Search

Epigenetic marking systems confer stability of gene expression during mammalian development. Genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming occurs at stages when developmental potency of cells changes. At fertilization, the paternal genome exchanges protamines for histones, undergoes DNA demethylation, and acquires histone modifications, whereas the maternal genome appears epigenetically more static. During preimplantation development, there is passive DNA demethylation and further reorganization of histone modifications. In blastocysts, embryonic and extraembryonic lineages first show different epigenetic marks. This epigenetic reprogramming is likely to be needed for totipotency, correct initiation of embryonic gene expression, and early lineage development in the embryo. Comparative work demonstrates reprogramming in all mammalian species analysed, but the extent and timing varies, consistent with notable differences between species during preimplantation development. Parental imprinting marks originate in sperm and oocytes and are generally protected from this genome-wide reprogramming. Early primordial germ cells possess imprinting marks similar to those of somatic cells. However, rapid DNA demethylation after midgestation erases these parental imprints, in preparation for sex-specific de novo methylation during gametogenesis. Aberrant reprogramming of somatic epigenetic marks after somatic cell nuclear transfer leads to epigenetic defects in cloned embryos and stem cells. Links between epigenetic marking systems appear to be developmentally regulated contributing to plasticity. A number of activities that confer epigenetic marks are firmly established, while for those that remove marks, particularly methylation, some interesting candidates have emerged recently which need thorough testing in vivo. A mechanistic understanding of reprogramming will be crucial for medical applications of stem cell technology.

It is well recognized that there is a surprising degree of phenotypic variation among genetically identical individuals, even when the environmental influences, in the strict sense of the word, are identical. Genetic textbooks acknowledge this fact and use different terms, such as 'intangible variation' or 'developmental noise', to describe it. We believe that this intangible variation results from the stochastic establishment of epigenetic modifications to the DNA nucleotide sequence. These modifications, which may involve cytosine methylation and chromatin remodelling, result in alterations in gene expression which, in turn, affects the phenotype of the organism. Recent evidence, from our work and that of others in mice, suggests that these epigenetic modifications, which in the past were thought to be cleared and reset on passage through the germline, may sometimes be inherited to the next generation. This is termed epigenetic inheritance, and while this process has been well recognized in plants, the recent findings in mice force us to consider the implications of this type of inheritance in mammals. At this stage we do not know how extensive this phenomenon is in humans, but it may well turn out to be the explanation for some diseases which appear to be sporadic or show only weak genetic linkage.

Epigenetic modifications that suppress gene activity in mammals are generally considered to be cleared in the germline, restoring totipotency of the genome. Here we report the germline inheritance of transcriptional silencing in mice, and reversion to activity after as many as three generations in the silent state. In a series of lines made with a LacZ transgene, one line exhibits variable expressivity: genotypically identical littermates have proportions of beta-Gal-positive erythrocytes that vary over at least four orders of magnitude, and in some offspring expression is completely silenced. The silent state of the transgene is inherited for multiple generations in the founder strain irrespective of the sex of the parent, implying maintenance of the epigenetic state through meiosis. Crosses of silenced mice with C57BL/6 mice result in reactivation of the transgene in approximately a third of F(1) littermates. The silencing involves a stochastic, all-or-none mechanism. Furthermore, silencing is transcriptional and correlates with methylation of the transgene as well as an inaccessible chromatin structure; these changes are reversed when expression is reactivated. This work supports the notion that silent genetic information in mammals can be inherited and later reactivated, and implies a mode of phenotypic inheritance that is less stable than Mendelian inheritance.