Search

The treatment of macular diseases requires frequent monitoring by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Home monitoring would reduce the burden of frequent clinical visits and increase therapy adherence. In a pilot study with 47 patients having different macular diseases we tested a proprietary self-examination low-cost full-field OCT (SELFF-OCT). For comparison, scans with a standard clinical spectral domain OCT were taken. Data was graded by a reading center. Patients were able to successfully acquire images that were clinically gradable for 85% of the included eyes. The sensitivity and specificity for an anti-VEGF treatment decision based on the SELFF-OCT was 0.94 and 0.95, respectively.

Purpose The treatment guidelines for many macular diseases rely on frequent monitoring with optical coherence tomography (OCT). However, the burden of frequent disease control leads to low therapy adherence in real life. OCT home monitoring would address this issue but requires an inexpensive and self-operable device. With self-examination low-cost full-field OCT (SELFF-OCT), our group has introduced a novel technology that may fulfill both requirements. In this pilot study, we report the initial experiences with a clinical prototype. Methods Fifty-one patients with different macular diseases were recruited in a cross-sectional study. The most common diseases were age-related macular degeneration (AMD; 39/51), diabetic macular edema (DME; 6/51), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO; 3/51). Patients received a short training in device usage and then performed multiple self-scans with the SELFF-OCT device. For comparison, scans with a standard clinical spectral domain (SD-)OCT were taken. Results After a brief training, 77% of the patients were able to successfully acquire images that were clinically gradable. No significant influence on success could be found for age (p = 0.08) or BCVA (p = 0.97). Relevant disease biomarkers in the most common retinal diseases could be detected. Conclusions SELFF-OCT was used successfully for retinal self-examination and in the future could be used for retinal home monitoring. Future improvements in technology are expected to improve success rates and image quality. Trial registration The Trial was registered in the German Trial Register under the number DRKS00013755 on 14.03.2018.

Introduction To quantify optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) signal changes at the level of the choriocapillaris (CC) in patients with different stages of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) and to explore any correlation between subretinal fluid (SRF) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations and the OCTA CC signal. Methods One hundred one CSC eyes and 42 healthy control eyes were included in this retrospective study. CSC patients were allocated into four groups: acute, non-resolving, chronic atrophic and inactive CSC. CC OCTA images (AngioPlex®, Zeiss) were automatically quantified using an image-processing algorithm. Spatial correlation analysis of OCTA signals was performed by overlapping macular edema heatmaps and fundus autofluorescence images with corresponding OCTA images. Results Active CSC subgroups demonstrated significantly more increased and decreased flow pixels in the CC compared with controls (p

Current algorithms for automated computer interpretation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of patients suffering from neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) mostly rely on fluid detection. However, fluid detection itself and correct interpretation of the fluid currently limits diagnostic accuracy. We therefore performed a detailed analysis of the requirements that would have to be met for fluid detection approaches. We further investigated if monitoring retinal volume would be a viable alternative to detect disease activity. Retrospective analysis and manual grading of 764 OCT volume scans of 44 patients with exudative AMD treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections at a pro-re-nata (PRN) treatment regimen for at least 24 months. Detection of subretinal fluid (SRF) or intraretinal fluid (IRF) alone is not sufficient for disease detection. A combination of SRF and IRF can detect disease activity with a sensitivity of 98.6% and a specificity of 82%. With further characterization of IRF into exudative and degenerative cysts, specificity can be increased to 100%. However, correct characterization is currently not achieved by published fluid detection approaches. Change of macular retinal volume (MRV) can depict disease activity with sensitivity of 88.4% and specificity of 89.6%. Combination with the detection of SRF can further improve diagnostic accuracy to a specificity of 93.3% and sensitivity of 93.9% without relying on IRF or IRF characterization. Fluid detection without further characterization is not sufficient for AMD monitoring. Either further distinction between exudative and degenerative cysts is necessary, or other activity markers have to be taken into account. MRV offers good potential to fill this diagnostic gap and might become an important monitoring marker.

The PONS study was conceived to analyze the extent of nonpersistence (NP) and nonadherence (NA) in the treatment of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in everyday clinical practice in Germany. Further objectives were to identify factors that can affect NP and NA and to analyze clinical outcomes under everyday conditions.Nonpersistence (no contact with doctor for at least 3 months) and NA (no treatment or follow-up for at least 6 weeks) as well as clinical data were analyzed up to 24 months retrospectively and 12 months prospectively in 480 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in 23 treatment centers. Patients were interviewed for factors possibly affecting NP and NA.One third of patients fulfilled criteria of NA in the first 3 months and two thirds after 6 months. The NP was 18.8% after 12 months. Treatment exclusively at one center, a higher number of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration at the treating center, and fixed appointments were associated with a lower risk for NP. An initial gain in visual acuity after upload was not preserved after 12 months (mean change -0.5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters). Whereas visual acuity declined by 7.5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in patients with good baseline visual acuity20/40, visual acuity improved by 8.5 letters in patients with baseline visual acuity of ≤20/200. Only 7.5% of patients underwent an optical coherence tomography scan after 3 upload injections, and only 2.0 optical coherence tomographies were performed in the first 12 months.The NP and NA were high in our study population and are likely to have contributed to a suboptimal clinical outcome compared with randomized clinical trials. Shortcomings in the management of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, including restrictions in the timely and adequate follow-up (including optical coherence tomography) and retreatment, appear to be constraining factors in Germany.

Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a vision-threatening eye disease for which there is still no approved treatment. Recent studies suggest that the corticosteroid pathway in the choroid is implicated in CSC pathogenesis, and that therapy with the aldosterone antagonist eplerenone improves clinical outcomes. However, there is still little clinical data to support this hypothesis. We performed a retrospective chart review to further investigate the clinical value of eplerenone treatment in patients with chronic CSC and to identify possible response predictors. Twenty-four patients with chronic CSC resistant to conventional therapy over at least 4 months were included in this retrospective study. Patients were initially treated with 25 mg/day of eplerenone administered orally for 1 week, followed by a sustained daily dose of 50 mg. The primary outcome measure was percentage of eyes achieving complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF), recorded by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Secondary outcomes included changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Baseline SD-OCT images were also evaluated as possible predictors of treatment response. Twenty-nine percent of patients experienced complete resolution of SRF after a median of 106 days of treatment, while 33 % of patients showed a transient initial decrease in SRF, and 25 % failed to respond to treatment. Treatment had to be stopped in 13 % of patients because of adverse effects of the eplerenone treatment. In the study population, CMT decreased from 342 to 275 μm after treatment, which was associated with a modest improvement in mean BCVA from 0.35 to 0.3 logMar. The integrity of the ellipsoid zone and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) at baseline were associated with a tendency towards a favourable visual outcome. This study confirms the proposed clinical value of eplerenone for treating patients with therapy-resistant CSC. However, patients presenting widespread RPE changes are less likely to benefit from eplerenone treatment, which may argue for an earlier intervention. Larger studies are needed to characterise patient subgroups that may benefit the most from eplerenone treatment.

Christoph Ehlken,1,2 Mandy Helms,1 Daniel Böhringer,1 Hansjürgen T Agostini,1 Andreas Stahl1 1Ophthalmology, Eye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, 2Ophthalmology, Eye Center, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany Purpose: Real-life clinical outcomes of patients treated with anti-VEGF drugs for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), or macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) are often inferior to results from randomized clinical trials. This observational cohort study investigates treatment adherence and real-life clinical outcomes within the first year of treatment.Patients and methods: A total of 708 treatment-naïve patients (466 nAMD, 134 DME, and 108 BRVO) were included. Patients were followed with a PRN treatment protocol with three intravitreal injections (IVIs) and a series of 3 monthly injections in case of persistent or recurrent disease activity, as determined by monthly follow-up exams including optical coherence tomographies. Occurrence of gaps of >56 days between treatments or follow-up (nonadherence [NA]) and the reasons for NA (patient- or center-associated) as well as disease activity within the first 12 months of treatment were analyzed. Visual acuity (VA) as well as numbers and dates of optical coherence tomography and IVI were extracted from medical records.Results: NA occurred significantly more often in patients with DME (44%) than nAMD (32%) or BRVO (25%, p0.05).Conclusion: NA to treatment and follow-up regimens is a common problem in the management of patients with AMD and DME and limits clinical treatment outcomes under real-life conditions. Patients with DME have the highest risk of patient-associated NA, associated with a higher risk for significant VA loss. Keywords: AMD, RVO, DME, adherence, anti-VEGF, PRN, follow-up

Patients with exudative maculopathies (neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO)) are faced with a high burden of examinations and treatments. This study was conceived to analyze the accuracy of a subjective evaluation of visual acuity (VA) and metamorphopsia to detect disease reactivation, compared to morphological signs of reactivation assessed by means of SD-OCT.Retrospective study of 888 patients treated for nAMD (n = 638), DME (84), BRVO (110), and CRVO (56) was conducted. Subjective evaluation of the patient at an examination (i.e., change of VA and/or metamorphopsia) was compared to clinical evaluation of disease activity as assessed by SD-OCT. Sensitivity and specificity, negative and positive predictive values (PPV/NPV) for detection of active disease were calculated. Factors associated with false-negative subjective evaluation were analyzed by regression analysis.The sensitivity of the subjective evaluation to detect disease reactivation was 0.50 in all exudative maculopathies. Sensitivity was increased to ≥ 0.60 by combining subjective worsening with loss of 1 line in the VA test in RVO, but not in DME and nAMD. The specificity was 0.85 in all patients. PPV was 0.85 in patients with RVO. Regression analysis did not reveal any factors that could reliably identify patient subgroups in which OCT could be omitted, though CRVO patients with a visual acuity of 0.3 logMAR had an odds ratio of 0.20 for false-negative subjective evaluation (p = 0.009).The accuracy of subjective evaluation to discriminate disease activity in patients with different exudative maculopathies was low and cannot substitute for frequent SD-OCT exams. Routinely assessed clinical parameters such as age, visual acuity, or treatment experience were of no use to predict the validity of subjective evaluation of disease activity.This trial was registered at the DRKS (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, drks.de; No 00006851) prior to the inclusion of the first patient.

Background Anti vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is an established treatment for various retinal diseases. Long-term data on injection frequencies and visual acuity (VA), however, are still rare. Methods Five-year analysis of real-life VA developments and injection patterns from 2072 patients (2577 eyes; 33 187 injections) with chronically active disease undergoing pro-re-nata treatment for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular oedema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and myopic choroidal neovascularisation (CNV). Results Maximum mean VA gain in year 1 was+5.2 letters in AMD, +6.2 in DME, +10 in RVO and+7.2 in myopic CNV. Over 5 years, however, VA in patients with AMD declined. By year 5, 34% of patients with AMD had experienced VA loss of >15 letters, 56% had remained stable and 10% had gained >15 letters. Long-term VA developments in DME and RVO were more favourable with 81% of DME and 79% of patients with RVO gaining or maintaining vision at 5 years. In AMD, median injection frequency was six in year 1 and between four and five in consecutive years. In DME and RVO, median injection frequency was six in year 1 but lower compared with AMD in consecutive years. Injection frequency in DME was weakly associated with patient age (r s =0.1; p=0.03). Conclusions In AMD, the initial VA gain was not maintained long term despite higher injection numbers compared with DME, RVO and myopic CNV. The presented real-world data provide a peer-group-based estimate of VA developments and injection frequencies for counselling patients undergoing long-term anti-VEGF therapy.

BACKGROUND: Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a common disease characterized by a disrupted retinal blood supply and a high risk of subsequent vision loss due to retinal edema and neovascular disease. This study was designed to assess the concentrations of selected signaling proteins in the vitreous and blood of patients with ischemic CRVO. METHODS: Vitreous and blood samples were collected from patients undergoing surgery for ischemic CRVO (radial optic neurotomy (RON), n = 13), epiretinal gliosis or macular hole (control group, n = 13). Concentrations of 40 different proteins were determined by an ELISA-type antibody microarray. RESULTS: Expression of proteins enriched in the vitreous (CCL2, IGFBP2, MMP10, HGF, TNFRSF11B (OPG)) was localized by immunohistochemistry in eyes of patients with severe ischemic CRVO followed by secondary glaucoma. Vitreal expression levels were higher in CRVO patients than in the control group (CRVO / control; p < 0.05) for ADIPOQ (13.6), ANGPT2 (20.5), CCL2 (MCP1) (3.2), HGF (4.7), IFNG (13.9), IGFBP1 (14.7), IGFBP2 (1.8), IGFBP3 (4.1), IGFBP4 (1.7), IL6 (10.8), LEP (3.4), MMP3 (4.3), MMP9 (3.6), MMP10 (5.4), PPBP (CXCL7 or NAP2) (11.8), TIMP4 (3.8), and VEGFA (85.3). In CRVO patients, vitreal levels of CCL2 (4.2), HGF (23.3), IGFBP2 (1.23), MMP10 (2.47), TNFRSF11B (2.96), and VEGFA (29.2) were higher than the blood levels (vitreous / blood, p < 0.05). Expression of CCL2, IGFBP2, MMP10, HGF, and TNFRSF11B was preferentially localized to the retina and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). CONCLUSION: Proteins related to hypoxia, angiogenesis, and inflammation were significantly elevated in the vitreous of CRVO patients. Moreover, some markers known to indicate atherosclerosis may be related to a basic vascular disease underlying RVO. This would imply that local therapeutic targeting might not be sufficient for a long term therapy in a systemic disease but hypothetically reduce local changes as an initial therapeutic approach. peerReviewed

Although anti-VEGF therapy of exudative AMD with bevacizumab and ranibizumab proved efficacious in the majority of patients, CNV activity does not respond to continued treatment after repeated injections in a considerable amount of patients. These are referred to as nonresponders. A change of the drug to bevacizumab or ranibizumab could possibly offer an alternative option for the treatment of nonresponding exudative AMD. A total of 138 nonresponders who switched therapy from bevacizumab to ranibizumab (n=114) or vice versa (n=24) were included in a retrospective study. Visual acuity (VA) and foveal thickness before and after the switch of therapy were compared. By means of linear regression analysis, we analyzed possible prognostic factors associated with a favorable outcome for visual acuity. Linear regression analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit for nonresponders when treatment was changed to a different anti-VEGF drug (bevacizumab or ranibizumab). VA at the time of the switch was positively correlated with a beneficial development of VA after changing the drug. There was no significant correlation with age, macular thickness, number of injections before the switch, or the development of VA under treatment before the switch. Both patients switching to Avastin and Lucentis benefitted without statistically significant differences. An exchange of bevacizumab with ranibizumab or vice versa should be considered in nonresponders in the treatment of exudative AMD. Further prognostic factors may help to identify patients who might benefit from a switch. These factors should be investigated in further studies.

Aim To conduct a systematic review in order to compare adverse effects (AE) and the reporting of harm in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs evaluating intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration. Methods Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched with no limitations of language and year of publication. Studies which compared bevacizumab or ranibizumab as monotherapy with any other control group were included. Case series were included if they met predefined quality standards. Results The 2 year results of phase III trials evaluating ranibizumab show that the rates of serious ocular AE were low (≤2.1%) but indicate major safety concerns (RR 3.13, 95% CI 1.10 to 8.92). A possible signal with regard to thromboembolic events (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.77) and a significant increase in non-ocular haemorrhage (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.55) were also noted. In contrast to ranibizumab trials, the RCTs evaluating bevacizumab are of limited value. The main shortcomings are small sample sizes and an apparent lack of rigorous monitoring for AE. A critical assessment of the large number of published case series evaluating bevacizumab also shows that no reliable conclusions on safety can be drawn using this study design. Therefore, any perception that intravitreal bevacizumab injections are not associated with major ocular or systemic AE are not supported by reliable data. Conclusion The bevacizumab studies show too many methodological limitations to rule out any major safety concerns. Higher evidence from ranibizumab trials suggests signals for an increased ocular and systemic vascular and haemorrhagic risk which warrants further investigation.

Purpose To determine the concentration of the pro-angiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF 165 (VEGF) and the anti-angiogenic VEGF 165b in vitreous samples of patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in comparison to patients without retinal occlusive disease. Design Experimental laboratory investigation. Methods Vitreous samples were collected from patients undergoing surgery for arteriovenous dissection after BRVO, radial optic neurotomy after CRVO in the occlusion group, or macular pucker or macular hole in the control group. Concentrations of VEGF and VEGF 165b were determined by ELISA and an ELISA-type antibody microarray. Results Average vitreal concentration of VEGF was 8.6 ng/mL in the CRVO group and 2.0 ng/mL in the BRVO group as compared to 0.26 ng/mL in the control group. Average vitreal concentration of VEGF 165b was 27 pg/mL in the CRVO group, 42 pg/mL in the BRVO group, and 49 pg/mL in the control group. In patients with CRVO and BRVO, the angiogenic balance was shifted towards angiogenic stimulation. Conclusion The severity of RVO from BRVO to CRVO correlates with an increase of VEGF and the decrease of VEGF 165b , indicating a pro-angiogenic shift. Altering the ratio of VEGF 165b /VEGF 165 might be a feasible approach for treating retinal occlusive diseases.

Purpose of review We conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether the existing evidence justifies the intravitreal use of bevacizumab in comparison to ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration. Recent findings Compared with photodynamic therapy, bevacizumab shows a relative improvement in visual acuity that is of similar size as in the comparison of ranibizumab with photodynamic therapy (relative improvement from 30 to 35%). However, this finding is based on one randomized controlled trial including less than 50 patients treated with bevacizumab. Also, nothing is known about long-term (>12 months) improvements in visual acuity and optimal treatment intervals for bevacizumab.Regarding safety, the published literature indicates that ocular and systemic adverse effects are less frequent under bevacizumab than ranibizumab treatment. But the validity of this finding is strongly limited by inadequate reporting, an unsystematic evaluation of adverse effects and short follow-up times in studies evaluating bevacizumab. Summary Given the lack of controlled data, the widespread off-label use of bevacizumab is not justified in clinical practice. On the other hand, a major challenge in the management of patients who require repeated antivascular endothelial growth factor injections is the high cost of ranibizumab. This dilemma underlines the need for head-to-head studies comparing both vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies, or, at least, well conducted randomized controlled trials evaluating intravitreal bevacizumab.

Purpose To measure the level of VEGF protein in serum and breast milk after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Methods Serum and breast milk samples before and after repeated intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and ranibizumab were collected from a 35-year old female who was treated for CNV secondary to a chorioretinal scar and who was nursing her 4-month old son. Samples were analysed for the level of VEGF protein via ELISA. Results VEGF protein in the serum was reduced significantly to non-detectable levels after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and started to recover only after 6 weeks. After intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, however, only a temporary dip 3 days after injection could be detected. VEGF in breast milk was reduced by approximately one third directly after injection of bevacizumab. After injection of ranibizumab, the level of VEGF protein remained unaltered. Conclusion Use of intravitreal VEGF inhibitors should be avoided during pregnancy or while nursing a baby. However, if necessary, ranibizumab seems to have a lower effect on VEGF in the serum or breast milk an should therefore be used.

The effect of the heparin analog 5-amino-2-naphthalenesulfonate (5-amino-2-NMS) on retinal neovascularization was investigated in the mouse model for oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR). From postnatal day 7 (P7) until P12, mice were kept in a 75% oxygen environment. On P12, they received an intravitreal injection of 10mM 5-amino-2-NMS in one eye and PBS as control substance in the fellow eye. The animals were intracardially perfused with fluorescein-dextran solution on P17. Retinal whole mounts were prepared and ischemic retinopathy was evaluated in 30 animals using a standardized retinopathy score. A single intravitreal injection of 5-amino-2-NMS reduces significantly angioproliferative changes (blood vessel tufts, extra-retinal neovascularization, and blood vessel tortuosity) compared to the contralateral control eye (p=0.025). The median retinopathy score (maximal 13) for the 5-amino-2-NMS treated eyes was 6 versus 8 for the control eyes. 5-Amino-2-NMS binds to the heparin-binding site of FGF1 and FGF2 and thus may be a promising substance for the local treatment of retinal neovascularization.

BackgroundWe set out a systemic review to evaluate whether off-label bevacizumab is as safe as licensed ranibizumab, and whether bevacizumab can be justifiably offered to patients as a treatment for age-related macular degeneration with robust evidence of no differential risk.Methods and findingsMedline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched with no limitations of language and year of publication. We included RCTs with a minimum follow-up of one year which investigated bevacizumab or ranibizumab in direct comparison or against any other control group (indirect comparison). Direct comparison (3 trials, 1333 patients): The one year data show a significantly higher rate of ocular adverse effects (AE) with bevacizumab compared to ranibizumab (RR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.2-6.5). The proportion of patients with serious infections and gastrointestinal disorders was also higher with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab (RR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.7). Arterial thromboembolic events were equally distributed among the groups. Indirect comparison: Ranibizumab versus any control (5 trials, 4054 patients): The two year results of three landmark trials showed that while absolute rates of serious ocular AE were low (≤ 2.1%), relative harm was significantly raised (RR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.1-8.9). A significant increase in nonocular haemorrhage was also observed with ranibizumab (RR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7). Bevacizumab versus any control (3 trials, 244 patients): We were unable to judge the safety profile of bevacizumab due to the poor quality of AE monitoring and reporting in the trials.ConclusionsEvidence from head-to-head trials raises concern about an increased risk of ocular and multiple systemic AE with bevacizumab. Therefore, clinicians and patients should continue to carefully weight up the benefits and harms when choosing between the two treatment options. We also emphasize the need for studies that are powered not just for efficacy, but for defined safety outcomes based on the signals detected in this systematic review.