1. Breed differentiation among Japanese native chickens by specific skull features determined by direct measurements and computer vision techniques
- Author
-
Fumihito Akishinonomiya, Koh Nomura, Y. Ino, Takashi Amano, Takao Oka, Y. Uehara, Katsushi Ikeuchi, Jun Takamatsu, Atsushi Nakazawa, Katsuhiro Fukuta, Yoshitake Hayashi, S. Kawashima, T. Watanabe, Hideki Endo, Tomohito Masuda, and Atsuyuki Okabe
- Subjects
Male ,Veterinary medicine ,Biology ,Red junglefowl ,Japan ,Species Specificity ,Computer Graphics ,medicine ,biology.domesticated_animal ,Animals ,Computer Simulation ,Computer vision ,Phylogeny ,business.industry ,Skull ,Broiler ,Genetic Variation ,General Medicine ,Breed ,White (mutation) ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Female ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,Chickens ,Food Science - Abstract
1. Inter-breed morphological comparisons were made among 11 breeds of Japanese native chickens (Gifujidori, Hinaidori, Shokoku, Totenko, Tomaru, Satsumadori, Shamo, Koshamo, Koeyoshi, Chabo and Nagoya), White Leghorn, broiler chickens (Chunky) and red junglefowl collected in the Philippines, based on results of direct measurements and analysis by computer vision techniques of the skull. 2. Analysis of direct measurements identified two groups of chicken: a small type that included the Chabo, Koshamo, red junglefowl, Gifujidori and Shokoku and a large type that included the remaining breeds studied. These groupings were made based on size determined both in the first (PC1) and second principal component (PC2). The greatest length of the cranium and condylobasal length greatly contributed to the morphological differences between these two groups. 3. Analysis by computer vision techniques, however, identified three groups: the Bantam group (which includes red junglefowl), Shokoku group and Shamo group. White Leghorn clustered within the Shokoku group while the broiler chicken belonged to the Shamo group. The region around the junction of the neural cranium and the visceral cranium contributed greatly to the morphological differences among breeds, both in the PC1 and PC2.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF