Search

Language is considered a function of either the left or, in exceptional cases, the right side of the brain. Functional imaging studies show, however, that in the general population a graded continuum from left hemispheric to right hemispheric language lateralization exists. To determine the functional relevance of lateralization differences, we suppressed language regions using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in healthy human subjects who differed in lateralization of language-related brain activation. Language disruption correlated with both the degree and side of lateralization. Subjects with weak lateralization (more bilaterality) were less affected by either left- or right-side TMS than were subjects with strong lateralization to one hemisphere. Thus in some people, language processing seems to be distributed evenly between the hemispheres, allowing for ready compensation after a unilateral lesion.

In most people the left hemisphere of the brain is dominant for language. Because of the increased incidence of atypical right-hemispheric language in left-handed neurological patients, a systematic association between handedness and dominance has long been suspected. To clarify the relationship between handedness and language dominance in healthy subjects, we measured lateralization directly by functional transcranial Doppler sonography in 326 healthy individuals using a word-generation task. The incidence of right-hemisphere language dominance was found to increase linearly with the degree of left-handedness, from 4% in strong right-handers (handedness = 100) to 15% in ambidextrous individuals and 27% in strong left-handers (handedness = -100). The relationship could be approximated by the formula: f1.gif" BORDER="0">. These results clearly demonstrate that the relationship between handedness and language dominance is not an artefact of cerebral pathology but a natural phenomenon.

The cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) in the basal arteries during a word-generation task was assessed by functional transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (fTCD) and by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The study investigates how event-related CBFV modulations in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) relate to regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes. Both fMRI and fTCD were used in 13 subjects (7 men, 6 women, aged 21 to 44 years). The maximum difference of relative CBFV changes between the left and right MCA during the word-generation task was used as the language laterality index (LIfTCD). For the fMRI examination during the nearly identical language task, the corresponding index was defined by LIfMRI = 100(N(L) - N(R))/(N(L) + N(R)), where N(L) and N(R) refer to the numbers of voxels activated in the left and right hemisphere, respectively. The evoked CBFV changes expressed by LIfTCD and the corresponding laterality index, LIfMRI, estimated by fMRI showed a close linear relation (regression analysis: r = 0.95, p < 0.0001). The results of this study demonstrate that language-related velocity changes in the MCAs relate to rCBF increases in a linear fashion. Since the laterality indices assessed by fMRI and fTCD are in such close agreement both techniques can therefore be used in a complementary way.

Our knowledge about the variability of cerebral language lateralization is derived from studies of patients with brain lesions and thus possible secondary reorganization of cerebral functions. In healthy right-handed subjects 'atypical', i.e. right hemisphere language dominance, has generally been assumed to be exceedingly rare. To test this assumption we measured language lateralization in 188 healthy subjects with moderate and strong right-handedness (59% females) by a new non-invasive, quantitative technique previously validated by direct comparison with the intracarotid amobarbital procedure. During a word generation task the averaged hemispheric perfusion differences within the territories of the middle cerebral arteries were determined. (i) The natural distribution of language lateralization was found to occur along a bimodal continuum. (ii) Lateralization was equivalent in men and women. (iii) Right hemisphere dominance was found in 7.5% of subjects. These findings indicate that atypical language dominance in healthy right-handed subjects of either sex is considerably more common than previously suspected.

Hemispheric asymmetry is known for higher brain functions like language and attention. We tested whether such an asymmetry also exists in the representation of elementary sensory functions. Magnetic source imaging was used to compare the cortical somatosensory hand representation in seven right- and five left-handed individuals. In all right-handers the representation of the dominant hand was larger than the contralateral one in the corresponding hemispheres. In contrast, only two out of five left-handers revealed a larger representation of the dominant left hand compared to the right one. In agreement with previous findings on the lateralization of language and attention, there is a strong correlation between handedness and the extent of the cortical hand representation in right-, but not in left-handers. We conclude that a profound functional hemispheric asymmetry also exists in primary sensory cortices.

Perception has been linked to a highly coordinated activation of cortical regions whose functional organization and performance is subject to plastic changes. We tested whether chronic repetitive disturbances of the brain by focal epileptic activity have a long-standing detrimental effect on the perceptual performance in the affected hemisphere. Nine patients were examined who had a history of complex partial seizures but no structural cerebral damage on magnetic resonance imaging and no evidence of ongoing epileptic activity on scalp electroencephalography and who had clinically been without seizures for at least 3 days. The side of primary epileptic involvement was determined by seizure semiology (n = 2), focal electroencephalographic slowing (n = 3) or focal abnormality during single photon emission topography (SPECT) (n = 4). The computer controlled psychometric assessment of the somesthetic frequency discrimination revealed that the perception in the hand corresponding to the affected hemisphere was impaired relative to the contralateral hand (P < 0.01), and to the performance of a group of normal controls (P < 0.01). We conclude that mechanisms related to focal epileptic activity can result in regional perceptual decrements even when there is no clinical or surface-electroencephalographic evidence of epileptic discharges. This in turn suggests that somatosensory testing may be of help in localizing, or at least lateralizing an epileptic focus.

Most humans have a left hemispheric dominance for language. However, during diagnostic language testing there also is activation of the right hemisphere, which is probably related to attention. To investigate further the role of attention during language production we monitored cerebral blood flow velocities in the middle cerebral arteries by continuous bilateral transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) in nine right-handed subjects. During cued word generation, a successive activation of the right hemisphere in the preparatory phase, and of the left hemisphere during word searching was demonstrated. These findings indicate that attentional processes precede verbal activation and that the two procedures can be separated by comparative blood flow velocity measurement.

We examined the ability to match the voluntary isometric finger flexion forces of the dominant and nondominant hand in humans, as well as the influence of unilateral visual feedback during this task. Right- and left-handed subjects were trained to produce a "low" force level (50 +/- 25 g) and a "high" force level (200 +/- 50 g) with the right and left index finger, separately. Following the training session, subjects were instructed to match the isometric forces of both fingers simultaneously within the required range (either low or high) so that they were perceived to be identical. The results showed an asymmetry, whereby greater forces were exerted with the index finger of the dominant hand. The asymmetry was independent of the subjects' maximum finger flexion strength. When unilateral visual feedback represented the force output of the dominant hand, the asymmetry was no longer present. In contrast, when it represented the force output of the nondominant hand, the asymmetry was not compensated. We hypothesize that these findings are the result of anatomical or physiological asymmetries inherent in the motor system controlling the production of force.