Search

Background: The added value of local treatment in selected metastatic GIST patients is unclear. This study aims to provide insight into the usefulness of local treatment in metastatic GIST by use of a survey study and retrospective analyses in a clinical database., Methods: A survey study was conducted among clinical specialists to select most relevant characteristics of metastatic GIST patients considered for local treatment, defined as elective surgery or ablation. Patients were selected from the Dutch GIST Registry. A multivariate Cox-regression model for overall survival since time of diagnosis of metastatic disease was estimated with local treatment as a time-dependent variable. An additional model was estimated to assess prognostic factors since local treatment., Results: The survey's response rate was 14/16. Performance status, response to TKIs, location of active disease, number of lesions, mutation status, and time between primary diagnosis and metastases, were regarded the 6 most important characteristics. Of 457 included patients, 123 underwent local treatment, which was associated with better survival after diagnosis of metastases (HR = 0.558, 95%CI = 0.336-0.928). Progressive disease during systemic treatment (HR = 3.885, 95%CI = 1.195-12.627) and disease confined to the liver (HR = 0.269, 95%CI = 0.082-0.880) were associated with worse and better survival after local treatment, respectively., Conclusion: Local treatment is associated with better survival in selected patients with metastatic GIST. Locally treated patients with response to TKIs and disease confined to the liver have good clinical outcome. These results might be considered for tailoring treatment, but should be interpreted with care because only specific patients are provided with local treatment in this retrospective study., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Previous literature showed a high risk of recurrence following surgical treatment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). However, little is known about the patient- and treatment characteristics of local recurrences (LRs) in GIST patients. Therefore, this study aimed to better understand patterns of LR in surgically treated localised GIST and to describe treatment options based on our Dutch GIST Registry (DGR)., Methods: Data of primary surgically treated localised GIST between January 2009 until July 2021 were retrospectively retrieved from the DGR., Results: Of 1452 patients registered in the DGR, 912 patients were included in this study. Only 3.8% (35/912) of patients developed LR, including 20 patients with LR only and 15 patients with simultaneous LR and distant metastases (DM). Median time to LR was 30 (interquartile range 8-53) months from date of surgery. Eleven percent (100/912) of patients developed only DM. A total of 2.3% (6/259) of patients treated with adjuvant treatment developed an LR during adjuvant therapy. Seventy percent of patients with LR only (14/20) were treated with surgery (85.7% R0), which was mostly combined with systemic treatment., Conclusions: Patients with primary surgically treated localised GIST have a limited risk of developing recurrence. Fifteen percent developed recurrence, of which one quarter developed an LR. Therefore, less intensified follow-up schedules could be considered, especially during treatment with adjuvant imatinib. In patients with LR only, potentially curative treatment strategies, including surgical (re-)resection, are often possible as treatment for LR., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: This work was supported by a research grant for the Dutch GIST Registry, which was received from Novartis (3017/13), Pfizer (WI189378), Bayer (2013-MED-12005) and Deciphera (4EE9EEC-7F19-484D-86A4-646CFE0950A5). These funding sources did not have any involvement in the conduction of this research., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare tumours. Variability in the management may influence outcome, but there is a lack of understanding regarding contemporary variance in care. A multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study was performed to elucidate characteristics and outcomes of rectal GIST in European practice, with particular reference to surgical approach., Methods: All rectal GIST patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2018 were identified from five European databases. Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Possible confounders were identified using Cox regression analyses., Results: From 210 patients, 155 patients had surgery. The three main types of surgery were local tumour resection (LTR, n = 46), low anterior resection (LAR, n = 31) and abdomino-perineal resection (APR, n = 32). Most patients received neoadjuvant (65%) and/or adjuvant imatinib therapy (66%). Local recurrence rate after surgery was 15% and overall recurrence rate 28%. No significant differences were found in terms of RFS nor OS between LTR, LAR and APR. However, locally resected tumours were smaller, while LAR and APR patients more often received perioperative imatinib. General hospitals treated smaller GISTs, offered imatinib less frequently, and had a higher tumour rupture rate. In the multivariate analysis in the group having LTR, APR or LAR, the only significant prognostic factor for local recurrence was higher age (HR 1.06, CI 1.00-1.12, p = 0.048)., Conclusions: In European clinical practice for rectal GIST, LTR, LAR and APR have comparable local control. Multimodal approach is higher and tumour rupture less frequent in specialist centres compared to general hospitals., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest P. Rutkowski has received honoraria for lectures and Advisory Board from Novartis, Pfizer and Blueprint Medicines. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)