Search

Purposes: Management of staple-line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is challenging and controversial. Guidelines for leak treatment are not standardized and often involve multidisciplinary management by surgical, medical and radiological methods. Herein we present our experience and proposed strategy for handling leaks after LSG., Patients and Methods: Retrospective data regarding LSG performed from April 2012 to October 2017 at the Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood ''G. Barresi'', University Hospital "G. Martino", University of Messina, Italy, were reviewed. The management approaches and the surgical, endoscopic, and percutaneous procedures used were examined. Outcomes measured included the prevalence of gastric leaks, radiological features, related morbidities and mortalities, hospital stay and management., Results: LSG was performed in 310 patients. Eight patients were managed for gastric leak within the 5-year period: 5 (1.6% overall prevalence) from our division, 3 referred from another hospital. All cases were successfully treated conservatively with combined CT/US-guided drainage using a locking pigtail catheter and endoscopic gastric stent positioning. Endoscopic therapy included the use of fully covered self-expanding esophageal metal stents (Hanarostent® 24 cm; M.I. Tech, Seoul, Korea) in addition to pigtail drains (Drainage Catheter Locking Pigtail 8F/21cm; Tru-Set® Ure-Sil, Skokie, IL, USA). Complete closure of the leak was achieved in all patients. The mean time from presentation to healing was 74 days ± 37.76 (SD). None of the patients underwent remedial surgery., Conclusion: This study presents our management strategy for leak resolution in LSG patients. Based on our results, we strongly recommend the conservative and combined management of gastric leaks following LSG by endoscopic stenting and percutaneous drainage.

Background and Aims: Bleeding and staple line leak are the most common postoperative complications of LSG. To prevent and/or to promptly identify such complications, conventional peri-operative protocols imply post-operative gastric decompression (NGT) and staple line drain (IAD). Our aim was to evaluate the role of naso-gastric tube (NGT) and intra-abdominal drain (IAD) in preventing and/or facilitating identification and treatment of post-operative complications after sleeve gastrectomy., Patients and Methods: A retrospective observational study on two consecutive series has been undertaken to evaluate the real utility of routine placement of NGT and IAD at the end of a LSG to prevent (primary end-point), promptly identify (secondary end-point) and manage (tertiary end-point) bleeding and staple line leakage. Collected outcome data of all consecutive cases, which underwent primary LSG at our Department, were analyzed. The first 100 consecutive patients (group A) received the standard perioperative protocol and the other consecutive 100 (group B) received a fast track protocol (no NGT neither IAD)., Results: The two groups were not different in their outcome. Two bleeding occurred in Group A and were conservatively treated. One abscess developed in group B soon after surgery. It was diagnosed by an abdominal CT performed because patients presented fever, leucocitosis and tachycardia. It was successfully treated by percutaneous ultrasound-guided drainage. One fistula occurred in group B after discharge on 30th post-operative day. Fistula was suspected based on fever and tachycardia in absence of any abdominal discomfort and was confirmed by an abdominal CT. The patient was successfully treated in 40 days by endoscopic positioning of a gastric tube-prosthesis and percutaneous ultrasound-guided drainage of abdominal collection. A third patient in group B experienced bleeding suspected due to hemoglobin drop and confirmed by abdominal CT. He also was conservatively treated., Conclusions: In conclusion, placement of drains does not facilitate detection of leak, abscess, or bleeding after primary LSG.