Search

Context. The upcoming new generation of optical spectrographs on four-meter-class telescopes, with their huge multiplexing capabilities, excellent spectral resolution, and unprecedented wavelength coverage, will provide invaluable information for reconstructing the history of star formation in individual galaxies up to redshifts of about 0.7. Aims. We aim at defining simple but robust and meaningful physical parameters that can be used to trace the coexistence of widely diverse stellar components: younger stellar populations superimposed on the bulk of older ones. Methods. We produced spectra of galaxies closely mimicking data from the forthcoming Stellar Populations at intermediate redshifts Survey (StePS), a survey that uses the WEAVE spectrograph on the William Herschel Telescope. First, we assessed our ability to reliably measure both ultraviolet and optical spectral indices in galaxies of different spectral types for typically expected signal-to-noise ratios. We then analyzed such mock spectra with a Bayesian approach, deriving the probability density function of r- and u-band light-weighted ages as well as of their difference. Results. We find that the ultraviolet indices significantly narrow the uncertainties in estimating the r- and u-band light-weighted ages and their difference in individual galaxies. These diagnostics, robustly retrievable for large galaxy samples even when observed at moderate signal-to-noise ratios, allow us to identify secondary episodes of star formation up to an age of ∼0.1 Gyr for stellar populations older than ∼1.5 Gyr, pushing up to an age of ∼1 Gyr for stellar populations older than ∼5 Gyr. Conclusions. The difference between r-band and u-band light-weighted ages is shown to be a powerful diagnostic to characterize and constrain extended star-formation histories and the presence of young stellar populations on top of older ones. This parameter can be used to explore the interplay between different galaxy star-formation histories and physical parameters such as galaxy mass, size, morphology, and environment.© ESO 2019., L. C. wish to acknowledge financial support from Premiale 2015 MITiC, program 1.05.06.10 and Comunidad de Madrid under Atraccion de Talento grant 2018-T2/TIC-11612. A. I., S. Z., M. L., A. G., A. M., and C. T. acknowledge the financial support from the INAF PRIN-SKA 2017 program 1.05.01.88.04.ESKAPE-HI. I. L. acknowledges financial support from INAF-WEAVE funds, program 1.05.03.04.05. R. G. B. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through grant 205 AYA2016-77846-P and the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the >Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa> award to 2017 the Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (SEV-2017-0709). A. F. M. has received financial support through the Postdoctoral Junior Leader Fellowship Programme from >La Caixa> Banking Foundation (LCF/BQ/LI18/11630007). B. V. acknowledges the financial support from INAF Main Stream 2018 (P. I.: B. Vulcani).

Full list of authors: Iovino, A.; Poggianti, B. M.; Mercurio, A.; Longhetti, M.; Bolzonella, M.; Busarello, G.; Gullieuszik, M.; La Barbera, F.; Merluzzi, P.; Morelli, L.; Tortora, C.; Vergani, D.; Zibetti, S.; Haines, C. P.; Costantin, L.; Ditrani, F. R.; Pozzetti, L.; Angthopo, J.; Balcells, M.; Bardelli, S.; Benn, C. R.; Bianconi, M.; Cassara, L. P.; Corsini, E. M.; Cucciati, O.; Dalton, G.; Ferre-Mateu, A.; Fossati, M.; Gallazzi, A.; Garcia-Benito, R.; Granett, B.; Delgado, R. M. Gonzalez; Ikhsanova, A.; Iodice, E.; Jin, S.; Knapen, J. H.; McGee, S.; Moretti, A.; Murphy, D. N. A.; de Arriba, L. Peralta; Pizzella, A.; Sanchez-Blazquez, P.; Spiniello, C.; Talia, M.; Trager, S. C.; Vazdekis, A.; Vulcani, B.; Zucca, E.--This is an Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited., Context. The upcoming new generation of optical spectrographs on four-meter-class telescopes will provide valuable opportunities for forthcoming galaxy surveys through their huge multiplexing capabilities, excellent spectral resolution, and unprecedented wavelength coverage. Aims. WEAVE is a new wide-field spectroscopic facility mounted on the 4.2 m William Herschel Telescope in La Palma. WEAVE-StePS is one of the five extragalactic surveys that will use WEAVE during its first five years of operations. It will observe galaxies using WEAVE MOS (∼950 fibres distributed across a field of view of ∼3 square degrees on the sky) in low-resolution mode (R ∼ 5000, spanning the wavelength range 3660 − 9590 Å). Methods. WEAVE-StePS will obtain high-quality spectra (S/N ∼ 10 Å−1 at R ∼ 5000) for a magnitude-limited (IAB = 20.5) sample of ∼25 000 galaxies, the majority selected at z ≥ 0.3. The survey goal is to provide precise spectral measurements in the crucial interval that bridges the gap between LEGA-C and SDSS data. The wide area coverage of ∼25 square degrees will enable us to observe galaxies in a variety of environments. The ancillary data available in each of the observed fields (including X-ray coverage, multi-narrow-band photometry and spectroscopic redshift information) will provide an environmental characterisation for each observed galaxy. Results. This paper presents the science case of WEAVE-StePS, the fields to be observed, the parent catalogues used to define the target sample, and the observing strategy that was chosen after a forecast of the expected performance of the instrument for our typical targets. Conclusions. WEAVE-StePS will go back further in cosmic time than SDSS, extending its reach to encompass more than ∼6 Gyr. This is nearly half of the age of the Universe. The spectral and redshift range covered by WEAVE-StePS will open a new observational window by continuously tracing the evolutionary path of galaxies in the largely unexplored intermediate-redshift range. © The Authors 2023., Funding for the WEAVE facility has been provided by UKRI STFC, the University of Oxford, NOVA, NWO, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), the Isaac Newton Group partners (STFC, NWO, and Spain, led by the IAC), INAF, CNRS-INSU, the Observatoire de Paris, Région Île-de-France, CONCYT through INAOE, Konkoly Observatory (CSFK), Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg), Lund University, the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (AIP), the Swedish Research Council, the European Commission, and the University of Pennsylvania. The WEAVE Survey Consortium consists of the ING, its three partners, represented by UKRI STFC, NWO, and the IAC, NOVA, INAF, GEPI, INAOE, and individual WEAVE Participants. Please see the relevant footnotes for the WEAVE website (https://ingconfluence.ing.iac.es/confluence//display/WEAV/The+WEAVE+Project) and for the full list of granting agencies and grants supporting WEAVE (https://ingconfluence.ing.iac.es/confluence/display/WEAV/WEAVE+Acknowledgements). This work makes use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular, the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement. This work makes use of data from the VIMOS VLT Deep Survey, the VIPERS-MLS database and the HST-COSMOS database, operated by CeSAM/Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille, France. This work makes use of observations obtained with MegaPrime/MegaCam, a joint project of CFHT and CEA/IRFU, at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) which is operated by the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada, the Institut National des Science de l’Univers of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) of France, and the University of Hawaii. This work makes use of data products produced at Terapix available at the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre as part of the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey, a collaborative project of NRC and CNRS. R.G.B. and R.G.D. acknowledge financial support from the grants CEX2021-001131-S funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, SEV-2017-0709, and to PID2019-109067-GB100. A.F.M. acknowledges financial support from grant CEX2019-000920-S from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. M.Bi. acknowledges support from STFC grant numbers ST/N021702/1 C.S. is supported by a ‘Hintze Fellow’ at the Oxford Centre for Astrophysical Surveys, which is funded through generous support from the Hintze Family Charitable Foundation. G.B., M.Bo., F.R.D., A.I., F.L.B., M.L., P.M., B.P., C.T., D.V., and S.Z. acknowledge financial support from INAF funds, program 1.05.01.86.16 – Mainstream 2019. L.C. acknowledges financial support from Comunidad de Madrid under Atracción de Talento grant 2018-T2/TIC-11612. J.A. acknowledges financial support from INAF-WEAVE funds, program 1.05.03.04.05 and INAF-OABrera funds, program 1.05.01.01. J.H.K. acknowledges financial support from the State Research Agency (AEI-MCINN) of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under the grant “The structure and evolution of galaxies and their central regions” with reference PID2019-105602GB-I00/10.13039/501100011033, and from the ACIISI, Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento y Empleo del Gobierno de Canarias and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under grant with reference PROID2021010044. A special thanks to Daniela Bettoni for her suggestions and comments and to the anonymous referee for his/her useful comments.

Fossil groups (FGs) are galaxy aggregates with an extended and luminous X-ray halo, which are dominated by a very massive early-type galaxy and lack of L* objects. FGs are indeed characterized by a large magnitude gap between their central and surrounding galaxies. This is explained by either speculating that FGs are failed groups that formed without bright satellite galaxies and did not suffer any major merger, or by suggesting that FGs are very old systems that had enough time to exhaust their bright satellite galaxies through multiple major mergers. Since major mergers leave signatures in the stellar populations of the resulting galaxy, we study the stellar population parameters of the brightest central galaxies (BCGs) of FGs as a benchmark against which the formation and evolution scenarios of FGs can be compared. We present long-slit spectroscopic observations along different axes of NGC 6482 and NGC 7556, which are the BCGs of two nearby FGs. The measurements include spatially resolved stellar kinematics and radial profiles of line-strength indices, which we converted into stellar population parameters using single stellar-population models. NGC 6482 and NGC 7556 are very massive and large galaxies and host a centrally concentrated stellar population, which is significantly younger and more metal rich than the rest of the galaxy. The age gradients of both galaxies are somewhat larger than those of the other FG BCGs studied so far, whereas their metallicity gradients are similarly negative and shallow. They have negligible gradients of alpha-element abundance ratio. The measured metallicity gradients are less steep than those predicted for massive galaxies that formed monolithically and evolved without experiencing any major merger. We conclude that the observed FGs formed through major mergers rather than being failed groups that lacked bright satellite galaxies from the beginning., Comment: 17 pages, 9 figures, A&A in press, corrected proofs