Search

Introduction: Management of oesophageal atresia (OA) and trachea-oesophageal fistula (TOF) in babies of low birth weight is challenging especially when associated with other anomalies. Birth weight of <1500 g has previously formed part of a classification system designed to predict outcome, alongside the cardiac status of the patient. Improvements in neonatal care have led to increasing numbers of premature low birth weight infants surviving. The aim of this study was to look at the experience of our institution in the extremely low birth weight (ELBW) patients., Methods: A retrospective review of our institutions OA database was performed from 1993 to June 2015. Patients of birth weight less than 1000 g were included. A review of our OA/TOF clinical database and notes review established the following; gestation, birth weight, associated anomalies, operative procedures, morbidity and mortality., Results: Of 349 patients with OA across the 22-year period, 9 ELBW patients were identified (<1000 g). Six males and three females. Gestational age ranged from 23 to 34 weeks and median birth weight was 815 g ranging from 630 to 950 g. Overall survival was 56 % (5/9). There were double the numbers of ELBW OA/TOF patients seen in the second half of the study period presumably the result of improving neonatal care. Seven patients had type C OA with TOF and underwent emergency TOF ligation, two had concomitant oesophageal repair. One of these patients died from NEC; the other survived. Of the five who had isolated TOF ligation three died-two from cardiac disease and one from prematurity. Both type A patients survived and after initial gastrostomy placement one had a primary delayed repair, the other a gastric transposition. All three babies under 800 g died-one from cardiac disease the others from conditions indicative of their prematurity-necrotising enterocolitis and intraventricular haemorrhage., Conclusions: 50 % survival is achievable in OA/TOF under 1 kg and the Spitz classification is still applicable in this group as a whole. However, none of the current classification systems are applicable in infants <800 g who in our study all had poor outcomes. We suggest these should be considered as separate group when predicting outcomes.

Aim: "Buried bumper" is a complication of percutaneous gastrostomy related to the internal flange getting buried into the wall of the stomach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the management of this complication., Methods: The surgical and interventional radiology database in our hospital from August 1999 to May 2011 was analyzed. There were 2,007 patients who underwent percutaneous gastrostomy insertion. Notes for patients with buried bumper were reviewed. A telephonic interview with the parents of these children was performed with focused assessment of the care of the gastrostomy tube before the episode of buried bumper. Continuous data are reported as median (range)., Results: Twenty children developed buried bumper after gastrostomy insertion. They had a primary diagnosis of neurological (n = 14), metabolic (n = 3), or endocrine (n = 3) disorders. The age at presentation was 5.7 years (2 to 18 years); 2.5 years (1 month to 5 years) after gastrostomy insertion. Ten children (50%) presented with symptoms related to buried bumper which included leakage around the gastrostomy (n = 4), pus, discharge or bleeding from the site (n = 5), stiffness on feeding (n = 3), and unable to push the flange (n = 1) (three children had more than one symptom). Ten children (50%) were asymptomatic and underwent routine change or removal of gastrostomy. In nine children, there was an attempt to remove the flange by interventional radiology but this was successful only in one. In the remaining 19 children, 4 had endoscopic removal while 15 children developed an inflammatory mass and required a laparotomy (n = 12) or laparoscopic-assisted excision (n = 3)., Conclusion: Buried bumper is a rare complication of percutaneous gastrostomy. Inadequate postoperative care without appropriate mobilization is a factor leading to this preventable complication. Endoscopic removal is possible, failing which laparoscopic surgery should be considered., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background/purpose: Gastrostomy insertion in children can be performed in many ways, but which is the best technique remains uncertain. This study evaluates the outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and image-guided gastrostomy (IG)., Methods: We reviewed children who had either PEG (n = 136) inserted by pediatric surgeons or IG (n = 195) inserted by interventional radiologists in our hospital between May 2004 and July 2008. Gastrostomy-related complications were given scores ranging from 20 for major complications (eg, peritonitis, gastrointestinal bleed, and visceral injury) to 1 for minor (eg, site infection and tube migration), and total score per month of follow-up was calculated per patient., Results: Conversion to laparoscopic or open gastrostomy was more frequent in PEG versus IG (P = .001). Fewer PEG patients (28%) had complications than did IG (47%) (P = .001). One PEG patient developed a gastrocolic fistula. In the IG group, 2 patients had transverse colon puncture, 1 had intraperitoneal tube detachment, and 1 had upper gastrointestinal bleeding. When scored and adjusted by length of follow-up, PEG had lower scores compared with IG, indicating a better outcome (P = .03). These findings were supported by zero-inflated Poisson regression analysis., Conclusion: Major complications were rare and observed more frequently after IG. Minor complications were observed in both procedures but were significantly less common in PEG., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim "Buried bumper" is a complication of percutaneous gastrostomy related to the internal flange getting buried into the wall of the stomach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the management of this complication. Methods The surgical and interventional radiology database in our hospital from August 1999 to May 2011 was analyzed. There were 2,007 patients who underwent percutaneous gastrostomy insertion. Notes for patients with buried bumper were reviewed. A telephonic interview with the parents of these children was performed with focused assessment of the care of the gastrostomy tube before the episode of buried bumper. Continuous data are reported as median (range). Results Twenty children developed buried bumper after gastrostomy insertion. They had a primary diagnosis of neurological (n = 14), metabolic (n = 3), or endocrine (n = 3) disorders. The age at presentation was 5.7 years (2 to 18 years); 2.5 years (1 month to 5 years) after gastrostomy insertion. Ten children (50%) presented with symptoms related to buried bumper which included leakage around the gastrostomy (n = 4), pus, discharge or bleeding from the site (n = 5), stiffness on feeding (n = 3), and unable to push the flange (n = 1) (three children had more than one symptom). Ten children (50%) were asymptomatic and underwent routine change or removal of gastrostomy. In nine children, there was an attempt to remove the flange by interventional radiology but this was successful only in one. In the remaining 19 children, 4 had endoscopic removal while 15 children developed an inflammatory mass and required a laparotomy (n = 12) or laparoscopic-assisted excision (n = 3). Conclusion Buried bumper is a rare complication of percutaneous gastrostomy. Inadequate postoperative care without appropriate mobilization is a factor leading to this preventable complication. Endoscopic removal is possible, failing which laparoscopic surgery should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recurrence of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) following redo Nissen fundoplication represents a significant clinical problem. The aim of this study was to identify factors predicting failure of redo Nissen fundoplication. The notes of children who underwent redo Nissen fundoplication for recurrent GOR in a single institution between June 1994 and May 2005 were reviewed. Data are reported as median (range), or as numbers of cases. Multiple logistic regression analysis, using type of first fundoplication, neurological status, presence of gastrostomy, age-weight, retching-gas bloat after first fundoplication, associated anomalies, oesophageal atresia and length of follow-up as factors, was used to generate a model to identify factors predicting recurrent vomiting (failure) after redo. Eighty-one children underwent redo Nissen fundoplication 15.9 months (0.2-176) after the initial Nissen fundoplication. In 29, the first Nissen was laparoscopic. Age at redo Nissen fundoplication was 3.3 years (0.3-15.9) and weight 12.8 kg (5-60). Thirty-four children (42%) presented with recurrent vomiting (failure). Overall, the model successfully predicted vomiting (failure) after redo fundoplication (P = 0.009). Open surgery at first fundoplication (P = 0.011) and neurological impairment (P = 0.046) were both significant predictors of redo failure in the model, whereas presence of gastrostomy (P = 0.035) and older-heavier age-weight (P = 0.028) were associated with significantly better results. Retching-gas bloat, associated anomalies and oesophageal atresia were not significant predictors of failure. Redo Nissen fundoplication has a high failure rate. Risk factors are open fundoplication at first operation and neurological impairment. Redo fundoplication after primary laparoscopic Nissen has a lower risk of failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]