Search

In recent times, there is an increasing global interest in the consumption of safe, healthy fruits and juices without synthetic materials and preservatives. The objective of the study was to evaluate the physiochemical quality of Valencia, Ibadan sweet, and Washington varieties of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) fruits in response to eucalyptus leaves, orange peels, and their combination during 30 days of storage at ambient 25°C and 80-85% relative humidity. The experimental design was a 4 × 3 factorial design in a completely randomized design. The results showed that orange fruits coated with the combined oils of eucalyptus leaves and orange peels significantly (P ≤ 0.05) delayed weight changes, firmness, titratable acidity, total soluble solids concentration, vitamin C content, and higher acceptability with extended shelf life compared to uncoated control fruits. Valencia (V1) exhibited a significant beneficial effect of the biobased oils treatment on weight, firmness, and vitamin C content. In Ibadan sweet (V2) fruits, biobased oils enhanced titratable acidity with relatively better total soluble solids and marketability. Biobased oils are known to reduce fruit weight loss by limiting respiration rate. It was concluded that the combined biobased oil had the best effect on keeping citrus fresh. These findings provide a practical basis for the application of combined biobased oil as an effective preservative to improve the storage quality of citrus fruits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Climate, soil and tree water status, fruit yields and quality of 'Valencia' orange trees were monitored over five consecutive seasons (2007–2012) to study the effects of irrigation placement or volume. Three irrigation treatments were imposed: conventional irrigation (CI, 100% of crop evapotranspiration on both sides of the rootzone), partial rootzone drying (PRD, 50% of CI water only on one alternated side of the rootzone) and continuous deficit irrigation (DI, 50% of CI water on both sides of the rootzone). Yield parameters were generally not affected by PRD, and only yield per tree was lower in DI than CI trees. Fruit size and juice content were also reduced by DI, and not by PRD. Both PRD and DI increased juice soluble solids and acidity, vitamin C and carotenoid concentrations, as well as fruit, juice and sugar productivity per unit of irrigation water. Overall, the straight reduction of irrigation volumes by ~55% (DI) induced an average of 4.4% leaf dehydration, which caused significant fruit size reductions and a 3.4% reduction in juice yield, corresponding to a loss of about 2.6 tons of juice and 261 kg of sugars per hectare and year. On the other hand, water savings of about 2 mega liters per hectare and year with PRD caused a mild 2.3% leaf dehydration and mainly fruit quality improvements, indicating that PRD is a sustainable irrigation strategy for 'Valencia' orange. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]