Search

U ovoj studiji se pokušava dekonstruisati neokolonijalni status Srbije. U radu se tvrdi da je Srbija samokolonizovana preko dva kulturalna varijeteta: preko delovanja drugosrbijanskih, vesternizovanih liberalno-demokratskih elita i preko delovanja prvosrbijanskih, tradicionalizovanih elita. Pokazano je kako i jedan i drugi diskurs favorizuju neoimperijalne imperative i agende. Dekolonizujeće rešenje se vidi u hibridizaciji kulture preko koncepata „kulture srpske dušeˮ i „super-Srbinaˮ.

This paper presents an overview of a research study on the position of persons with disabilities (PWD) in the labour market of the Boka Kotorska region, in the municipalities of Tivat, Kotor and Herceg Novi. This original research study is based on an analysis of the perception and attitudes of PWD regarding their position in the labour market. The study looks into the attitudes of PWD towards: education, employment, motivation to engage in employment, and the challenges they face in seeking employment in the region of Boka Kotorska. Simultaneously, it tested the impact of the different forms and types of disability, as well as age on potential employment. Data on unemployment of PWD in Boka Kotorska, combined with the activities and capacities of employers in the area of employment of PWD were analysed. The research findings indicate certain internal and external barriers in the labour market. PWD mostly face the following problems: difficulties with obtaining employment, lack of recognition of their potential, prejudice on behalf of employers regarding their skills and capacities, early abandonment of education, and physical barriers. A certain number of PWD faces limitations primarily related to low levels of motivation to: engage in employment, actively seek employment, engage in professional rehabilitation programmes, advance in education, self-employ. However, a majority of PWD wish to engage in some form of employment, in areas that are adapted to their capacities, and with modified working hours.

U ovome radu se raspravlja intenzitet, forma i stepen osvešćenosti postmodernizacije socijalnog rada. U tom smislu, pod postmodernizacijom socijalnog rada se podrazumeva njegovo diskurzivno/metanarativno smeštanje u kontekst globalno postmodernizovanih društva, kako na nivou spoljne institucionalne mreže značenja, tako i na nivou unutrašnjeg rekonfigurisanja, reformulisanja, redefinisanja i reorganizovanja po novim, postmodernim, načelima, agendama i zahtevima. Međutim, to ne znači apsorbovanje nekim drugim metanarativom, već formulisanje autentičnog metanarativa socijalnog rada. Objašnjenje posmodernosti i postmodernizacije ne mora nužno biti deo „intelektualno-spekulativneˮ sfere postmodernizma, modernističke teorije mogu biti integrisane sa postmodernističkim diskurzivnim protokolima u svrhu hibridnog objašnjenja nekog odnosnog fenomena. Takav stav/pozicija se afirmiše preko propitivanja/dekonstrukcije TIME/TIME modela i odnosa neoliberalnog metanarativa i metanarativa socijalnog rada.

Niklas Luhmann articulates the basic elements of his authentic theoretical position as criticism of, as he calls them, classical sociology or classical organisation theory. While within these orientations, (social) systems are mainly interpreted as centralised entities whose structures are stabilised by purpose determined at the top, Luhmann, in his general theory of social systems privileges internal differentiation in which subsystems autonomously define their purposes, making society more flexible and capable of responding to environmental challenges. In that sense, the main intention of this paper is the creation of cognitive interest for the notions of complexity and flexibility, i.e. for the issue of subsystem autonomy, as the important elements of Luhmann’s general theory of social systems. Our premise is that the establishment of subsystem autonomy is not a matter of mere, a priori, theoretical and/or practical arbitrariness, nor does it mean an introduction into deconstruction of the system, but it represents a necessary step in the creation of successful responses of the social system to problems arising from the immense and dynamic complexity of its own environment. In other words, through the process of internal differentiation, by establishing subsystem autonomy, the social system increases its own complexity, i.e. ability to adjust to the environment. Thus, challenges arising from the environment are not transferred to the whole, but localised and processed in the appropriate, autonomous parts of the system. By so increasing its internal complexity, the system undeniably acquires the necessary flexibility, or capability for a faster and more efficient creation of alternative.

U ovome radu se upoređuju i kritički propituju najvažnije karakteristike strukturalizma i poststrukturalizma kao dve izuzetno važne teorijske orijentacije za razumevanje aktuelne društvene i političke stvarnosti in genere. U tom smislu, analiziraju se teoretske premise/konceptualizacije: strukture, subjekta, identiteta, jezičkih formi, retorskih inkoherentnosti teksta i generativnih konsekvencija moći, to jest kontekstualizacije njenih istorijski datih/nasleđenih institucija i praksi. Pored toga što rad pokušava i da popuni evidentnu prazninu koja vlada na nivou razumevanja ova dva diskursa u okviru srpskog politikološkog prostora, on pledira i za njihovu intenzivno projektovanje/primenu u interpretaciji indigene srpske političke realnosti. Rad tretira poststrukturalizam i kao svojevrsnu intrinsičnu kritiku strukturalizma, i kao „strukturalizam strukturalizma”, neku vrstu, jako slobodno rečeno, „meta-strukturalizma”. Pritom, postmodernistički meta-narativ se doživljava kao kulturna manifestacija/valencija akademski formulisanog meta-narativa poststrukturalizma.

This paper investigates the role of performative models within the context of architectural design. Understanding the performances of the built environment can be postulated in rather different manners. It is commonly expected that the built environment complies with the diverse and changing requirements of its users. It is equally required that buildings are economically constructed, easily maintained, energy efficient, safe and aesthetically pleasing. Yet, such expectations are complex and consist of a great number of intertwined effects that are not easy to synchronize during architectural design process. Although they can be precisely evaluated and quantitatively expressed, the values specifying the performances, such as temperature, humidity and intensity of light or sound, in traditionally established course of architectural design are usually only considered throughout the post-rationalization or correction of the architectural design. The research presented in this paper explores design mechanisms, for direct and formative incorporation of feedback information into the very conception of architectural form. Ovaj rad istražuje ulogu performativnog modela u procesu arhitektonskog projektovanja. Razumevanje performansi izgrađenog okruženja možemo postaviti na veoma različite načine. Danas očekujemo da izgrađeni objekti budu usklađeni sa različitim i promenljivim potrebama svojih korisnika, da budu ekonomično izgrađeni, pogodni za održavanje, energetski efikasni, bezbedni i estetski ugodni. Međutim, ovakva očekivanja su složena i sastoje se od velikog broja međusobno povezanih uticaja koje nije lako uskladiti tokom arhitektonskog projektovanja. Iako mogu biti precizno evaluirane i izražene kvantitativnim putem, vrednosti koje određuju performanse, kao što su temperatura, vlažnost, intenzitet svetlosti ili zvuka, u tradicionalno uspostavljenom toku arhitektonskog projektovanja se najčešće primenjuju samo za naknadnu racionalizaciju ili delimičnu korekciju arhitektonskog projekta. Predmet istraživanja ove studije se odnosi na mehanizme za neposredno i formativno uključivanje povratnih informacija, koje nastaju putem evaluacije modela, u sam tok koncepcije arhitektonske forme.