Search

FAO specifications for liquid paraquat dichloride SL formulations require the use of an emetic agent to stimulate vomiting within 30 min of ingestion. To date, there is no high-quality evidence of efficacy, despite use of the PP796 emetic since 1979. We first examined the validity of patients' self-reported dose of paraquat ingested by examining the relationship with blood paraquat concentration and time to death for patients ingesting the standard paraquat SL formulation in a Sri Lankan cohort. As a secondary outcome, we assessed whether ingestion resulted in vomiting within 30 min and whether vomiting was associated with good outcome.Patients presenting with paraquat SL self-poisoning were prospectively studied in ten Sri Lankan hospitals in 2003-08. Data on reported dose ingested, incidence and timing of vomiting after ingestion, treatment received, plasma paraquat concentration, and outcome were collected prospectively on presentation to hospital. Time between ingestion and blood sampling was incorporated by covariate adjustment.441 patients were recruited to the case series, presenting a median (IQR) of 3.0 (1.5-8.1] h post ingestion. Outcome was known for 435 patients of whom 322 (74.0%) died within 42 days, a median of 1.3 (0.6-4.4) days post ingestion. Median reported dose ingested was 15 to30 mL. There was a highly significant linear trend between log plasma paraquat and reported dose ingested (Importantly, we found good agreement between reported dose ingested and plasma paraquat concentration, case fatality, and time to death, suggesting that the reported dose is a valid marker for the dose ingested. Vomiting occurred within 30 min for 68.5% of patients, exceeding the characteristics for a purported effective emetic in the FAO specifications. However, vomiting within 30 min was associated with approximately double the risk of death compared to those who did not vomit, larger paraquat ingestions, and higher blood paraquat concentrations. In addition, death occurred in many patients who did not vomit, and the proportion vomiting within 30 min only reached 82.1% for the highest ingested dose group. Overall, we found no evidence of benefit resulting from incorporation of the emetic, suggesting that the current FAO specification is not effective at preventing deaths after ingestion of the paraquat SL formulation.

Purpose Cervical cancer metastasis results in poor prognosis and increased mortality, which is not separated from inflammatory reactions accumulated by prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). As a specific G-protein coupled PGE2 receptor, EP3 is demonstrated as a negative prognosticator of cervical malignancy. Now, we aimed to investigate the pathological mechanism of EP3 in modulating cervical cancer carcinogenesis. Methods Bioinformatics analysis was used to identify PAI-1 and uPAR correlations with EP3 expression, as well as the prognosis of cervical cancer patients. In vitro analyses were carried out to investigate the role of EP3 on cervical cancer proliferation and migration. Results In vitro studies showed that sulprostone (an EP3 agonist) enhanced the proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cells, whereas silencing of EP3 inhibited their proliferation and migration. Furthermore, EP3 knockdown increased the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (p-ERK1/2), but decreased p53 expression. Bioinformatics analysis showed that both PAI-1 and uPAR were correlated with EP3 expression, as well as the prognosis of cervical cancer patients. The survival analysis further showed that uPAR overexpression (IRS≥2) was correlated with a lower overall survival rate of cervical cancer patients with advanced stages (FIGO III-IV). Conclusion These results indicated that EP3 signaling pathway might facilitate the migration of cervical cancer cells through modulating uPAR expression. Therefore, EP3 and uPAR could represent novel therapeutic targets in the treatment of cervical cancer in advantaged stages.

The platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) and its ligand (PAF) are important inflammatory mediators that are overexpressed in ovarian cancer. The receptor is an important player in ovarian cancer development. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of PAFR in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and the potential use of its antagonist, Rupatadine as an experimental treatment. Tissue microarrays of ovarian cancer patients, most markedly those with a non-mucinous subtype, immunohistochemically overexpressed PAFR. Elevated cytoplasmic PAFR expression was found to significantly and independently impair patients’ overall and recurrence-free survival (OS: median 83.48 vs. 155.03 months; p=0.022; RFS: median 164.46 vs. 78.03 months; p=0.015). In vitro, especially the serous ovarian cancer subtypes displayed an elevated PAFR gene and protein expression. siRNA knockdown of PAFR decreased cell proliferation significantly, thus confirming the receptor's protumorigenic effect on ovarian cancer cells. The clinically approved PAFR antagonist Rupatadine effectively inhibited in vitro cell proliferation and migration of ovarian cancer cells. PAFR is a prognostic marker in ovarian cancer patients and its inhibition through Rupatadine may have important therapeutic implications in the therapy of ovarian cancer patients.

In recent years, a vast amount of studies have centered on the role of vitamin D in the pathogenesis of certain types of cancers such as breast, colorectal and lung cancer. Increasing evidence suggests that vitamin D and its receptor play a crucial role in the development of gynecological cancers. In this review, we systematically analyzed the effect of vitamin D and the vitamin D receptor on endometrial, ovarian, cervical, vulvar and vaginal cancer. Our literature research shows that vitamin D levels and vitamin-D-related pathways affect the risk of gynecological cancers. Numerous ecological studies give evidence on the inverse relationship between UVB exposure and gynecological cancer risk. However, epidemiologic research is still inconclusive for endometrial and ovarian cancer and insufficient for rarer types of gynecological cancers. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is upregulated in all gynecological cancers, indicating its influence on cancer etiology. The VDR polymorphism FokI (rs2228570) seems to increase the risk of ovarian cancer. Other nuclear receptors, such as the RXR, also influence gynecological cancers. Although there is limited knowledge on the role of the VDR/RXR on the survival of endometrial, cervical, vulvar or vaginal cancer patients, some studies showed that both receptors influence survival. Therefore, we suggest that further studies should focus on the vitamin D- and its hetero dimer receptor RXR in gynecological cancers.

Expression of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) has been described in various tumor entities from different organs. However, its role in ovarian cancer has not been thoroughly investigated. We aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of AhR, its correlation with the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), and their functional role in ovarian cancer. By immunohistochemistry, AhR staining was analyzed in a subset of 156 samples of ovarian cancer patients. AhR staining was assessed in the nucleus and the cytoplasm using the semi-quantitative immunoreactive score (IRS), and the scores were grouped into high- and low-level expression. AhR expression was detected in all histological subtypes, with clear cell ovarian cancer displaying the highest staining intensity. Low cytoplasmic expression of AhR was associated with longer overall survival (median 183.46 vs. 85.07 months, p = 0.021). We found a positive correlation between AhR and FSHR (p = 0.005). Ovarian cancer patients with high cytoplasmic AhR and concurrent FSHR expression had the worst outcome (median 69.72 vs. 43.32 months, p = 0.043). Consequently, low cytoplasmic AhR expression seems to be associated with improved survival in ovarian cancer patients. Our data suggest that AhR and FSHR levels correlate with each other, and their concurrent expression was observed in ovarian cancer patients with the worst outcome. Further investigation of the interaction of both receptors and their functional role might better predict the impact of endocrine therapy in ovarian cancer.