Search

The genetic screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in the Netherlands, which was embraced by the Dutch Ministry of Health from 1994 to 2014, has led to twenty years of identification of at least 1500 FH cases per year. Although funding by the government was terminated in 2014, the approach had proven its effectiveness and had built the foundation for the development of more sophisticated diagnostic tools, clinical collaborations, and new molecular-based treatments for FH patients. As such, the community was driven to continue the program, insurance companies were convinced to collaborate, and multiple approaches were launched to find new index cases with FH. Additionally, the screening was extended, now also including other heritable dyslipidemias. For this purpose, a diagnostic next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel was developed, which not only comprised the culprit LDLR , APOB , and PCSK9 genes, but also 24 other genes that are causally associated with genetic dyslipidemias. Moreover, the NGS technique enabled further optimization by including pharmacogenomic genes in the panel. Using such a panel, more patients that are prone to cardiovascular diseases are being identified nowadays and receive more personalized treatment. Moreover, the NGS output teaches us more and more about the dyslipidemic landscape that is less straightforward than we originally thought. Still, continuous progress is being made that underlines the strength of genetics in dyslipidemia, such as discovery of alternative genomic pathogenic mechanisms of disease development and polygenic contribution.

Although awareness of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is increasing, this common, potentially fatal, treatable condition remains underdiagnosed. Despite FH being a genetic disorder, genetic testing is rarely used. The Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation convened an international expert panel to assess the utility of FH genetic testing. The rationale includes the following: 1) facilitation of definitive diagnosis; 2) pathogenic variants indicate higher cardiovascular risk, which indicates the potential need for more aggressive lipid lowering; 3) increase in initiation of and adherence to therapy; and 4) cascade testing of at-risk relatives. The Expert Consensus Panel recommends that FH genetic testing become the standard of care for patients with definite or probable FH, as well as for their at-risk relatives. Testing should include the genes encoding the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9); other genes may also need to be considered for analysis based on patient phenotype. Expected outcomes include greater diagnoses, more effective cascade testing, initiation of therapies at earlier ages, and more accurate risk stratification., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia is a rare inherited disorder, characterized by extremely high total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, that has been previously linked to mutations in LDLRAP1. We identified a family with autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia not explained by mutations in LDLRAP1 or other genes known to cause monogenic hypercholesterolemia. The aim of this study was to identify the molecular pathogenesis of autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia in this family., Approach and Results: We used exome sequencing to assess all protein-coding regions of the genome in 3 family members and identified a homozygous exon 8 splice junction mutation (c.894G>A, also known as E8SJM) in LIPA that segregated with the diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia. Because homozygosity for mutations in LIPA is known to cause cholesterol ester storage disease, we performed directed follow-up phenotyping by noninvasively measuring hepatic cholesterol content. We observed abnormal hepatic accumulation of cholesterol in the homozygote individuals, supporting the diagnosis of cholesterol ester storage disease. Given previous suggestions of cardiovascular disease risk in heterozygous LIPA mutation carriers, we genotyped E8SJM in >27 000 individuals and found no association with plasma lipid levels or risk of myocardial infarction, confirming a true recessive mode of inheritance., Conclusions: By integrating observations from Mendelian and population genetics along with directed clinical phenotyping, we diagnosed clinically unapparent cholesterol ester storage disease in the affected individuals from this kindred and addressed an outstanding question about risk of cardiovascular disease in LIPA E8SJM heterozygous carriers.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is associated with pronounced atherosclerosis leading to premature cardiovascular disease and untimely death. Despite the availability of effective preventative drug treatments, many affected individuals remain undiagnosed and untreated until they become symptomatic with cardiovascular disease. To assess the cost-effectiveness of systematic genetic screening of family members of persons diagnosed with FH, an analysis was conducted using data from a nationwide screening program for the identification of individuals with FH, instituted in The Netherlands in 1994, and from other sources. There was DNA testing of families with a known genetic defect to identify new cases of FH in the presymptomatic stage of the disease. After identification, most newly identified patients were started on cholesterol-lowering statin treatment. On average, new cases diagnosed by the screening program gained 3.3 years of life each. Twenty-six myocardial infarctions would be avoided for every 100 persons treated with statins between the ages of 18 and 60 years. The average total lifetime incremental costs, over all age ranges and both sexes, including costs for screening and testing, lifetime drug treatment, and treatment of cardiovascular events, was US dollars 7500 per new case identified. Cost per life-year gained was US dollars 8700. Therefore, systematic genetic screening of family members of persons diagnosed with FH is cost-effective in The Netherlands and should be considered for other settings.

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common lipid disorder that predisposes to premature cardiovascular disease. Lipid-lowering treatment of affected individuals is widely advocated, and maximum benefit can be obtained if medication is started early. A screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia is ongoing in the Netherlands since 1994. To assess the extent of treatment and therapy compliance, patients were followed up for 2 years after the diagnosis was established., Methods: Data were obtained by questionnaire. The 747 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia participating in the study were from the general community, and 62.4% were not receiving cholesterol-lowering medication., Results: The overall percentage of treated patients had risen from 37.6% at screening to 92.5% 1 year later and then decreased to 85.9% 2 years after screening. During follow-up, 6.4% of patients discontinued their medication and 12.0% of untreated patients never started medication for various reasons, but in the majority of cases as advised by their own physicians. The mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in previously untreated patients was 30.1% (from 219 to 153 mg/dL [5.7 to 4.0 mmol/L]). For those already receiving treatment, an additional reduction of 10.3% (from 195 to 175 mg/dL [5.0 to 4.5 mmol/L]) was obtained., Conclusions: Most patients were receiving treatment 2 years after identification and had a positive attitude toward the screening program. However, the reduction of cholesterol levels still did not meet the internationally accepted goals of treatment. This underscores the fact that additional education is required to improve the treatment of individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia.

• HoFH requires prompt diagnosis and intensive treatment to prevent CVD in childhood. • Couples both carrying an FH variant run a 25% chance of having a child with HoFH. • Prenatal genetic counseling for HoFH should be performed on a case-by-case basis. • Clinicians should discuss all available diagnostic and reproductive options. • Discuss treatment outlook considering FH genotype and weighing parental preferences. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare, potentially life-limiting, inherited disorder of lipoprotein metabolism characterized by extremely high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. When both parents have heterozygous FH, there is a 25% chance they will conceive a child with HoFH. Here we describe our clinical experience with two such prospective parent couples who were counseled regarding reproductive options and prenatal testing for HoFH. These cases showcase how, in consultation with a molecular geneticist and pediatric cardiologist, parents may be informed of the prognosis and treatment outlook of HoFH based on the FH-variants carried, to ultimately make personal decisions on reproductive options. One couple opted for prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy in case HoFH was found, while the other accepted the risk without testing. We review the available literature on preconception counseling for HoFH and provide practical guidance to clinicians counseling at-risk couples. Optimal counseling of prospective parents may help prevent future physical and psychological problems for both parent and child. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to briefly review but also to highlight the rationale, motivation, and methods in the process of identifying patients of all ages with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), an often hidden but very important genetic disorder. Since the initiation of population screening for FH in 1994 in the Netherlands, a vast amount of experience has been gathered, addressing almost all issues that are encountered in population screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims We assembled a cohort of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) for both basic and clinical research. We used a set of established diagnostic criteria to define FH. Some put forward that a definite diagnosis of FH is made when a mutation in the LDL-receptor (LDLR) gene is identified. We therefore set out to determine in these patients whether patients with a DNA diagnosis would differ significantly from those diagnosed clinically. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common inherited disease characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) plasma levels and increased cardiovascular disease risk. Most patients carry a mutation in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene (LDLR). Common and rare variants in the genes encoding adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette transporters G5 and G8 (ABCG5 and ABCG8) have been shown to affect LDL-C levels. The objective of this study was to investigate whether and to which extent heterozygous variants in ABCG5 and ABCG8 are associated with the hypercholesterolemic phenotype. We sequenced ABCG5 and ABCG8 in a cohort of 3031 clinical FH patients and compared the prevalence of variants with a European reference population (gnomAD). Clinical characteristics of carriers of putative pathogenic variants in ABCG5 and/or ABCG8 were compared with heterozygous carriers of mutations in LDLR. Furthermore, we assessed the segregation of one ABCG5 and two ABCG8 variants with plasma lipid and sterol levels in three kindreds. The frequencies of (likely) pathogenic LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, ABCG5, and ABCG8 variants in our FH cohort were 11.42%, 2.84%, 0.69%, 1.48%, and 0.96%, respectively. We identified 191 ABCG5 and ABCG8 variants of which 53 were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Of these 53 variants, 51 were either absent from a reference population or more prevalent in our FH cohort than in the reference population. LDL-C levels were significantly lower in heterozygous carriers of a (likely) pathogenic ABCG5 or ABCG8 variant compared to LDLR mutation carriers (6.2 ± 1.7 vs 7.2 ± 1.7 mmol/L, P <.001). The combination of both an ABCG5 or ABCG8 variant and a LDLR variant was found not to be associated with significant higher LDL-C levels (7.8 ± 2.3 vs 7.2 ± 1.7 mmol/L, P =.259). Segregation analysis in three families (nine carriers, in addition to the index cases, and 16 noncarriers) did not show complete segregation of the ABCG5/G8 variants with high LDL-C levels, and LDL-C levels were not different (3.9 ± 1.3 vs 3.5 ± 0.6 mmol/L in carriers and noncarriers, respectively, P =.295), while plasma plant sterol levels were higher in carriers compared to noncarriers (cholestanol: 10.2 ± 1.7 vs 8.4 ± 1.6 μmol/L, P =.007; campesterol: 22.5 ± 10.1 vs 13.4 ± 3.5 μmol/L, P =.008; sitosterol: 17.0 ± 11.6 vs 8.2 ± 2.6 μmol/L, P =.024). 2.4% of subjects in our FH cohort carried putative pathogenic ABCG5 and ABCG8 variants but had lower LDL-C levels compared to FH patients who were heterozygous carriers of an LDLR variant. These results suggest a role for these genes in hypercholesterolemia in FH patients with less severely elevated LDL-C levels. We did not find evidence that these variants cause autosomal dominant FH. • 2.4% of clinical familial hypercholesterolemia patients carry variants in ABCG5 and ABCG8. • ABCG5 or ABCG8 carriers have lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared to LDLR mutation carriers. • ABCG5 and ABCG8 variants did not cosegregate with high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in familial hypercholesterolemia families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an LDL-like particle whose plasma levels are largely genetically determined. The impact of measuring Lp(a) in patients with clinical familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) referred for genetic testing is largely unknown. We set out to evaluate the contribution of (genetically estimated) Lp(a) in a large nation-wide referral population of clinical FH. In 1504 patients referred for FH genotyping, we used an LPA genetic instrument (rs10455872 and rs3798220) as a proxy for plasma Lp(a) levels. The genetic Lp(a) proxy was used to correct LDL-cholesterol and reclassify patients with clinical FH based on Dutch Lipid Criteria Network (DLCN) scoring. Finally, we used estimated Lp(a) levels to reclassify ASCVD risk using the SCORE and SMART risk scores. LPA SNPs were more prevalent among mutation-negative compared with mutation-positive patients (296/1280 (23.1%) vs 35/224 (15.6%), p = 0.016). Among patients with genetically defined high Lp(a) levels, 9% were reclassified to the DLCN category 'unlikely FH' using Lp(a)-corrected LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C cor) and all but one of these patients indeed carried no FH variant. Furthermore, elevated Lp(a) reclassified predicted ASCVD risk into a higher category in up to 18% of patients. In patients referred for FH molecular testing, we show that taking into account (genetically estimated) Lp(a) levels not only results in reclassification of probability of genetic FH, but also has an impact on individual cardiovascular risk evaluation. However, to avoid missing the diagnosis of an FH variant, clear thresholds for the use of Lp(a)-cholesterol adjusted LDL-cholesterol levels in patients referred for genetic testing of FH must be established. [Display omitted] • High Lp(a) partly explains clinical FH in patients in whom no FH-variant is identified. • Up to 9% of patients lose a clinical FH diagnosis using Lp(a)-corrected LDL-C. • Using Lp(a) reclassifies up to 1 in 5 patients towards a higher ASCVD risk category. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels vary in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and can be explained by a single deleterious genetic variant or by the aggregate effect of multiple, common small-effect variants that can be captured in a polygenic score (PS). We set out to investigate the contribution of a previously published PS to the inter-individual LDL-C variation and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk in patients with a clinical FH phenotype. First, in a cohort of 628 patients referred for genetic FH testing, we evaluated the distribution of a PS for LDL-C comprising 12 genetic variants. Next, we determined its association with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk using UK Biobank data. The mean PS was higher in 533 FH-variant-negative patients (FH/M-) compared with 95 FH-variant carriers (1.02 vs 0.94, p < 0.001). 39% of all patients had a PS equal to the top 20% from a population-based reference cohort and these patients were less likely to carry an FH variant (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10–0.48) compared with patients in the lowest 20%. In UK Biobank data, the PS explained 7.4% of variance in LDL-C levels and was associated with incident CAD. Addition of PS to a prediction model using age and sex and LDL-C did not increase the c-statistic for predicting CAD risk. This 12-variant PS was higher in FH/M- patients and associated with incident CAD in UK Biobank data. However, the PS did not improve predictive accuracy when added to the readily available characteristics age, sex and LDL-C, suggesting limited discriminative value for CAD. [Display omitted] • Clinical familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) without monogenic cause may be explained by a polygenic background. • A 12-variant polygenic score explains 7% of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) variance in the general population. • This score is modestly associated with incident coronary artery disease. • This does not improve risk discrimination, suggesting little clinical benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder associated with a severely increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Although DNA test results in FH are associated with important medical and ethical consequences, data on accuracy of genetic tests is scarce. Methods. Therefore, we performed a prospective study to assess the overall accuracy of the DNA test used in the genetic cascade screening program for FH in The Netherlands. Individuals aged 18 years and older tested for one of the 5 most prevalent FH mutations, were included consecutively. DNA samples were analyzed by the reference and a counter-expertise laboratory following a standardized procedure. Results. 1003 cases were included. In the end, 317 (32%) carried an FH mutation, whereas in 686 (69%) samples no mutation was found. The overall accuracy of the reference laboratory was 99.8%, with two false positive results identified by the counter-expertise laboratory. Conclusion.The currently used mutation analysis is associated with a very low error rate.Therefore, we do not recommend routine use of duplicate testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Screening for mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene has identified more than 1000 mutations as the cause of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). In addition, numerous intronic mutations with uncertain effects on pre-mRNA splicing have also been identified. In this study, we have selected 18 intronic mutations in the LDLR gene for comprehensive studies of their effects on pre-mRNA splicing. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) transformed lymphocytes from subjects heterozygous for these mutations were established and mRNA was studied by Northern blot analyses and reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions. Furthermore, functional studies of the LDLRs were performed by flow cytometry. The results of the wet-lab analyses were compared to the predictions obtained from bioinformatics analyses using the programs MaxEntScan, NetGene2 and NNSplice 0.9, which are commonly used software packages for prediction of abnormal splice sites. Thirteen of the 18 intronic mutations were found to affect pre-mRNA splicing in a biologically relevant way as determined by wet-lab analyses. Skipping of one or two exons was observed for eight of the mutations, intron inclusion was observed for four of the mutations and activation of a cryptic splice site was observed for two of the mutations. Transcripts from eight of the mutant alleles were subjected to degradation. The computational analyses of the normal and mutant splice sites, predicted abnormal splicing with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 60%. Thus, bioinformatics analyses are valuable tools as a first screening of the effects of intronic mutations in the LDLR gene on pre-mRNA splicing. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]