Search

Background Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (hoFH) can cause severe atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in early infancy. Diagnosis and initiation of effective lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) are recommended as early as possible to prevent ASCVD-related morbidity and mortality. Methods The clinical courses of a pair of siblings with an identical hoFH genotype, who exhibited major similarities of their clinical phenotype were analyzed in a case-control fashion including the family. Results The older sibling was diagnosed with hoFH at the age of 4. Untreated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was 17 mmol/L (660 mg/dL). LLT including lipoprotein apheresis (LA) was initiated and has been successful for 8 years now. A reduction of estimated cholesterol burden by 74% was achieved by LA and combined drug therapy including statins and ezetimibe. The efficacy of escalation of drug therapy was limited because the underlying LDL receptor (LDLR) mutation in the family resulted in substantially reduced receptor function. Treatment with proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9)-antibodies failed. His younger brother died at the age of 2 years shortly after the hoFH diagnosis of the elder sibling. Postmortem examination revealed advanced aortic root atheroma and aortic valve stenosis. In the older sibling, aortic valve stenosis and insufficiency were treated at the age of 9 years with mechanical aortic valve replacement. Conclusions LLT including LA should be initiated as early as possible following the diagnosis of hoFH with very high LDL-C levels. With the same genotype, the phenotype of hoFH can exhibit similar patterns but outcome is substantially related to treatment.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) consists of an LDL particle whose apolipoprotein B (apoB) is covalently bound to apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]). An increased Lp(a) concentration is a causal, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and a predictor of incident or recurrent cardiovascular events. Although Lp(a) was first described as early as 1963, only the more recent results of epidemiological, molecular, and genetic studies have led to this unequivocal conclusion. More than 20% of Western populations have elevated Lp(a) values. Lp(a) concentrations should be always part of the lipid profile when ASCVD risk is assessed. However, presence of other risk factors, laboratory findings, medical history and family history must be considered to conclude on its clinical relevance in an individual patient. Early or progressive ASCVD or a familial predisposition are key findings which can be associated with elevated Lp(a). The cholesterol portion contained in Lp(a) is also included in the various methods of LDL-C measurement. To assess proximity to the cardiovascular risk related target value for LDL-C, appropriate correction should be applied when high Lp(a) values are obtained to estimate the LDL-C that can actually be treated by lipid lowering drugs. Initial study data show that antisense oligonucleotides, which selectively decrease apolipoprotein(a), are promising as future treatment options. Currently, lipoprotein apheresis, which has a reimbursement guideline in Germany, is the therapy of choice for patients with Lp(a)-associated progressive ASCVD, with the aim of sustained prevention of further cardiovascular events.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor playing a causal role for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a safe well-tolerated outpatient treatment to lower LDL-C and Lp(a) by 60–70%, and is the ultimate escalating therapeutic option in patients with hyperlipoproteinemias (HLP) involving LDL particles. Major therapeutic effect of LA is preventing cardiovascular events. Lp(a)-HLP associated with progressive CVD has been approved as indication for regular LA in Germany since 2008. The Pro(a)LiFe-study investigated with a prospective multicenter design the long-term preventive effect of LA on incidence rates of cardiovascular events prospectively over a period of 5 years in 170 consecutive patients who commenced regular LA. During a median period of 4.7 years of the pre-LA period, Lp(a) associated progressive CVD became apparent. Apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene (LPA) were analyzed to assess hypothetical clinical correlations. 154 patients (90.6%) completed 5‑years follow-up. Significant decline of the mean annual major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was observed from 0.41 ± 0.45 two years prior to regular LA to 0.06 ± 0.11 during 5 years with regular LA (p < 0.0001). 95.3% of patients expressed at least one small apo(a) isoform. Calculation of isoform specific concentrations allowed to confirm the equivalence of 60 mg/dl or 120 nmol/l as Lp(a) thresholds of the German LA guideline. Results of 5 years prospective follow-up confirmed that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP and afore progressive CVD.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor playing a causal role for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Early or progressive ASCVD or a familial predisposition are key findings which can be associated with Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP). The German guideline for the indication of lipoprotein apheresis in patients with Lp(a)-HLP has proved to be of value to identify patients at highest risk, using the composite of a Lp(a) threshold >60 mg/dl (>120 nmol/l) and clinical ASCVD progression despite effective LDL-C lowering therapy. In particular for such patients it appears to be plausible that Lp(a)-associated risk would increase cardiovascular mortality as the most important part of total mortality in Western populations. By the majority of existing investigations an association of Lp(a) concentration on total or cardiovascular mortality was demonstrated. However, inconsistency in the findings between studies exists without a clear trend for any study feature to explain this. Genetic homogeneity of the population, long-term follow-up, and clinically guided selection of patients might be important to further clarify the impact of Lp(a) concentration on progression of ASCVD, and finally total or cardiovascular mortality. LDL and Lp(a) particles exhibit a mutual effect modification on related ASCVD risk. Therefore, LDL-C levels and concomitant LDL-C lowering treatment must be considered in this context. Prospective evaluation is needed to document that specific Lp(a)-lowering additional to targeted LDL-C lowering will in fact reduce cardiovascular or total mortality.

INTRODUCTION Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition with monoclonal antibodies has complemented the armamentarium of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) before the final step of commencing chronic lipoprotein apheresis (LA). Data are scarce on patients who, after escalation of LLT with PCSK9 antibodies, have commenced chronic LA or PCSK9 antibody treatment during ongoing long-term LA. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this study, a cohort of 110 patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) due to hypercholesterolemia or concomitant lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia, who received PCSK9 antibodies for the first time during routine care, were consecutively identified. RESULTS Mean LDL-C concentration prior to initiation of LA or PCSK9 antibody treatment was 5.3 ± 2.6 mmol/L (205 ± 102 mg/dL). Due to established ASCVD, the risk-adjusted LDL-C target value was

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has emerged as an important independent cardiovascular risk factor, and causal association has been accepted with adverse outcome in atherosclerotic disease. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) can lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and Lp(a) by 60-70 % and is the final escalating therapeutic option in patients with hyperlipoproteinemias (HLP) involving LDL or Lp(a) particles. Major therapeutic effect of LA is preventing cardiovascular events. Stabilizing plaque morphology might be an important underlying mechanism of action. In Germany, since 2008, a reimbursement guideline has been implemented to establish the indication for LA not only for familial or severe forms of hypercholesterolemia but also for Lp(a)-HLP associated with a progressive course of cardiovascular disease, that persists despite effective treatment of other concomitant cardiovascular risk factors, i.e. isolated Lp(a)-HLP. The Pro(a)LiFe-study confirmed with a prospective multicenter design that LA can effectively reduce Lp(a) plasma levels and prevent cardiovascular events.

Background: Idiopathic sudden hearing loss (ISHL) has been suggested to precipitate as final common pathway of microcirculatory impairment of the inner ear associated with a variety of etiologies and characterized by a local hyperviscosity syndrome in cochlear vessels. Therefore, we investigated the[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL], 80th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) can lower LDL-cholesterol and Lp(a) by 60%-70% and is the final escalating option in patients with hyperlipoproteinemias involving LDL or Lp(a) particles. Major therapeutic effect of LA is preventing cardiovascular events. In Germany since 2008 a reimbursement guideline has been implemented accepting to establish the indication for LA not only for familial or severe forms of hypercholesterolemia but also based on Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia associated with a progressive course of cardiovascular disease, that persists despite effective treatment of other concomitant cardiovascular risk factors. The Pro(a)LiFe-study confirmed with a prospective multicenter design that LA can be regarded as an important therapeutic approach to effectively reduce Lp(a) plasma levels and prevent cardiovascular events in this particular high-risk patient group. Results support that Lp(a) may be a major causal factor for precipitating mechanisms of accelerated progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Indication for LA based on measurement of Lp(a) as part of risk assessment is supported by the following conditions: progressive CVD as assessed clinically and with imaging techniques, established maximally tolerated lipid lowering drug treatment, recent cardiovascular events despite efficient drug treatment, out of the ordinary frequency of cardiovascular events, early CVD, or positive family history of early CVD. Still existing difficulties with Lp(a) laboratory measurement require a practical approach to establish the indication for LA considering the 60 mg/dl threshold of German guidelines with selecting an Lp(a) assay which has been calibrated for mass.

The control of waste water plants is difficult or even impossible using the classical determination method for biological oxygen demand (BOD), because of its high time consumption of five days. A determination within some minutes is possible by microbial BOD-sensors. However, high molecular weight substances cannot be detected, a problem which can be overcome by the use of additional enzymes. For the application in a flow-through system to analyse starch containing waste water, α-amylase and amyloglucosidase were immobilized by adsorption to polystyrene or polypropylene carriers followed by crosslinking. Furthermore, covalent coupling to different nylon carriers, derivatives of chitin, silanized glass beads and silanized beads of foamed glass was tried. Chitin and Lewatit were the best suited carriers for the immobilization of α-amylase and amyloglucosidase. Two glass columns were filled with the immobilized enzymes and inserted into a commercial BOD-sensor containing the yeast Trichosporon cutaneum as biological component. The system was stable for more than two months under storage and one month under working conditions. A comparison of different starch types resulted in a hydrolysis of more than 80% in case of potato starch whereas grain starch was hydrolized only for 40–50%. Sensor-determined BOD-values of waste water with potato starch were nearly identical with BOD5-values resulting from the classical method.

Patients suffering from sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL), especially those with hearing impairment refractory to infusion therapy, need new therapeutic options. Fibrinogen-LDL-apheresis, covering Rheopheresis and HELP-apheresis for the indication of SSHL, proved to be an effective treatment option within the therapeutic armamentarium for SSHL in two randomized controlled trials including each more than 200 patients, and has also been shown to be an effective treatment option for patients refractory to the first line standard treatment. Fibrinogen-LDL-apheresis effects an immediate pulsed reduction of plasma viscosity as well as whole blood viscosity, hypothesized to lead to a sustained microcirculatory recovery, thus improving the natural course of acute microcirculatory impairment significantly. The solid body of evidence provided by investigations on fibrinogen-LDL-apheresis in recent years has been recognized by German SSHL guidelines, proposing fibrinogen-lowering treatments like this as part of a multimodality approach. Superiority of fibrinogen-LDL-apheresis over established first line standard treatments could not been shown in general. In consequence, no regular reimbursement by health insurances is available, in particular facing the current policy of health insurances for initial therapeutic nihilism at the acute onset of SSHL. Patients can apply for individual reimbursement or must pay the cost for the treatment. Refractory patients hopefully will profit by growing experiences.

There is increasing interest from neurologists to use therapeutic apheresis in autoimmune neurologic diseases due to growing knowledge of pathogenic relevance of autoantibodies. Developments in that field have been summarized in this review focusing on German guidelines and recent results from clinical research. Therapeutic apheresis can offer a therapeutic armamentarium with rapid response for severe acute neurologic symptoms, and a drug-free option for clinical courses being refractory to drug based strategies or complicated by drug side effects. Plasma exchange (PE) as the classical method has become part of current guidelines within basic and escalating immunomodulatory treatments of autoimmune neurologic diseases, and in daily practice gets increasingly replaced by selective immunoadsorption (IA) due to its equivalent efficacy in combination with a superior safety profile. Therapeutic effects of PE and IA in autoantibody mediated diseases can be attributed to 3 major mechanisms: immediate intravascular reduction of (auto-)antibody concentration, pulsed induction of antibody redistribution, and subsequent immunomodulatory changes. 5 treatments over a period of 8-10 days seem to be an appropriate regimen to restore neurologic function in acute flares or relapses of autoimmune neuropathies, e.g. myasthenic crisis, Guillain-Barre-syndrome, and steroid refractory relapse of multiple sclerosis. Especially in MS a better understanding is needed, who are the best candidates for IA.

For many years dextran sulfate adsorption (DSA) treatment of separated plasma has been an established technology for low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-elimination. Recently a system for the treatment of whole blood based on DSA was introduced into clinical practice. To further characterize DSA treatment of whole blood, the performance characteristics of both DSA modalities were compared at two investigational sites with two alternative LDL apheresis systems being already in routine clinical use. In prospective cross-over design, DSA whole blood treatment was compared with a whole blood polyacrylate LDL adsorption system (DALI) in one study group. DSA for plasma treatment was compared with Lipidfiltration in cross-over design in a second study group. In total, 12 patients on chronic LDL apheresis received 169 treatments. Six patients were treated twice with whole blood polyacrylate adsorption and twice with whole blood DSA. LDL-cholesterol (74.9-78.0%) and lipoprotein (a) (72.1-73.3%) were reduced by both with equal efficacy. DSA achieved a significantly higher reduction rate of fibrinogen. Another six patients were treated eight times with DSA plasma adsorption followed by 16 Lipidfiltration treatments. LDL-cholesterol (67.0-70.2%) and lipoprotein (a) (69.2-73.7%) were reduced by both with equal efficacy. Fibrinogen was eliminated more efficiently by Lipidfiltration (50.2 vs. 38.5%). DSA proved to be a safe and effective in both treatment modes, for plasma as well as for whole blood. At the discretion of the apheresis specialist, depending upon the status of national approval, DSA of whole blood complements the armamentarium of powerful modalities for extracorporeal elimination of atherosclerotic lipoproteins to meet specific individual, medical, or logistic needs.