status and family history of breast cancer.ConclusionsWe confirmed the previously reported inverse association of genetically predicted BMI with breast cancer risk, and showed a positive association of genetically predicted fasting insulin and 2-h glucose and an inverse association of WHRadj BMI with breast cancer risk. Our study suggests that genetically determined obesity and glucose/insulin-related traits have an important role in the aetiology of breast cancer.
Published: 2019

29. Genome-wide association and transcriptome studies identify target genes and risk loci for breast cancer.

Author: Ferreira, Manuel A, Gamazon, Eric R, Al-Ejeh, Fares, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arason, Adalgeir, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Asseryanis, Ella, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Barnes, Daniel R, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Borg, Ake, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Burwinkel, Barbara, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campa, Daniele, Campbell, Ian, Canzian, Federico, Carter, Jonathan, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Christiansen, Hans, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, EMBRACE Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, GEMO Study Collaborators, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, de la Hoya, Miguel, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ellberg, Carolina, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Ganz, Patricia A, Gapstur, Susan M, Garber, Judy, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, He, Wei, Heyworth, Jane, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Hulick, Peter J, Humphreys, Keith, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, ABCTB Investigators, HEBON Investigators, and BCFR Investigators
Subjects: EMBRACE Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, GEMO Study Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, HEBON Investigators, BCFR Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Gene Expression Profiling, Quantitative Trait Loci, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Prevention, Cancer, Human Genome, Aging, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Biotechnology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 170 breast cancer susceptibility loci. Here we hypothesize that some risk-associated variants might act in non-breast tissues, specifically adipose tissue and immune cells from blood and spleen. Using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) reported in these tissues, we identify 26 previously unreported, likely target genes of overall breast cancer risk variants, and 17 for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, several with a known immune function. We determine the directional effect of gene expression on disease risk measured based on single and multiple eQTL. In addition, using a gene-based test of association that considers eQTL from multiple tissues, we identify seven (and four) regions with variants associated with overall (and ER-negative) breast cancer risk, which were not reported in previous GWAS. Further investigation of the function of the implicated genes in breast and immune cells may provide insights into the etiology of breast cancer.
Published: 2019

30. Genome-wide association study of germline variants and breast cancer-specific mortality.

Author: Escala-Garcia, Maria, Guo, Qi, Dörk, Thilo, Canisius, Sander, Keeman, Renske, Dennis, Joe, Beesley, Jonathan, Lecarpentier, Julie, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Abraham, Jean, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Auer, Paul L, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Blomqvist, Carl, Boeckx, Bram, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brentnall, Adam, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brock, Ian W, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Caldas, Carlos, Caldés, Trinidad, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Carracedo, Angel, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Chin, Suet-Feung, Clarke, Christine L, NBCS Collaborators, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, David G, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dunn, Janet A, Dunning, Alison M, Durcan, Lorraine, Dwek, Miriam, Earl, Helena M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Ellberg, Carolina, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Galle, Eva, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, George, Angela, Georgoulias, Vassilios, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Alnæs, Grethe I Grenaker, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hankinson, Susan, Harkness, Elaine F, Harrington, Patricia A, Hart, Steven N, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Hein, Alexander, Hillemanns, Peter, Hiller, Louise, and Holleczek, Bernd
Subjects: NBCS Collaborators, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Receptors, Estrogen, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Bayes Theorem, Female, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, White People, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundWe examined the associations between germline variants and breast cancer mortality using a large meta-analysis of women of European ancestry.MethodsMeta-analyses included summary estimates based on Cox models of twelve datasets using ~10.4 million variants for 96,661 women with breast cancer and 7697 events (breast cancer-specific deaths). Oestrogen receptor (ER)-specific analyses were based on 64,171 ER-positive (4116) and 16,172 ER-negative (2125) patients. We evaluated the probability of a signal to be a true positive using the Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP).ResultsWe did not find any variant associated with breast cancer-specific mortality at P
Published: 2019

31. Genetic Data from Nearly 63,000 Women of European Descent Predicts DNA Methylation Biomarkers and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk

Author: Yang, Yaohua, Wu, Lang, Shu, Xiang, Lu, Yingchang, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Cai, Qiuyin, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Li, Bingshan, Ye, Fei, Berchuck, Andrew, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Banerjee, Susana, Benitez, Javier, Bjørge, Line, Brenton, James D, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Kexin, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, deFazio, Anna, Dennis, Joe, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, Eccles, Diana M, Edwards, Digna Velez, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Gayther, Simon A, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind M, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harris, Holly R, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle A, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Huntsman, David G, Kar, Siddhartha P, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Kjaer, Susanne K, Koushik, Anita, Lambrechts, Diether, Le, Nhu D, Levine, Douglas A, Massuger, Leon F, Matsuo, Keitaro, May, Taymaa, McNeish, Iain A, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Monteiro, Alvaro N, Moorman, Patricia G, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olsson, Håkan, Onland-Moret, N Charlotte, Park, Sue K, Paul, James, Pearce, Celeste L, Pejovic, Tanja, Phelan, Catherine M, Pike, Malcolm C, Ramus, Susan J, Riboli, Elio, Rodriguez-Antona, Cristina, Romieu, Isabelle, Sandler, Dale P, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Setiawan, Veronica W, Shan, Kang, Siddiqui, Nadeem, Sieh, Weiva, Stampfer, Meir J, Sutphen, Rebecca, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Szafron, Lukasz M, Teo, Soo Hwang, Tworoger, Shelley S, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Webb, Penelope M, Wentzensen, Nicolas, White, Emily, Willett, Walter C, Wolk, Alicja, Woo, Yin Ling, Wu, Anna H, Yan, Li, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Sellers, Thomas A, Pharoah, Paul DP, Zheng, Wei, and Long, Jirong
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Biotechnology, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer Genomics, Prevention, Women's Health, Cancer, Clinical Research, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Cohort Studies, DNA Methylation, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Models, Genetic, Ovarian Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk, White People, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Biochemistry and cell biology, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: DNA methylation is instrumental for gene regulation. Global changes in the epigenetic landscape have been recognized as a hallmark of cancer. However, the role of DNA methylation in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. In this study, high-density genetic and DNA methylation data in white blood cells from the Framingham Heart Study (N = 1,595) were used to build genetic models to predict DNA methylation levels. These prediction models were then applied to the summary statistics of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ovarian cancer including 22,406 EOC cases and 40,941 controls to investigate genetically predicted DNA methylation levels in association with EOC risk. Among 62,938 CpG sites investigated, genetically predicted methylation levels at 89 CpG were significantly associated with EOC risk at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 7.94 × 10-7. Of them, 87 were located at GWAS-identified EOC susceptibility regions and two resided in a genomic region not previously reported to be associated with EOC risk. Integrative analyses of genetic, methylation, and gene expression data identified consistent directions of associations across 12 CpG, five genes, and EOC risk, suggesting that methylation at these 12 CpG may influence EOC risk by regulating expression of these five genes, namely MAPT, HOXB3, ABHD8, ARHGAP27, and SKAP1. We identified novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk and propose that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk via regulation of gene expression. SIGNIFICANCE: Identification of novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk suggests that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk through regulation of gene expression.
Published: 2019

32. Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers.

Author: Jiang, Xia, Finucane, Hilary K, Schumacher, Fredrick R, Schmit, Stephanie L, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Han, Younghun, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Lesseur, Corina, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Dennis, Joe, Conti, David V, Casey, Graham, Gaudet, Mia M, Huyghe, Jeroen R, Albanes, Demetrius, Aldrich, Melinda C, Andrew, Angeline S, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antoniou, Antonis C, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arnold, Susanne M, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Bandera, Elisa V, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barnes, Daniel R, Batra, Jyotsna, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Benlloch, Sara, Berchuck, Andrew, Berndt, Sonja I, Bickeböller, Heike, Bien, Stephanie A, Blomqvist, Carl, Boccia, Stefania, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brenton, James D, Brook, Mark N, Brunet, Joan, Brunnström, Hans, Buchanan, Daniel D, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Cadoni, Gabriella, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Campbell, Peter T, Cancel-Tassin, Géraldine, Cannon-Albright, Lisa, Campa, Daniele, Caporaso, Neil, Carvalho, André L, Chan, Andrew T, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Chu, Christiani, David C, Claes, Kathleen BM, Claessens, Frank, Clements, Judith, Collée, J Margriet, Correa, Marcia Cruz, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, deFazio, Anna, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Donovan, Jenny L, Dörk, Thilo, Duell, Eric J, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Edlund, Christopher K, Edwards, Digna R Velez, Ellberg, Carolina, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Ferris, Robert L, Liloglou, Triantafillos, Figueiredo, Jane C, Fletcher, Olivia, Fortner, Renée T, Fostira, Florentia, Franceschi, Silvia, Friedman, Eitan, Gallinger, Steven J, and Ganz, Patricia A
Subjects: Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Neoplasm Proteins, Case-Control Studies, Smoking, Mental Disorders, Inheritance Patterns, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Male, Genome-Wide Association Study, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prevention, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Lung Cancer, Human Genome, Colo-Rectal Cancer, Digestive Diseases, Lung, MD Multidisciplinary
Abstract: Quantifying the genetic correlation between cancers can provide important insights into the mechanisms driving cancer etiology. Using genome-wide association study summary statistics across six cancer types based on a total of 296,215 cases and 301,319 controls of European ancestry, here we estimate the pair-wise genetic correlations between breast, colorectal, head/neck, lung, ovary and prostate cancer, and between cancers and 38 other diseases. We observed statistically significant genetic correlations between lung and head/neck cancer (rg = 0.57, p = 4.6 × 10-8), breast and ovarian cancer (rg = 0.24, p = 7 × 10-5), breast and lung cancer (rg = 0.18, p =1.5 × 10-6) and breast and colorectal cancer (rg = 0.15, p = 1.1 × 10-4). We also found that multiple cancers are genetically correlated with non-cancer traits including smoking, psychiatric diseases and metabolic characteristics. Functional enrichment analysis revealed a significant excess contribution of conserved and regulatory regions to cancer heritability. Our comprehensive analysis of cross-cancer heritability suggests that solid tumors arising across tissues share in part a common germline genetic basis.
Published: 2019

33. Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes.

Author: Mavaddat, Nasim, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Fachal, Laura, Lee, Andrew, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Chen, Ting-Huei, Wang, Qin, Bolla, Manjeet K, Yang, Xin, Adank, Muriel A, Ahearn, Thomas, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Allen, Jamie, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Auvinen, Päivi, Barrdahl, Myrto, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Bremer, Michael, Brenner, Hermann, Brentnall, Adam, Brock, Ian W, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Campa, Daniele, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chlebowski, Rowan, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, J Margriet, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Durcan, Lorraine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Ellberg, Carolina, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Försti, Asta, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Georgoulias, Vassilios, Giles, Graham G, Gilyazova, Irina R, Glendon, Gord, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Grenaker Alnæs, Grethe I, Grip, Mervi, Gronwald, Jacek, Grundy, Anne, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, and Hankinson, Susan E
Subjects: ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, NBCS Collaborators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Receptors, Estrogen, Medical History Taking, Risk Assessment, Reproducibility of Results, Age Factors, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Female, breast, cancer, epidemiology, genetic, polygenic, prediction, risk, score, screening, stratification, Human Genome, Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: Stratification of women according to their risk of breast cancer based on polygenic risk scores (PRSs) could improve screening and prevention strategies. Our aim was to develop PRSs, optimized for prediction of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific disease, from the largest available genome-wide association dataset and to empirically validate the PRSs in prospective studies. The development dataset comprised 94,075 case subjects and 75,017 control subjects of European ancestry from 69 studies, divided into training and validation sets. Samples were genotyped using genome-wide arrays, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected by stepwise regression or lasso penalized regression. The best performing PRSs were validated in an independent test set comprising 11,428 case subjects and 18,323 control subjects from 10 prospective studies and 190,040 women from UK Biobank (3,215 incident breast cancers). For the best PRSs (313 SNPs), the odds ratio for overall disease per 1 standard deviation in ten prospective studies was 1.61 (95%CI: 1.57-1.65) with area under receiver-operator curve (AUC) = 0.630 (95%CI: 0.628-0.651). The lifetime risk of overall breast cancer in the top centile of the PRSs was 32.6%. Compared with women in the middle quintile, those in the highest 1% of risk had 4.37- and 2.78-fold risks, and those in the lowest 1% of risk had 0.16- and 0.27-fold risks, of developing ER-positive and ER-negative disease, respectively. Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that this PRS was well calibrated and predicts disease risk accurately in the tails of the distribution. This PRS is a powerful and reliable predictor of breast cancer risk that may improve breast cancer prevention programs.
Published: 2019

34. A Transcriptome-Wide Association Study Among 97,898 Women to Identify Candidate Susceptibility Genes for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk

Author: Lu, Yingchang, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Wu, Lang, Guo, Xingyi, Li, Bingshan, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Im, Hae Kyung, Chen, Yian A, Permuth, Jennifer B, Reid, Brett M, Teer, Jamie K, Moysich, Kirsten B, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arun, Banu K, Bandera, Elisa V, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barnes, Daniel R, Benitez, Javier, Bjorge, Line, Brenton, James, Butzow, Ralf, Caldes, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Claes, Kathleen BM, Couch, Fergus J, Cramer, Daniel W, Daly, Mary B, deFazio, Anna, Dennis, Joe, Diez, Orland, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Fountzilas, George, Friedman, Eitan, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Giles, Graham G, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldgar, David E, Goodman, Marc T, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Hamann, Ute, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Høgdall, Claus K, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hulick, Peter J, Huntsman, David G, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Isaacs, Claudine, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kwong, Ava, Le, Nhu D, Leslie, Goska, Lesueur, Fabienne, Levine, Douglas A, Mattiello, Amalia, May, Taymaa, McGuffog, Lesley, McNeish, Iain A, Merritt, Melissa A, Modugno, Francesmary, Montagna, Marco, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Nielsen, Finn C, Nikitina-Zake, Liene, Nussbaum, Robert L, Offit, Kenneth, Olah, Edith, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Olson, Sara H, Olsson, Håkan, Osorio, Ana, Park, Sue K, Parsons, Michael T, Peeters, Petra HM, Pejovic, Tanja, Peterlongo, Paolo, Phelan, Catherine M, Pujana, Miquel Angel, Ramus, Susan J, Rennert, Gad, Risch, Harvey, Rodriguez, Gustavo C, Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina, and Romieu, Isabelle
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Prevention, Human Genome, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinogenesis, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Cohort Studies, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prognosis, Quantitative Trait Loci, Risk Factors, Transcriptome, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Biochemistry and cell biology, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified approximately 35 loci associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. The majority of GWAS-identified disease susceptibility variants are located in noncoding regions, and causal genes underlying these associations remain largely unknown. Here, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study to search for novel genetic loci and plausible causal genes at known GWAS loci. We used RNA sequencing data (68 normal ovarian tissue samples from 68 individuals and 6,124 cross-tissue samples from 369 individuals) and high-density genotyping data from European descendants of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx V6) project to build ovarian and cross-tissue models of genetically regulated expression using elastic net methods. We evaluated 17,121 genes for their cis-predicted gene expression in relation to EOC risk using summary statistics data from GWAS of 97,898 women, including 29,396 EOC cases. With a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of P < 2.2 × 10-6, we identified 35 genes, including FZD4 at 11q14.2 (Z = 5.08, P = 3.83 × 10-7, the cross-tissue model; 1 Mb away from any GWAS-identified EOC risk variant), a potential novel locus for EOC risk. All other 34 significantly associated genes were located within 1 Mb of known GWAS-identified loci, including 23 genes at 6 loci not previously linked to EOC risk. Upon conditioning on nearby known EOC GWAS-identified variants, the associations for 31 genes disappeared and three genes remained (P < 1.47 × 10-3). These data identify one novel locus (FZD4) and 34 genes at 13 known EOC risk loci associated with EOC risk, providing new insights into EOC carcinogenesis.Significance: Transcriptomic analysis of a large cohort confirms earlier GWAS loci and reveals FZD4 as a novel locus associated with EOC risk. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5419-30. ©2018 AACR.
Published: 2018

35. rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 Region and Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma of Mucinous Histology.

Author: Kelemen, Linda E, Earp, Madalene, Fridley, Brooke L, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Ekici, Arif B, Hein, Alexander, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Behrens, Sabine, Moysich, Kirsten B, Cannioto, Rikki, Lele, Shashikant, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Thompson, Pamela J, Wilkens, Lynne R, Dörk, Thilo, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bogdanova, Natalia, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, du Bois, Andreas, Harter, Philipp, Heitz, Florian, Schwaab, Ira, Butzow, Ralf, Pelttari, Liisa M, Nevanlinna, Heli, Modugno, Francesmary, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Ness, Roberta B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Orsulic, Sandra, Walsh, Christine, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Cunningham, Julie M, Vierkant, Robert A, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Southey, Melissa C, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen, Wu, Xifeng, Sellers, Thomas A, Levine, Douglas A, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Iversen, Edwin S, Terry, Kathryn L, Cramer, Daniel W, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Bandera, Elisa V, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Vestrheim Thomsen, Liv Cecilie, Bjorge, Line, Krakstad, Camilla, Tangen, Ingvild L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Aben, Katja KH, Massuger, Leon FAG, van Altena, Anne M, Pejovic, Tanja, Bean, Yukie, Kellar, Melissa, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Gronwald, Jacek, Cybulski, Cezary, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Hogdall, Estrid, Engelholm, Svend Aage, Hogdall, Claus, Lundvall, Lene, Nedergaard, Lotte, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dicks, Ed, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, McNeish, Iain, Siddiqui, Nadeem, and Carty, Karen
Subjects: Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Humans, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Ovarian Neoplasms, Hydro-Lyases, Thymidylate Synthase, Proteins, RNA, Antisense, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Risk, Case-Control Studies, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Middle Aged, Female, Genetic Association Studies, consortia, enolase superfamily member 1, expression quantitative trait locus, genetics, gynecology, ovarian neoplasms, single-nucleotide polymorphism, thymidylate synthase, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Biotechnology, Cancer, Digestive Diseases, Genetics, Chemical Physics, Other Chemical Sciences, Other Biological Sciences
Abstract: Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is a crucial enzyme for DNA synthesis. TYMS expression is regulated by its antisense mRNA, ENOSF1. Disrupted regulation may promote uncontrolled DNA synthesis and tumor growth. We sought to replicate our previously reported association between rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 3' gene region and increased risk of mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) in an independent sample. Genotypes from 24,351 controls to 15,000 women with invasive OC, including 665 MOC, were available. We estimated per-allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression, and meta-analysis when combining these data with our previous report. The association between rs495139 and MOC was not significant in the independent sample (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.97⁻1.22; p = 0.15; N = 665 cases). Meta-analysis suggested a weak association (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.03⁻1.24; p = 0.01; N = 1019 cases). No significant association with risk of other OC histologic types was observed (p = 0.05 for tumor heterogeneity). In expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis, the rs495139 allele was positively associated with ENOSF1 mRNA expression in normal tissues of the gastrointestinal system, particularly esophageal mucosa (r = 0.51, p = 1.7 × 10-28), and nonsignificantly in five MOC tumors. The association results, along with inconclusive tumor eQTL findings, suggest that a true effect of rs495139 might be small.
Published: 2018

36. A transcriptome-wide association study of 229,000 women identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast cancer

Author: Wu, Lang, Shi, Wei, Long, Jirong, Guo, Xingyi, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Beesley, Jonathan, Bolla, Manjeet K, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Lu, Yingchang, Cai, Qiuyin, Al-Ejeh, Fares, Rozali, Esdy, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Li, Bingshan, Zeng, Chenjie, Feng, Helian, Gusev, Alexander, Barfield, Richard T, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Barrdahl, Myrto, Baynes, Caroline, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Caldés, Trinidad, Canzian, Federico, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, J Esteban, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Xiaoqing, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, NBCS Collaborators, Collée, Margriet, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, David, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Doheny, Kimberly F, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Eilber, Ursula, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fachal, Laura, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Ghoussaini, Maya, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, Hein, Alexander, Hicks, Belynda, Hillemanns, Peter, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, and Huang, Guanmengqian
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Genetics, Human Genome, Biotechnology, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Women's Health, Cancer Genomics, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Generic health relevance, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Female, Gene Expression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Transcriptome, NBCS Collaborators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Agricultural biotechnology, Bioinformatics and computational biology
Abstract: The breast cancer risk variants identified in genome-wide association studies explain only a small fraction of the familial relative risk, and the genes responsible for these associations remain largely unknown. To identify novel risk loci and likely causal genes, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study evaluating associations of genetically predicted gene expression with breast cancer risk in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry. We used data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project to establish genetic models to predict gene expression in breast tissue and evaluated model performance using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Of the 8,597 genes evaluated, significant associations were identified for 48 at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P
Published: 2018

37. The BRCA2 c.68‐7T > A variant is not pathogenic: A model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity

Author: Colombo, Mara, Lòpez‐Perolio, Irene, Meeks, Huong D, Caleca, Laura, Parsons, Michael T, Li, Hongyan, Vecchi, Giovanna, Tudini, Emma, Foglia, Claudia, Mondini, Patrizia, Manoukian, Siranoush, Behar, Raquel, Garcia, Encarna B Gómez, Meindl, Alfons, Montagna, Marco, Niederacher, Dieter, Schmidt, Ane Y, Varesco, Liliana, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Wang, Qin, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly‐Fadel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, García‐Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, González‐Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hauke, Jan, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, Jung, Audrey, Kosma, Veli‐Matti, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loid, Lindblom, Annika, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Miao, Hui, Milne, Roger L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olson, Janet E, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Pylkäs, Katri, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schneeweiss, Andreas, Schoemaker, Minouk J, See, Mee Hoong, Southey, Melissa C, Swerdlow, Anthony, Teo, Soo H, Toland, Amanda E, Tomlinson, Ian, Truong, Thérèse, Asperen, Christi J, Ouweland, Ans MW den, der Kolk, Lizet E, Winqvist, Robert, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Zheng, Wei, Investigators, kConFab AOCS, Dunning, Alison M, and Easton, Douglas F
Subjects: Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, BRCA2 Protein, Base Sequence, Calibration, Cell Line, Exons, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Humans, Mitomycin, Models, Genetic, RNA Splicing, RNA, Messenger, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, BRCA2, digital PCR, multifactorial likelihood analysis, quantitative real-time PCR, spliceogenic variants, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: Although the spliceogenic nature of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant has been demonstrated, its association with cancer risk remains controversial. In this study, we accurately quantified by real-time PCR and digital PCR (dPCR), the BRCA2 isoforms retaining or missing exon 3. In addition, the combined odds ratio for causality of the variant was estimated using genetic and clinical data, and its associated cancer risk was estimated by case-control analysis in 83,636 individuals. Co-occurrence in trans with pathogenic BRCA2 variants was assessed in 5,382 families. Exon 3 exclusion rate was 4.5-fold higher in variant carriers (13%) than controls (3%), indicating an exclusion rate for the c.68-7T > A allele of approximately 20%. The posterior probability of pathogenicity was 7.44 × 10-115 . There was neither evidence for increased risk of breast cancer (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.86-1.24) nor for a deleterious effect of the variant when co-occurring with pathogenic variants. Our data provide for the first time robust evidence of the nonpathogenicity of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A. Genetic and quantitative transcript analyses together inform the threshold for the ratio between functional and altered BRCA2 isoforms compatible with normal cell function. These findings might be exploited to assess the relevance for cancer risk of other BRCA2 spliceogenic variants.
Published: 2018

38. Assessment of moderate coffee consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study

Author: Ong, Jue-Sheng, Hwang, Liang-Dar, Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Martin, Nicholas G, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Quinn, Michael CJ, Cornelis, Marilyn C, Gharahkhani, Puya, Webb, Penelope M, MacGregor, Stuart, Bryne, Enda, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Burghaus, Stefanie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Jones, Michael, Orr, Nicholas, Schoemaker, Minouk, Edwards, Digna Velez, Brenton, James, Benítez, Javier, García, María J, Rodriguez-Antona, Cristina, Rossing, Mary Anne, Fortner, Renée T, Riboli, Elio, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Eilber, Ursula, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Goodman, Marc T, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo, Duerst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Antonenkova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Cannioto, Rikki, Heitz, Florian, Karlan, Beth, Olsson, Håkan, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Wu, Xifeng, Le Marchand, Loic, Setiawan, V Wendy, Permuth, Jennifer B, Bisogna, Maria, Dao, Fanny, Levine, Douglas A, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Stampfer, Meir, Willet, Walter, Missmer, Stacey, Bjorge, Line, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bischof, Katharina, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pejovic, Tanja, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Olson, Sara H, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Gilks, C Blake, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Kluz, Tomasz, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Trabert, Britton, and Lissowska, Jolanta
Subjects: Epidemiology, Health Sciences, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Nutrition, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Coffee, Female, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Odds Ratio, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Public health
Abstract: BackgroundCoffee consumption has been shown to be associated with various health outcomes in observational studies. However, evidence for its association with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is inconsistent and it is unclear whether these associations are causal.MethodsWe used single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with (i) coffee and (ii) caffeine consumption to perform Mendelian randomization (MR) on EOC risk. We conducted a two-sample MR using genetic data on 44 062 individuals of European ancestry from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC), and combined instrumental variable estimates using a Wald-type ratio estimator.ResultsFor all EOC cases, the causal odds ratio (COR) for genetically predicted consumption of one additional cup of coffee per day was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79, 1.06]. The COR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.10) for high-grade serous EOC. The COR for genetically predicted consumption of an additional 80 mg caffeine was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.11) for all EOC cases and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.10) for high-grade serous cases.ConclusionsWe found no evidence indicative of a strong association between EOC risk and genetically predicted coffee or caffeine levels. However, our estimates were not statistically inconsistent with earlier observational studies and we were unable to rule out small protective associations.
Published: 2018

39. Adult height is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study

Author: Dixon-Suen, Suzanne C, Nagle, Christina M, Thrift, Aaron P, Pharoah, Paul DP, Ewing, Ailith, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Zheng, Wei, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Wicklund, Kristine G, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Jung, Audrey Y, Moysich, Kirsten B, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Wilkens, Lynne R, Thompson, Pamela J, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Dörk, Thilo, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Hillemanns, Peter, Bogdanova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Leminen, Arto, Modugno, Francesmary, Ness, Roberta B, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Heitz, Florian, du Bois, Andreas, Harter, Philipp, Schwaab, Ira, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Orsulic, Sandra, Rimel, Bobbie J, Kjær, Susanne K, Høgdall, Estrid, Jensen, Allan, Goode, Ellen L, Fridley, Brooke L, Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Milne, Roger L, Southey, Melissa C, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Wu, Xifeng, Lu, Karen H, Liang, Dong, Levine, Douglas A, Bisogna, Maria, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Bandera, Elisa V, Olson, Sara H, Salvesen, Helga B, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bjorge, Line, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pejovic, Tanja, Bruegl, Amanda, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Swenerton, Kenneth D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Kelemen, Linda E, Lubiński, Jan, Huzarski, Tomasz, Gronwald, Jacek, Menkiszak, Janusz, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Yang, Hannah, Lissowska, Jolanta, Høgdall, Claus K, Lundvall, Lene, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Campbell, Ian, Eccles, Diana, Paul, James, Glasspool, Rosalind, Siddiqui, Nadeem, and Whittemore, Alice S
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Women's Health, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Height, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Geography, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundObservational studies suggest greater height is associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, but cannot exclude bias and/or confounding as explanations for this. Mendelian randomisation (MR) can provide evidence which may be less prone to bias.MethodsWe pooled data from 39 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium studies (16,395 cases; 23,003 controls). We applied two-stage predictor-substitution MR, using a weighted genetic risk score combining 609 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted height and risk were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.ResultsGreater genetically predicted height was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk overall (pooled-OR (pOR) = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11 per 5 cm increase in height), and separately for invasive (pOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and borderline (pOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.29) tumours.ConclusionsWomen with a genetic propensity to being taller have increased risk of ovarian cancer. This suggests genes influencing height are involved in pathways promoting ovarian carcinogenesis.
Published: 2018

40. Variants in genes encoding small GTPases and association with epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility

Author: Earp, Madalene, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Winham, Stacey J, Lin, Hui-Yi, Chornokur, Ganna, Dennis, Joe, Aben, Katja KH, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Bunker, Clareann H, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Despierre, Evelyn, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Claus K, Høgdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Jung, Audrey Y, Karlan, Beth Y, Kellar, Melissa, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Lim, Boon Kiong, Kjaer, Susanne K, Krakstad, Camilla, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lele, Shashi, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Li, Zheng, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Iain, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Odunsi, Kunle, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Orsulic, Sandra, Paul, James, Pejovic, Tanja, Pelttari, Liisa M, Permuth, Jenny B, Pike, Malcolm C, Poole, Elizabeth M, Rosen, Barry, Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H, and Runnebaum, Ingo B
Subjects: Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Biotechnology, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, A Kinase Anchor Proteins, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Humans, Monomeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, Risk Factors, General Science & Technology
Abstract: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in American women. Normal ovarian physiology is intricately connected to small GTP binding proteins of the Ras superfamily (Ras, Rho, Rab, Arf, and Ran) which govern processes such as signal transduction, cell proliferation, cell motility, and vesicle transport. We hypothesized that common germline variation in genes encoding small GTPases is associated with EOC risk. We investigated 322 variants in 88 small GTPase genes in germline DNA of 18,736 EOC patients and 26,138 controls of European ancestry using a custom genotype array and logistic regression fitting log-additive models. Functional annotation was used to identify biofeatures and expression quantitative trait loci that intersect with risk variants. One variant, ARHGEF10L (Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like) rs2256787, was associated with increased endometrioid EOC risk (OR = 1.33, p = 4.46 x 10-6). Other variants of interest included another in ARHGEF10L, rs10788679, which was associated with invasive serous EOC risk (OR = 1.07, p = 0.00026) and two variants in AKAP6 (A-kinase anchoring protein 6) which were associated with risk of invasive EOC (rs1955513, OR = 0.90, p = 0.00033; rs927062, OR = 0.94, p = 0.00059). Functional annotation revealed that the two ARHGEF10L variants were located in super-enhancer regions and that AKAP6 rs927062 was associated with expression of GTPase gene ARHGAP5 (Rho GTPase activating protein 5). Inherited variants in ARHGEF10L and AKAP6, with potential transcriptional regulatory function and association with EOC risk, warrant investigation in independent EOC study populations.
Published: 2018

41. PHIP - a novel candidate breast cancer susceptibility locus on 6q14.1

Author: Jiao, Xiang, Aravidis, Christos, Marikkannu, Rajeshwari, Rantala, Johanna, Picelli, Simone, Adamovic, Tatjana, Liu, Tao, Maguire, Paula, Kremeyer, Barbara, Luo, Liping, von Holst, Susanna, Kontham, Vinaykumar, Thutkawkorapin, Jessada, Margolin, Sara, Du, Quan, Lundin, Johanna, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Ambrosone, Christine B, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Boeckx, Bram, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cai, Qiuyin, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Deming-Halverson, Sandra L, Devilee, Peter, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dörk, Thilo, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Guo, Qi, Gündert, Melanie, Haiman, Christopher A, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Huang, Guanmengqian, Jakubowska, Anna, Jones, Michael E, Kerin, Michael J, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kristensen, Vessela N, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Martens, John WM, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger L, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Peto, Julian, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rhenius, Valerie, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, Seynaeve, Caroline, Shah, Mitul, Simard, Jacques, Southey, Melissa C, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Truong, Thérèse, Wendt, Camilla, Winqvist, Robert, Zheng, Wei, Benitez, Javier, Dunning, Alison M, and Pharoah, Paul DP
Subjects: Cancer, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Human Genome, Genetic Testing, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, familial breast cancer, linkage analysis, risk haplotype, sequencing, NBCS Collaborators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract: Most non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families have no identified genetic cause. We used linkage and haplotype analyses in familial and sporadic breast cancer cases to identify a susceptibility locus on chromosome 6q. Two independent genome-wide linkage analysis studies suggested a 3 Mb locus on chromosome 6q and two unrelated Swedish families with a LOD >2 together seemed to share a haplotype in 6q14.1. We hypothesized that this region harbored a rare high-risk founder allele contributing to breast cancer in these two families. Sequencing of DNA and RNA from the two families did not detect any pathogenic mutations. Finally, 29 SNPs in the region were analyzed in 44,214 cases and 43,532 controls from BCAC, and the original haplotypes in the two families were suggested as low-risk alleles for European and Swedish women specifically. There was also some support for one additional independent moderate-risk allele in Swedish familial samples. The results were consistent with our previous findings in familial breast cancer and supported a breast cancer susceptibility locus at 6q14.1 around the PHIP gene.
Published: 2017

42. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci.

Author: Michailidou, Kyriaki, Lindström, Sara, Dennis, Joe, Beesley, Jonathan, Hui, Shirley, Kar, Siddhartha, Lemaçon, Audrey, Soucy, Penny, Glubb, Dylan, Rostamianfar, Asha, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Tyrer, Jonathan, Dicks, Ed, Lee, Andrew, Wang, Zhaoming, Allen, Jamie, Keeman, Renske, Eilber, Ursula, French, Juliet D, Qing Chen, Xiao, Fachal, Laura, McCue, Karen, McCart Reed, Amy E, Ghoussaini, Maya, Carroll, Jason S, Jiang, Xia, Finucane, Hilary, Adams, Marcia, Adank, Muriel A, Ahsan, Habibul, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu, Auer, Paul L, Bacot, François, Barrdahl, Myrto, Baynes, Caroline, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brennan, Paul, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brock, Ian W, Broeks, Annegien, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butterbach, Katja, Cai, Qiuyin, Cai, Hui, Caldés, Trinidad, Canzian, Federico, Carracedo, Angel, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chan, Tsun L, David Cheng, Ting-Yuan, Seng Chia, Kee, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, NBCS Collaborators, Collée, Margriet, Conroy, Don M, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Cornelissen, Sten, Cox, David G, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Doheny, Kimberly F, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Durcan, Lorraine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Ellberg, Carolina, and Elvira, Mingajeva
Subjects: NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, ConFab/AOCS Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Transcription Factors, Risk Assessment, Binding Sites, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Computer Simulation, Asian Continental Ancestry Group, European Continental Ancestry Group, Asia, Europe, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Loci, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Human Genome, Genetic Testing, Cancer, Genetics, Prevention, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, General Science & Technology
Abstract: Breast cancer risk is influenced by rare coding variants in susceptibility genes, such as BRCA1, and many common, mostly non-coding variants. However, much of the genetic contribution to breast cancer risk remains unknown. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study of breast cancer in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry and 14,068 cases and 13,104 controls of East Asian ancestry. We identified 65 new loci that are associated with overall breast cancer risk at P
Published: 2017

43. Analyses of germline variants associated with ovarian cancer survival identify functional candidates at the 1q22 and 19p12 outcome loci

Author: Glubb, Dylan M, Johnatty, Sharon E, Quinn, Michael CJ, O’Mara, Tracy A, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Gao, Bo, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Velez Edwards, Digna R, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Garcia, Maria J, Goodman, Marc T, Thompson, Pamela J, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Modungo, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten, Heitz, Florian, du Bois, Andreas, Pfisterer, Jacobus, Hillemanns, Peter, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Goode, Ellen L, Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Larson, Melissa C, McCauley, Bryan M, Kjær, Susanne Krüger, Jensen, Allan, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Salvesen, Helga B, Bjorge, Line, Webb, Penny M, Grant, Peter, Pejovic, Tanja, Moffitt, Melissa, Hogdall, Claus K, Hogdall, Estrid, Paul, James, Glasspool, Rosalind, Bernardini, Marcus, Tone, Alicia, Huntsman, David, Woo, Michelle, Group, AOCS, deFazio, Anna, Kennedy, Catherine J, Pharoah, Paul DP, MacGregor, Stuart, and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Orphan Drug, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, ovarian cancer outcome, genetic association, gene regulation, meta-analysis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: We previously identified associations with ovarian cancer outcome at five genetic loci. To identify putatively causal genetic variants and target genes, we prioritized two ovarian outcome loci (1q22 and 19p12) for further study. Bioinformatic and functional genetic analyses indicated that MEF2D and ZNF100 are targets of candidate outcome variants at 1q22 and 19p12, respectively. At 19p12, the chromatin interaction of a putative regulatory element with the ZNF100 promoter region correlated with candidate outcome variants. At 1q22, putative regulatory elements enhanced MEF2D promoter activity and haplotypes containing candidate outcome variants modulated these effects. In a public dataset, MEF2D and ZNF100 expression were both associated with ovarian cancer progression-free or overall survival time. In an extended set of 6,162 epithelial ovarian cancer patients, we found that functional candidates at the 1q22 and 19p12 loci, as well as other regional variants, were nominally associated with patient outcome; however, no associations reached our threshold for statistical significance (p
Published: 2017

44. Germline whole exome sequencing and large-scale replication identifies FANCM as a likely high grade serous ovarian cancer susceptibility gene

Author: Dicks, Ed, Song, Honglin, Ramus, Susan J, Van Oudenhove, Elke, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Intermaggio, Maria P, Kar, Siddhartha, Harrington, Patricia, Bowtell, David D, Group, AOCS Study, Cicek, Mine S, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Alsop, Jennifer, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Piskorz, Anna, Goranova, Teodora, Kent, Emma, Siddiqui, Nadeem, Paul, James, Crawford, Robin, Poblete, Samantha, Lele, Shashi, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara, Moysich, Kirsten B, Sieh, Weiva, McGuire, Valerie, Lester, Jenny, Odunsi, Kunle, Whittemore, Alice S, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dürst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Karlan, Beth Y, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Tischkowitz, Marc, Levine, Douglas, Brenton, James D, Dörk, Thilo, Goode, Ellen L, Gayther, Simon A, and Pharoah, Paul DP
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Genetic Testing, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Cancer, Prevention, Human Genome, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, ovarian cancer, susceptibility genes, DNA repair, next generation sequencing, Next generation sequencing, Susceptibility Genes, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: We analyzed whole exome sequencing data in germline DNA from 412 high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project and identified 5,517 genes harboring a predicted deleterious germline coding mutation in at least one HGSOC case. Gene-set enrichment analysis showed enrichment for genes involved in DNA repair (p = 1.8x10-3). Twelve DNA repair genes - APEX1, APLF, ATX, EME1, FANCL, FANCM, MAD2L2, PARP2, PARP3, POLN, RAD54L and SMUG1 - were prioritized for targeted sequencing in up to 3,107 HGSOC cases, 1,491 cases of other epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) subtypes and 3,368 unaffected controls of European origin. We estimated mutation prevalence for each gene and tested for associations with disease risk. Mutations were identified in both cases and controls in all genes except MAD2L2, where we found no evidence of mutations in controls. In FANCM we observed a higher mutation frequency in HGSOC cases compared to controls (29/3,107 cases, 0.96 percent; 13/3,368 controls, 0.38 percent; P=0.008) with little evidence for association with other subtypes (6/1,491, 0.40 percent; P=0.82). The relative risk of HGSOC associated with deleterious FANCM mutations was estimated to be 2.5 (95% CI 1.3 - 5.0; P=0.006). In summary, whole exome sequencing of EOC cases with large-scale replication in case-control studies has identified FANCM as a likely novel susceptibility gene for HGSOC, with mutations associated with a moderate increase in risk. These data may have clinical implications for risk prediction and prevention approaches for high-grade serous ovarian cancer in the future and a significant impact on reducing disease mortality.
Published: 2017

45. BRCA2 Hypomorphic Missense Variants Confer Moderate Risks of Breast Cancer

Author: Shimelis, Hermela, Mesman, Romy LS, Von Nicolai, Catharina, Ehlen, Asa, Guidugli, Lucia, Martin, Charlotte, Calléja, Fabienne MGR, Meeks, Huong, Hallberg, Emily, Hinton, Jamie, Lilyquist, Jenna, Hu, Chunling, Aalfs, Cora M, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brennan, Paul, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Brouwers, Barbara, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cheng, Ching-Yu, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Collée, J Margriet, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, Dennis, Joe, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hogervorst, Frans B, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hopper, John L, Ito, Hidemi, Jakubowska, Anna, Kang, Daehee, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kristensen, Vessela, Lai, Kah-Nyin, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Lubinski, Jan, Machackova, Eva, Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, Matsuo, Keitaro, Miao, Hui, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Muir, Kenneth, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olson, Janet E, Olswold, Curtis, Oosterwijk, Jan JC, Osorio, Ana, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Pharoah, Paul DP, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rashid, Muhammad Usman, Rhenius, Valerie, Rudolph, Anja, Sangrajrang, Suleeporn, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Seynaeve, Caroline, Shah, Mitul, Shen, Chen-Yang, and Shrubsole, Martha
Subjects: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Aged, Amino Acid Substitution, Animals, BRCA2 Protein, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genotype, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Mice, Mutation, Missense, Risk, for kConFab/AOCS Investigators, for NBCS Collaborators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: Breast cancer risks conferred by many germline missense variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, often referred to as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), have not been established. In this study, associations between 19 BRCA1 and 33 BRCA2 missense substitution variants and breast cancer risk were investigated through a breast cancer case-control study using genotyping data from 38 studies of predominantly European ancestry (41,890 cases and 41,607 controls) and nine studies of Asian ancestry (6,269 cases and 6,624 controls). The BRCA2 c.9104A>C, p.Tyr3035Ser (OR = 2.52; P = 0.04), and BRCA1 c.5096G>A, p.Arg1699Gln (OR = 4.29; P = 0.009) variant were associated with moderately increased risks of breast cancer among Europeans, whereas BRCA2 c.7522G>A, p.Gly2508Ser (OR = 2.68; P = 0.004), and c.8187G>T, p.Lys2729Asn (OR = 1.4; P = 0.004) were associated with moderate and low risks of breast cancer among Asians. Functional characterization of the BRCA2 variants using four quantitative assays showed reduced BRCA2 activity for p.Tyr3035Ser compared with wild-type. Overall, our results show how BRCA2 missense variants that influence protein function can confer clinically relevant, moderately increased risks of breast cancer, with potential implications for risk management guidelines in women with these specific variants. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2789-99. ©2017 AACR.
Published: 2017

46. Genetic modifiers of CHEK2*1100delC-associated breast cancer risk

Author: Muranen, Taru A, Greco, Dario, Blomqvist, Carl, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Khan, Sofia, Hogervorst, Frans, Verhoef, Senno, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dunning, Alison M, Shah, Mitul, Luben, Robert, Bojesen, Stig E, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Schoemaker, Minouk, Swerdlow, Anthony, García-Closas, Montserrat, Figueroa, Jonine, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Hall, Per, Li, Jingmei, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Bermisheva, Marina, Kristensen, Vessela, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Investigators, NBCS, Peto, Julian, dos Santos Silva, Isabel, Couch, Fergus J, Olson, Janet E, Hillemans, Peter, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Brauch, Hiltrud, Hamann, Ute, Burwinkel, Barbara, Marme, Frederik, Meindl, Alfons, Schmutzler, Rita K, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Sawyer, Elinor J, Tomlinson, Ian, Lambrechts, Diether, Moisse, Matthieu, Lindblom, Annika, Margolin, Sara, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Martens, John WM, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Andrulis, Irene L, Knight, Julia A, Investigators, kConFab AOCS, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Giles, Graham G, Milne, Roger L, Brenner, Hermann, Arndt, Volker, Mannermaa, Arto, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Devilee, Peter, Seynaeve, Caroline, Hopper, John L, Southey, Melissa C, John, Esther M, Whittemore, Alice S, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Dennis, Joe, Easton, Douglas F, Schmidt, Marjanka K, and Nevanlinna, Heli
Subjects: Cancer, Prevention, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast Neoplasms, Checkpoint Kinase 2, Female, Genes, Modifier, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Odds Ratio, Penetrance, Sequence Deletion, breast cancer, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, CHEK2*1100delC, common variants, polygenic risk score, NBCS Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Genetics, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: PurposeCHEK2*1100delC is a founder variant in European populations that confers a two- to threefold increased risk of breast cancer (BC). Epidemiologic and family studies have suggested that the risk associated with CHEK2*1100delC is modified by other genetic factors in a multiplicative fashion. We have investigated this empirically using data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC).MethodsUsing genotype data from 39,139 (624 1100delC carriers) BC patients and 40,063 (224) healthy controls from 32 BCAC studies, we analyzed the combined risk effects of CHEK2*1100delC and 77 common variants in terms of a polygenic risk score (PRS) and pairwise interaction.ResultsThe PRS conferred odds ratios (OR) of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.21-2.09) per standard deviation for BC for CHEK2*1100delC carriers and 1.58 (1.55-1.62) for noncarriers. No evidence of deviation from the multiplicative model was found. The OR for the highest quintile of the PRS was 2.03 (0.86-4.78) for CHEK2*1100delC carriers, placing them in the high risk category according to UK NICE guidelines. The OR for the lowest quintile was 0.52 (0.16-1.74), indicating a lifetime risk close to the population average.ConclusionOur results confirm the multiplicative nature of risk effects conferred by CHEK2*1100delC and the common susceptibility variants. Furthermore, the PRS could identify carriers at a high lifetime risk for clinical actions.Genet Med advance online publication 06 October 2016.
Published: 2017

47. Association of breast cancer risk with genetic variants showing differential allelic expression: Identification of a novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 4q21

Author: Hamdi, Yosr, Soucy, Penny, Adoue, Véronique, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Canisius, Sander, Lemaçon, Audrey, Droit, Arnaud, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Baynes, Caroline, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Burwinkel, Barbara, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Grenaker-Alnæs, Grethe, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Hamann, Ute, Hallberg, Emily, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, Jones, Michael, Kabisch, Maria, Kataja, Vesa, Lambrechts, Diether, Marchand, Loic Le, Lindblom, Annika, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Maranian, Mel, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, Milne, Roger L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Neven, Patrick, Olswold, Curtis, Peto, Julian, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rudolph, Anja, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Southey, Melissa C, Swerdlow, Anthony, Tollenaar, Rob AEM, Tomlinson, Ian, Torres, Diana, Truong, Thérèse, Vachon, Celine, Van Den Ouweland, Ans MW, Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert, Investigators, kConFab AOCS, Zheng, Wei, Benitez, Javier, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Dunning, Alison M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Kristensen, Vessela, Hall, Per, Easton, Douglas F, Pastinen, Tomi, Nord, Silje, and Simard, Jacques
Subjects: Human Genome, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Genetics, Biotechnology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Biomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms, Canada, Carrier Proteins, Case-Control Studies, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4, DNA Helicases, Europe, Female, Gene Frequency, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Mitochondrial Proteins, Odds Ratio, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, breast cancer, genetic susceptibility, association studies, differential allelic expression, cis-regulatory variants, NBCS Collaborators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract: There are significant inter-individual differences in the levels of gene expression. Through modulation of gene expression, cis-acting variants represent an important source of phenotypic variation. Consequently, cis-regulatory SNPs associated with differential allelic expression are functional candidates for further investigation as disease-causing variants. To investigate whether common variants associated with differential allelic expression were involved in breast cancer susceptibility, a list of genes was established on the basis of their involvement in cancer related pathways and/or mechanisms. Thereafter, using data from a genome-wide map of allelic expression associated SNPs, 313 genetic variants were selected and their association with breast cancer risk was then evaluated in 46,451 breast cancer cases and 42,599 controls of European ancestry ascertained from 41 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The associations were evaluated with overall breast cancer risk and with estrogen receptor negative and positive disease. One novel breast cancer susceptibility locus on 4q21 (rs11099601) was identified (OR = 1.05, P = 5.6x10-6). rs11099601 lies in a 135 kb linkage disequilibrium block containing several genes, including, HELQ, encoding the protein HEL308 a DNA dependant ATPase and DNA Helicase involved in DNA repair, MRPS18C encoding the Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein S18C and FAM175A (ABRAXAS), encoding a BRCA1 BRCT domain-interacting protein involved in DNA damage response and double-strand break (DSB) repair. Expression QTL analysis in breast cancer tissue showed rs11099601 to be associated with HELQ (P = 8.28x10-14), MRPS18C (P = 1.94x10-27) and FAM175A (P = 3.83x10-3), explaining about 20%, 14% and 1%, respectively of the variance inexpression of these genes in breast carcinomas.
Published: 2016

48. PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: data from COGS

Author: Southey, Melissa C, Goldgar, David E, Winqvist, Robert, Pylkäs, Katri, Couch, Fergus, Tischkowitz, Marc, Foulkes, William D, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Heikkinen, Tuomas, Nevanlinna, Heli, Hopper, John L, Dörk, Thilo, Claes, Kathleen BM, Reis-Filho, Jorge, Teo, Zhi Ling, Radice, Paolo, Catucci, Irene, Peterlongo, Paolo, Tsimiklis, Helen, Odefrey, Fabrice A, Dowty, James G, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Broeks, Annegien, Hogervorst, Frans B, Verhoef, Senno, Carpenter, Jane, Clarke, Christine, Scott, Rodney J, Fasching, Peter A, Haeberle, Lothar, Ekici, Arif B, Beckmann, Matthias W, Peto, Julian, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Fletcher, Olivia, Johnson, Nichola, Bolla, Manjeet K, Sawyer, Elinor J, Tomlinson, Ian, Kerin, Michael J, Miller, Nicola, Marme, Federik, Burwinkel, Barbara, Yang, Rongxi, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Menegaux, Florence, Sanchez, Marie, Bojesen, Stig, Nielsen, Sune F, Flyger, Henrik, Benitez, Javier, Zamora, M Pilar, Perez, Jose Ignacio Arias, Menéndez, Primitiva, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Neuhausen, Susan, Ziogas, Argyrios, Clarke, Christina A, Brenner, Hermann, Arndt, Volker, Stegmaier, Christa, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brüning, Thomas, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Muranen, Taru A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Lindblom, Annika, Margolin, Sara, Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Spurdle, Amanda B, Investigators, kConFab, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Wauters, Els, Smeets, Dominiek, Beuselinck, Benoit, Floris, Giuseppe, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Seibold, Petra, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Olson, Janet E, Vachon, Celine, Pankratz, Vernon S, McLean, Catriona, Haiman, Christopher A, Henderson, Brian E, Schumacher, Fredrick, Le Marchand, Loic, Kristensen, Vessela, Alnæs, Grethe Grenaker, and Zheng, Wei
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Ovarian Cancer, Aging, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Women's Health, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Urologic Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Checkpoint Kinase 2, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group N Protein, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Male, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Cancer: breast, Cancer: ovary, Cancer: prostate, cancer predisposition, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, Clinical sciences
Abstract: BackgroundThe rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study.MethodsWe genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T>G and c.3113G>A, CHEK2 c.349A>G, c.538C>T, c.715G>A, c.1036C>T, c.1312G>T, and c.1343T>G and ATM c.7271T>G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant.ResultsFor European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10-5), PALB2 c.3113G>A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10-8) and ATM c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A>G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C>T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C>T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T>G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G>T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants.ConclusionsThis report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important.
Published: 2016

49. Inherited variants affecting RNA editing may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility: results from a large-scale collaboration

Author: Permuth, Jennifer B, Reid, Brett, Earp, Madalene, Chen, Y Ann, Monteiro, Alvaro NA, Chen, Zhihua, Group, AOCS Study, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Van Niewenhuyse, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Wilkens, Lynne R, Thompson, Pamela J, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa, Leminen, Arto, Modugno, Francesmary, Edwards, Robert P, Ness, Roberta B, Kelley, Joseph, Heitz, Florian, Karlan, Beth, Lester, Jenny, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham, Hildebrandt, Michelle, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Wu, Xifeng, Levine, Douglas A, Bisogna, Maria, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Bandera, Elisa V, Fridley, Brooke, Cunningham, Julie, Winham, Stacey J, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Bjorge, Line, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon, Pejovic, Tanja, Moffitt, Melissa, Le, Nhu, Cook, Linda S, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Kelemen, Linda E, Gronwald, Jacek, Lubinski, Jan, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Yang, Hanna, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Lundvall, Lene, Pharoah, Paul DP, Song, Honglin, Campbell, Ian, Eccles, Diana, McNeish, Iain, Whittemore, Alice, McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Rothstein, Joseph, Phelan, Catherine M, Risch, Harvey, Narod, Steven, McLaughlin, John, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Menon, Usha, Gayther, Simon, Ramus, Susan J, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Wu, Anna H, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Cheng, Jin Q, and Goode, Ellen L
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Animals, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Genetic Variation, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, RNA Editing, polymorphisms, RNA editing, ovarian cancer risk, AOCS Study Group, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: RNA editing in mammals is a form of post-transcriptional modification in which adenosine is converted to inosine by the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) family of enzymes. Based on evidence of altered ADAR expression in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), we hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ADAR genes modify EOC susceptibility, potentially by altering ovarian tissue gene expression. Using directly genotyped and imputed data from 10,891 invasive EOC cases and 21,693 controls, we evaluated the associations of 5,303 SNPs in ADAD1, ADAR, ADAR2, ADAR3, and SND1. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), with adjustment for European ancestry. We conducted gene-level analyses using the Admixture Maximum Likelihood (AML) test and the Sequence-Kernel Association test for common and rare variants (SKAT-CR). Association analysis revealed top risk-associated SNP rs77027562 (OR (95% CI)= 1.39 (1.17-1.64), P=1.0x10-4) in ADAR3 and rs185455523 in SND1 (OR (95% CI)= 0.68 (0.56-0.83), P=2.0x10-4). When restricting to serous histology (n=6,500), the magnitude of association strengthened for rs185455523 (OR=0.60, P=1.0x10-4). Gene-level analyses revealed that variation in ADAR was associated (P
Published: 2016

50. Assessment of variation in immunosuppressive pathway genes reveals TGFBR2 to be associated with risk of clear cell ovarian cancer

Author: Hampras, Shalaka S, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara E, Cannioto, Rikki, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Modugno, Francesmary, Dörk, Thilo, Hillemanns, Peter, Preus, Leah, Knutson, Keith L, Wallace, Paul K, Hong, Chi-Chen, Friel, Grace, Davis, Warren, Nesline, Mary, Pearce, Celeste L, Kelemen, Linda E, Goodman, Marc T, Bandera, Elisa V, Terry, Kathryn L, Schoof, Nils, Eng, Kevin H, Clay, Alyssa, Singh, Prashant K, Joseph, Janine M, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Baker, Helen, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dennis, Joe, Despierre, Evelyn, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Doug, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Gronwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hogdall, Claus, Hogdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Kolomeyevskaya, Nonna, Krakstad, Camilla, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kruszka, Bridget, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashikant, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Liu, Song, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, and McGuire, Valeria
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Immunology, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Frequency, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Receptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type II, Receptors, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Risk Factors, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, ovarian cancer, immunosuppression, biomarkers, genetic variation, TGFBR2, TGFBR2, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundRegulatory T (Treg) cells, a subset of CD4+ T lymphocytes, are mediators of immunosuppression in cancer, and, thus, variants in genes encoding Treg cell immune molecules could be associated with ovarian cancer.MethodsIn a population of 15,596 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases and 23,236 controls, we measured genetic associations of 1,351 SNPs in Treg cell pathway genes with odds of ovarian cancer and tested pathway and gene-level associations, overall and by histotype, for the 25 genes, using the admixture likelihood (AML) method. The most significant single SNP associations were tested for correlation with expression levels in 44 ovarian cancer patients.ResultsThe most significant global associations for all genes in the pathway were seen in endometrioid ( p = 0.082) and clear cell ( p = 0.083), with the most significant gene level association seen with TGFBR2 ( p = 0.001) and clear cell EOC. Gene associations with histotypes at p < 0.05 included: IL12 ( p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, serous and high-grade serous, respectively), IL8RA ( p = 0.035, endometrioid and mucinous), LGALS1 ( p = 0.03, mucinous), STAT5B ( p = 0.022, clear cell), TGFBR1 ( p = 0.021 endometrioid) and TGFBR2 ( p = 0.017 and p = 0.025, endometrioid and mucinous, respectively).ConclusionsCommon inherited gene variation in Treg cell pathways shows some evidence of germline genetic contribution to odds of EOC that varies by histologic subtype and may be associated with mRNA expression of immune-complex receptor in EOC patients.
Published: 2016

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Topic

Publication Year Range

Language

Publication Type

Journal

Database

Publisher

221 results on '"Dörk, Thilo"'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources