Search

Background: In the field of anesthesia for bariatric surgery, a wide variety of recommendations exist, but a general consensus on the perioperative management of such patients is missing. We outline the perioperative experiences that we gained in the first two years after introducing a bariatric program., Methods: The perioperative approach was established together with all relevant disciplines. Pertinent topics for the anesthesiologists were; successful airway management, indications for more invasive monitoring, and the planning of the postoperative period and deposition. This retrospective analysis was approved by the local ethics committee. Data are mean [SD]., Results: 182 bariatric surgical procedures were performed (147 gastric bypass procedures (GBP; 146 (99.3%) performed laparascopically). GBP patients were 43 [10] years old, 78% female, BMI 45 [7] kg/m(2), 73% ASA physical status of 2. 42 patients (28.6%) presented with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. 117 GBP (79.6%) patients were intubated conventionally by direct laryngoscopy (one converted to fiber-optic intubation, one aspiration of gastric contents). 32 patients (21.8%) required an arterial line, 10 patients (6.8%) a central venous line. Induction lasted 25 [16] min, the procedure itself 138 [42] min. No blood products were required. Two patients (1.4%) presented with hypothermia (<35 °C) at the end of their case. The emergence period lasted 17 [9] min. Postoperatively, 32 patients (21.8%) were transferred to the ICU (one ventilated). The other patients spent 4.1 [0.7] h in the post anesthesia care unit. 15 patients (10.2%) required take backs for surgical revision (two laparotomies)., Conclusions: The physiology and anatomy of bariatric patients demand a tailored approach from both the anesthesiologist and the perioperative team. The interaction of a multi-disciplinary team is key to achieving good outcomes and a low rate of complications., Trial Registration: DRKS00005437 (date of registration 16(th) December 2013).

Background: One strategy to reduce the consumption of resources associated to specific procedures is to utilize clinical pathways, in which surgical care is standardized and preset by determination of perioperative in-hospital processes. The aim of this prospective study was to establish the impact of clinical pathways on costs, complication rates, and nursing activities., Method: Data was prospectively collected for 171 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 50), open herniorrhaphy (n = 56), and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 65)., Results: Clinical pathways reduced the postoperative hospital stay by 28% from a mean of 6.1 to 4.4 days (p < 0.001), while the 30-day readmission rate remained unchanged (0.5% vs. 0.45%). Total mean costs per case were reduced by 25% from euro 6,390 to euro 4,800 (p < 0.001). Costs for diagnostic tests were reduced by 33% (p < 0.001). Nursing hours decreased, reducing nursing costs by 24% from euro 1,810 to euro 1,374 (p < 0.001). A trend was noted for lower postoperative complication rates in the clinical pathway group (7% vs. 14%, p = 0.07)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates clinically and economically relevant benefits for the utilization of clinical pathways with a reduction in use of all resource types, without any negative impact on the rate of complications or re-hospitalization.

Background: Laparoscopic gastric bypass is the 'gold standard' for treatment of morbidly obese patients in many centres. There is debate regarding the optimal length for small bowel limbs. This study aimed to determine whether the proximal or distal approach is better., Methods: Twenty-five patients undergoing primary distal gastric bypass in 2000-2002 were randomly matched for age, sex and preoperative body mass index (BMI) with 25 patients having a primary proximal bypass. All distal operations were performed laparoscopically; one proximal procedure was converted to open surgery., Results: Mean operating time was 170 min for proximal and 242 min for distal bypasses (P = 0.004); median hospital stay was similar in the two groups. There were no deaths and the overall complication rate was similar, as was weight loss at 4 years: BMI decreased from 45.9 to 31.7 kg/m2 for the proximal and from 45.8 to 33.1 kg/m2 for the distal approach. Co-morbidities decreased after surgery in both groups; the prevalence of diabetes, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia at all time points was similar in the two groups., Conclusion: Proximal and distal laparoscopic gastric bypass operations are feasible and safe, with no differences in weight loss or reduction of co-morbidity in unselected morbidly obese patients., (Copyright (c) 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Over the last decade, more than 130,000 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bandings (LAGB) have been performed for the treatment of morbid obesity. Nowadays, longer follow-up data are available in the literature and increasing numbers of late complications and treatment failures of gastric banding have been reported. The aim of the present study was the long-term evaluation of two different rescue operations after failed LAGB: conversion to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass (LRYGB) versus laparoscopic gastric rebanding., Methods: Between January 1997 and November 2002, 74 consecutive patients underwent either laparoscopic gastric rebanding (n = 44) or LRYGB (n = 30) after failed LAGB. There were 14 men and 60 women, with a median age of 42 (23-60) years. The indication for reoperation was an increasing body mass index (BMI) and band-related complications such as pouch dilatation, band slippage, and penetration after LAGB. Rebandings were done by preference during the initial period of the study and LRYGB was the treatment of choice during the latter period. The success of the rescue operation was assessed by postoperative changes in the BMI, improvements of co-morbidities, and the need for further reoperations (secondary failure). The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-60 months)., Results: Patients who underwent LRYGB had a significantly better weight loss than patients with a rebanding operation (mean -6.1 versus +1.5 BMI points). In addition, the LRYGB patients showed a significantly better control of serum cholesterol during the long term follow-up (-0.6 versus +0.1 mmol/l). Almost half of the patients (45%) in the rebanding group needed a further operative revision, whereas only 20% underwent reoperation after rescue LRYGB. Thus, the secondary failure rate in the rebanding group was significantly higher compared to the bypass group (p = 0.028)., Conclusions: The present long-term study confirms our previous finding that LRYGB is a better treatment than rebanding after failed laparoscopic gastric banding regarding weight loss and treatment of co-morbidities. During the long-term follow-up the reoperation rate due to secondary failure became significantly higher in the rebanding group. We therefore recommend that LRYGB should be preferred as rescue procedure after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Background: Since 1994, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) has gained popularity for the treatment of morbid obesity. In analogy to open surgery, the operation was initially performed in a retrocolic fashion. Later, an antecolic procedure was introduced. According to short-term studies, the antecolic technique is favorable. In this study, we compared the retrocolic vs the antecolic technique with 3 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that the antecolic technique is superior to the retrocolic in terms of operation time and morbidity., Methods: 33 consecutive patients with retrocolic technique and 33 patients with antecolic technique of LRYGBP were compared, using a matched-pair analysis. Data were extracted from a prospectively collected database. The matching criteria were: BMI, age, gender and type of bypass (proximal or distal). The end-points of the study were: operation time, length of hospital stay, incidence of early and late complications, reoperation rates and weight loss in the follow-up over 36 months., Results: In the retrocolic group, operation time was 219 min compared to 188 min in the antecolic group (P = 0.036). In the retrocolic group, 3 patients (9.1%) developed an internal hernia and 4 patients (12.1%) suffered from anastomotic strictures. In the antecolic group, 2 patients (6.1%) developed internal hernias and in 3 patients (9.1%) anastomotic strictures occurred. Median hospital stay in the retrocolic group was 8 days compared to 7 days in the antecolic group. In the antecolic group, the mean BMI dropped from 46 kg/m2 to 32 kg/m2 postoperatively after 36 months. This corresponds to an excess BMI loss of 66%. In the retrocolic group, we found a similar decrease in BMI from preoperative 45 kg/m2 to 34 kg/m2 after 36 months (P = 0.276)., Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrate a reduction of operation time and hospital stay in the antecolic group compared to the retrocolic group. No differences between the two groups were found regarding morbidity and weight loss. Taken together, the antecolic seems to be superior to the retrocolic technique.

Background: In laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) surgery, the anastomosis between the gastric pouch and the jejunum can be performed using a circular stapler, as described in the original publication by Wittgrove in 1994. The introduction of the circular stapler through the thick abdominal wall in morbidly obese patients can be challenging. To overcome the difficulties of this task, a new device was developed and its use is presented., Method: The new device has the shape of a trocar tip which can be mounted on the circular stapler, giving it the properties of a trocar. Therefore, easier introduction into the abdominal cavity is feasible. The use of the device was assessed analyzing the data of a prospective database, comparing patient groups operated without the device (n=301) and patients operated with the device (n=100)., Results: The groups were comparable in age, sex, BMI and number of previous abdominal operations. The wound infection rate at the site of stapler introduction decreased from 6.6% to 1% (P=0.035). The overall operating time, hospital stay and complication rate were unchanged., Conclusion: The new device proved to be useful in daily practice and enabled an easier stapler introduction with fewer wound infections.

Background: With a dramatically increasing number of bariatric operations performed world-wide in the recent years, more late complications have been noticed. Proximal gastric pouch dilatation is a known late complication after laparoscopic or open restrictive surgery for morbid obesity. In the present paper, we report our experience with laparoscopic re-operation of enlarged gastric pouches after laparoscopic gastric bypass, with emphasis on technique and outcome., Methods: Data were retrieved from a prospective database of 334 patients who underwent a laparoscopic gastric bypass operation at the University Hospital of Zurich from July 2000 to December 2004. Five laparoscopic revisions for pouch dilatation after primary bypass were performed., Results: 3 female and 2 male patients with median age 40 years (range 32-55) underwent a laparoscopic pouch resizing. At the time of the re-operation, the median BMI was 32.0 kg/m(2) (range 28.4-48.4). All procedures were performed laparoscopically with no conversion to open surgery. The median operating-time was 110 minutes (95-120). The median hospital stay was 6 days (range 5-14). The median BMI in the follow-up of 12 months (9-14) was 28.0 kg/m(2) (25.5-45.8). Diabetes mellitus improved in 4 cases during follow-up., Conclusion: Laparoscopic pouch resizing with redo of the gastro-jejunal anastomosis was feasible, safe and effective in this small series. It led to further weight loss and improved symptoms of poor pouch emptying.

Objective: To define whether laparoscopic gastric banding or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass represents the better approach to treat patients with morbid obesity., Summary Background Data: Two techniques, laparoscopic gastric bypass or gastric banding, are currently widely used to treat morbid obesity. Since both procedures offer certain advantages, a strong controversy exists as to which operation should be proposed to these patients. Therefore, data are urgently needed to identify the best therapy., Methods: Since randomized trials are most likely not feasible because of the highly different invasiveness and irreversibility of these procedures, a matched-pair design of a large prospectively collected database appears to be the best method. Therefore, we used our prospective database including 678 bariatric procedures performed at our institution since 1995. A total of 103 consecutive patients with laparoscopic gastric bypass were randomly matched to 103 patients with laparoscopic gastric banding according to age, body mass index, and gender., Results: Both groups were comparable regarding age, gender, body mass index, excessive weight, fat mass, and comorbidites such as diabetes, heart disease, and hypertension. Feasibility and safety: All gastric banding procedures were performed laparoscopically, and one gastric bypass operation had to be converted to an open procedure. Mean operating time was 145 minutes for gastric banding and 190 minutes for gastric bypass (P < 0.001). Hospital stay was 3.3 days for gastric banding and 8.4 days for gastric bypass. The incidence of early postoperative complications was not significantly different, but late complications were significantly more frequent in the gastric banding group (pouch dilatation). There was no mortality in both groups. Efficiency: Body mass index decreased from 48.0 to 36.8 kg/m in the gastric banding group and from 47.8 to 31.9 kg/m in the gastric bypass group within 2 years of surgery. These differences became significant from the first postoperative month until the end of the follow-up (24 months). The gastric bypass procedure achieved a significantly better reduction of comorbidities., Conclusions: Laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass are feasible and safe. Pouch dilatations after gastric banding are responsible for more late complications compared with the gastric bypass. Laparoscopic gastric bypass offers a significant advantage regarding weight loss and reduction of comorbidities after surgery. Therefore, in our hands, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass appears to be the therapy of choice.

Objective: To define whether laparoscopic rebanding or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass represents the best approach for failed laparoscopic gastric banding in patients with morbid obesity., Summary Background Data: Countless laparoscopic gastric bandings have been implanted during the recent years worldwide. Despite excellent short-term results, long-term failures and complications have been reported in more than 20% of patients. Which rescue procedures should be used remains controversial. Therefore, we analyzed our experience with the use of laparoscopic rebanding versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding., Methods: Using a prospectively collected database, we analyzed the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of laparoscopic rebanding versus laparoscopic conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed laparoscopic gastric banding. RESULTS A total of 62 consecutive patients were treated in our institution between May 1995 and December 2002 for failed primary laparoscopic gastric banding, including 30 laparoscopic rebandings and 32 laparoscopic conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Rebandings were preferably done during the initial period of the study and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the last period. Both groups were comparable before the initial banding procedures. At the time of redo surgery, patients receiving a gastric bypass had more esophageal dysmotility (47% vs. 7%, P = 0.002) and higher body mass index (BMI) than those elected for rebanding procedures (BMI 42.0 vs. 38.4 kg/m2, P = 0.015). Feasibility and safety: Each procedure was performed laparoscopically. Mean operating time was 215 minutes for gastric bypass and 173 minutes for rebanding (P = 0.03). Early complications occurred in one case in the rebanding group and in 2 cases in the bypass group; all underwent a laparoscopic reexploration without the need for open surgery. There was no mortality in this series. Effectiveness: BMI in the gastric bypass group decreased from 42.0 to 31.8 kg/m2 (P = 0.02) within 1 year of surgery, while it remained unchanged in the rebanding group., Conclusions: Laparoscopic conversion to a gastric bypass as well as laparoscopic rebanding are feasible and safe. Conversion to gastric bypass offers a significant advantage in terms of further weight loss after surgery. Therefore, this procedure should be considered as the rescue therapy of choice after a failed laparoscopic gastric banding.