Search

The neurosteroid allopregnanolone (ALLO) and pregnanolone (PREG), are equally effective positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of GABAA receptors. Interestingly, the PAM effects of ALLO are strongly enantioselective, whereas those of PREG are not. This study was aimed at determining the basis for this difference in enantioselectivity. The oocyte electrophysiology studies showed that ent-ALLO potentiates GABA-elicited currents in α1β3 GABAA receptors with lower potency and efficacy than ALLO, PREG or ent-PREG. The small PAM effect of ent-ALLO was prevented by the α1(Q242L) mutation in the intersubunit neurosteroid binding site between the β3 and α1 subunits. Consistent with this result, neurosteroid analogue photolabeling with mass spectrometric readout, showed that ent-ALLO binds weakly to the β3-α1 intersubunit binding site in comparison to ALLO, PREG and ent-PREG. Rigid body docking predicted that ent-ALLO binds in the intersubunit site with a preferred orientation 180° different than ALLO, PREG or ent-PREG, potentially explaining its weak binding and effect. Photolabeling studies did not identify differences between ALLO and ent-ALLO binding to the α1 or β3 intrasubunit binding sites that also mediate neurosteroid modulation of GABAA receptors. The results demonstrate that differential binding of ent-ALLO and ent-PREG to the β3-α1 intersubunit site accounts for the difference in enantioselectivity between ALLO and PREG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: Glycine receptors are important players in pain perception and movement disorders and therefore important therapeutic targets. Glycine receptors can be modulated by the intravenous anaesthetic propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol). However, the drug is more potent, by at least one order of magnitude, on GABAA receptors. It has been proposed that halogenation of the propofol molecule generates compounds with selective enhancement of glycinergic modulatory properties.Experimental Approach: We synthesized 4-bromopropofol, 4-chloropropofol and 4-fluoropropofol. The direct activating and modulatory effects of these drugs and propofol were compared on recombinant rat glycine and human GABAA receptors expressed in oocytes. Behavioural effects of the compounds were compared in the tadpole loss-of-righting assay.Key Results: Concentration-response curves for potentiation of homomeric α1, α2 and α3 glycine receptors were shifted to lower drug concentrations, by 2-10-fold, for the halogenated compounds. Direct activation by all compounds was minimal with all subtypes of the glycine receptor. The four compounds were essentially equally potent modulators of the α1β3γ2L GABAA receptor with EC50 between 4 and 7 μM. The EC50 for loss-of-righting in Xenopus tadpoles, a proxy for loss of consciousness and considered to be mediated by actions on GABAA receptors, ranged from 0.35 to 0.87 μM.Conclusions and Implications: We confirm that halogenation of propofol more strongly affects modulation of homomeric glycine receptors than α1β3γ2L GABAA receptors. However, the effective concentrations of all tested halogenated compounds remained lower for GABAA receptors. We infer that 4-bromopropofol, 4-chloropropofol and 4-fluoropropofol are not selective homomeric glycine receptor modulators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Propofol is the most important intravenous general anesthetic in current clinical use. It acts by potentiating GABAA (γ-aminobutyric acid type A) receptors, but where it binds to this receptor is not known and has been a matter of some debate. We synthesized a new propofol analog photolabeling reagent whose biological activity is very similar to that of propofol. We confirmed that this reagent labeled known propofol binding sites in human serum albumin that have been identified using X-ray crystallography. Using a combination of protiated and deuterated versions of the reagent to label mammalian receptors in intact membranes, we identified a new binding site for propofol in GABAA receptors consisting of both β3 homopentamers and α1β3 heteropentamers. The binding site is located within the β subunit at the interface between the transmembrane domains and the extracellular domain and lies close to known determinants of anesthetic sensitivity in the transmembrane segments TM1 and TM2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE GABAA receptors mediate both synaptic and extrasynaptic actions of GABA. In several neuronal populations, α4 and δ subunits are key components of extrasynaptic GABAA receptors that strongly influence neuronal excitability and could mediate the effects of neuroactive agents including neurosteroids and ethanol. However, these receptors can be difficult to study in native cells and recombinant δ subunits can be difficult to express in heterologous systems. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH We engineered concatemeric (fused) subunits to ensure δ and α4 subunit expression. We tested the pharmacology of the concatemeric receptors, compared with a common synaptic-like receptor subunit combination (α1 +β2 +γ2L), and with free-subunit α4/δ receptors, expressed in Xenopus oocytes. KEY RESULTS δ-β2 −α4 +β2-α4 cRNA co-injected into Xenopus oocytes resulted in GABA-gated currents with the expected pharmacological properties of α4/δ-containing receptors. Criteria included sensitivity to agonists of different efficacy, sensitivity to the allosteric activator pentobarbital, and modulation of agonist responses by DS2 (4-chloro- N-[2-(2-thienyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-yl benzamide; a δ-selective positive modulator), furosemide, and Zn2+. We used the concatemers to examine neurosteroid sensitivity of extrasynaptic-like, δ-containing receptors. We found no qualitative differences between extrasynaptic-like receptors and synaptic-like receptors in the actions of either negative or positive neurosteroid modulators of receptor function. Quantitative differences were explained by the partial agonist effects of the natural agonist GABA and by a mildly increased sensitivity to low steroid concentrations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The neurosteroid structure-activity profile for α4/δ-containing extrasynaptic receptors is unlikely to differ from that of synaptic-like receptors such as α1/β2/γ2-containing receptors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A model of the alignment of neurosteroidsand ent-neurosteroids at the same binding site onγ-aminobutyric acidtype A (GABAA) receptors was evaluated for its abilityto identify the structural features in ent-neurosteroidsthat enhance their activity as positive allosteric modulators of thisreceptor. Structural features that were identified included: (1) aketone group at position C-16, (2) an axial 4α-OMe group, and(3) a C-18 methyl group. Two ent-steroids were identifiedthat were more potent than the anesthetic steroid alphaxalone in theirthreshold for and duration of loss of the righting reflex in mice.In tadpoles, loss of righting reflex for these two ent-steroids occurs with EC50values similar to those foundfor allopregnanolone. The results indicate that ent-steroids have considerable potential to be developed as anestheticagents and as drugs to treat brain disorders that are amelioratedby positive allosteric modulators of GABAAreceptor function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Modern views of anesthetic neurosteroid interaction with the GABAA receptor conceptualize steroid ligands interacting with a protein binding site on the receptor. It has generally been assumed that the steroid interaction/binding site is contained in an extracellular domain of the receptor, and that steroid interactions are of high potency, evidenced by the low aqueous ligand concentrations required to achieve potentiation of channel function. We have been considering implications of the observations that steroids are quite lipophilic and that recently identified putative steroid binding sites are in transmembrane domains of the receptor. Accordingly, we expect that both the effective plasma membrane steroid concentration and steroid pharmacophore properties will contribute to steady-state potency and to the lifetime of steroid actions following removal of free aqueous steroid. Here we review our recent studies that address the evidence that membrane partitioning and intracellular accumulation are non-specific contributors to the effects of anesthetic steroids at GABAA receptors. We compare and contrast the profile of anesthetic steroids with that of sulfated steroids that negatively regulate GABAA receptor function. These studies give rise to the view that the inherent affinity of anesthetic steroid for GABAA receptors is very low; low effective aqueous concentrations are accounted for by lipid partitioning. This yields a very different picture of the interaction of neurosteroids with the GABAA receptor than that of steroid interactions with classical intracellular steroid receptors, which exhibit inherently high affinity. These considerations have practical implications for actions of endogenous neurosteroids. Lipophilicity will tend to promote autocrine actions of neurosteroids at GABAA receptors within cells that synthesize neurosteroids, and lipophilic retention will limit intercellular diffusion from the source of steroid synthesis. Lipophilicity and steroid access to the receptor binding sites also must be considerations in drug design if drugs are to effectively reach the target GABAA receptor site. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Alphaxalone, a neuroactive steroid containing a 17β-acetyl group, has potent anesthetic activity in humans. This pharmacological activity is attributed to this steroid’s enhancement of γ-amino butyric acid-mediated chloride currents at γ-amino butyric acid type A receptors. The conversion of alphaxalone into Δ16-alphaxalone produces an analogue that lacks anesthetic activity in humans and that has greatly diminished receptor actions. By contrast, the corresponding 17β-carbonitrile analogue of alphaxalone and the Δ16-17-carbonitrile analogue both have potent anesthetic and receptor actions. The differential effect of the Δ16-double bond on the actions of alphaxalone and the 17β-carbonitrile analogue is accounted for by a differential effect on the orientation of the 17-acetyl and 17-carbonitrile substituents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]