Search

Background: A gap remains between the mounting evidence for single session management of bile duct stones and the adoption of this approach. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) is limited by the scarcity of training opportunities and adequate equipment and by the perception that the technique requires a high skill-set. The aim of this study was to create a new classification of difficulty based on operative characteristics and to stratify postoperative outcomes of easy vs. difficult LBDE irrespective of the surgeon's experience., Methods: A cohort of 1335 LBDEs was classified according to the location, number and size of ductal stones, the retrieval technique, utilisation of choledochoscopy and specific biliary pathologies encountered. A combination of features indicated easy (Grades I and II A & B) or difficult (Grades III A and B, IV and V) transcystic or transcholedochal explorations., Results: 78.3% of patients with acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis, 37% with jaundice and 46% with cholangitis had easy explorations. Difficult explorations were more likely to present as emergencies, with obstructive jaundice, previous sphincterotomy and dilated bile ducts on ultrasound scans. 77.7% of easy explorations were transcystic and 62.3% of difficult explorations transductal. Choledochoscopy was utilised in 23.4% of easy vs. 98% of difficult explorations. The use of biliary drains, open conversions, median operative time, biliary-related complications, hospital stay, readmissions, and retained stones increased with the difficulty grade. Grades I and II patients had 2 or more hospital episodes in 26.5% vs. 41.2% for grades III to V. There were 2 deaths in difficulty Grade V and one in Grade IIB., Conclusion: Difficulty grading of LBDE is useful in predicting outcomes and facilitating comparison between studies. It ensures fair structuring and assessment of training and progress of the learning curve. LBDEs were easy in 72% with 77% completed transcystically. This may encourage more units to adopt this approach., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: This study aims to examine the indications, techniques, and outcomes of choledochoscopy during laparoscopic bile duct exploration and evaluate the results of the wiper blade maneuver (WBM) for transcystic intrahepatic choledochoscopy., Summary of Background Data: Choledochoscopy has traditionally been integral to bile duct explorations. However, laparoscopic era studies have reported wide variations in choledochoscopy availability and use, particularly with the increasing role of transcystic exploration., Methods: The indications, techniques, and operative and postoperative data on choledochoscopy collected prospectively during transcystic and choledo- chotomy explorations were analyzed. The success rates of the WBM were evaluated for the 3 mm and 5 mm choledochoscopes., Results: Of 935 choledochoscopies, 4 were performed during laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 931 during 1320 bile duct explorations (70.5%); 486 transcystic choledochoscopies (52%) and 445 through choledochotomies (48%). Transcystic choledochoscopy was utilized more often than blind exploration (55.7%% vs 44.3%) in patients with emergency admissions, jaundice, dilated bile ducts on preoperative imaging, wide cystic ducts, and large, numerous or impacted bile duct stones. Intrahepatic choledochoscopy was successful in 70% using the 3 mm scope and 81% with the 5 mm scope. Choledochoscopy was necessary in all 124 explorations for impacted stones. Twenty retained stones (2.1%) were encountered but no choledochoscopy related complications., Conclusions: Choledochoscopy should always be performed during a chol- edochotomy, particularly with multiple and intrahepatic stones, reducing the incidence of retained stones. Transcystic choledochoscopy was utilized in over 50% of explorations, increasing their rate of success. When attempted, the transcystic WBM achieves intrahepatic access in 70%-80%. It should be part of the training curriculum., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to describe the service model of one-session management, with a limited role for preoperative endoscopic clearance. The secondary aim was to review the outcomes and long term follow up in comparison to available studies on LCBDE., Background: The laparoscopic era brought about a decline in the conventional surgical management of common bile duct stones. Preoperative endoscopic removal became the primary method of managing choledocholithiasis. Although LCBDE deals with gallstones and ductal stones in onw session, the limited availability of such an advanced procedure perpetuated the reliance on the endoscopic approach., Methods: Prospective data was entered into a single surgeon's database containing 5739 laparoscopic cholecystectomy over 28 years and analyzed., Results: One thousand eighteen consecutive LCBDE were included (23% of the series). Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in 1292 (98.0%). The median age was 60 years, male to female ratio 1:2 and 75% were emergency admissions. Most patients (43.4%) presented with jaundice. 66% had transcystic explorations and one third through a choledochotomy with 2.1% retained stones, 1.2% conversion, 18.7% morbidity, and 0.2% mortality. Postoperative ERCPs were needed in 3.1%. Recurrent stones occurred in 3%., Conclusions: One stage LCBDE is a safe and cost-effective treatment where the expertise and equipment are available. Endoscopic treatment has a role for specific indications but remains the first-line treatment in most units. This study demonstrates that establishing specialist services through training and logistic support can optimize the outcomes of managing common bile duct stones., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)