Search

We analyze the gravity waves (GWs) from the ground to the thermosphere during 11–14 January 2016 using the nudged HI Altitude Mechanistic general Circulation Model. We find that the entrance, core and exit regions of the polar vortex jet are important for generating primary GWs and amplifying GWs from below. These primary GWs dissipate in the upper stratosphere/lower mesosphere and deposit momentum there; the atmosphere responds by generating secondary GWs. This process is repeated, resulting in medium to large‐scale higher‐order, thermospheric GWs. We find that the amplitudes of the secondary/higher‐order GWs from sources below the polar vortex jet are exponentially magnified. The higher‐order, thermospheric GWs have concentric ring, arc‐like and planar structures, and spread out latitudinally to 10 − 90°N. Those GWs with the largest amplitudes propagate against the background wind. Some of the higher‐order GWs generated over Europe propagate over the Arctic region then southward over the US to ∼15–20°N daily at ∼14 − 24 UT (∼9 − 16 LT) due to the favorable background wind. These GWs have horizontal wavelengths λH ∼ 200 − 2,200 km, horizontal phase speeds cH ∼ 165 − 260 m/s, and periods τr ∼ 0.3 − 2.4 hr. Such GWs could be misidentified as being generated by auroral activity. The large‐scale, higher‐order GWs are generated in the lower thermosphere and propagate southwestward daily across the northern mid‐thermosphere at ∼8–16 LT with λH ∼ 3,000 km and cH ∼ 650 m/s. We compare the simulated GWs with those observed by AIRS, VIIRS/DNB, lidar and meteor radars and find reasonable to good agreement. Thus the polar vortex jet is important for facilitating the global generation of medium to large‐scale, higher‐order thermospheric GWs via multi‐step vertical coupling. Plain Language Summary: Gravity waves (GWs) are perturbations in the Earth's atmosphere created by various processes. When a GW breaks, it imparts momentum to the atmosphere, which in turn can become unbalanced and generate secondary GWs. The same process happens at higher altitudes where the secondary GWs break, thereby generating higher‐order GWs. We simulate the primary, secondary and higher‐order GWs on 11–14 January 2016 using a GW‐resolving whole atmosphere model. We find that the entrance, core and exit regions of the jet that encircles the polar vortex generate primary GWs. In addition, the polar vortex jet magnifies the amplitudes of higher‐order GWs from sources below the jet, such as mountain waves. The resulting higher‐order GWs have horizontal wavelengths of hundreds to thousands of km with concentric ring, arc‐like and planar structures in the thermosphere. We compare the simulated GWs with AIRS, VIIRS/DNB, lidar, and meteor radar observations and find reasonable to good agreement. Key Points: The vertical shear of the horizontal wind in the entrance, core and exit regions of the polar vortex jet generate GWs in the stratosphereHigher‐order GWs generated over Europe and Asia propagate over the Arctic then southward over the CONUS at ∼9 − 16 LT due to favorable windsLarge‐scale GWs with λH ∼ 3,000 km and cH ∼ 650 m/s propagate southwestward across the northern thermosphere at ∼8–16 LT [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We simulate the primary and secondary atmospheric gravity waves (GWs) excited by the upward movement of air generated by the Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai (hereafter "Tonga") volcanic eruption on 15 January 2022. The Model for gravity wavE SOurce, Ray trAcing and reConstruction (MESORAC) is used to calculate the primary GWs and the local body forces/heatings generated where they dissipate. We add these forces/heatings to the HIgh Altitude Mechanistic general Circulation Model (HIAMCM) to determine the secondary GWs and large‐scale wind changes that result. We find that a wide range of medium to large‐scale secondary GWs with concentric ring structure are created having horizontal wind amplitudes of u′, v′ ∼ 100–200 m/s, ground‐based periods of τr ∼ 20 min to 7 hr, horizontal phase speeds of cH ∼ 100–600 m/s, and horizontal wavelengths of λH ∼ 400–7,500 km. The fastest secondary GWs with cH ∼ 500–600 m/s are large‐scale GWs with λH ∼ 3,000–7,500 km and τr ∼ 1.5–7 hr. They reach the antipode over Africa ∼9 hr after creation. Large‐scale temporally and spatially varying wind changes of ∼80–120 m/s are created where the secondary GWs dissipate. We analyze the Tonga waves measured by the Michelson Interferometer for Global High‐resolution Thermospheric Imaging (MIGHTI) on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ionospheric Connection Explorer (ICON), and find that the observed GWs were medium to large‐scale with cH ∼ 100–600 m/s and λH ∼ 800–7,500 km, in good agreement with the simulated secondary GWs. We also find good agreement between ICON‐MIGHTI and HIAMCM for the timing, amplitudes, locations, and wavelengths of the Tonga waves, provided we increase the GW amplitudes by ∼2 and sample them ∼30 min later than ICON. Plain Language Summary: Atmospheric gravity waves (GWs) are buoyancy driven perturbations in the Earth's atmosphere that can be created by various processes. GW breaking is similar to the breaking of ocean waves when they overturn. A breaking GW imparts momentum to the ambient atmosphere, which can create secondary GWs. We simulated the Tonga eruption on 15 January 2022 using Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite satellite images, ray tracing, and a GW‐resolving global circulation model. We find that the secondary GWs created by the breaking of the primary GWs from the eruption propagated globally and changed the large‐scale wind patterns in the thermosphere. Furthermore, the phase speeds and wavelengths of these waves simulated by the model agree well with corresponding results from ICON satellite measurements. Thus, this study highlights the importance of a process called "multi‐step vertical coupling", according to which secondary GWs are important drivers in the Earth's thermosphere. Key Points: Modeled secondary gravity waves (GWs) radiate globally from Tonga with cH ∼ 100–600 m/s, λH ∼ 400–7,500 km, and τr ∼ 20 min to 7 hrICON observed northeastward GWs from Tonga with cH ∼ 100–600 m/s and λH ∼ 800–7,500 km, in good agreement with the modelTemporally and spatially variable large‐scale wind changes of ∼80–120 m/s are created by the dissipation of the secondary GWs [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We analyze the gravity waves (GWs) observed by a Rayleigh lidar at the Arctic Lidar Observatory for Middle Atmosphere Research (ALOMAR) (16.08°E, 69.38°N) in Norway at z ∼ 20–85 km on 12–14 January 2016. These GWs propagate upward and downward away from zknee = 57 and 64 km at a horizontally‐displaced location with periods τr ∼ 5–10 hr and vertical wavelengths λz ∼ 9–20 km. Because the hodographs are distorted, we introduce an alternative method to determine the GW parameters. We find that these GWs are medium to large‐scale, and propagate north/northwestward with intrinsic horizontal phase speeds of ∼35–65 m/s. Since the GW parameters are similar above and below zknee, these are secondary GWs created by local body forces (LBFs) south/southeast of ALOMAR. We use the nudged HIAMCM (HIgh Altitude Mechanistic general Circulation Model) to model these events. Remarkably, the model reproduces similar GW structures over ALOMAR, with zknee = 58 and 66 km. The event #1 GWs are created by a LBF at ∼35°E, ∼60°N, and z ∼ 58 km. This LBF is created by the breaking and dissipation of primary GWs generated and amplified by the imbalance of the polar night jet below the wind maximum; the primary GWs for this event are created at z ∼ 25–35 km at 49–53°N. We also find that the HIAMCM GWs agree well with those observed by the Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder (AIRS) satellite, and that those AIRS GWs south and north of ∼50°N over Europe are mainly mountain waves and GWs from the polar vortex, respectively. Plain Language Summary: Atmospheric gravity waves (GWs) are perturbations in the Earth's atmosphere which can be created by wind flow over mountains and breaking GWs. Here, a breaking GW is similar to the breaking of an ocean wave when it overturns. A breaking GW imparts momentum to the atmosphere, which creates secondary GWs. We report on the long‐period inertia GWs seen over Arctic Lidar Observatory for Middle Atmosphere Research (ALOMAR) in northern Norway during 12–14 January 2016. We find that the inertia GWs seen over ALOMAR were secondary GWs created by the breaking of primary GWs generated by the imbalance of the polar vortex. We did this via simulating this event with the HIAMCM model and directly comparing these results to lidar and Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder data. After we found that the HIAMCM results agreed very well with these data, we investigated the dynamics which led to the ALOMAR GWs using the HIAMCM model data. This is the first concrete model/data comparison study to show that GWs generated by the polar vortex are important for generating GWs observed in the Earth's mesosphere. This study also highlights the importance of the complicated process dubbed "multi‐step vertical coupling," for which secondary, not primary, GWs can explain the wintertime GWs seen in the mesosphere. Key Points: The upward and downward inertia gravity waves (GWs) over Arctic Lidar Observatory for Middle Atmosphere Research are secondary GWs created by the breaking/dissipation of primary GWs from the polar vortexThe primary GWs are created from imbalance of the polar vortex and are amplified below the wind maximum where the vertical wind shear is largeThe primary and secondary GWs from the polar vortex simulated by the nudged HIAMCM agree well with lidar and Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder observations [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present a new version of the HIgh Altitude Mechanistic general Circulation Model (HIAMCM) with specified dynamics. We utilize a spectral method that nudges only the large‐scale flow to MERRA‐2 reanalysis. The nudged HIAMCM simulates gravity waves (GWs) down to horizontal wavelengths of about 200 km from the troposphere to the thermosphere like the free‐running model, including the generation of secondary and tertiary GWs. Case studies show that the simulated large‐scale GWs are consistent with those in the reanalysis, while the medium‐scale GWs compare well with observations in the northern winter 2016 stratosphere from the Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder (AIRS). GWs having wavelengths larger than about 1,350 km can be described with the nonlinear balance equation. The GWs relevant in the stratosphere, however, have smaller scales and require a different approach. We propose that the GW amplification due to kinetic energy transfer from the large‐scale flow combined with GW potential energy flux convergence helps to identify the mesoscale GW sources due to spontaneous emission. The GW amplification is strongest in the region of maximum large‐scale vertical wind shear in the mid‐stratosphere. Maps of the time‐averaged stratospheric GW activity simulated by the HIAMCM and computed from AIRS satellite data show a persistent hot spot over Europe during January 2016. At about 40 km, the average GW amplitudes are maximum in the region of fastest large‐scale flow. We argue that refraction of GWs originating in the troposphere, as well as GWs from spontaneous emission in the stratosphere contribute to this effect. Plain Language Summary: We present a new version of the HIgh Altitude Mechanistic general Circulation Model (HIAMCM) with specified dynamics in the troposphere, stratosphere, and lower mesosphere. The HIAMCM is a spectral model with high spatial resolution (the shortest horizontal wavelength is about 156 km) and a model top at about 450 km. The nudging of the model to reanalysis is formulated in spectral space and restricted to the large‐scale flow. This ensures that gravity waves (GWs) are self‐consistently simulated over the whole altitude range like in the free‐running model. The simulated large‐scale GWs are quantitatively consistent with those in the reanalysis, while the medium‐scale GWs compare well with satellite observations in the northern winter 2016 stratosphere. We analyze a case of GW generation in the stratosphere from imbalance of the polar vortex. We propose that this process can be identified by the transfer of kinetic energy transfer from the large‐scale flow to the GWs combined with the GW potential energy flux convergence. The in‐situ generation of GWs in the stratosphere likely contributes to the averaged distribution of GW activity in the upper stratosphere, which is maximum around the edge of the polar vortex. Key Points: Nudging in spectral space allows for self‐consistent simulation of gravity waves up to the thermosphereSimulated gravity waves in the winter stratosphere agree well with satellite observationsSpontaneous emission of GWs in the winter stratosphere depends critically on vertical wind shear [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]