Search

Recently, we and other group have reported that furosemide administration along with hypertonic saline solution enhanced diuretic efficiency of furosemide. However, little is known about factors which associated with high diuretic efficiency by hypertonic saline solution with furosemide therapy. To identify predictors of diuretic efficiency in the hypertonic saline solution with furosemide therapy, we recruited 30 consecutive hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients with volume overload (77 ± 10 years, systolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg, and estimated glomerular filtration rate > 15 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ). Hypertonic saline with furosemide solution, consisting of 500 ml of 1.7% hypertonic saline solution with 40 mg of furosemide, was administered continuously over 24 h. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of 24-h urine volume (UV) after initiation of diuretic treatment ≥ 2000 ml (high urine volume: HUV) and < 2000 ml (low urine volume: LUV). The basal clinical characteristics of both groups were analyzed and the predictors of HUV after receiving the treatment were identified. There were not significant differences between two groups in baseline clinical characteristics and medication. Univariate logistic analysis revealed that blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio, urine urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (UUN/UCre), fractional excretion of sodium, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion positively associated with HUV. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that UUN/UCre at baseline was independently associated with HUV, and UUN/UCre best predicts HUV by the therapy with a cut-off value of 6.16 g/dl/g Cre (AUC 0.910, 95% CI 0.696-0.999, sensitivity 80%, specificity 87%). The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significant difference for HF rehospitalization and death rate at 180 days between patients with UUN/UCre ≥ 6.16 g/dl/g Cre and those with UUN/UCre < 6.16 g/dl/g Cre (log-rank P = 0.0489). UUN/UCre at baseline strongly predicted of diuretic efficiency in the hypertonic saline solution with furosemide therapy, and was associated with HF prognosis.

Hypertonic saline with furosemide has been proposed for a long time as an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We previously reported the efficacy of continuous infusion of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide in treatment for ADHF. Although this therapeutic strategy can be a useful option for effective decongestion in treatment for ADHF, there is no study that assesses the effect and safety of saline supplementation compared with standard therapy in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion compared with carperitide. We compared clinical outcomes, adverse events, and cost for patients receiving carperitide (carperitide group) with those for patients receiving 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide (salt group) during the initial hospitalization for ADHF. The cost analysis was performed on the basis of the previous report about cost-effectiveness of acute heart failure. A total of 175 ADHF patients received either carperitide (n = 111) or 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion (n = 64) as initial treatment. There were no differences in length of hospital stay (27 ± 19 vs. 25 ± 16 day, p = 0.170) and infusion period (7.2 ± 6.1 vs. 8.4 ± 7.5 day, p = 0.474) between the two groups. The incidence of rehospitalization did not differ at 1 month (7.6 vs. 6.6 %, p = 1.000) and 1 year (36.8 vs. 37.7 %, p = 0.907) between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no significant difference for 1 year all-cause mortality between the two groups (log-rank, p = 0.724). The single hospitalization cost was 95,314 yen lower and the yearly hospitalization cost 125,628 yen lower in the salt group compared with the carperitide group. Thus, intravenous 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion is as effective as carperitide in terms of clinical outcome and is a cost-effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ADHF.

Background: Theoretically, salt supplementation should promote diuresis through increasing the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) even with low-dose furosemide; however, there is little evidence to support this idea., Methods and Results: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial that compared the diuretic effectiveness of salt infusion with that of glucose infusion supplemented with low-dose furosemide in 44 consecutive patients with ADHF. Patients were randomly administered 1.7% hypertonic saline solution supplemented with 40 mg furosemide (salt infusion group) or glucose supplemented with 40 mg furosemide (glucose infusion group). Our major end points were 24-hour urinary volume and GFR. Urinary volume was greater in the salt infusion group than in the glucose infusion group (2,701 ± 920 vs 1,777 ± 797 mL; P < .001). There was no significant difference in the estimated GFR at baseline. Creatinine clearance for 24 h was greater in the salt infusion group than in the glucose infusion group (63.5 ± 52.6 vs 39.0 ± 26.3 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2); P = .048)., Conclusions: Salt supplementation rather than salt restriction evoked favorable diuresis through increasing GFR. The findings support an efficacious novel approach of the treatment of ADHF., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)