Search

Mammals detect and discriminate numerous odors via a large family of G protein-coupled odorant receptors (ORs). However, little is known about the molecular and structural basis underlying OR response properties. Using site-directed mutagenesis and computational modeling, we studied ORs sharing high sequence homology but with different response properties. When tested in heterologous cells by diverse odorants, MOR256-3 responded broadly to many odorants, whereas MOR256-8 responded weakly to a few odorants. Out of 36 mutant MOR256-3 ORs, the majority altered the responses to different odorants in a similar manner and the overall response of an OR was positively correlatedwith its basal activity, an indication of ligand-independent receptor activation. Strikingly, a single mutation in MOR256-8 was sufficient to confer both high basal activity and broad responsiveness to this receptor. These results suggest that broad responsiveness of an OR is at least partially attributed to its activation likelihood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G protein--coupled olfactory receptors (ORs) enable us to detect innumerous odorants. They are also ectopically expressed in nonolfactory tissues and emerging as attractive drug targets. ORs can be promiscuous or highly specific, which is part of a larger mechanism for odor discrimination. Here, we demonstrate that the OR extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) plays critical roles in OR promiscuity and specificity. Using site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling, we constructed 3D OR models in which ECL2 forms a lid over the orthosteric pocket. We demonstrate using molecular dynamics simulations that ECL2 controls the shape and volume of the odorant-binding pocket, maintains the pocket hydrophobicity, and acts as a gatekeeper of odorant binding. Therefore, we propose the interplay between the specific orthosteric pocket and the variable, less specific ECL2 controls OR specificity and promiscuity. Furthermore, the 3D models created here enabled virtual screening of new OR agonists and antagonists, which exhibited a 70% hit rate in cell assays. Our approach can potentially be generalized to structure-based ligand screening for other G protein--coupled receptors that lack high-resolution 3D structures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Odorant receptor (OR) genes and proteins represent more than 2% of our genome and 4% of our proteome and constitute the largest subgroup of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The mechanism underlying OR activation remains poorly understood, as they do not share some of the highly conserved motifs critical for activation of non-olfactory GPCRs. By combining site-directed mutagenesis, heterologous expression, and molecular dynamics simulations that capture the conformational change of constitutively active mutants, we tentatively identified crucial residues for the function of these receptors using the mouse MOR256-3 (Olfr124) as a model. The toggle switch for sensing agonists involves a highly conserved tyrosine residue in helix VI. The ionic lock is located between the "DRY" motif in helix III and a positively charged "R/K" residue in helix VI. This study provides an unprecedented model that captures the main mechanisms of odorant receptor activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

GPCR functional selectivity opens new opportunities for the design of safer drugs. Ligands orchestrate GPCR signaling cascades by modulating the receptor conformational landscape. Our study provides insights into the dynamic mechanism enabling opioid ligands to preferentially activate the G protein over the β-arrestin pathways through the μ-opioid receptor (μOR). We combine functional assays in living cells, solution NMR spectroscopy, and enhanced-sampling molecular dynamic simulations to identify the specific μOR conformations induced by G protein-biased agonists. In particular, we describe the dynamic and allosteric communications between the ligand-binding pocket and the receptor intracellular domains, through conserved motifs in class A GPCRs. Most strikingly, the biased agonists trigger μOR conformational changes in the intracellular loop 1 and helix 8 domains, which may impair β-arrestin binding or signaling. The findings may apply to other GPCR families and provide key molecular information that could facilitate the design of biased ligands. [Display omitted] • NMR and MD simulations help define the molecular mechanisms of μOR-biased signaling • Biased, unbiased, and partial agonists stabilize different μOR conformations • Biased agonists stabilize specific conformations in the TM7, ICL1, and H8 domains • The bias in conformation persists after binding to a G protein mimetic nanobody Biased ligands of GPCRs offer new drug design strategies to enhance beneficial drug actions while reducing side effects. Cong et al. combined molecular simulations, NMR spectroscopy, and functional assays to uncover the molecular mechanism of ligand bias in the μ-opioid receptor, which provides structural basis for designing better opioid analgesics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]