Search

Historically, correspondence rules and quantum quasi-distributions were motivated by classical mechanics as a guide for obtaining quantum operators and quantum corrections to classical results. In this paper, we start with quantum mechanics and show how to derive the infinite number of quantum quasi-distributions and corresponding c-functions. An interesting aspect of our approach is that it shows how the c-numbers of position and momentum arise from the quantum operator.

A ground-state atom uniformly accelerated through the Minkowski vacuum can become excited by emitting an Unruh-Minkowski photon. We show that from the perspective of an accelerated atom, the sign of the frequency of the Unruh-Minkowski photons can be positive or negative depending on the acceleration direction. The accelerated atom becomes excited by emitting an Unruh-Minkowski photon which has negative frequency in the atom's frame, and decays by emitting a positive-frequency photon. This leads to interesting effects. For example, the photon emitted by accelerated ground-state atom cannot be absorbed by another ground-state atom accelerating in the same direction, but it can be absorbed by an excited atom or a ground-state atom accelerated in the opposite direction. We also show that similar effects take place for Cherenkov radiation. Namely, a Cherenkov photon emitted by an atom cannot be absorbed by another ground-state atom moving with the same velocity, but can be absorbed by an excited atom or a ground-state atom moving in the opposite direction.

In 1932, Fermi presented a two-atom model for determining whether quantum mechanics is consistent with causality, and concluded that indeed it is. In the late 1960's, Shirokov and others found that Fermi's approximations may not have been sound, and when corrected, Fermi's model shows non-causal behavior. We show that if instead of time-dependent perturbation theory, the Magnus expansion is used to approximate the time-evolution operator, causality does follow., Comment: 7 pages, 1 figure

We present a new approach for obtaining quantum quasi-probability distributions, $P(\alpha,\beta)$, for two arbitrary operators, $\mathbf{a}$ and $\mathbf{b}$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the corresponding c-variables. We show that the quantum expectation value of an arbitrary operator can always be expressed as a phase space integral over $\alpha$ and $\beta$, where the integrand is a product of two terms: One dependent only on the quantum state, and the other only on the operator. In this formulation, the concepts of quasi-probability and correspondence rule arise naturally in that simultaneously with the derivation of the quasi-distribution, one obtains the generalization of the concept of correspondence rule for arbitrary operators., Comment: 14 pages

We find that uniformly accelerated motion of a mirror yields excitation of a static two-level atom with simultaneous emission of a real photon. This occurs because of virtual transitions with probability governed by the Planck factor involving the photon frequency ν and the Unruh temperature. The result is different from the Unruh radiation of an accelerated atom, which is governed by the frequency of the atom, ω, rather than frequency of the emitted photon. We also find that the excitation probability oscillates as a function of the atomic position because of interference between contributions from the waves incident on and reflected from the mirror.

Quantum phase-space distributions offer a royal road into the fascinating quantum–classical interface; the Wigner function being the first and best example. However, the subject is frequent with subtleties and textbook-level misinformation; e.g. “The Wigner distribution can give wrong answers for some operator expectation values” [1]. Since the Wigner distribution is just another representation of the density matrix, it must yield correct answers. To that end, Marlan Scully has asked at several international conferences (the 2015 Prague conference being one of them) the following question: “Starting with the density matrix (not the Moyal characteristic function), could you give me a simple direct derivation of the Wigner distribution?” Section 'A jump start' contains his answer. In Appendix D, we give a related treatment and make contact with other approaches. We hope that as a result of our studies, the Wigner distribution will become more deeply appreciated.