Search

Patients with Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) suffer from chronic relapsing intestinal inflammation. While many studies focused on adaptive immunity, less is known about the role of innate immune cells in these diseases. Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are recently identified cells with a high cytokine-producing capacity at mucosal barriers. The aim was to study the impact of biological treatment on ILC in CD and UC. Patients initiating anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), ustekinumab, or vedolizumab treatment were prospectively followed up and peripheral and intestinal ILCs were determined. In the inflamed gut tissue of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, we found an increase of ILC1 and in immature NKp44 - ILC3, whereas there was a decrease of mature NKp44 + ILC3 when compared to healthy controls (HCs). Similar but less pronounced changes in ILC1 were observed in blood, whereas circulating NKp44 - ILC3 were decreased. Fifteen percent of CD patients had NKp44 + ILC3 in blood and these cells were not detected in blood of HCs or UC patients. Therapy with three different biologicals (ustekinumab targeting the IL-12/23 cytokines, anti-TNF and vedolizumab) partly restored intestinal ILC subset equilibrium with a decrease of ILC1 (except for ustekinumab) and an increase of NKp44 + ILC3. Anti-TNF also mobilized more NKp44 + ILC3 in circulation. As ILC1 are proinflammatory cells and as NKp44 + ILC3 contribute to homeostasis of intestinal mucosa, the observed effects of biologicals on ILCs might contribute to their clinical efficacy., (Copyright © 2020 Creyns, Jacobs, Verstockt, Cremer, Ballet, Vandecasteele, Vanuytsel, Ferrante, Vermeire, Van Assche, Ceuppens and Breynaert.)

Background & Aims: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, in a randomized trial of patients with Crohn's disease (CD)., Methods: We performed a double-blind, phase 2 trial in adults with moderate to severe CD and inadequate response or intolerance to immunosuppressants or tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1) to groups given placebo; or 3 mg, 6 mg, 12 mg, or 24 mg upadacitinib twice daily; or 24 mg upadacitinib once daily and were evaluated by ileocolonoscopy at weeks 12 or 16 of the induction period. Patients who completed week 16 were re-randomized to a 36-week period of maintenance therapy with upadacitinib. The primary endpoints were clinical remission at week 16 and endoscopic remission at week 12 or 16 using the multiple comparison procedure and modeling and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, with a 2-sided level of 10%., Results: Among the 220 patients in the study, clinical remission was achieved by 13% of patients receiving 3 mg upadacitinib, 27% of patients receiving 6 mg upadacitinib (P < .1 vs placebo), 11% of patients receiving 12 mg upadacitinib, and 22% of patients receiving 24 mg upadacitinib twice daily, and by 14% of patients receiving 24 mg upadacitinib once daily, vs 11% of patients receiving placebo. Endoscopic remission was achieved by 10% (P < .1 vs placebo), 8%, 8% (P < .1 vs placebo), 22% (P < .01 vs placebo), and 14% (P < .05 vs placebo) of patients receiving upadacitinib, respectively, vs none of the patients receiving placebo. Endoscopic but not clinical remission increased with dose during the induction period. Efficacy was maintained for most endpoints through week 52. During the induction period, patients in the upadacitinib groups had higher incidences of infections and serious infections vs placebo. Patients in the twice-daily 12 mg and 24 mg upadacitinib groups had significant increases in total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels compared with patients in the placebo group., Conclusions: In a phase 2 trial of patients with CD, upadacitinib induced endoscopic remission in a significant proportion of patients compared with placebo. Upadacitinib's benefit/risk profile supports further development for treatment of CD. (Clinicaltrials.gov, Number: NCT02365649)., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surrogate markers that accurately detect mucosal healing [MH] in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] are urgently needed. Several stool neutrophil-related proteins are currently used as biomarkers for MH. However, the sensitivity and specificity are not sufficient to avoid unnecessary endoscopic evaluations., Methods: Novel serum neutrophil-related markers (neutrophil gelatinase B-associated lipocalin and matrix metalloproteinase-9 [NGAL-MMP-9 complex], cathelicidin LL-37 and chitinase 3-like 1 [CHI3L1]), together with C-reactive protein [CRP] and neutrophil counts were studied. Serum samples were obtained from 176 anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF]-treated UC patients (145 infliximab [IFX] and 31 adalimumab [ADM]) at baseline and after a median of 9.5 weeks. All patients had active disease prior to treatment (Mayo endoscopic subscore [MES] ≥ 2), and MH was defined as MES ≤ 1. Serum was also obtained from 75 healthy controls. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to generate the Ulcerative Colitis Response Index [UCRI]. The performance of individual markers and UCRI was tested with receiver operating characteristic analysis., Results: All neutrophil-related markers were significantly higher in active UC patients compared to healthy controls. In the IFX cohort, CRP, NGAL-MMP-9, CHI3L1 and neutrophil count decreased significantly after treatment and all marker levels were significantly lower in healers compared to non-healers following IFX. In the ADM cohort, CRP, NGAL-MMP-9, CHI3L1 and neutrophil count decreased significantly only in healers. UCRI [including CRP, CHI3L1, neutrophil count and LL-37] accurately detected MH in both IFX-treated (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.83) and ADM-treated [AUC = 0.79] patients., Conclusions: The new UCRI index accurately detects MH after treatment with IFX and ADM. This panel is useful for monitoring MH in UC patients under anti-TNF treatment., Podcast: This article has an associated podcast which can be accessed at https://academic.oup.com/ecco-jcc/pages/podcast., (Copyright © 2019 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: In limited retrospective series, infliximab, adalimumab and vedolizumab have demonstrated efficacy in chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Here, we report single-centre data of all biological therapies in refractory pouchitis., Methods: We retrospectively assessed all records from patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch -anal anastomosis who received infliximab, adalimumab or vedolizumab for pouchitis. Clinically relevant remission, defined as a modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index <5 and a reduction of modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index ≥2 points from baseline, was assessed at week 14., Results: Thirty-three unique patients were identified. Prior to colectomy, patients had been exposed to cyclosporine ( n  = 14), infliximab ( n  = 12), adalimumab ( n  = 3), and/or vedolizumab ( n  = 3). All developed chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, for which they received infliximab ( n  = 23), adalimumab ( n  = 13) or vedolizumab ( n  = 15). Clinically relevant remission was observed in 43.5% of patients in the infliximab group, and in 38.5% and 60.0% in the adalimumab and vedolizumab group, respectively. In the long-term, significantly more patients continued vedolizumab compared to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy (hazard ratio 3.0, p  = 0.04). Adverse events (mainly infusion reactions) explained 40.7% of the patients discontinuing anti-TNF therapy, whereas discontinuation of vedolizumab was only related to insufficient efficacy. Four patients eventually required a permanent ileostomy., Conclusion: In this case series of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, biological therapy was effective in the majority of patients and only a minority eventually required a permanent ileostomy. The use of anti-TNF agents was hampered by a high rate of adverse events, partly related to immunogenicity as some patients had been exposed to anti-TNF prior to colectomy. Vedolizumab was also efficacious and may provide a safe alternative in these chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis patients., (© Author(s) 2019.)

Background: Combined therapy with vedolizumab and corticosteroids may improve clinical response or remission in Crohn's disease. The aim of this study is to assess efficacy and safety/tolerability of vedolizumab plus stable doses of corticosteroids at baseline during induction therapy in moderately to severely active Crohn's disease., Methods: A post hoc exploratory analysis was performed on data from GEMINI 2 (NCT00783692) and GEMINI 3 (NCT01224171), which assessed outcomes following induction therapy over 6- and 10-week periods, respectively. Patients receiving vedolizumab or placebo were stratified by corticosteroid use at baseline. Efficacy endpoints were clinical remission (CR; Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score ≤150 points) and enhanced clinical response (ECR; decrease of ≥100 points in CDAI score from baseline), assessed at week 6 (GEMINI 2 and GEMINI 3) and week 10 (GEMINI 3). Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events., Results: Vedolizumab plus corticosteroids resulted in higher CR rates than placebo plus corticosteroids at week 6 in GEMINI 2 and at week 6 and week 10 in GEMINI 3. More patients receiving vedolizumab plus corticosteroids achieved CR at week 6 in GEMINI 2 and at week 10 in GEMINI 3 than patients receiving vedolizumab alone. Vedolizumab plus corticosteroids also resulted in significantly higher ECR rates than placebo plus corticosteroids at all timepoints in both studies. More patients receiving vedolizumab plus corticosteroids achieved higher ECR rates at week 6 in GEMINI 2 and at week 10 in GEMINI 3 than patients receiving vedolizumab alone. Adverse event incidence was similar across groups., Conclusions: Vedolizumab in combination with stable doses of corticosteroids at baseline may improve induction of clinical response or remission in moderately to severely active Crohn's disease., Trial Registration Numbers: NCT00783692, NCT01224171., (© 2019 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.)

Objectives: Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed as a useful tool in the management of infliximab (IFX) treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether IFX trough levels after induction therapy are predictive for outcome at week 52., Methods: All pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving maintenance IFX at our centre, with IFX trough level available at their first maintenance infusion and a follow-up of at least 52 weeks were included. IFX induction regimens could be intensified at the discretion of the treating physician. All children received proactive drug monitoring during maintenance with dose adaptation aiming to target a therapeutic window of 3 to 7 μg/mL., Results: We included 35 children (23 with Crohn disease and 12 with ulcerative colitis). Median IFX trough levels just before the first maintenance infusion were significantly higher in children achieving clinical (4.6 μg/mL [2.7-11.8] vs 1.5 μg/mL [0.9-3.0]), biological (4.6 μg/mL [2.5-10.3] vs 2.6 μg/mL [0.3-3.2]) and combined clinical/biological remission (6.0 μg/mL [3.2-12.0] vs 2.6 μg/mL [1.1-3.2]) at week 52 compared to children not meeting these criteria (all P ≤ 0.002). Binary logistic regression identified these trough levels as the only predictor for the same outcomes with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.083 (1.085-3.998), 2.203 (1.101-4.408), and 2.264 (1.096-4.680), respectively (all P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Adequate IFX exposure during induction therapy is associated with better clinical and/or biological remission at week 52. Postinduction IFX trough levels were the only predictor for clinical and/or biological remission at week 52.

Aims: The therapeutic failure of infliximab therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis remains a challenge even 2 decades after its approval. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has shown value during maintenance therapy, but induction therapy has still not been explored. Patients may be primary nonresponders or underexposed with the standard dosing regimen. We aimed to: (i) develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model; (ii) identify the best exposure metric that predicts mucosal healing; and (iii) build an exposure-response (ER) model to demonstrate model-based dose finding during induction therapy with infliximab., Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from a clinical database. A total of 583 samples, from 204 patients, was used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to generate exposure metrics for subsequent ER modelling. A subset of 159 patients was used to develop a logistic regression ER model, describing the relationship between infliximab exposure and ordered transitions between Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 3, 2 and ≤1 (baseline to post-induction)., Results: A 1-compartment population pharmacokinetic model with interindividual and interoccasion variability was found to fit the data best. Covariates influencing exposure were C-reactive protein, albumin, baseline MES, fat-free mass, concomitant corticosteroid use and pancolitis. The cumulative area under the infliximab concentration-time curve until endoscopy (CAUC endoscopy ) was found to be the best exposure metric for predicting mucosal healing (baseline MES >1 and post-induction MES ≤1). The model predicted that 70% of patients will attain mucosal healing with infliximab administered at days 0, 14 and 42 and a target CAUC endoscopy of 3752 mg/L*day at day 84., Conclusions: TDM-based dose individualisation targeting CAUC endoscopy has the potential to improve the effectiveness of infliximab during induction therapy., (© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Evidence for second-line therapy in patients with microscopic colitis [MC] failing budesonide is scarce, although anti-tumour necrosis factors [anti-TNFs], methotrexate and azathioprine have been reported to be effective in small cohort studies. Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting α4β7-integrin, prevents homing of T-cells to the gut. We evaluated clinical remission with vedolizumab in budesonide-refractory MC patients., Methods: We solicited gastroenterologists in Europe and Canada for cases of MC treated with vedolizumab. Vedolizumab 300 mg IV was administered at weeks 0, 2 and 6, and then every 8 weeks. Clinical remission and histological remission were defined as less than three stools per day and normalization of histology, respectively, after induction treatment., Results: Eleven cases were retrieved (nine females, lymphocytic colitis [LC] n = 5, collagenous colitis [CC] n = 6). Median [interquartile range] disease duration at vedolizumab initiation was 51 [29-70] months. Nine of 11 patients had failed one immunosuppressant and ten of 11 at least one anti-TNF agent. After three infusions of vedolizumab, clinical remission was observed in 5/11 patients [two LC and three CC] of whom three remained well with maintenance therapy [median duration of 13 months]. Biopsies were obtained from 9/11 patients. Histological remission was observed in 3/4 patients with clinical remission [2/3 CC, 1/1 LC] and 0/5 patients without clinical improvement., Conclusion: In a series of highly refractory MC patients, vedolizumab induced clinical remission in 5/11 subjects, of whom 75% showed normalized histology. Larger randomized trials are needed to assess the efficacy of vedolizumab in patients with MC., (Copyright © 2018 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Ileocolonic expression of IL13RA2 has been identified as a predictive marker for nonresponsiveness to infliximab (IFX) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD)., Aim: To validate the IL13RA2 biomarker, study its anti-TNF specificity and get a better understanding of the underlying biology driving its expression., Methods: IL13RA2 mucosal expression was studied in a cohort of adalimumab and vedolizumab treated patients. To identify the upstream regulators of anti-TNF nonresponsiveness, weighted gene co-expression network analysis was applied on publicly available microarray data of IFX-treated patients. Selected serum proteins, including TNF, were measured prior to first IFX exposure and compared between healers and nonhealers., Results: Increased mucosal IL13RA2 expression prior to start of biological therapy was predictive for anti-TNF nonresponsiveness specifically (AUROC, area under the curve = 0.90, P < 0.001 in anti-TNF vs AUROC = 0.63, P = 0.30 in vedolizumab treated patients). In baseline biopsies, TNF-driven pathways were significantly enriched in future anti-TNF nonhealers (P = 5.0 × 10 -34 ). We found an increased baseline mucosal TNF burden in nonhealers (P = 0.02), and TNF mRNA correlated significantly with IL13RA2 expression (ρ = 0.55, P = 0.02). Baseline serum TNF levels were significantly lower in nonhealers (P = 0.04), and correlated inversely with IFX serum induction levels (r = -0.45, P = 0.002 at week 6)., Conclusions: Increased mucosal IL13RA2 expression is associated with an increased mucosal TNF burden in CD patients. In view of its specificity for prediction of anti-TNF therapy resistance, mucosal IL13RA2 expression is a potential biomarker for therapy selection and/or for the need of increased anti-TNF drug dosing., (© 2019 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: Trough concentrations of vedolizumab were found to correlate with clinical response in phase 3 studies of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). Nevertheless, there are no solid data to support monitoring of vedolizumab trough concentrations in treated patients. We investigated the correlation between vedolizumab exposure and response in a real-world population and aimed to identify patient factors that affect exposure and response., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 179 consecutive patients (66 with UC and 113 with CD) who began vedolizumab therapy from September 1, 2015, through October 1, 2016, at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. Serum concentrations of vedolizumab were measured before all infusions up to week 30. Effectiveness endpoints included endoscopic healing (UC, Mayo endoscopic sub-score ≤1; CD, absence of ulcers), clinical response (physicians' global assessment), and biologic response or remission (based on level of C-reactive protein) and were assessed at week 14 (for patients with UC) and week 22 (for patients with CD). A stepwise forward addition-backward elimination modeling approach was performed to identify factors independently associated with vedolizumab exposure and response., Results: Vedolizumab trough concentrations >30.0 μg/mL at week 2, >24.0 μg/mL at week 6, and >14.0 μg/mL during maintenance therapy associated with a higher probability of attaining the effectiveness endpoints for patients with UC or CD (P < .05). Higher body mass and more severe disease (based on high level of C-reactive protein and low level of albumin and/or hemoglobin) at the start of vedolizumab therapy associated with lower trough concentrations of vedolizumab over the 30-week period and a lower probability of achieving mucosal healing (P < .05). Mucosal healing was achieved in significantly more patients with UC than patients with CD, even though a diagnosis of UC was not an independent predictor of higher vedolizumab trough concentrations., Conclusions: In a retrospective study of 179 patients with CD or UC, we observed a correlation between vedolizumab exposure and response. These findings support monitoring of vedolizumab trough concentrations to predict patients' outcome., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of therapeutic drug monitoring for infliximab [IFX] therapy in children with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is poorly investigated. We determined if IFX exposure correlates with long-term remission in children., Methods: In this retrospective study, all children with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC], receiving maintenance IFX at our centre, were included. Serum trough levels and cumulative drug exposure were correlated with clinical, biological, and endoscopic remission. All children received proactive drug monitoring and dose adaptation aiming to target a therapeutic window of 3-7 µg/mL. All data are presented as median [interquartile range]., Results: A total of 686 serum levels during IFX maintenance in 52 paediatric patients [33 CD and 19 UC] were included (median 9 [4-18] per patient). With a median of 17 [8-36] months under IFX therapy, 39/52 [75%] patients were in clinical remission and 29/40 [73%] patients were in endoscopic remission. Median IFX trough levels were significantly higher when children achieved clinical remission (5.4 [3.8-8.0] µg/mL versus 4.2 [2.6-6.7] µg/mL), biological remission (5.2 [3.7-7.7] µg/mL versus 4.2 [2.6-6.5] µg/mL), combined clinical and biological remission (5.7 [4.0-8.2] µg/mL versus 4.4 [2.7-6.8] µg/mL) and endoscopic remission (6.5 [4.2-9.5] µg/mL versus 3.2 [2.3-5.6] µg/mL) compared with not meeting these criteria [all p ≤ 0.001]., Conclusions: In this large paediatric cohort, children with clinical and/or endoscopic remission had significantly higher IFX exposure during maintenance therapy. We showed excellent outcome data using serial and systematic measurements of drug levels. This could provide a rationale for the use of proactive drug monitoring in children in order to improve long-term outcomes.

Background & Aims: The Trough Concentration Adapted Infliximab Treatment (TAXIT) trial demonstrated that maintaining infliximab trough concentrations at 3 to 7 μg/mL is most effective at inducing remission in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), with fewer flares than clinic-based dosing. We performed a follow-up analysis of study participants to explore the correlation between trough dosing strategy and mucosal healing, continued infliximab use, and rates of hospitalization, surgery, and steroid use., Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study of 226 patients with IBD who completed the maintenance phase of TAXIT, performed at the University Hospitals of Leuven in Belgium. Baseline patient characteristics, laboratory test results, and endoscopic data were obtained at the end of that study between June 2012 and December 2013 (n = 125). Long-term outcome data (IBD-related hospitalization, abdominal surgery, and systemic steroid use) were collected from the time of the last TAXIT study visit (August 2012-April 2013) until April 1, 2016. We also collected data on continued use of infliximab and trough concentrations., Results: At baseline, 91% of patients in the clinic-based dosing group and 90% of patients in the trough concentration-based dosing group had mucosal healing. After a median follow-up time of 41 months (interquartile range, 39-42 mo), infliximab treatment was continued by 81 of 108 patients (75%) from the clinic-based dosing group and 86 of 107 (80%) from the trough concentration-based dosing group. However, within 1 year, infliximab was discontinued by 10 of 27 patients (37%) from the clinic-based dosing group and 2 of 21 patients (10%) from the trough concentration-based dosing group (P = .04). The rates of hospitalization, surgery, and steroid use were below 15% in both groups., Conclusions: At the end of a trial of clinic-based dosing vs trough concentration-based dosing of infliximab in patients with IBD, most patients had mucosal healing. Most patients (≥75%) in both groups continued taking infliximab for more than 3 years after the trial, but a significantly higher proportion of patients in the clinic-based dosing group discontinued infliximab in the first year after the end of the trial. Both groups had low rates of hospitalization, surgery, and steroid use., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Symptomatic intestinal strictures develop in more than one third of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) within 10 years of disease onset. Strictures can be inflammatory, fibrotic or mixed and result in a significant decline in quality of life, frequently requiring surgery for palliation of symptoms. Patients under the age of 40 with perianal disease are more likely to suffer from disabling ileocolonic disease thus may have a greater risk for fibrostenotic strictures. Treatment options for fibrostenotic strictures are limited to endoscopic and surgical therapy. Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) appears to be a safe, less invasive and effective alternative modality to replace or defer surgery. Serious complications are rare and occur in less than 3% of procedures. For non-complex strictures without adjacent fistulizaation or perforation that are less than 5 cm in length, EBD should be considered as first-line therapy. The aim of this review is to present the current literature on the endoscopic management of small bowel and colonic strictures in CD, which includes balloon dilatation, adjuvant techniques of intralesional injection of steroids and anti-tumor necrosis factor, and metal stent insertion. Short and long-term outcomes, complications and safety of EBD will be discussed., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: None.

The advent of anti-TNF agents has dramatically changed the treatment algorithms for IBD in the last 15 years, but primarily and more importantly secondary loss of response is often observed. Fortunately , new treatment options have been actively explored and some have already entered our clinical practice. In the class of anti-cytokine agents, the anti-IL12/IL23 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have entered clinical practice with the anti-p40 mAb ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD). Also, more selective anti-IL23 agents (anti-p19) have shown efficacy and are being further developed, in contrast to agents inhibiting IL-17 downstream which have failed in clinical trials despite their clear efficacy in psoriasis (Verstockt et al. in Expert Opin Biol Ther 17(1):31-47, 2017; Verstockt et al. in Expert Opin Drug Saf 16(7):809-821, 2017). Following up on the efficacy of the anti-adhesion molecule vedolizumab, etrolizumab (anti-beta-7 integrin) and PF-00547659, an anti-MadCam mAb, are being developed (Lobaton et al. in Aliment Pharmacol Ther 39(6):579-594, 2014). Oral anti-trafficking agents, such as ozanimod, targeting the S1P receptor responsible for the efflux of T-cells from the lymph nodes, have also shown efficacy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) (Sandborn et al. in N Engl J Med 374(18):1754-1762, 2016). Oral agents inhibiting cell signaling have been explored successfully in IBD. Tofacitinib, a non-selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is effective in patients with UC and several other more or less selective Jak1, 2 and 3 inhibitors are being developed for the treatment of CD and UC (Sandborn et al. in N Engl J Med 376(18):1723-1736, 2017; Vermeire et al. in Lancet 389(10066):266-275, 2017; De Vries et al. in J Crohns Colitis 11(7):885-93, 2017). Finally, despite initial disappointing results with systemic administration of mesenchymal stem cells, Alofisel, adipose tissue derived, allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells, locally injected in perianal fistula tracts, induce long-lasting beneficial effects and the drug has been approved in Europe (Panes et al. in Gastroenterology, 2017). In summary, the quest for new treatment options in IBD is very active and justified by the high medical need and unresolved problems patients are facing.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical relevance of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) measured using a drug-tolerant assay in a post hoc analysis of the Trough Concentration (TC) Adapted Infliximab Treatment (TAXIT) randomised controlled trial., Design: ADA in serum samples (n=221) of 76 patients enrolled in TAXIT, who presented with an infliximab TC <3 µg/mL at screening, were reanalysed after optimisation and at the end of the study using a drug-tolerant ADA assay. Patients underwent dose escalation to achieve therapeutic TCs between 3 µg/mL and 7 µg/mL prior to randomisation. Patients were grouped into quartiles (Q1-4) according to ADA concentration at screening., Results: Using a drug-tolerant assay, the immunogenicity detection rate increased from 21% (drug-sensitive assay) to 63% at screening, from 0% to 51% after optimisation and from 3% to 42% at the end of TAXIT. Patients in ADA Q4 required a higher cumulative infliximab dose (2390 (880-2998) mg) to achieve target TCs, resulting in a higher drug cost (€10 712 (4120-13 596)) compared with ADA-negative patients (€2060 (1648-3296)) and patients in ADA Q1/Q2 (€2060 (1648-4120)/€2060 (1751-3296), p<0.001). However, all but one patient belonging to ADA Q4 were also ADA-positive using a drug-sensitive assay., Conclusions: Upon dose intensification, low concentration ADAs, not detectable using a drug-sensitive assay, disappear in more than half of the patients over time and are clinically non-relevant. In contrast, high concentration ADAs which are typically also detected in a drug-sensitive assay, persist over time and necessitate a higher cumulative dose and drug cost. In the latter group, proactive drug switching may be more cost-efficient., Clinical Trials Register: 2011-002061-38; Post-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TVS is a PhD fellow of Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship (VLAIO, Flanders). GVA, MF and SV are senior clinical researchers of the FWO. NVC received consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, UCB and Takeda. GVA received financial support for research from Abbott and Ferring Pharmaceuticals, lecture fees from Janssen, MSD and Abbott, and consultancy fees from PDL BioPharma, UCB Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, Abbott, Abbvie, Ferring, Novartis, Biogen Idec, Janssen Biologics, NovoNordisk, Zealand Pharma A/S, Millenium/Takeda, Shire, Novartis and Bristol Mayer Squibb. MF received financial support for research from Takeda, lecture fees from MSD, Janssen, Abbvie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ferring, Chiesi, Tillotts, Zeria and Mitsubishi Tanabe, and consultancy fees from MSD, Janssen, Abbvie, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Ferring. SV received grant support from MSD, Abbvie and Takeda, lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Hospira and consultancy fees from Abbvie, Takeda, Pfizer, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Shire Pharmaceuticals Group, MSD, Hospira, Mundipharma, Celgene, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche. AG has served as a speaker for MSD, Janssen Biologicals, Pfizer, Takeda and Abbvie, as consultant for UCB and has received Investigator Initiated Research Grants from Pfizer., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Objective: Ciclosporin and infliximab have demonstrated short-term similar efficacy as second-line therapies in patients with acute severe UC (ASUC) refractory to intravenous steroids. The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcome of patients included in a randomised trial comparing ciclosporin and infliximab., Design: Between 2007 and 2010, 115 patients with steroid-refractory ASUC were randomised in 29 European centres to receive ciclosporin or infliximab in association with azathioprine. Patients were followed until death or last news up to January 2015. Colectomy-free survival rates at 1 and 5 years and changes in therapy were estimated through Kaplan-Meier method and compared between initial treatment groups through log-rank test., Results: After a median follow-up of 5.4 years, colectomy-free survival rates (95% CI) at 1 and 5 years were, respectively, 70.9% (59.2% to 82.6%) and 61.5% (48.7% to 74.2%) in patients who received ciclosporin and 69.1% (56.9% to 81.3%) and 65.1% (52.4% to 77.8%) in those who received infliximab (p=0.97). Cumulative incidence of first infliximab use at 1 and 5 years in patients initially treated with ciclosporin was, respectively, 45.7% (32.6% to 57.9%) and 57.1% (43.0% to 69.0%). Only four patients from the infliximab group were subsequently switched to ciclosporin. Three patients died during the follow-up, none directly related to UC or its treatment., Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with steroid-refractory ASUC initially treated by ciclosporin or infliximab, long-term colectomy-free survival was independent from initial treatment. These long-term results further confirm a similar efficacy and good safety profiles of both drugs and do not favour one drug over the other., Trial Registration Number: EudraCT: 2006-005299-42; ClinicalTrials.gouv number: NCT00542152; post-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DL: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda. AB: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda. MA: consulting and/or lecture fees from Janssen, MSD, Takeda. YB: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Hospira, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda. JF: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Takeda. FZ: lecture fees for Abbvie, Takeda. GS: lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Takeda. LV: lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Hospira and Takeda and consulting fees from Abbvie. JM: lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Takeda. AA: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Takeda. JC: consulting fees from Abbvie, Vifor. ER: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD. OD: lecture fees from MSD. AL-S: lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD. MF: lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda. GB: lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda. BC: lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD. XR: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, Theradiag. GvA: consulting and/or lecture fees and research support from MSD, Novartis. ME: consulting and/or lecture fees for MSD, Abbott, Shire Pharmaceuticals. JPG: consulting and/or lecture fees Abbvie, Janssen, Hospira, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda. PM: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda. SN: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Takeda. MdV: consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbott, Ferring, MSD. EL: research grants from AstraZeneca, Schering-Plough; consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbott, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Ferring, Schering-Plough, MSD, Chiesi, Menarini, Millenium, Mitsubishi Pharma, Nycomed, Falk, Takeda, UCB., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Objective: Lymphocyte recruitment to the inflamed gut is increased in UC. Inhibition of this cell trafficking by vedolizumab (VDZ) was successful in inducing and maintaining remission and in induction of endoscopic mucosal healing. There are no data on histological healing with VDZ. We studied histological changes following VDZ therapy and compared gene expression in patients with UC before and after therapy., Design: Forty-one patients with UC from GEMINI I and LTS were studied before and at three time points (weeks 6/12/52) following VDZ therapy. Colonic biopsies were scored using the Geboes index and correlated with Mayo endoscopic subscore. Gene expression was analysed using Affymetrix gene arrays., Results: Fifty-five per cent of patients achieving endoscopic healing (= Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1) with VDZ at the studied time points also had histological healing (= Geboes grade 0-1). In most healers, some residual histological changes (eg, disturbed architecture and increased mononuclear cell infiltrate) were still observed, although this was less at week 52. VDZ restored expression of many inflammatory genes in patients with endoscopic healing only at week 52 and not before. In VDZ healers, the expression of many genes remained dysregulated at weeks 6/12/52 compared with controls., Conclusions: VDZ induces histological healing in >50% of patients with endoscopic healing, with maximal effect at week 52. VDZ also restored, although incompletely, the colonic expression of many immune-related genes in patients with UC achieving endoscopic healing at week 52. However, persistent histological and gene dysregulations did remain even in healers, suggesting that maintenance therapy will be necessary to control the intestinal inflammation., Trial Registration Numbers: NCT00783718 and NCT00790933; post-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GDH—consulting fees: Genentech, Centocor, Galapagos. MF—grant support: Takeda; lecture fees: Abbvie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Falk, Ferring, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Takeda, Tillotts, Zeria; consulting fees: Abbvie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ferring, Janssen, MSD. GVA—grant support: Abbvie, MSD; lecture fees: Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Janssen, Takeda; consulting fees: Abbvie, MSD, Takeda. PR—grant support: Abbvie, Centocor, Merck, UCB; lecture fees: Centocor, Merck, Abbvie; consulting fees: Centocor, Merck, UCB, Abbvie, Millenium/Takeda, Genentech/Hoffman LaRoche, Merck/Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Robarts, Tillotts, Pfizer, Falk Pharma. SV—grant support from Abbvie, MSD; lecture fees: Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Ferring, Falk Pharma, Hospira, Tillotts; grant support from Abbvie, MSD; consulting fees: Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Ferring, Genentech/Roche, Shire, Pfizer, Galapagos, Mundipharma, Hospira, Celgene, Second Genome, Janssen., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Background: Vedolizumab (VDZ) has been approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The GEMINI trials reported a low prevalence of anti-VDZ antibodies (AVA). However, the AVA assays used in GEMINI were drug sensitive, resulting in a possible underestimation of the rate of AVA formation. This study aimed to monitor immunogenicity of VDZ in a real-life cohort using a drug-resistant AVA assay., Methods: Using a combination of VDZ/AVA complex precipitation and acid dissociation, a drug-resistant assay for AVA detection in the presence of high VDZ concentrations has been developed and analytically validated. The assay was applied on serum samples of 179 VDZ-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the prevalence and time course of AVA., Results: A dose-response curve ranging from 25 to 1600 ng/mL using 1/125 diluted serum was obtained, allowing the detection of AVA concentrations up to 200 μg/mL of MA-VDZ19C11 equivalents, a calibrator antibody to VDZ. This assay was highly AVA specific and drug resistant. Four of 179 VDZ-treated patients (2.2%) were AVA positive and AVA were detected already after the first VDZ infusion. AVA were all transient in these patients without need for any dosage optimization. There was no correlation between VDZ and AVA concentrations in the AVA-positive samples., Conclusions: AVA appear from the first VDZ infusion onward and disappear over time. The low prevalence of AVA suggests that immunogenicity does not influence response to treatment.

Objective: Primary non-response to infliximab in Crohn's disease is still incompletely understood. Our aim was to further characterize the role of inflammatory burden during infliximab induction therapy., Materials and Methods: We studied a well-characterized cohort of 201 anti-TNF naive Crohn's disease patients treated with infliximab 5mg/kg at week 0, 2, 6 and 14 who had serum samples drawn just before every infusion. All serum samples were analyzed for CRP, albumin, TNF, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, infliximab trough concentrations (in-house-developed ELISA) and antibodies to infliximab (HMSA, Prometheus Laboratories Inc., San Diego, CA). Primary non-response was defined as the absence of clinical improvement at week 14., Results: The incidence of primary non-response to infliximab was 8% (n = 16). IL-8 concentrations at baseline were higher (p = .01) and albumin at week 6 was lower in primary non-responders (p = .01) compared to responders. During induction, IFN-γ and IL-6 concentrations decreased significantly at week 2 and week 6 in responders compared to primary non-responders (p < .05). Serum TNF increased significantly after each infliximab infusion and this increase from week 0 to week 14 was more pronounced in responders (p = .03). Multiple logistic regression identified TNF/CRP ratio at baseline as predictive for primary non-response to infliximab at week 14 (OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.4-5.5; p = .003))., Conclusions: In this intensively sampled cohort of Crohn's disease patients, we demonstrate that inflammatory burden is more determining for primary non-response than drug exposure or immunogenicity. Our findings furthermore suggest that the contribution of TNF in inflammation might be higher in primary non-response, contradicting the non-TNF-driven concept.

Introduction: Vedolizumab has proven efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], but long-term mucosal healing in Crohn's disease [CD], as well as the incidence of colorectal neoplasia in IBD, among patients treated with vedolizumab have not been studied. We aimed to document mucosal healing and to explore the risk of colorectal neoplasia with vedolizumab maintenance therapy., Methods: Surveillance colonoscopy was prospectively scheduled for patients with longstanding ulcerative coltis [UC] or CD at a tertiary referral centre, in the open-label extension phase (vedolizumab 300 mg intravenously [IV] every 4 weeks) of the Gemini studies [GEMINI LTS, study number NCT00790933]. Mayo score ≤ 1 or ulcer disappearance [in CD] was defined as mucosal healing. Targeted biopsies were graded for inflammation and dysplasia., Results: Of 68 patients [29 CD/39 UC] treated for ≥ 1 year [median 3.2 years, range 1.1-6.1], 58 [24 CD/34 UC] were endoscopically monitored. Durable endoscopic healing corrected by non-responder imputation was found in 7/24, 29% [CD] and 17/34, 50% [UC]. Combined histological and mucosal healing was observed in 5/24 [CD] and 11/34 [UC] of those with endoscopic healing. Low-grade dysplasia was detected in 10% of patients and high-grade dysplasia in the resection specimen of one patient with biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia., Conclusions: Long-term endoscopic and histological healing was observed in a proportion of patients treated with vedolizumab long-term. The dysplasia risk with vedolizumab deserves further study., (Copyright © 2017 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

One third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) inadequately respond to anti-TNF treatment and preclinical data suggest that matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is a novel therapeutic target. Here we show that IBD clinical and histopathological parameters found in wild type mice challenged with three different models of colitis, acute and chronic dextran sodium sulphate (DSS), and acute 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced colitis are not attenuated in MMP-9 knockout mice. We find similar colonic gene expression profiles in wild type and MMP-9 knockout mice in control and acute DSS conditions with the exception of eleven genes involved in antimicrobial response during colitis. Parameters of chronic colitis are similar in wild type and MMP-9 knockout mice. Pharmacological inhibition of MMP-9 with bio-active peptides does not improve DSS colitis. We suggest that MMP-9 upregulation is a consequence rather than a cause of intestinal inflammation and we question whether MMP-9 represents a disease target in IBD.

Background and Aims: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) and disability were compared in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy versus patients who received treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents., Patients and Methods: UC patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy or started anti-TNF treatment between January 2010 and January 2015 were included at two tertiary referral centers. A matched cohort was created using propensity score matching for the covariates disease duration, Montreal classification, age, and sex. HRQL and disability were assessed using the Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO), Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disability Index (IBD-DI), EuroQol-5D-3L, and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires., Results: In total, 297 patients were included, of whom 205 (69%) patients responded. Fifty-nine pouch patients were matched to 59 anti-TNF-treated patients. Pouch patients reported better general health scores (P=0.042) compared with the anti-TNF group (SF-36). No differences were found for the EuroQol-5D-3L and IBD-DI between the two groups. Pouch patients had significantly higher COREFO scores compared with anti-TNF-treated patients for 'stool frequency' (P<0.001), 'antidiarrheal medication use' (P<0.001), and 'stool-related aspects' (P=0.004), of which the latter was because of a higher perianal skin irritation frequency (P<0.001)., Conclusion: UC patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy reported a higher bowel movement frequency and more perianal skin irritation compared with anti-TNF-treated patients, but this did not affect overall disease-specific disability outcomes. Patients in the surgery group reported better outcomes for generic health compared with those in the anti-TNF group.

Background: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective α4β7 integrin antagonist for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). Aims of this study were to characterize the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab induction and maintenance therapy in patients who were naïve to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonist therapy (TNF-naïve) or who had discontinued TNF-α antagonist therapy because of inadequate response (i.e., primary nonresponse), loss of response, or intolerance (collectively classified as the TNF-failure population)., Methods: Post hoc analyses of the efficacy data for 516 TNF-naïve and 960 TNF-failure patients from the GEMINI 2 and GEMINI 3 trials were evaluated at weeks 6, 10, and 52 and included clinical remission (CD Activity Index [CDAI] score ≤150), enhanced clinical response (≥100-point decrease from baseline in CDAI score), durable clinical remission (remission at ≥80% of visits), and corticosteroid-free remission. Adverse events were summarized for the TNF-naïve and TNF-failure subgroups by treatment received., Results: Among patients who responded to vedolizumab induction at week 6, 48.9% of TNF-naïve and 27.7% of TNF-failure patients were in remission with vedolizumab at week 52 (versus 26.8% and 12.8% with placebo). Clinical efficacy was similar between the different types of TNF-α antagonist failure or the number of prior TNF-α antagonists failed. Safety profiles were similar in both subpopulations., Conclusions: Vedolizumab had increased efficacy over placebo in CD patients irrespective of TNF-α antagonist treatment history. Overall, rates of response and remission were numerically higher in patients receiving vedolizumab as a first biologic than in patients who had experienced TNF failure.

Objectives: Ample evidence exists that Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) concentrations during induction determine short and long-term outcome in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We investigated if a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism in the neonatal Fc-receptor (FcRn), responsible for extending half-life of IgG, influences anti-TNF concentrations in patients with IBD., Methods: Retrospective single-center study, including a cohort of 395 infliximab (IFX) naive IBD patients treated with IFX 5 mg/kg on weeks 0, 2, and 6 and a second cohort of 139 adalimumab naive patients, treated with adalimumab 160-80-40 mg on weeks 0, 2, and 4. Area under the serum anti-TNF concentration-time curve (AUC), from week 2 and 6 for IFX and week 2 and 4 for adalimumab, was used to identify factors influencing these drug concentrations., Results: The VNTR2/VNTR3 genotype was associated with a 14% lower IFX AUC compared with patients homozygous for VNTR3/VNTR3 (P=0.03), although this effect became apparent only when immunogenicity (26% lower concentrations, P=9 × 10 -5 ) was not present. Prior anti-TNF use predicted a 27% lower IFX AUC (P=0.002). Similarly, VNTR2/VNTR3 patients had a 24% predicted lower adalimumab AUC than VNTR3/VNTR3 patients (P=0.005). The combined presence of VNTR2/VNTR3 genotype, male gender, and prior IFX use predicted a 41% lower adalimumab AUC concentration (P=0.04)., Conclusions: The VNTR2/3 genotype in the FcRn gene is associated with lower IFX but also lower adalimumab drug exposure during induction in patients with IBD. Previously identified pharmacokinetic modifying factors were confirmed. Identifying risk factors in patients is important as higher induction doses may be needed to ensure optimal disease outcome.

Background and Aims: We studied the long-term outcome of patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] and primary non response [PNR] to infliximab and searched for predictors of colectomy in these patients., Methods: This retrospective, multi-centre study included UC patients from three European referral centres, with PNR to infliximab defined as a lack of clinical improvement after the induction therapy, leading to drug discontinuation. Relapse, for patients who continued on biologicals after PNR to infliximab, was defined as drug discontinuation for PNR, loss of response, or serious adverse event. Serum infliximab concentrations at Weeks 2 and 6 were evaluated using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] developed in house., Results: The study population consisted of 99 anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF]-naïve patients with UC and PNR to infliximab. At the end of follow-up (median: 3.2 [interquartile range 1-6.3] years), 55 [55.6%] of these patients underwent colectomy. Multiple Cox regression analysis identified acute severe UC (hazard ratio [HR]: 24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5-231; p = 0.006], baseline C-reactive protein [CRP] > 5mg/l [HR: 11; 95% CI: 2.1-58.8; p = 0.005], baseline albumin < 40g/l [HR: 9.5; 95% CI: 1.3-71.4; p = 0.026], and infliximab concentration at Week 2 < 16.5 μg/ml [HR: 5.6; 95% CI: 1.1-27.8; p = 0.034] as independent predictors of colectomy. Regarding patients who continued on biologicals after PNR to infliximab, there was a marginally higher cumulative probability for relapse in patients switching to another anti-TNF agent compared with those swapping to vedolizumab [p logrank = 0.08]., Conclusions: About half of UC patients with PNR to infliximab will undergo colectomy. Patients with severe inflammation and low serum infliximab concetrations during the induction phase are at greatest risk., (Copyright © 2016 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Aim: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic gastrointestinal conditions requiring medical therapy to maintain clinical remission. Low adherence to therapy leads to poorer disease outcome. Therefore, we aimed to identify predictors of low adherence in the Belgian IBD population., Patients and Methods: Between November 2013 and March 2014, 570 ambulatory patients (471 patients with IBD and 99 non-IBD controls) visiting a tertiary IBD-referral centre were requested to complete the Morisky 8-Item Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) questionnaire as well as a survey of sociodemographic data (smoking, educational level, marital status and occupation). On the basis of the self-reported MMAS questionnaire, adherence was categorized as low (MMAS-8 score: >2), medium (MMAS-8 score: 1-2) or high (MMAS-8 score: 0)., Results: The response rate in the IBD population was as high as 99%. Low adherence was reported less frequently in the IBD population than in the non-IBD controls (36 vs. 49%, P=0.021). In multivariate analysis, factors associated independently with low adherence in the IBD population were age younger than 40 [odds ratio: 1.589 (95% confidence interval: 1.057-2.389), P=0.026], higher educational level [1.961 (1.305-2.946), P=0.001], being single [1.641 (1.020-2.639), P=0.041] and the use of mesalamine [1.591 (1.018-2.487), P=0.041]. Self-employment was identified as a protective factor for low adherence [0.397 (0.167-0.946), P=0.041]., Conclusion: Approximately one-third of the IBD patients were low adherers. Predictors of low adherence were aged younger than 40 years, higher educational level, being single and mesalamine use, whereas being self-employed was a protective factor. On the basis of these data, personalized algorithms may be developed to improve patient education, empowerment and follow-up.

Background: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy has become a standard therapy for severe inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), but its effect on B lymphocytes is largely unexplored. In this study we investigated peripheral blood B cells, B-cell subsets, and CD40 expression in patients with IBD before and during anti-TNF therapy with infliximab (IFX)., Methods: Blood was taken from healthy controls (n = 52) and patients with active IBD before (n = 46) and/or during anti-TNF therapy (n = 55). B-cell markers were detected by immunofluorescent staining and FACS analysis. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders to anti-TNF therapy., Results: We found a numerical deficiency of circulating CD19 B cells, a lower activation state (CD40 expression) and lower proportions of CD5 B cells and IgMIgDCD27 preswitched memory cells among B cells in active patients with IBD before IFX therapy compared with healthy controls. IFX treatment increased CD19 B-cell numbers as well as the proportions of named B-cell subsets in responders but not in nonresponders. IFX more effectively upregulated CD40 expression in responders than in nonresponders. Restoration of B cells correlated with the biological response to therapy (C-reactive protein). Trough serum levels of IFX correlated with the number of B cells during therapy., Conclusions: A lower number of circulating B cells, a low CD40 expression, and a decrease in the proportion of CD5 and in the preswitched memory subset characterize active IBD. Restoration of these abnormalities correlates with the clinical response to anti-TNF therapy. The mechanism for this effect on B cells should be further explored.

Background and Aims: Although costly and uncomfortable for the patient, the current standard to assess mucosal healing in Crohn's disease [CD] patients is endoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate NGAL-MMP-9 as surrogate marker for mucosal healing in CD patients., Methods: Serum NGAL-MMP-9 levels were determined with sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and up to 5 years after first infliximab infusion in 108 active CD patients [median age at first infliximab 36 years, 57% female] and 43 healthy controls [HC, median age 27 years, 60% female]. Serum samples were matched to the time of endoscopy and complete endoscopic healing was defined as absence of ulcerations. Histological healing was defined as absence of epithelial damage [D'Haens score]., Results: At baseline, median [interquartile range] NGAL-MMP-9 levels were significantly higher in active CD patients vs HC (77.6 [36.9-141.0] vs 25.5 [17.8-42.8] ng/ml; p < 0.001). After treatment, NGAL-MMP-9 levels significantly decreased in completely healed CD patients [n = 38] (84.5 [36.7-138.4] to 23.4 [7.4-42.5] ng/ml; p < 0.001) and--to a lesser extent--in non-healed CD patients [n = 36] (100.9 [43.4-152.6] to 43.8 [27.0-96.8] ng/ml; p = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis defined a NGAL-MMP-9 cut-off level of 45 ng/ml corresponding to complete endoscopic healing (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.79, 82% sensitivity, 65% specificity) and histological healing [AUC = 0.72, 79% sensitivity, 53% specificity]. At baseline, C-reactive protein [CRP] was not elevated in 33% of active CD patients, whereas 53% of these patients did have elevated NGAL-MMP-9 levels., Conclusions: In the search for surrogate markers to assess mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease, NGAL-MMP-9 supplements and outperforms CRP in both ulcerative colitis and CD patients., (Copyright © 2015 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Prediction of primary non-response [PNR] to anti-tumour necrosis factors [TNFs] in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is direly needed to select the optimal therapeutic class for a given patient. We developed a matrix-based prediction tool to predict response to infliximab [IFX] in Crohn's disease [CD] patients., Methods: This retrospective single-centre study included 201 anti-TNF naïve CD patients who started with IFX induction therapy. PNR occurred in 16 [8%] patients. Clinical, biological [including serum TNF and the IBD serology 6 panel and genetic [the 163 validated IBD risk loci] markers were collected before start. Based on the best fitted regression model, probabilities of primary response to IFX were calculated and arranged in a prediction matrix tool., Results: Multiple logistic regression withheld three final independent predictors [p < 0.05] for PNR: age at first IFX, {odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI] of 1.1 (1.0-1.1)}, body mass index [BMI] (0.86 [0.7-1.0]), and previous surgery (4.4 [1.2-16.5]). The accuracy of this prediction model did not improve when the genetic markers were added (area under the curve [AUC] from 0.80 [0.67-0.93] to 0.78 [0.65-0.91]). The predicted probabilities for PNR to IFX increased from 1% to 53% depending on the combination of final predictors., Conclusions: Readily available clinical factors [age at first IFX, BMI, and previous surgery] outperform serological and IBD risk loci in prediction of primary response to infliximab in this real-life cohort of CD patients. This matrix tool could be useful for guiding physicians and may avoid unnecessary or inappropriate exposure to IFX in IBD patients unlikely to benefit., (Copyright © 2015 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: A defect in regulatory T cells (Tregs) may be involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Several subsets of human Foxp3+ Tregs (activated and resting Tregs) have now been identified, as well as an IL-10 and IFN-γ double producing Foxp3 type 1 regulatory-like T cell (Tr1L). We have quantified these Tregs in patients with active IBD and during therapy with infliximab (IFX)., Methods: Blood samples were obtained from healthy controls (n = 54) and patients with active IBD, either before (n = 62) or during IFX therapy (n = 75). Tregs were identified by immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry analysis. Resting and activated Foxp3+ Tregs can be differentiated from Foxp3+ effector T cells (Foxp3+ Teff) by the expression of CD45RA. Tr1L are identified as CD4+CD45RA-CD25-CD127-Foxp3- T cells., Results: A numerical deficiency of circulating resting Tregs, activated Treg cells, and Tr1L was documented in patients with active IBD. Baseline levels of these Treg subsets predicted clinical responses to IFX. We documented an upregulation of all 3 subsets during IFX therapy. Moreover, after therapy, significant differences in Treg subsets were seen between responders and nonresponders to IFX. Restoration of Tregs correlated with the clinical and biological response to IFX therapy. Trough serum levels of IFX positively correlated with the proportion of activated Treg cells and Tr1L during therapy., Conclusions: IFX therapy, when successful, results in upmodulation of the different types of Treg cells in the blood of patients with IBD. This effect might be relevant for understanding the mechanism of action of anti-TNF agents.

Background & Aims: Infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor antagonist, is effective for treating patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to determine whether dosing based on therapeutic drug monitoring increases rate of remission and whether continued concentration-based dosing is superior to clinically based dosing of infliximab for maintaining remission in patients with CD and UC., Methods: We performed a 1-year randomized controlled trial at a tertiary referral center, including 263 adults (178 with CD and 85 with UC) with stable responses to maintenance infliximab therapy. Doses were escalated or reduced using an algorithm to reach a target trough concentration (TC) of 3-7 μg/mL in all patients (optimization phase). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups that received infliximab dosing based on their clinical features (n = 123) or continued dosing based on TCs (n = 128) (maintenance phase). The primary end point was clinical and biochemical remission at 1 year after the optimization phase., Results: At screening, 115 of 263 patients had a TC of infliximab of 3-7 μg/mL (43.7%). Of 76 patients with TCs <3 μg/mL, 69 patients (91%) achieved TCs of 3-7 μg/mL after dose escalation. This resulted in a higher proportion of CD patients in remission than before dose escalation (88% vs 65%; P = .020) and a decrease in the median concentration of C-reactive protein, compared with before the dose increase (3.2 vs 4.3 mg/L; P < .001); these changes were not observed in patients with UC. Of 72 patients with TCs >7 μg/mL, 67 patients (93%) achieved TCs of 3-7 μg/mL after dose reduction. This resulted in a 28% reduction in drug cost from before dose reduction (P < .001). Sixty-six percent of patients whose dosing was based on clinical features and 69% whose dosing was based on TC achieved remission, the primary end point (P = .686). Disease relapsed in 21 patients who received clinically based dosing (17%) and 9 patients who received concentration-based dosing (7%) (P = .018)., Conclusions: Targeting patients' infliximab TCs to 3-7 μg/mL results in a more efficient use of the drug. After dose optimization, continued concentration-based dosing was not superior to clinically based dosing for achieving remission after 1 year, but was associated with fewer flares during the course of treatment. ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu number: 2011-002061-38., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Information is limited on the relationship between serological markers and disease behavior and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF) therapy response in ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to determine the association between serological markers and unfavorable UC behavior defined as need for colectomy or UC-related hospitalization. The association between serological markers and requirement for and outcome of anti-TNF therapy was also evaluated., Methods: Two hundred thirty patients were studied. Requirement for colectomy, UC-related hospitalization, and anti-TNF therapy were documented. Response to anti-TNF therapy at 1 year and rates of therapy discontinuation were recorded. Titers of perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCAs), anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA), and antibody to Escherichia Coli outer membrane porin (anti-OmpC) were determined. Antibody reference ranges were used to dichotomize subjects into seropositive and seronegative groups. Where multiple tests were performed, P-values were Bonferroni corrected (pcorr)., Results: Extensive colitis was associated with requirement for colectomy and UC-related hospitalization, HR 7.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-32.2) pcorr  = 0.03 and HR 2.7 (95% CI 1.5-4.6), pcorr  = 0.006, respectively. No serological variable was associated with unfavorable UC behavior. Anti-OmpC positivity was associated with a lack of response to anti-TNF therapy at 1 year (odds ratio 0.14 [95% CI 0.03-0.60], pcorr  = 0.04) and increased likelihood of therapy discontinuation (HR 2.2 [95% CI 1.1-4.7], P = 0.03)., Conclusion: Extensive colitis is associated with unfavorable disease course in UC. Anti-OmpC holds promise as a biomarker of anti-TNF therapy response in UC; however, prospective studies are required before it can be incorporated into routine clinical practice., (© 2014 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Introduction: The advent of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists represented a radical change in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Both in short- and long-term, anti-TNF therapy has been shown to reduce symptoms, heal mucosal ulcers, reduce hospitalizations and surgeries and spare corticosteroids., Areas Covered: A literature search to August 2013 was performed to identify the most relevant reports on the use of TNF antagonists in IBD. First, the authors focused on the mechanism of action of TNF antagonists. Second, they evaluated different indications, contraindications, the optimal time to start and the role of combining TNF antagonists with immunomodulators. Third, they explored the importance of mucosal healing, followed by the controversial topic on when TNF antagonists should be stopped. This is followed by the subjects of treatment failure, immunogenicity and therapeutic drug monitoring. Last, they analyzed safety issues including exposure to TNF antagonists during pregnancy., Expert Opinion: TNF antagonists have become indispensable in the management of IBD. Efforts to focus on treatment of inflammatory signs only and on optimization of treatment with therapeutic drug monitoring are underway. The advent of several new compounds and "biosimilars" will further challenge the position of TNF antagonists in the treatment algorithm of IBD.

Background: Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-antagonists have an established role in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), however, subtherapeutic drug levels and the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) may decrease their efficacy., Aim: The evidence supporting the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) based clinical algorithms for infliximab (IFX) and their role in clinical practice will be discussed., Methods: The literature was reviewed to identify relevant articles on the measurement of IFX levels and antibodies-to-infliximab., Results: Treatment algorithms for IBD have evolved from episodic monotherapy used in patients refractory to all other treatments, to long-term combination therapy initiated early in the disease course. Improved remission rates have been observed with this paradigm shift, nevertheless many patients ultimately lose response to therapy. Although empiric dose optimization or switching agents constitute the current standard of care for secondary failure, these interventions have not been applied in an evidence-based manner and are probably not cost-effective. Multiple TDM-based algorithms have been developed to identify patients that may benefit from measurement of IFX and ADA levels to guide adjustments to therapy., Conclusions: Therapeutic drug monitoring offers a rational approach to the management of secondary failure to IFX. This concept has gained momentum based on evidence from case series, cohort studies and post-hoc analyses of randomised controlled trials., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: Diarrhoea with urgency is a debilitating long-term complication of ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) after a proctocolectomy. Somatostatin analogues are used to control diarrhoea and high-output ostomies. Hence, we designed a prospective, double-blind, crossover trial to explore the efficacy and tolerability of octreotide to reduce diarrhoea in adult patients with IPAA., Method: Patients were randomized to octreotide subcutaneously (SC), 500 μg three times daily (t.i.d.), or matching placebo SC for 7 days. Responders (a reduction in stool frequency of three or more stools per 24-h period and with a reduction in stool frequency of at least 30% after 7 days of treatment compared with baseline; the primary end-point) remained in the same group and nonresponders could cross over to the alternative treatment for 7 days. Open-label octeotide LAR 30 mg was offered to all responders on day 14. Flexible pouchoscopy with biopsies was performed at baseline in all patients and was repeated on days 7 and 14 in patients with pouchitis., Results: Fifteen patients (11 men, median age 52 years), all with ulcerative colitis, were randomized. Three patients were withdrawn for side effects during the blinded phase. Response was achieved by two of 12 and two of 11 patients treated with octreotide or placebo, respectively (including crossover, P = 0.9). The median stool frequency remained stable in both groups [Δoctreotide: 0 (IQR, -4 to 0), Δplacebo: -1 (IQR, -1 to 1), P = 0.45]. Octreotide had no effect on the modified pouch disease activity index (mPDAI), and pouchitis persisted in five of six subjects with pouchitis at onset. One subject received open-label octreotide LAR., Conclusion: Octreotide has no clear beneficial effect on the stool pattern or on pouchitis severity in patients with high stool frequency after IPAA., (© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background & Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to assess the outcome of infliximab (IFX) therapy in patients with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD). However, few long-term data are available about its efficacy., Methods: We assessed 59 patients with pfCD by MRI and clinical evaluation at baseline. Treated patients then received paired clinical and MRI examinations for a median time period of 36 (11-53.3) weeks. Short-, mid-, and long-term effects of therapy, as well as the ability of MRI to predict treatment outcome and need for surgery, were evaluated., Results: Compared with the baseline MRI, the short-term follow-up MRI (n = 29) revealed a reduced number of fistula tracks in 13.8% and in the inflammatory activity in 55.2% of patients, respectively; mid-term MRI (n = 25) in 56% and in 52%, respectively; and long-term MRI (n = 13) in 15.4% and in 31%, respectively. Improvement of pfCD based on MRI results coincided with clinical improvement in 54.7% of the patients. Short-term and mid-term (but not long-term) MRI showed a significant decrease in the activity score. Therapy outcome was worse among patients with persisting fistulas (P = .01), collections (P = .009), and rectal wall involvement (P = .01) in the final MRI. Patients with single-branched fistulas (P < .0001) and collections (P = .006) in their baseline MRI were more likely to undergo surgery., Conclusions: MRI is a useful technique for evaluation of pfCD during the first year of follow-up. In the long-term, the MRI improvement coincides with clinical and endoscopic response to IFX in 50% of the patients., (Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Infliximab (IFX) has become the mainstay of therapy of refractory Crohn's disease (CD). However, a subset of patients shows incomplete or no response to this agent. In this study we investigated whether we could identify a mucosal gene panel to predict (non)response to IFX in CD., Methods: Mucosal biopsies were obtained during endoscopy from 37 patients with active CD (19 Crohn's colitis [CDc] and 18 Crohn's ileitis [CDi]) before and after first IFX treatment. Response was defined based on endoscopic and histologic findings. Total RNA was analyzed with Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Arrays. Quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to confirm microarray data., Results: At baseline, significant gene expression differences were found between CDc and CDi. For predicting response in CDc, comparative analysis of CDc pretreatment expression profiles identified 697 significant probe sets between CDc responders (n = 12) and CDc nonresponders (n = 7). Class prediction analysis of CDc top 20 and top 5 significant genes allowed complete separation between CDc responders and CDc nonresponders. The CDc top 5 genes were TNFAIP6, S100A8, IL11, G0S2, and S100A9. Only one patient with CDi completely healed the ileal mucosa. Even using less stringent response criteria, we could not identify a predictive gene panel for IFX responsiveness in CDi., Conclusions: This study identified a 100% accurate predictive gene signature for (non)response to IFX in CDc, whereas no such a predictive gene set could be identified for CDi., (Copyright © 2010 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America, Inc.)

Background and Aims: Pilot studies with visilizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to CD3, suggest efficacy for corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). A placebo-controlled trial was warranted., Methods: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of visilizumab induction treatment in 127 patients with severely active UC despite treatment with ≥5 days of intravenous corticosteroids. Patients received placebo or visilizumab 5μg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 2. Corticosteroids were tapered according to disease activity. Patients were followed up for 90 days. The primary end point was induction of response at day 45. Secondary end points included remission and mucosal healing at day 45, symptomatic response at day 15 and colectomy., Results: Response at day 45 occurred in 55% of patients receiving visilizumab compared with 47% of those who received placebo (p=0.475). Remission at day 45 occurred in 8% of patients receiving visilizumab compared with 9% of those who received placebo (p=0.704). Mucosal healing at day 45 occurred in 29% of patients receiving visilizumab compared with 26% of those who received placebo (p=0.799). Symptomatic response at day 15 occurred in 82% of patients receiving visilizumab compared with 74% of those who received placebo (p=0.244). Colectomy was performed in 18% of patients receiving visilizumab compared with 7% of those who received placebo (p=0.130). Cardiac disorders and vascular disorders occurred more frequently in the patients who received visilizumab., Conclusion: Visilizumab at a dose of 5μg/kg for two consecutive days was not effective for severe, corticosteroid-refractory UC and was associated with increased cardiac and vascular adverse events. (Registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.govNCT00279422/).

Background and Aims: Biological therapy with anti TNF agents requires parenteral administration and in the case of infliximab this involves in hospital treatment. We aimed to prospectively assess the safety and tolerance of infliximab infusion in patients with IBD in a specialized unit adhering to strict standard operation procedures including switch to accelerated 1h infusions., Methods: A prospective audit of a referral center IBD infusion unit was performed. We recorded infusion times and all adverse events including hypersensitivity reactions. Patients were also polled about the impact of the treatment on quality of life (QOL)., Results: On 20 consecutive days 177 patients were treated with infliximab and all participated. Of those infliximab 117 received 1h infusions and 4 (2.2%) had an immediate infusion reaction. Median time on unit was optimal for those with 1h infusions [1:35 h (IQR: 1:25-1:50)] without an increased risk of infusion reactions. Prophylactic therapy significantly increased the time on unit [3:20 h (IQR: 2:50-3:45), p<0.001]. Patients reported a high global satisfaction and a good tolerability of the infusions with a considerable or strong impact on studies, work or QOL in one third., Conclusions: A dedicated IBD infusion unit can achieve high quality of care and shortened 1h infliximab infusions are well tolerated in patients with scheduled maintenance therapy., (Copyright © 2009 European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune therapies may act in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) by modulating regulatory T cells (Tregs). Therefore, we investigated the effect of infliximab (IFX) therapy on Forkhead box protein3 (Foxp3) T cells in blood and intestinal mucosa from Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)., Methods: Forty patients with active IBD (23 CD / 17 UC) were treated with IFX 5 mg/kg intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 6, and each 8 weeks thereafter. Blood samples were obtained before every infusion and T-lymphocyte subsets were characterized by flow cytometry. Foxp3 expression in intestinal biopsies from 43 patients with active IBD (19 CD / 24 UC) before and after IFX infusion and from 6 controls were assessed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), clinical response, and endoscopic healing data were collected in parallel., Results: IFX therapy resulted in a significant and sustained relative increase of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) Treg and of CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) Treg cells in peripheral blood (both P < 0.0001 compared to baseline), particularly in responders (both P < 0.05 compared to nonresponders). The change in CRP over time inversely correlated with the increase of CD25(+)Foxp3(+) cells (P < 0.001, r = -0.39) and durable clinical response was associated with a sustained increase of circulating Foxp3(+) cells. Surprisingly, IFX therapy downregulated mucosal mRNA and protein expression of Foxp3 in UC and CD responders (both P < 0.001) but not in nonresponders., Conclusions: IFX therapy has opposite effects in Foxp3(+) Treg cells in blood and gut mucosa, which suggests a redistribution of this important T-cell subset.

The natural history of Crohn's disease is characterized by progression to complicated and disabling disease, often necessitating surgical interventions. There is either circumstantial or direct evidence to support the disease-modifying potential of several therapeutic agents. Healing of endoscopic lesions is an emerging surrogate marker of disease modification, as mucosal lesions are considered to reflect ongoing inflammation and tissue damage that lead to the formation of fistulas and fibrotic strictures, which are the main indications for surgery. In contrast to systemic steroids, both azathioprine and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have demonstrated the potential of mucosal healing. Prevention of hospitalization and surgery in the short and medium term has been demonstrated for the anti-TNF agents infliximab and adalimumab. The evidence supporting a role for medical therapy in the prevention of fibrotic wall thickening and in the obliteration of fistula tracks is limited and should be the focus of further prospective studies. These studies should validate predictors of complicated disease and randomized studies should be performed in high-risk groups to investigate whether early introduction of immunosuppressive agents or biologic therapies slows down disease progression and alters the natural history of the disease.

Background: Adalimumab (ADA) and certolizumab pegol (CZP) have demonstrated efficacy in Crohn's disease (CD) patients previously treated with infliximab (IFX)., Aim: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of a third anti-TNF in CD after failure of and/or intolerance to two different anti-TNF antibodies., Methods: Crohn's disease patients who received ADA or CZP after loss of response and/or intolerance to two anti-TNF agent were included in this retrospective study. Data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. Clinical response, duration, safety and reasons for discontinuation were assessed., Results: Sixty-seven patients treated with CZP (n = 40) or ADA (n = 27) were included. A clinical response was observed in 41 (61%) at week 6 and 34 patients (51%) at week 20. The probability of remaining under treatment at 3 months, 6 months and 9 months was 68%, 60% and 45%, respectively. At the end of follow-up, the third anti-TNF had been stopped in 36 patients for intolerance (n = 13), or failure (n = 23). Two deaths were observed., Conclusions: The treatment with a third anti-TNF (CZP or ADA) agent of CD patients, who have experienced loss of response and/or intolerance to two anti-TNF antibodies, has favourable short-term and long-term efficacy. It is an option to be considered in patients with no other therapeutic options.

Background and Aims: Infliximab is an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis with over 60% of patients responding to treatment and up to 30% reaching remission. The mechanism of resistance to anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) is unknown. This study used colonic mucosal gene expression to provide a predictive response signature for infliximab treatment in ulcerative colitis., Methods: Two cohorts of patients who received their first treatment with infliximab for refractory ulcerative colitis were studied. Response to infliximab was defined as endoscopic and histological healing. Total RNA from pre-treatment colonic mucosal biopsies was analysed with Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Arrays. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to confirm microarray data., Results: For predicting response to infliximab treatment, pre-treatment colonic mucosal expression profiles were compared for responders and non-responders. Comparative analysis identified 179 differentially expressed probe sets in cohort A and 361 in cohort B with an overlap of 74 probe sets, representing 53 known genes, between both analyses. Comparative analysis of both cohorts combined, yielded 212 differentially expressed probe sets. The top five differentially expressed genes in a combined analysis of both cohorts were osteoprotegerin, stanniocalcin-1, prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2, interleukin 13 receptor alpha 2 and interleukin 11. All proteins encoded by these genes are involved in the adaptive immune response. These markers separated responders from non-responders with 95% sensitivity and 85% specificity., Conclusion: Gene array studies of ulcerative colitis mucosal biopsies identified predictive panels of genes for (non-)response to infliximab. Further study of the pathways involved should allow a better understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to infliximab therapy in ulcerative colitis. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00639821.

Background: Infliximab (IFX) treatment induces mucosal healing (MH) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) but the impact of MH on the long-term outcome of IFX treatment in CD is still debated., Methods: We studied MH during long-term treatment with IFX in 214 CD patients. A total of 183 patients (85.5%) responded to induction therapy and 31 patients (14.5%) were primary nonresponders. They underwent lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy within a median of 0.7 months (interquartile range [IQR] 0.1-6.8) prior to first IFX and after a median of 6.7 months (IQR 1.4-24.6) after start of IFX and were further analyzed. The relationship between the outcome of IFX treatment long-term and MH was studied., Results: MH was observed in 67.8% of the 183 initial responders (n = 124), with 83 patients having complete healing (45.4%) and 41 having partial healing (22.4%). Scheduled IFX treatment from the start resulted in MH more frequently (76.9% MH rate) than episodic treatment (61.0% MH rate; P = 0.0222, odds ratio [OR] 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-4.12). Concomitant treatment with corticosteroids (CS) had a negative impact on MH (37.9% in patients with CS versus 63.2% in patients without CS; P = 0.021, OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.80). MH was associated with a significantly lower need for major abdominal surgery (MAS) during long-term follow-up (14.1% of patients with MH needed MAS versus 38.4% of patients without MH; P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: MH induced by long-term maintenance IFX treatment is associated with an improved long-term outcome of the disease especially with a lower need for major abdominal surgeries.

Background and Aims: This observational study assessed the long-term clinical benefit of infliximab (IFX) in 614 consecutive patients with Crohn's disease (CD) from a single centre during a median follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range (IQR) 27-83)., Methods: The primary analysis looked at the proportion of patients with initial response to IFX who had sustained clinical benefit at the end of follow-up. The long-term effects of IFX on the course of CD as reflected by the rate of surgery and hospitalisations and need for corticosteroids were also analysed., Results: 10.9% of patients were primary non-responders to IFX. Sustained benefit was observed in 347 of the 547 patients (63.4%) receiving long-term treatment. In 68.3% of these, treatment with IFX was ongoing and in 31.7% IFX was stopped, with the patient being in remission. Seventy patients (12.8%) had to stop IFX due to side effects and 118 (21.6%) due to loss of response. Although the yearly drop-out rates of IFX in patients with episodic (10.7%) and scheduled treatment (7.1%) were similar, the need for hospitalisations and surgery decreased less in the episodic than in the scheduled group. Steroid discontinuation also occurred in a higher proportion of patients in the scheduled group than in the episodic group., Conclusions: In this large real-life cohort of patients with CD, long-term treatment with IFX was very efficacious to maintain improvement during a median follow-up of almost 5 years and changed disease outcome by decreasing the rate of hospitalisations and surgery.

Background and Aims: This study evaluates the long-term safety of infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with the drug over a 14-year period., Methods: The medical records of 734 patients with IBD treated with infliximab and 666 control patients not treated with infliximab were reviewed for adverse events. The time of onset and outcome, severity and concomitant medication were recorded., Results: Patients and controls were followed up for serious adverse events for a median time of 58 months (IQR 33-88) and 144 months (IQR 83-163), respectively. 112 severe adverse events occurred in 93 patients (13%) treated with infliximab and 157 occurred in 126 (19%) control patients (OR 1.33 (95% CI 0.56 to 3.00, p = 0.45). There was no difference between the two groups in mortality, malignancies and infection rate. Tuberculosis was diagnosed in two patients receiving infliximab who had negative skin tests at baseline whereas none of 16 patients with positive skin tests who received prophylaxis developed tuberculosis. Concomitant treatment with steroids was the only independent risk factor for infections in patients treated with infliximab (OR 2.69 (95% CI 1.18 to 6.12), p = 0.018). The most commonly observed systemic side effects were skin eruptions including psoriasiform eruptions in 150 patients (20%)., Conclusions: Long-term infliximab treatment had a good overall safety profile in the patient cohort studied.

The introduction of biological therapies has greatly advanced the therapeutic armamentarium of the inflammatory bowel diseases Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. At present, three anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents (infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol) and one anti-adhesion cytokine (natalizumab) have been approved and have shown efficacy in luminal and/or fistulizing Crohn's disease and/or in ulcerative colitis. Although the overall benefit/risk ratio for the anti-TNF agents is positive, of particular concern has been the problem of immunogenicity ascribed to the formation of antibodies to these molecules. Antibody formation is associated with allergic reactions and loss of response through decreased trough serum concentrations. Ways to reduce antibody formation include maintenance therapy, the use of concomitant immunomodulators and pre-treatment with corticosteroids. Other safety concerns include the occurrence of opportunistic infections, skin manifestations, and the rare but often lethal hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma. The alpha-4 integrin natalizumab has been associated with three cases of progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy and was the reason for which the drug was not approved in Europe, and is available only through a specialised programme in the US. We discuss the safety aspects of the biological agents in this chapter and, where available, give ways to prevent and/or treat them.

Although systemic steroids are highly efficacious in ulcerative colitis (UC), failure to respond to steroids still poses an important challenge to the surgeon and physician alike. Even if the life time risk of a fulminant UC flare is only 20%, this condition is potentially life threatening and should be managed in hospital. If patients fail 3 to 5 d of intravenous corticosteroids and optimal supportive care, they should be considered for any of three options: intravenous cyclosporine (2 mg/kg for 7 d, and serum level controlled), infliximab (5 mg/kg IV, 0-2-6 wk) or total colectomy. The choice between these three options is a medical-surgical decision based on clinical signs, radiological and endoscopic findings and blood analysis (CRP, serum albumin). Between 65 and 85% of patients will initially respond to cyclosporine and avoid colectomy on the short term. Over 5 years only 50% of initial responders avoid colectomy and outcomes are better in patients naive to azathioprine (bridging strategy). The data on infliximab as a medical rescue in fulminant colitis are more limited although the efficacy of this anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody has been demonstrated in a controlled trial. Controlled data on the comparative efficacy of cyclosporine and infliximab are not available at this moment. Both drugs are immunosuppressants and are used in combination with steroids and azathioprine, which infers a risk of serious, even fatal, opportunistic infections. Therefore, patients not responding to these agents within 5-7 d should be considered for colectomy and responders should be closely monitored for infections.