Search

Background: The role of antibiotics in the treatment of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection is controversial., Objectives: To evaluate the association between treatment (antibiotics, antidiarrheal agents, and probiotics) for STEC infection and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) development., Patients and Methods: We performed a population-based matched case-control study using the data from the National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases (NESID) between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. We identified all patients with STEC infection and HUS as cases and matched patients with STEC infection without HUS as controls, with a case-control a ratio of 1:5. Further medical information was obtained by a standardized questionnaire. Multivariable conditional logistic regression model was used., Results: 7760 patients with STEC infection were registered in the NESID. 182 patients with HUS and 910 matched controls without HUS were selected. 90 patients with HUS (68 children and 22 adults) and 371 patients without HUS (266 children and 105 adults) were included in the main analysis. The matched ORs of any antibiotics and fosfomycin for HUS in children were 0.56 (95% CI 0.32-0.98), 0.58 (0.34-1.01). The matched ORs for HUS were 2.07 (1.07-4.03), 0.86 (0.46-1.61) in all ages treated with antidiarrheal agent and probiotics., Conclusions: Antibiotics, especially fosfomycin, may prevent the development of HUS in children, while use of antidiarrheal agents should be avoided., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) is an important cause of gastroenteritis in Japan. Although non-O157 EHEC infections have been increasingly reported worldwide, their impact on children has not been well described.Methods: We collected national surveillance data of EHEC infections reported between 2010 and 2013 in Japan and characterized outbreaks that occurred in childcare facilities. Per Japanese outbreak investigation protocol, faecal samples from contacts of EHEC cases were collected regardless of symptomatic status. Cases and outbreaks were described by demographics, dates of diagnosis and onset, clinical manifestations, laboratory data, and relation to specific outbreaks in childcare facilities.Results: During 2010-2013, a total of 68 EHEC outbreaks comprised of 1035 cases were related to childcare facilities. Among the 66 outbreaks caused by a single serogroup, 29 were serogroup O26 and 22 were O157; 35 outbreaks were caused by stx1-producing strains. Since 2010, the number of reported outbreaks steadily increased, with a rise in cases and outbreaks caused by stx1-producing O26. Of 7069 EHEC cases reported nationally in 2010-2011, the majority were caused by O157 (n = 4938), relative to O26 (n = 1353) and O111 (n = 195). However, relative to 69 cases of O157 (2%) associated with childcare facility EHEC outbreaks, there were 131 (10%) such cases of O26, and this trend intensified in 2012-2013 (O157, 3%; O26, 24%; O111, 48%). Among family members of childcare facility cases, the proportion of cases that were symptomatic declined with age; 10/16 cases (63%) aged 6 years or younger, 16/53 cases (30%) 6-19 years old, 23/120 cases (19%) 20-49 years old and 2/28 cases (7%) 50 years or older were symptomatic. Thirty one of the 68 outbreaks (46%) were classified as foodborne-related.Conclusions: Childcare facility EHEC outbreaks due to non-O157 serogroups, particularly O26 and O111, increased during 2010-2013. These facilities should pay extra attention to health conditions in children. As older family members of childcare facility cases appear to be less symptomatic, they should be vigilant about hand-washing to prevent further transmission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]