Search

The radiocapitellar line (RCL) is a routinely referenced radiographic measurement for evaluating injury of the pediatric elbow, such as a Monteggia fracture. It is most commonly described as a line drawn along the radius that should intercept the center of the capitellum in a normal elbow. However, the RCL has not been rigorously defined or validated in young children.The RCL was drawn out on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of 116 normal pediatric elbows by 3 examiners. On each radiograph, lines were drawn along the longitudinal center of the radial neck as well as the radial shaft. The distance from each of these lines to the center of the capitellum was defined as the line-capitellar distance (LCD). The LCD was standardized to the patient size and correlated with patient variables.Of the 2052 RCLs drawn, 50% (1029/2052) fell outside the middle third of the capitellum and 8.6% (176/2052) missed the capitellum completely. Lines drawn along the radial neck in the anteroposterior and lateral views missed the capitellum less frequently (1.2% vs. 12.7%, P0.0001) and passed through its central third less (77.8% vs. 44.7%, P0.0001) when compared with lines drawn using the radial shaft. Lines along the radial neck intersected the capitellum significantly more often on the lateral view than on the anteroposterior view (98.8% vs. 96.8%, P=0.06) and were more likely to pass through the center third of the capitellum (77.8% vs. 55.5%, P0.0001). With both techniques of drawing the RCL, the percent of measurements falling within the middle third of the capitellum was higher in patients above 5 years of age (P0.001). The RCL is more reliable in older patients and shows considerable variation in infants.The RCL does not invariably bisect or fall within the middle third of the capitellum in normal pediatric elbows. Therefore, an abnormal RCL is suggestive but not pathognomonic for injury such as Monteggia fracture. An RCL drawn along the radial shaft will miss the capitellum in 15.6% of elbows. The most consistent RCL is drawn along the radial neck on the lateral view. Patient variables such as age and sex should be considered in the ability of the RCL to identify elbow injury.Diagnostic Level 3.

Background: Surveys have demonstrated that wrong-site surgery of the spine is performed by up to 50% of spine surgeons over the course of a career. Inaccurate identification of appropriate vertebral levels is a common reason for wrong-site spine surgery. The present study examined the prevalence of variations in the number of vertebrae in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Methods: A retrospective review of radiographs and reports of 364 consecutive patients undergoing operative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at a single center was performed. The study included eighty-eight male patients (24%) and 276 female patients (76%) with a mean age of fourteen years (range, ten to twenty years). Radiographs were reviewed to assess the number of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and the presence of a lumbosacral transitional vertebra. Results: Ten percent of the patients (thirty-eight) had an atypical number of vertebrae in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine. Twenty-one patients (5.8%) had an atypical number of thoracic vertebrae, with fourteen having eleven thoracic vertebrae and seven patients having thirteen. Twenty-four patients (6.6%) had an atypical number of lumbar vertebrae, with four having four lumbar vertebrae and twenty patients having six. A lumbosacral transitional vertebra was present in 6.3% (twenty-three) of the patients. Multilevel vertebral anomalies were present in 1.9% of the patients (seven of 364). A variation in the number of vertebrae had been identified in 0.5% (two) of the reports by the radiologist. Conclusions: Variations in the number of thoracic or lumbar vertebrae were found in 10% of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis but had been identified in only 0.5% of the radiology reports. Clinical Relevance: Assessment of possible variations in the number of vertebrae is important to help avoid surgery at the wrong vertebral level.

Much attention has been given to the relationship between various training factors and athletic injuries, but no study has examined the impact of sleep deprivation on injury rates in young athletes. Information about sleep practices was gathered as part of a study designed to correlate various training practices with the risk of injury in adolescent athletes.Informed consent for participation in an online survey of training practices and a review of injury records was obtained from 160 student athletes at a combined middle/high school (grades 7 to 12) and from their parents. Online surveys were completed by 112 adolescent athletes (70% completion rate), including 54 male and 58 female athletes with a mean age of 15 years (SD=1.5; range, 12 to 18 y). The students' responses were then correlated with data obtained from a retrospective review of injury records maintained by the school's athletic department.Multivariate analysis showed that hours of sleep per night and the grade in school were the best independent predictors of injury. Athletes who slept on average8 hours per night were 1.7 times (95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0; P=0.04) more likely to have had an injury compared with athletes who slept for ≥8 hours. For each additional grade in school, the athletes were 1.4 times more likely to have had an injury (95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.6; P0.001).Sleep deprivation and increasing grade in school appear to be associated with injuries in an adolescent athletic population. Encouraging young athletes to get optimal amounts of sleep may help protect them against athletic injuries.Level III.

Background Previous studies have reported that the use of abduction bracing after Pavlik harness failure in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is often effective in achieving hip reduction. Methods This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients with DDH at a single institution between 2006 and 2011. Patients in this study met all 4 inclusion criteria: (1) DDH, (2) a dislocated or dislocatable hip, (3) unsuccessful treatment with a Pavlik harness, and (4) subsequent treatment with abduction bracing. Exclusion criteria were dislocated hips associated with neurological, teratologic, syndromic, or other nonidiopathic conditions. Results Seven hips met inclusion criteria. Mean age at Pavlik harness initiation was 2.1 months (range, 1 d to 6 mo) and patients spent an average of 1.2 months (range, 0.4 to 2.7 mo) in the harness. After ultrasound demonstrated a persistently dislocated hip, patients were transitioned to an abduction brace and spent an average of 1.3 months (range, 0.1 to 3 mo) in the brace. One hundred percent (7/7) of hips treated with an abduction orthosis failed to reduce and required further treatment; 4 with closed reduction and spica casting, and 3 with open reduction. Patients were followed for an average of 33.6 months (range, 10 to 60 mo), and all patients had stable hips at latest follow-up. Conclusions In this series of 7 patients with developmentally dislocated hips who failed Pavlik harness treatment, subsequent abduction bracing provided no benefit, in contrast to previous studies. All patients who failed Pavlik harness treatment went on to require closed or open reduction of the hip. Abduction bracing may unnecessarily prolong the time to definitive treatment. Level of evidence Case series, level 4.