Search

Genetic testing has become an integral component of the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected primary immunodeficiency diseases. Results of genetic testing can have a profound effect on clinical management decisions. Therefore clinical providers must demonstrate proficiency in interpreting genetic data. Because of the need for increased knowledge regarding this practice, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases Committee established a work group that reviewed and summarized information concerning appropriate methods, tools, and resources for evaluating variants identified by genetic testing. Strengths and limitations of tests frequently ordered by clinicians were examined. Summary statements and tables were then developed to guide the interpretation process. Finally, the need for research and collaboration was emphasized. Greater understanding of these important concepts will improve the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected primary immunodeficiency diseases., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Genetic testing plays a critical role in diagnosis for many primary immunodeficiency diseases. The goals of this report are to outline some of the challenges that clinical immunologists face routinely in the use of genetic testing for patient care. In addition, we provide a review of the types of genetic testing used in the diagnosis of PID, including their strengths and limitations. We describe the strengths and limitations of different genetic testing approaches for specific clinical contexts that raise concern for specific PID disorders in light of the challenges reported by the clinical immunologist members of the CIS in a recent membership survey. Finally, we delineate the CIS's recommendations for the use of genetic testing in light of these issues.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes in some of the author names and affiliations. The correct list of author names and affiliations is below, with the corrections in bold. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) can identify infants with non-SCID T cell lymphopenia (TCL). The purpose of this study was to characterize the natural history and genetic findings of infants with non-SCID TCL identified on NBS. We analyzed data from 80 infants with non-SCID TCL in the mid-Atlantic region between 2012 and 2019. 66 patients underwent genetic testing and 41 (51%) had identified genetic variant(s). The most common genetic variants were thymic defects (33%), defects with unknown mechanisms (12%) and bone marrow production defects (5%). The genetic cohort had significantly lower median initial CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4/CD45RA+ T cell counts compared to the non-genetic cohort. Thirty-six (45%) had either viral, bacterial, or fungal infection; only one patient had an opportunistic infection (vaccine strain VZV infection). Twenty-six (31%) of patients had resolution of TCL during the study period. • Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency can detect T cell lymphopenia. • There is limited data on the cause or natural history of idiopathic T lymphopenia. • 51% of infants had genetic findings; these infants had lower initial T cell counts. • 45% had infection but only one patient had opportunistic infection. • 31% had resolution of lymphopenia during the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]