Search

Based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH), HER2-low breast cancers (BC) subtype—defined as IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH− tumors—emerged and represent more than half of all BC. We evaluated the performance of NGS for integrated molecular characterization of HER2-low BC, including identification of actionable molecular targets, copy number variation (CNV), and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis. Thirty-one BC specimens (11 HER2+, 10 HER2−, and 10 HER2-low) were routinely analyzed using IHC and ISH, and were selected and analyzed using NGS for gene mutations including ESR1, PIK3CA, AKT1, ERBB2, TP53, BRCA1, and BRCA2, CNV, and MSI. CNV values for the ERBB2 gene were significantly (p < 0.001) different between HER2+, and either HER2-low or HER2− tumors with mean values of 7.8 (SD = 6.8), 1.9 (SD = 0.3), and 2.0 (SD = 0.3), respectively. Using 3.25 as the cutoff value, 96.8% overall concordance of HER2 status was achieved between IHC and NGS compared to IHC and ISH. Using NGS, gene mutations and amplifications were detected in 68% (21/31) and 19% (6/31) of the cases, respectively. One case of MSI was detected in a HER2-negative and ISH unamplified case. Beside IHC, NGS allows the identification of HER2-low subtype simultaneously, with the detection of multiple actionable gene mutations being helpful for molecular board treatment selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Endocrine therapy (ET) remains the mainstay of treatment for Hormone Receptor-positive breast cancer, both in the early and advanced settings. The acquisition of mutations in the ESR1 gene encoding the estrogen receptor represents one of the main resistance mechanisms to ET. A conventional tumor tissue biopsy can be used to detect ESR1 mutations; however, these mutations are less likely to present on initial tissue biopsy, and such an invasive approach is hardly repeatable over time for longitudinal disease monitoring. The research of ESR1 mutations in liquid biopsies based on the analysis of circulating cell-free DNA in plasma is of increasing interest and has been recently recommended to guide therapy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers at progression under ET. This comprehensive review reports the most recent advances and recommendations in this field and compares the different techniques available for the analysis of the ESR1 gene in liquid biopsy. The predominant forms of breast cancer (BC) are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors characterized by the expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) and/or progesterone receptors (PRs). Patients with HR+ tumors can benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Three types of ET are approved for the treatment of HR+ BCs and include selective ER modulators, aromatase inhibitors, and selective ER downregulators. ET is the mainstay of adjuvant treatment in the early setting and the backbone of the first-line treatment in an advanced setting; however, the emergence of acquired resistance can lead to cancer recurrence or progression. The mechanisms of ET resistance are often related to the occurrence of mutations in the ESR1 gene, which encodes the ER-alpha protein. As ESR1 mutations are hardly detectable at diagnosis but are present in 30% to 40% of advanced BC (ABC) after treatment, the timeline of testing is crucial. To manage this resistance, ESR1 testing has recently been recommended; in ER+ HER2− ABC and circulating cell-free DNA, so-called liquid biopsy appears to be the most convenient way to detect the emergence of ESR1 mutations. Technically, several options exist, including Next Generation Sequencing and ultra-sensitive PCR-based techniques. In this context, personalization of ET through the surveillance of ESR1 mutations in the plasma of HR+ BC patients throughout the disease course represents an innovative way to improve the standard of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Assessment of KRAS, NRAS (RAS) and BRAF mutations is a standard in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Mutations could be assessed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) or real-time PCR-based assays. Times to results are 1 to 2 weeks for NGS and 1 to 3 days for real-time PCR-based assays. Using NGS can delay first-line treatment commencement and using PCR-based assays is limited by the number of possible analysed targets. The Idylla system is a real-time PCR cartridge-based assay, able to analyse hotspots mutations using one section of FFPE tumour tissue sample. To combine short delays and analysis of a large gene-panel, we propose here a laboratory workflow combining the Idylla system and NGS and compatible with FFPE samples with low tissue quantity. In this study we evaluated and validated the Idylla system for the analysis of RAS and BRAF mutations by pipetting directly DNA in the cartridge instead of FFPE section as recommended by the manufacturer. Materials and methods: DNA extracted from 29 FFPE samples from mCRC patients with NGS-characterized RAS and BRAF mutations were tested with the Idylla KRAS and the Idylla NRAS-BRAF mutation tests to assess sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and limit of detection of each test. Results: A 100% concordance was found between NGS and Idylla results for the determination of KRAS (12/12), NRAS (12/12) and BRAF (11/11) mutations with a sensitivity and a specificity of 100%. The system showed a good reproducibility with CV inferior to 3%. LOD was reached with 2.5 ng of DNA for KRAS and NRAS mutations and 5 ng of DNA for BRAF mutations. Conclusions: The analysis of RAS and BRAF mutations using DNA pipetted directly in the cartridge of the Idylla system showed a good sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and LOD, and can be integrated in a laboratory workflow for samples with few tissue without compromising a further complete tumour characterization using NGS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Metastatic or unresectable melanoma is a serious and deadly disease. Anti-BRAF and immunotherapy improved overall survival in patients with metastatic disease. Thus, BRAF genotyping is important to choose the right therapy. Methods: In our study, we assessed and compared BRAF mutations in 59 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor samples of patients with metastatic melanoma with next-generation sequencing (NGS), Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 mutation test CE-IVD commercial kit, high-resolution melting PCR (HRM), multiplex real-time allele specific amplification (multiplexed RT-ASA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: Thirty-one samples were found bearing a BRAF mutation with NGS (52.5%), 28 with Cobas test (47.5%), 28 with HRM (47.5%), 29 with multiplexed RT-ASA (49.2%) and 27 with IHC (45.8%). Based on NGS data, 26 (81.2%) were c.1799 T>A (p.Val600Glu), 3 (9.4%) were c. 1798-1799 GT>AA (p.Val600Lys), 1 was c.1789_1790 CT>TC (p.Leu597Ser) and 2 were complex mutations. Sensitivity was 90.3% for Cobas test, 93.1% for multiplexed RT-ASA and 87.1% for IHC and HRM. Specificity was 100% for Cobas test, IHC and multiplexed RT-ASA and 96.4% for HRM. The reference assay was NGS. Rare mutations were detected with NGS and HRM: c.1789_1790 CT>TC (p.Leu597Ser) mutation and the complex mutation c.1796 A>T; c.1797_1798 insACT (p.Thr599Thr; p.Thr599_Val600insThr). Our data suggest that multiplexed RT-ASA is the most sensitive assay but specific primers for each mutation are needed. HRM can detect all exon 15 mutations but has a lower sensitivity. Because of its specificity for Val600Glu mutation, IHC may be considered only as a screening tool and testing should be completed by a method able to detect other V600 mutations. BRAF Cobas assay is Val600Glu-specific and has poor sensitivity for the other V600 mutations; thus, it looks important to use multiplex assays able to detect all V600 mutations because a false-negative result will deprive the patient of an important treatment option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Overall survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients has been improved with the addition of targeted therapy such as anti-epithelial growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-EGFR mAbs) to standard chemotherapy. Retrospective studies and randomized trials showed that the presence of RAS mutations was linked to the absence of clinical response to anti-EGFR mAbs. Patients harboring KRAS and NRAS mutations on exons 2, 3 or 4 have little or no benefit from anti-EGFR therapies. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays are routinely used to assess KRAS and NRAS status, whereas deep sequencing with next generation sequencing (NGS) currently represents an alternative method.Objective: The objective of our study was to identify KRAS and NRAS non-hotspot mutations using NGS of mCRC tumor samples.Method: DNA was extracted from 188 consecutive formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples of histologically proven colorectal cancer tumor tissue from patients with mCRC. Following amplification, DNA was sequenced by ultra-deep pyrosequencing. Non-hotspot mutations identified by NGS (frequency of mutated allele range [1.8-70.6 %]) were confirmed by Sanger direct-sequencing when possible.Results: NGS procedure was applicable in 94 % of the cases and detected mutations in 62 % of the samples. Nine uncommon mutational profiles were found with a frequency of mutated allele  > 1 %. Silent mutations were found in 3.6 % of the samples. Mutations at or near functional domains of RAS proteins, other than defined hotspots, were found in 3.6 %. NGS proved to be accurate, sensitive and suitable for routine RAS genotyping.Conclusion: Clinical responses to anti-EGFR mAbs are potentially impaired in the presence of these uncommon RAS mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Metastatic melanoma is a severe disease with one of the highest mortality rate in skin diseases. Overall survival has significantly improved with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF V600 showed promising results. BRAF genotyping is mandatory for the prescription of anti-BRAF therapies. Methods: Fifty-nine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded melanoma samples were assessed using High-Resolution-Melting (HRM) PCR, Real-time allele-specific amplification (RT-ASA) PCR, Next generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the fully-automated molecular diagnostics platform IdyllaTM. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated using NGS as the reference standard to compare the different assays. Results: BRAF mutations were found in 28(47.5%), 29(49.2%), 31(52.5%), 29(49.2%) and 27(45.8%) samples with HRM, RT-ASA, NGS, IdyllaTM and IHC respectively. Twenty-six (81.2%) samples were found bearing a c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) mutation, three (9.4%) with a c.1798_1799delinsAA (p.Val600Lys) mutation and one with c.1789_1790delinsTC (p.Leu597Ser) mutation. Two samples were found bearing complex mutations. Conclusions: HRM appears the less sensitive assay for the detection of BRAF V600 mutations. The RT-ASA, IdyllaTM and IHC assays are suitable for routine molecular diagnostics aiming at the prescription of anti-BRAF therapies. IdyllaTM assay is fully-automated and requires less than 2 minutes for samples preparation and is the fastest of the tested assays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vemurafenib is approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma in patients with BRAF V600 mutation. In pivotal clinical trials, BRAF testing has always been done with the approved cobas 4800 BRAF test. In routine practice, several methods are available and are used according to the laboratories usual procedures. A national, multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted with prospective and consecutive collection of tumor samples. A parallel evaluation was performed in routine practice between the cobas 4800 BRAF V600 mutation test and home brew methods (HBMs) of 12 national laboratories, labelled and funded by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa). For 420 melanoma samples tested, the cobas method versus HBM showed a high concordance (93.3%; kappa = 0.86) in BRAF V600 genotyping with similar mutation rates (34.0% versus 35.7%, respectively). Overall, 97.4% and 98.6% of samples gave valid results using the cobas and HBM, respectively. Of the 185 samples strictly fulfilling the cobas guidelines, the concordance rate was even higher (95.7%; kappa = 0.91; 95%CI [0.85; 0.97]). Out of the 420 samples tested, 28 (6.7%) showed discordance between HBM and cobas. This prospective study shows a high concordance rate between the cobas 4800 BRAF V600 test and home brew methods in the routine detection of BRAF V600E mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Rapid advances in the understanding of cancer biology have transformed drug development thus leading to the approval of targeted therapies and to the development of molecular tests to select patients that will respond to treatments. KRAS status has emerged as a negative predictor of clinical benefit from anti-EGFR antibodies in colorectal cancer, and anti-EGFR antibodies use was limited to KRAS wild type tumors. In order to ensure wide access to tumor molecular profiling, the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) has set up a national network of 28 regional molecular genetics centers. Concurrently, a nationwide external quality assessment for KRAS testing (MOKAECM) was granted to analyze reproducibility and costs. Methods: 96 cell-line DNAs and 24 DNA samples from paraffin embedded tumor tissues were sent to 40 French laboratories. A total of 5448 KRAS results were collected and analyzed and a micro-costing study was performed on sites for 5 common methods by an independent team of health economists. Results: This work provided a baseline picture of the accuracy and reliability of KRAS analysis in routine testing conditions at a nationwide level. Inter-laboratory Kappa values were >0.8 for KRAS results despite differences detection methods and the use of in-house technologies. Specificity was excellent with only one false positive in 1128 FFPE data, and sensitivity was higher for targeted techniques as compared to Sanger sequencing based methods that were dependent upon local expertise. Estimated reagent costs per patient ranged from €5.5 to €19.0. Conclusion: The INCa has set-up a network of public laboratories dedicated to molecular oncology tests. Our results showed almost perfect agreements in KRAS testing at a nationwide level despite different testing methods ensuring a cost-effective equal access to personalized colorectal cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular fingerprint for defects in the mismatch repair system (dMMR) and is associated with higher risks of cancers. MSI/dMMR tumours are characterized by the accumulation of mutations throughout the genome, and particularly in microsatellite (MS) DNA repeat sequences. MSI stands as a major biomarker for familial cancer risk assessment, cancer prognosis, and therapeutic choices. Standard-of-care classification of MSI/dMMR tumours is most frequently achieved using immunohistochemistry or PCR-based assay directed against a set of five MS regions. However, novel molecular methods based on tumour tissue or plasma samples have been developed and could enter in the future trends of MSI testing. Here, we provide insights into these emerging approaches and discuss their advantages and limitations. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular scar resulting from a defective mismatch repair system (dMMR) and associated with various malignancies. MSI tumours are characterized by the accumulation of mutations throughout the genome and particularly clustered in highly repetitive microsatellite (MS) regions. MSI/dMMR status is routinely assessed in solid tumours for the initial screening of Lynch syndrome, the evaluation of cancer prognosis, and treatment decision-making. Currently, pentaplex PCR-based methods and MMR immunohistochemistry on tumour tissue samples are the standard diagnostic methods for MSI/dMMR. Other tissue methods such as next-generation sequencing or real-time PCR-based systems have emerged and represent viable alternatives to standard MSI testing in specific settings. The evolution of the standard molecular techniques has offered the opportunity to extend MSI determination to liquid biopsy based on the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma. This review aims at synthetizing the standard and emerging techniques used on tumour tissue samples for MSI/dMMR determination. We also provide insights into the MSI molecular techniques compatible with liquid biopsy and the potential clinical consequences for patients with solid cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]