Search

Objectives: After surgical repair, up to 70% of esophageal atresia (EA) patients suffer from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN guidelines on management of gastrointestinal complications in EA patients were published in 2016. Yet, the implementation of recommendations on GERD management remains poor.We aimed to assess GERD management in EA patients in more detail, to identify management inconsistencies, gaps in current knowledge, and future directions for research., Methods: A digital questionnaire on GERD management in EA patients was sent to all members of the ESPGHAN EA working group and members of the International network of esophageal atresia (INoEA)., Results: Forty responses were received. Thirty-five (87.5%) clinicians routinely prescribed acid suppressive therapy for 1-24 (median 12) months. A fundoplication was considered by 90.0% of clinicians in case of refractory GERD with persistent symptoms despite maximal acid suppressive therapy and in 92.5% of clinicians in case of GERD with presence of esophagitis on EGD. Half of clinicians referred patients with recurrent strictures or dependence on transpyloric feeds. Up to 25.0% of clinicians also referred all long-gap EA patients for fundoplication, those with long-term need of acid suppressants, recurrent chest infections and feedings difficulties., Conclusions: Respondents' opinions on the optimal duration for routine acid suppressive therapy and indications for fundoplication in EA patients varied widely. To improve evidence-based care for EA patients, future prospective multicenter outcome studies should compare different diagnostic and treatment regimes for GERD in patients with EA. Complications of therapy should be one of the main outcome measures in such trials., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether clinicians approached the management of children with esophageal atresia (EA) in accordance with the 2016 European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)/North American Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) guidelines on the management of gastrointestinal and nutritional complications in this cohort., Methods: We invited expert physicians and surgeons closely involved in the care of children with EA (members of the International network on esophageal atresia [INoEA], ESPGHAN EA working group, French national EA registry, European pediatric surgical association (EUPSA), and European rare disease reference network [ERNICA]) to participate in an anonymous online survey containing 15 multiple choice questions concerning the management of gastrointestinal and nutritional complications in children with EA. Questions were based on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) dysphagia, cyanotic spells, feeding and nutrition, anastamotic strictures, and transition to adult care as detailed in the 2016 guidelines., Results: Median concordance with ESPGHAN/NASPHAN EA Guidelines was 69% (16-100%, SD 16%) across all responders. Areas of greatest concordance were in the fields of surveillance endoscopy and medical management of GERD. Areas for potential educational opportunities include: the differential diagnosis and appropriate investigation of dysphagia and the diagnostic evaluation of extraesophageal symptoms., Conclusions: This survey highlights the importance of improving the understanding and adherence to the EA guidelines amongst clinicians involved in the care of these patients., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Objective: To evaluate outcomes of patients with esophageal atresia (EA) on systematic treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) since the neonatal period and to determine factors associated with successful discontinuation of PPI., Study Design: Longitudinal cohort study with prospective data collection of 73 EA patients, over 11 years systematically treated with PPI. Outcome and predictive factors for discontinuation of PPI treatment were evaluated at study end in February 2017. The incidence of anastomotic strictures was compared with a historical cohort of 134 EA patients followed in the same institution between 1990 and 2005 before the era of systematic PPI treatment., Results: PPI treatment was discontinued definitively in 48% of patients during follow-up. Prematurity, longer initial hospitalization, moderate-to-severe tracheomalacia, anastomotic leak and anastomotic stricture had a significant negative association with PPI discontinuation on univariate analysis (P < 0.05). On adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis, moderate-to-severe tracheomalacia and anastomotic leak were negatively associated with discontinuation of PPI treatment (hazard ratio 0.26 [95% CI 0.12-0.59]; P = 0.001 and hazard ratio 0.38 [95% CI 0.16-0.93]; P = 0.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic strictures in the present cohort compared with the historical cohort (44% vs 39%); (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: PPI treatment does not prevent the formation of anastomotic strictures and appears to be over-prescribed in children with airway symptoms because of tracheomalacia. This suggests that PPI treatment could be prescribed more selectively. Close monitoring and long-term follow-up, however, of these vulnerable patients in specialized multidisciplinary clinics is imperative.

Purpose of Review: Guidelines were recently published highlighting why esophageal atresia (EA) patients are prone to complication risks, and the need for long-term follow-up. In this review, we will focus on how to investigate and treat potential complications, as well as the pros and cons of different investigative and treatment modalities, and what areas continue to need further research., Recent Findings: EA patients are at high risk for gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal strictures, and the sequela that result. Extraintestinal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can appear similar to other pathologic diagnoses commonly found in EA patients, such as congenital stricture, eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal dysmotility, tracheomalacia, recurrent fistula, aspiration, etc. Therefore, it is important to have a standardized way to monitor for these issues. pH impedance allows for detection of nonacid reflux and the height of reflux, which are important in correlating symptoms with reflux episodes. A multidisciplinary approach is beneficial in evaluating and monitoring EA patients in the long term.

Dual pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance (pH-MII) is a sensitive tool for evaluating overall gastroesophageal reflux disease, and particularly for permitting detection of nonacid reflux events. pH-MII technology is especially useful in the postprandial period or at other times when gastric contents are nonacidic.pH-MII was recently recognized by the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition as being superior to pH monitoring alone for evaluation of the temporal relation between symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux. In children, pH-MII is useful to correlate symptoms with reflux (particularly nonacid reflux), to quantify reflux during tube feedings and the postprandial period, and to assess efficacy of antireflux therapy. This clinical review is simply an evidence-based overview addressing the indications, limitations, and recommended protocol for the clinical use of pH-MII in children.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of 24 h pH monitoring for the diagnosis of otolaryngologic including rhinologic manifestations of gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) in children and if possible to correlate the results with the efficacy of medical treatment. This is a retrospective study of 72 children from January 1997 to December 1999. The children were separated into three groups according to the main symptoms (although association of symptoms was frequent): rhinologic (n=28), laryngotracheal (n=28) and pharyngeal-otologic (n=16). With the classical gastroenterologic criterion (> or =4.2% of total time at pH < 4), the pH monitoring was positive in 56% of the patients. However, this criterion does not seem to be sensitive for otolaryngologic gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) because multiple daytime short reflux episodes are often involved. Indeed, the pH monitoring was positive in 75% of the patients (82% in the rhinologic group) when a number of 40 episodes in 24h was also taken into account. The success rate of medical treatment was about 80% in case of positive pH recording. This study underlines that GER is an important factor in pediatric otolaryngologic diseases.

Objective: To study the prevalence of Barrett esophagus (BE) (gastric and/or intestinal metaplasia) in adolescents treated for esophageal atresia (EA). Summary of Background Data: EA patients are at high risk of BE. Methods: This multicenter prospective study included EA patients aged 15 to 19 years. All eligible patients were proposed an upper endoscopy with multistaged esophageal biopsies under general anesthesia. Histological suspicion of metaplasia was confirmed centrally. Results: One hundred twenty patients [mean age, 16.5 years (±1.4)] were included; 70% had been treated for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) during infancy. At evaluation, 8% were undernourished, 41% had received antireflux surgery, and 41% presented with GERD symptoms, although only 28% were receiving medical treatment. Esophagitis was found at endoscopy in 34% and confirmed at histology in 67%. BE was suspected after endoscopy in 37% and was confirmed by histology for 43% of patients (50 gastric and 1 intestinal metaplasia). No endoscopic or histological anomalies were found at the anastomosis site. BE was not significantly related to clinical symptoms. In multivariate analysis, BE was associated with EA without fistula (P = 0.03), previous multiple antireflux surgery (P = 0.04), esophageal dilation (P = 0.04), suspicion of BE at endoscopy (P < 0.001), and histological esophagitis (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Patients with EA are at high risk of persistent GERD and BE. The development of BE is related to GERD history. Long-term systematic follow-up of the esophageal mucosa including multistaged biopsies is required, even in asymptomatic patients. (NCT02495051). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]