Search

Background/objectives: Gastric emptying (GE) requires precise antropyloroduodenal coordination for effective transpyloric flow, the mechanisms of which are still unclear. We aimed to correlate gastric antral function assessed by antroduodenal manometry (ADM) with GE scintigraphy (GES) for liquid feeds in children with suspected gastrointestinal dysmotility., Methods: Children who underwent both ADM and GES over a five-year period were reviewed. ADM tracings were re-analyzed to assess antral frequency, amplitude, and motility index (MI) pre-prandially and postprandially. Transpyloric propagation (TPP) was defined as antegrade propagated antral activity preceding duodenal phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC). TPP was defined as "poor" if occurring in <50% of all presented duodenal phases III. For GES, regions of interest over the whole stomach, fundus, and antrum were drawn to calculate GE half-time (GE-T 1/2 ) and retention rate (RR) in each region at 1 and 2 h., Results: Forty-seven children (median age: 7.0 years) were included. Twenty-two had PIPO, 14 functional GI disorders, and 11 gastroparesis. Children with poor TPP had longer GE-T 1/2 (113.0 vs 66.5 min, p = 0.028), higher RR of the whole stomach and fundus at 1 h (79.5% vs 63.5%, p = 0.038; 60.0% vs 41.0%, p = 0.022, respectively) and 2 h (51.0% vs 10.5%, p = 0.005; 36.0% vs 6.5%, p = 0.004, respectively). The pre-prandial antral amplitude of contractions inversely correlated with GE-T 1/2 , RR of the whole stomach, and fundus at 2 h., Conclusions: TPP during phase III of the MMC correlated with gastric emptying of liquid and its assessment on ADM might predict abnormalities in postprandial gastric function., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Normal and optimal functioning of the gastrointestinal tract is paramount to ensure optimal nutrition through digestion, absorption and motility function. Disruptions in these functions can lead to adverse physiological symptoms, reduced quality of life and increased nutritional risk. When disruption or dysfunction of neuromuscular function occurs, motility disorders can be classified depending on whether coordination or strength/velocity of peristalsis are predominantly impacted. However, due to their nonspecific presenting symptoms and overlap with sensory disruption, they are frequently misdiagnosed as disorders of the gut–brain interaction. Motility disorders are a prevalent issue in the pediatric population, with management varying from medical therapy to psychological therapy, dietary manipulation, surgical intervention or a multimodal approach. This narrative review aims to discuss the dietary management of common pediatric motility disorders including gastroesophageal reflux, esophageal atresia, achalasia, gastroparesis, constipation, and the less common but most severe motility disorder, pediatric intestinal pseudo-obstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pediatric gastrointestinal motility disorders represent some of the most challenging clinical conditions with largely undefined pathogenetic pathways and therefore limited therapeutic options. Herein, we provide an overview of the recent advances in treatment options for these disorders and their clinical impact. PubMed and Medline databases were searched for relevant articles related to the treatment of achalasia, esophageal atresia, gastroparesis, PIPO and constipation published between 2017 and 2022. In this article, we review and summarize recent advances in management of gastrointestinal motility disorders in children with a particular focus on emerging therapies as well as novel diagnostic modalities that help guide their application or develop new, more targeted treatments. Gastrointestinal motility disorders represent one of the most challenging conundrums in pediatric age and despite significant advances in investigative tools, the palette of treatment options remain limited. Overall, while pharmacological options have failed to bring a curative solution, recent advances in minimal invasive therapeutic and diagnostic techniques have emerged as potential keys to symptom and quality of life improvement, such as ENDOFLIP, POEM, cine-MRI, fecal microbiota transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pediatric intestinal pseudo‐obstruction (PIPO) encompasses a variety of rare, heterogeneous, and disabling disorders that severely affect gastrointestinal motility and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. PIPO management is complex and focuses on maintaining an optimal nutritional status, improving gut function, relieving symptoms, and treating complications. Nutritional issues prevail, and PIPO patients often experience severe undernutrition and faltering growth. Thus, nutritional management plays a pivotal role for achieving the most favorable clinical outcomes. The calorie and nutrient intake of each patient needs to be tailored to age, extent and severity of gut involvement and nutritional needs to support an optimal nutritional status. After defining the extent and severity of gut dysmotility, an experienced team should perform a careful nutritional assessment. An oral diet should always be encouraged and might include bite and dissolve solids, liquid diet or simple oral stimulation. If oral caloric intake is inadequate, liquid gastric feeds should provide the subsequent step. In the presence of severe gastric dysmotility, continuous post‐pyloric feeding represents a viable option. In the most severe cases, parenteral nutrition (PN) is required to meet appropriate nutritional requirements. Purpose: Pediatric data on this topic are scarce and mainly extrapolated from adult studies. In this review, we discuss current evidence and knowledge regarding nutritional options, implications of the use of different feed types, including a blended diet, and the use of PN. Moreover, based on our experience and the evidence from the literature, we propose a flow chart to guide the nutritional management of PIPO patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastrointestinal dysmotility is a common problem in a subgroup of children with intestinal failure (IF), including short bowel syndrome (SBS) and pediatric intestinal pseudo-obstruction (PIPO). It contributes significantly to the increased morbidity and decreased quality of life in this patient population. Impaired gastrointestinal (GI) motility in IF arises from either loss of GI function due to the primary disorder (e.g., neuropathic or myopathic disorder in the PIPO syndrome) and/or a critical reduction in gut mass. Abnormalities of the anatomy, enteric hormone secretion and neural supply in IF can result in rapid transit, ineffective antegrade peristalsis, delayed gastric emptying or gastroesophageal reflux. Understanding the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism(s) of the enteric dysmotility in IF helps us to plan an appropriate diagnostic workup and apply individually tailored nutritional and pharmacological management, which might ultimately lead to an overall improvement in the quality of life and increase in enteral tolerance. In this review, we have focused on the pathogenesis of GI dysmotility in children with IF, as well as the management and treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Objective evidence of small intestinal dysmotility is a key criterion for the diagnosis of pediatric intestinal pseudo-obstruction (PIPO). Small bowel scintigraphy (SBS) allows for objective measurement of small bowel transit (SBT), but limited data are available in children. We aimed to evaluate the utility of SBS in children suspected of gastrointestinal dysmotility. METHODS: Patients undergoing gastric emptying studies for suspected foregut dysmotility, including PIPO, from 2016 to 2022 at 2 tertiary children's hospitals were recruited to an extended protocol of gastric emptying studies to allow for assessment of SBT. PIPO was classified based on antroduodenal manometry (ADM). SBT was compared between PIPO and non-PIPO patients. Scintigraphic parameters were assessed and correlated against ADM scores. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (16 PIPO and 43 non-PIPO diagnoses) were included. SBS was performed with liquid and solid meals in 40 and 26 patients, respectively. As compared to the non-PIPO group, PIPO patients had a significantly lower median percentage of colonic filling at 6 hours, with both liquid (48% vs 83%) and solid tests (5% vs 65%). SBT in PIPO patients with myopathic involvement was significantly slower than in patients with neuropathic PIPO, both for liquid and solid meal. A significant correlation was found between solid SBT and ADM scores (r 5 20.638, P 5 0.036). DISCUSSION: SBS provides a practically feasible assessment of small intestinal motility. It shows a potential utility to help diagnose and characterize PIPO. SBS seems most discriminative in PIPO patients with myopathic involvement. Studies in a larger pediatric population and across different ages are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]