1. A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section
- Author
-
Julia Savchenko, Lars Ladfors, Linda Hjertberg, Eric Hildebrand, and Sophia Brismar Wendel
- Subjects
audit ,childbirth care ,labor ,obstetric delivery ,perinatal outcomes ,quality indicators ,Management of Technology and Innovation ,Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Reproduktionsmedicin och gynekologi ,General Medicine ,reproductive and urinary physiology - Abstract
Introduction The Robson Ten Group Classification System is widely used for the audit of cesarean section (CS) rates. However, CS rate alone is a poor quality indicator and should be balanced with other obstetric endpoints. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Swedish national data on obstetric outcomes other than CS, stratified by the Robson classification, could be analyzed in a useful way. Material and methods All births in Sweden from 2017 through 2020 recorded in the nationwide Swedish Pregnancy Register were categorized using the Robson classification with subdivision of some groups. Five outcomes were explored: CS, operative vaginal delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) and Apgar score The largest Robson groups were nulliparous and multiparous women with single-term cephalic pregnancies, unscarred uterus and spontaneous labor. Intrapartum CS rates were highest for multiple pregnancies, women with induced labor after previous CS, and nulliparous women with induced labor. Nulliparous women and multiparous women with a previous CS with attempted vaginal birth had the highest operative vaginal delivery and OASIS rates. The postpartum hemorrhage rate was highest for multiple pregnancies and transverse lie, followed by prelabor CS in nulliparous and multiparous women with single-term cephalic pregnancies and unscarred uterus. The highest rates of Apgar score
- Published
- 2022