Search

SPOP mutations drive opposing molecular and immune landscapes in prostate and endometrial cancers, suggesting tailored therapies PURPOSE: Recurrent gene mutations in speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP), the substrate-binding component of E3 ubiquitin ligase, are associated with tumor progression in prostate and endometrial cancers. Here, we characterized SPOP mutations in these cancers and explored their association with molecular and immune signatures and patient outcomes. METHODS: There were 7,398 prostate cancer and 19,188 endometrial cancer samples analyzed for clinical and molecular profiles at Caris Life Sciences. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Statistical significance was determined using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, with P values adjusted for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: SPOP mutations were identified in 9.2% of prostate and 4.3% of endometrial cancers. Mutations clustered in the SPOP meprin and TRAF-C homology domain, with no significant overlap between cancer types. SPOP mutation was associated with differential comutation profiles and opposing tumor immune microenvironment signatures for each cancer, with greater immune infiltration in SPOP -mutated endometrial cancer. SPOP -mutated prostate and endometrial cancers displayed altered epigenetic gene expression, including opposite regulation of BRD2 transcripts. In SPOP -mutant prostate cancer, higher expression of androgen receptor–regulated transcripts and improved OS after treatment with hormonal agents were observed. In endometrial cancer, hormone receptor expression was significantly lower in SPOP -mutated tumors and differences in OS were highly dependent on the particular hotspot mutation and histologic subtype. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that SPOP mutations drive opposing molecular and immune landscapes in prostate and endometrial cancers—suggesting a loss-of-function mechanism in prostate cancer and gain-of-function mechanism in endometrial cancer—and provide a rationale for tailored therapeutic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Angiosarcomas (AS) are rare, highly aggressive sarcomas with limited therapeutic options. Genomic sequencing techniques have identified recurrent genetic abnormalities. Nevertheless, the association of these findings with etiology, site of origin, prognosis, and therapeutic implications is not well understood. We analyzed Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Whole Transcriptome Sequencing (WTS) data in a cohort of 143 AS cases. We identified distinct genomic biology according to the AS primary site. Head and neck AS cases primarily have Immunotherapy (IO) response markers and mutations in TP53 and POT1. On the other hand, breast AS is enriched for cell cycle alterations, predominately MYC amplification. Additionally, a microenvironment with abundant immune cells is present in a minority of cases but distributed evenly among primary sites. Our findings can facilitate the design and optimization of therapeutic strategies for AS according to its biology at different primary sites. We performed a retrospective analysis of angiosarcoma (AS) genomic biomarkers and their associations with the site of origin in a cohort of 143 cases. Primary sites were head and neck (31%), breast (22%), extremity (11%), viscera (20%), skin at other locations (8%), and unknown (9%). All cases had Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) data with a 592 gene panel, and 53 cases had Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) data, which we used to study the microenvironment phenotype. The immunotherapy (IO) response biomarkers Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB), Microsatellite Instability (MSI), and PD-L1 status were the most frequently encountered alteration, present in 36.4% of the cohort and 65% of head and neck AS (H/N-AS) (p < 0.0001). In H/N-AS, TMB-High was seen in 63.4% of cases (p < 0.0001) and PDL-1 positivity in 33% of cases. The most common genetic alterations were TP53 (29%), MYC amplification (23%), ARID1A (17%), POT1 (16%), and ATRX (13%). H/N-AS cases had predominantly mutations in TP53 (50.0%, p = 0.0004), POT1 (40.5%, p < 0.0001), and ARID1A (33.3%, p = 0.5875). In breast AS, leading alterations were MYC amplification (63.3%, p < 0.0001), HRAS (16.1%, p = 0.0377), and PIK3CA (16.1%, p = 0.2352). At other sites, conclusions are difficult to generate due to the small number of cases. A microenvironment with a high immune signature, previously associated with IO response, was evenly distributed in 13% of the cases at different primary sites. Our findings can facilitate the design and optimization of therapeutic strategies for AS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify differential survival outcomes and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in MLH1 hypermethylated versus MLH1 mutated ("Lynch-like") endometrial tumors and determine whether their molecular profiles can elucidate the differential outcomes. 1673 mismatch repair deficient endometrial tumors were analyzed by next-generation sequencing and whole transcriptome sequencing (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). PD-L1, ER, and PR were tested by immunohistochemistry and immune cell infiltrates were calculated using MCP-counter. Significance was determined using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests and adjusted for multiple comparisons. Overall survival (OS) was depicted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The endometrial cancer cohort comprised 89.2% patients with MLH1 hypermethylated tumors and 10.8% with MLH1 mutated tumors, with median ages of 67 and 60 years, respectively (p < 0.01). Patients with MLH1 hypermethylated tumors had significantly worse OS and trended toward worse OS following ICI treatment than patients with MLH1 mutated tumors. The immune microenvironment of MLH1 hypermethylated relative to MLH1 mutated was characterized by decreased PD-L1 positivity, immune checkpoint gene expression, immune cell infiltration, T cell inflamed scores, and interferon gamma (IFNγ) scores. MLH1 hypermethylation was also associated with decreased mutation rates in TP53 and DNA damage repair genes, but increased rates of JAK1 , FGFR2 , CCND1 , and PTEN mutations, as well as increased ER and PR positivity. Endometrial cancer patients with MLH1 hypermethylation display significantly decreased survival and discrepant immunotherapy responses compared to patients with MLH1 mutated tumors, which was associated with differential mutational profiles, a more immune cold phenotype, and increased ER/PR expression in MLH1 hypermethylated tumors. Providers may consider early transition from single agent ICI to a multi-agent regimen or hormonal therapy for patients with MLH1 hypermethylated tumors. • MLH1 hypermethylated patients display discrepant survival and immunotherapy outcomes compared to MLH1 mutated patients. • MLH1 hypermethylated tumors have an altered mutational profile compared to MLH1 mutated tumors. • MLH1 hypermethylated tumors display a more immune cold phenotype than MLH1 mutated tumors. • MLH1 tumors have greater estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity than MLH1 mutated tumors. • The MLH1 hypermethylated cohort may benefit from multiple targeted agents rather than sole checkpoint inhibition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We performed a comprehensive genomic profiling of tumour samples from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients enrolled in the TRIBE2 study to assess the concordance among different techniques to evaluate mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status, to characterize tumours according to the tumour mutational burden (TMB) and explore the clinical relevance of different TMB cutpoints, and to investigate the prevalence of alterations actionable with targeted approaches or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Tumour samples of 296 (44%) of 679 enrolled patients underwent 592-gene DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS). MMR status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (MMR-IHC), and MSI status was assessed by NGS (MSI-NGS). TMB was defined as low, intermediate, or high if <7, 7–16, or ≥17 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb) were found. The performance of TMB to predict MSI status was tested by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Actionable alterations included BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, POLE mutations, HER2 amplification and mutations, and MSI-H. Of 216 paired cases, concordance between MMR-IHC and MSI-NGS was 98.6%. Among 11 TMB-high tumours, eight (73%) were MSI-H and three (27%) were microsatellite stable and harboured POLE or MSH6 mutations. High TMB had a trend for a better outcome than low/intermediate TMB (hazard ratio for overall survival 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.28–1.33; P = 0.106). No interaction effect between TMB and treatment arm was observed. Seventeen mut/Mb was identified as the optimal threshold of TMB for predicting MSI status. Actionable alterations were found in 62 (21%) of 296 patients. Genomic profiling provides an overview of the genomic landscape of mCRC in a single analysis, including actionable targets and markers of immune sensitivity. • Microsatellite testing by next-generation sequencing is higly concordant with immunohistochemistry. • High tumour mutational burden (TMB) defines a clinical and molecular subtype of mCRC. • Alterations in DNA damage repair are rare in microsatellite stable mCRC with high TMB. • Potentially actionable alterations are detectable in a small percentage of mCRC. • Molecular characterisation of mCRC is helpful in adopting personalised treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]