Search

Objective.To assess 5-year safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept (ABA) in methotrexate (MTX)-refractory patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.The Abatacept Comparison of sub[QU]cutaneous versus intravenous in Inadequate Responders to methotrexatE (ACQUIRE) phase IIIb, randomized, double-dummy, multinational trial compared efficacy and safety of SC and intravenous (IV) ABA in patients with RA. In the initial 6-month double-blind (DB) period, patients received IV or SC ABA, plus MTX, and in the subsequent open-label longterm extension (LTE) period, all patients received SC ABA (125 mg/wk). The final 5-year safety, tolerability, and efficacy analyses are reported.Results.Of 1385 patients who completed the DB period, 1372 entered LTE and 945 (68.8%) completed ≥ 5 years of treatment. During LTE, 97 (7.1%) patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event (AE). Incidence rate (IR; event/100 patient-yrs of exposure; based on LTE data, 95% CI) for AE of interest were the following: serious AE 7.73 (6.96–8.58), infection 38.60 (36.24–41.12), serious infection 1.68 (1.35–2.07), malignancies 1.09 (0.84–1.42), and autoimmune disorders 1.33 (1.05–1.69), and were stable over time. No association between immunogenicity and either worsening of ABA safety or loss of efficacy was noted. Efficacy in the LTE was consistent with the DB period and was maintained to the end of the study.Conclusion.These 5-year data establish that SC ABA (125 mg/wk) has a consistent safety profile and durable efficacy for longterm treatment of patients with RA who had an inadequate response to MTX.

Otolaryngologists commonly see patients with various nonspecific upper aerodigestive or "cervical" symptoms. The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and these symptoms has been studied but remains unclear. We reviewed the records of 216 patients with various cervical symptoms. Each patient underwent a uniform investigation that included barium swallow, esophageal manometry, acid stimulation testing, and esophagoscopy with distal biopsy. Patients were treated with a combination of a histamine H2blocker or omeprazole and a prokinetic agent. Follow-up was obtained in 194 patients. Overall, evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease was detected in 73% of patients. Complete resolution or improvement of symptoms was seen in 84% of patients with treatment. We believe gastroesophageal reflux disease is an important factor in the cause of cervical problems. (OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NECK SURG 1995;113:364-9.)