Search

Background/Aims Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance can be an option to treat difficult stones. Recently, a digital, single-operator cholangioscope (SPY-DS) has become available. Peroral transluminal cholangioscopy (PTLC) using SPY-DS has also been reported. In this retrospective study, the technical feasibility and clinical effectiveness of EHL for difficult bile duct stones under ERCP guidance and under PTLC guidance was examined. Methods In this pilot study, patients with difficult bile duct stones between July 2016 and July 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. Results Forty-two consecutive patients underwent EHL using a SPY-DS; 34 patients underwent EHL under ERCP guidance, and the other 8 patients underwent EHL under PTLC guidance. Median procedure time was 31 minutes (range, 19 to 66 minutes). The median number of EHL sessions was 1 (range, 1 to 2), and that of ERCP sessions was also 1 (range, 1 to 3). The rate of complete stone clearance was 98% (41/42). Adverse events such as cholangitis and acute pancreatitis were seen in 14% (6/42), which could be treated conservatively. Conclusions EHL using SPY-DS was technically feasible, not only under ERCP guidance, but also PTLC guidance. A prospective clinical study of EHL using SPY-DS is needed.

Background and Aim The clinical impact of catheter-based radiofrequency ablation (RFA) under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance has recently been reported; however, severe adverse events have also been noted. If tumor is not present in the biliary tract, severe adverse events such as perforation or bleeding as a result of vessel injury around the biliary tract may occur. In addition, the effectiveness of RFA may not be sufficient based solely on radiographic guidance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the actual feasibility of intraductal RFA by peroral cholangioscope (POCS) evaluation before/after RFA. Methods In this retrospective study carried out between July and September 2016, consecutive patients who underwent RFA for malignant biliary stricture and POCS evaluation before/after RFA were enrolled. Primary endpoint of this study was technical feasibility of RFA, which was evaluated by POCS. Secondary endpoints were rates and types of adverse event. Results A total of 12 consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Stent placement using uncovered metal stents had been previously done in six patients before RFA. Tumor was seen in the biliary tract in all patients. RFA was technically successful in all patients, and clinical success was confirmed in all patients by POCS imaging. Adverse events were seen in only one patient. Median stent patency was 154 days. Conclusions RFA for malignant biliary stricture may be safe. To confirm the feasibility and efficacy of RFA, additional cases, prospective studies, and a comparison study between with and without endobiliary RFA are needed.

Background and Aim On endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage, fistula dilation may be accompanied by leakage of bile juice, potentially along with bacteria or air, so this procedure should be kept as simple and short as possible. To date, various techniques to dilate the fistula have been reported. This prospective, single-center, single-arm study evaluated the technical feasibility and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage using novel balloon catheters. Methods Tip of novel balloon catheters is only 3 Fr and tapered, and the catheters also show favorable push ability. First, biliary tract was punctured using 19-G fine needle aspiration needle. Next, we immediately inserted the novel balloon catheter, and the biliary tract and intestinal wall were dilated. Then, we performed metallic stent placement without any dilation fistula. Results A total of 20 patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. Technical success rate was 100%. Eleven patients underwent EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, and nine patients underwent EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Median procedure time was only 11 min (range, 8–16 min) for EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy and 14 min (range, 11–18 min) for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Adverse events were seen in 15% (3/20; self-limited abdominal pain n = 2, peritonitis n = 1). Conclusions Although additional cases and a randomized controlled comparison with another dilation technique such as the graded dilation or cystotome dilation technique are needed, our technique may be helpful for EUS-guided biliary drainage.

Background and aim Re-intervention after stent placement for malignant hepatic hilum obstruction (HBO) is challenging. endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been developed as an alternative method for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In this retrospective study, the clinical utility of EUS-BD as a rescue drainage technique for HBO patients who failed re-intervention under ERCP guidance was evaluated. Methods Between April 2012 and August 2015, patients with HBO were enrolled. Patients' characteristics, kinds of metallic stents, configuration of stent placement, overall survival, stent patency, and results of re-intervention were reviewed, along with the re-intervention technical success rate. Results The biliary stricture type was Bismuth type IV in 59% (23/39) and types IIIa and b in 20.5% (8/39) each. Biliary metallic stent placement was bilateral in 38.5% (15/39), and unilateral in 61.5% (24/39). Primary stent dysfunction was observed in 71.8% (28/39) of cases. Planned re-intervention under ERCP guidance was attempted in 26 patients. The technical success rate was 62% (16/26). For the 10 patients who failed re-intervention under ERCP guidance, EUS-BD was planned. The technical success rate was 100% (10/10). The procedure time was 25.8 min. Adverse events were not seen in any patients. Stent patency after re-intervention was not significantly different between ERCP (165 days) guidance and EUS-BD (152 days) guidance (P = 0.463) CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, EUS-BD as a re-intervention method for metallic stent obstruction was safe and feasible. If ERCP was failed, EUS-BD may be one of option as re-intervention method for high-grade hilar stricture.

There is no evidence that strict follow-up using cross-sectional imaging after curative gastrectomy benefits survival; however, nonperitoneal recurrence detected early might be treated with additional surgery. The present study examined whether early detection of recurrence by imaging modalities could increase survival, particularly in patients with nonperitoneal recurrence. We retrospectively analyzed 218 patients with recurrent gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy performed from 2002 to 2014. The patients were divided into an asymptomatic group (n = 117) and a symptomatic group (n = 101), according to the presence of symptoms at the time of recurrence, to compare clinicopathological characteristics and long-term survival. Peritoneal recurrence was less frequent in the asymptomatic group (22.2%) than in the symptomatic group (62.4%), the median time to recurrence was shorter (12.7 months vs 18.9 months; P

Background Pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy (PLTE) is an effective surgical treatment for synchronous or metachronous hypopharyngeal or laryngeal cancer and thoracic esophageal cancer, although it is more invasive than esophagectomy and total pharyngolaryngectomy. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for complications after PLTE. Methods From November 2002 to December 2014, a total of 8 patients underwent PLTE at the Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan. We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics, surgical procedures, and postoperative complications of these patients. Results Of the 8 patients, 5 underwent one-stage PLTE and 3 underwent staged PLTE. There was no mortality in this study. Two cases of tracheal necrosis, two of anastomotic leakage, and one of ileus were observed as postoperative complications. Two patients who underwent one-stage PLTE with standard mediastinal lymph node dissection developed tracheal necrosis and severe anastomotic leakage. Conclusion One-stage PLTE and standard mediastinal lymph node dissection were identified as the risk factors for severe postoperative complications. Staged PLTE or transhiatal esophagectomy should be considered when PLTE is performed and standard mediastinal lymph node dissection should be avoided when one-stage PLTE is performed with transthoracic esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM Despite high technical and functional success rates with endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), rates of adverse events have also been high. No reports have focused on EUS-HGS alone with a large sample size about predictors of stent patency. The present study examined predictors of stent patency in patients who underwent EUS-HGS. PATIENTS AND METHODS The consecutive 51 patients who underwent EUS-HGS using one metallic stent were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Baseline characteristics, stent length from the hepatic portion and in the luminal portion, kinds of stent dysfunction, and stent patency were reviewed. RESULTS Median duration of stent patency was significantly shorter with stent length in the luminal portion

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a widely used minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer. However, skillful techniques are required to perform lymph node dissection using straight shaped forceps, particularly for D2 dissection. Robotic surgery using the da Vinci surgical system is anticipated to be a powerful tool for performing difficult techniques using high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) images and the EndoWrist equipped with seven degrees of freedom. Attempts are being made to apply robotic surgery in gastrectomy procedures mainly in Japan, South Korea, and Europe. Although definite superiority to laparoscopic gastrectomy is yet to be proven, robotic surgery has been reported to have a shorter learning curve and offer more precise dissection for total gastrectomy. Hence, its oncological efficacy needs to be verified in a clinical trial.

Background and Aim Recently, the digital single-operator cholangioscope (SPY-DS) has become available. This system may allow diagnosis by direct visualization and allow performance of various therapeutic procedures. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of DSOCS for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for biliary disease. Methods Technical success was defined as successful visualization of target lesions in the biliary tract and carrying out forceps biopsy as a diagnostic procedure, and successfully carrying out treatment such as guidewire insertion for the area of interest, electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), or migrated stent removal. Also, the present study aimed at investigating diagnostic yield of the cholangioscopic findings and biopsy specimens. Results A total of 55 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in this study; a diagnostic procedure was done in 33 patients, and a therapeutic procedure was done in 22 patients. Overall accuracy of visual findings was 93%, with a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 89%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. However, the overall accuracy of forceps biopsy was 89%, with a sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of 100%, and NPV of 90%. Overall technical success rate of therapeutic procedures such as selective guidewire insertion, EHL or migrated stent removal was 91% (20/22). Finally, adverse events were seen in two cases in the diagnostic group, but were not seen in the therapeutic group. Conclusion Although additional cases and a randomized, controlled study with another cholangioscope are needed, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures using SPY-DS appear to be feasible and safe.

Background: Temporary stent placement is widely performed for pancreatic duct stenosis due to chronic pancreatitis. A fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) has a larger diameter, and therefore longer stent patency, and the effect of expansion of the main pancreatic duct stricture may be obtained. However, if stent migration upstream occurs, stent removal is extremely difficult. In addition, because of the diameter gap between the FCSEMS and the main pancreatic duct, stent-induced ductal change may occur. To prevent these adverse events, the technical feasibility, safety and efficacy of the placement of a novel 6 mm diameter FCSEMS with a long suture, to facilitate its removal in cases of stent migration upstream, were evaluated in a pilot study. Methods: Between December 2014 and August 2015, symptomatic chronic pancreatitis patients with abdominal pain and a main pancreatic head duct stricture were enrolled. Stent placement for main pancreatic duct stricture was performed under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance and stent removal was performed within 6 months. Results: A total of 13 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Metal stent insertion was successfully performed in all patients and clinical success was high (12/13, 92%). As adverse events, stent migration upstream was seen in two patients. Another 11 patients successfully underwent stent removal without any adverse events. During follow up (median 258 days), 2 patients still underwent pancreatic duct stenting because of continuing main pancreatic duct stricture. Conclusion: In conclusion, this novel FCSEMS is acceptable for stent placement in cases of chronic pancreatitis with a main pancreatic duct stricture.

Background: Few reports have described endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for biliary lesions. In addition, adverse events were not completely examined in previous reports, due to the inclusion of cases in which biliary stents had already been placed. The present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield and adverse events of EUS-FNA for biliary lesions as the first-line diagnostic modality for consecutive prospectively registered patients. Methods: Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with suspected cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) based on computed tomography or other imaging modalities; (2) patients who had not previously undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or EUS-FNA; (3) absence of surgically altered anatomy, such as Roux-en-Y anastomosis or duodenal obstruction caused by tumor invasion, through which an endoscope could not pass; and (4) provision of written informed consent to all procedures associated with the study. Results: A total of 47 consecutive patients with suspected CCA were registered to this study. Sensitivity and accuracy were 89% and 87%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, puncture site was the only factor associated with reduced diagnostic yield (hazard ration, 6.879; 95% confidence interval, 1.172–40.374; P = 0.033). Remarkably, no adverse events such as bleeding or bile leakage were associated with EUS-FNA in any of the 47 patients. Conclusions: Our results suggest that EUS-FNA can be safely performed for biliary disease without biliary stenting. Furthermore, this procedure may warrant use as the first-line diagnostic method, although our results need to be validated in future prospective studies.

Background: Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gall bladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been reported using a self-expandable metallic stent. To prevent stent migration and food flowing into the common bile duct through the cystic duct, we perform a novel EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy with an anti-stent migration and anti-food impaction system. Methods: A total of 16 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy for acute cholecystitis were included in this study. Results: Technical and clinical success was obtained in all patients. The median procedure time was 26.9 min (range 19–42 min). Median follow-up time was 181.5 days (range 18–604 days), and in this time, recurrence of acute cholecystitis was not seen in all patients. Adverse events such as stent migration and cholangitis were not seen in any patients, although pneumoperitoneum was seen in one patient. Conclusion: Our technique may be favorable and effective for the prevention of adverse events on EUS-GBD.

We herein describe the case of a 67-year-old woman with a duodenal ulcer thought to be caused by elevated pancreatic ductal pressure. The patient complained of continuous upper abdominal pain. Her medical history included idiopathic chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy revealed a huge duodenal ulcer located on the inferior duodenal angle, which had not been seen on endoscopic retrograde pancreatography two months previously. A combination study using endoscopy and contrast imaging confirmed the relationship between the duodenal ulcer and the pancreatic branch duct. To our knowledge, this is the first case of duodenal ulcer thought to be caused by elevated pancreatic ductal pressure.

Duodenal stent placement has been developed as an alternative to surgical gastrojejunostomy [1]. Compared with uncovered metallic stents, duodenal fully covered metallic stents offer advantages, such as the prevention of tumor ingrowth, and thus lower occlusion rates [2]. However, duodenal fully covered metallic stents also have several disadvantages, such as stent migration [3]. Acute pancreatitis is another adverse event associated with duodenal stent placement, occurring at a frequency of approximately 4% [4,5]. In previous reports, acute pancreatitis has been treated conservatively. If a fully covered metallic stent is placed in the duodenum, the frequency of acute pancreatitis may be increased, and the treatment of acute pancreatitis may prove difficult. We report herein a novel treatment for acute pancreatitis due to duodenal placement of a fully covered metallic stent. A 78-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of vomiting and obstructive jaundice. He was undergoing chemotherapy for bladder cancer. Computed tomography showed a duodenal stenosis, attributed to lymph node metastasis. No other site of stenosis was detected, so we attempted duodenal stent placement. First, we advanced the endoscope into the duodenum, and contrast medium was injected. The second part of the duodenum was obstructed (●" Fig.1). Then, we placed a fully covered metallic stent (ComVi, 20mm×12 cm; TaeWoong Medical, Seoul, South Korea) in the duodenum (●" Fig.2). Although the vomiting resolved completely, acute pancreatitis developed. Computed tomography showed dilatation of the Fig.1 A duodenal stenosis is apparent (arrows) in a 78-year-oldmanadmittedwith vomitingand obstructive jaundice.

Scan the quick response (QR) code to the left with your mobile device to watch this article’s video abstract and others. Don’t have a QR code reader? Get one by searching ‘QR Scanner’ in your mobile device’s app store.

Duodenal metallic stent placement is one of the options for the palliative treatment of malignant duodenal obstruction [1]. However, this palliative procedure is associated with several adverse events; stent migration, bleeding, and perforation have been reported [2–5]. If the site of obstruction is in the duodenal bulb, the duodenal stent should be placed from the stomach to the duodenum across the pylorus. At this site, stent injury may be caused by pyloric spasm. Herein, we describe a rare adverse event – duodenal metallic stent tearing due to pyloric spasm – and our successful re-intervention. A 67-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of nausea and vomiting. He had undergone chemotherapy for bladder cancer. In addition, an uncovered duodenal metallic stent (Niti-S, 22mm× 12cm; TaeWoong Medical, Seoul, Korea) had been placed from the stomach to the second part of the duodenum because of duodenal bulb stenosis resulting from malignant peritonitis 2 months earlier. Computed tomographic and fluoroscopic imaging showed tearing of the duodenal stent (●" Figs.1,2). Therefore, we tried to re-intervene. A gastroduodenoscope was inserted into the stomach, and tearing of the duodenal metallic stent was again seen (●" Fig.3). First, we trimmed the metallic stent with a diathermic dilator (●" Fig.4) and removed it (●" Fig.5,●" Video 1). Then, we placed a fully covered duodenal metallic Fig.1 Computed tomography shows a torn duodenal metallic stent, placed in a 67-year-old man to manage duodenal bulb stenosis resulting from previous malignant peritonitis.