Search

Background: Stronger resting-state functional connectivity of the default mode and frontoparietal control networks has been associated with cognitive resilience to Alzheimer's disease related pathology and neurodegeneration in smaller cohort studies., Objectives: We investigated whether these networks are associated with longitudinal CR to AD biomarkers of beta-amyloid (Aβ)., Design: Longitudinal mixed., Setting: The Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4) study and its natural history observation arm, the Longitudinal Evaluation of Amyloid Risk and Neurodegeneration (LEARN) study., Participants: A sample of 1,021 cognitively unimpaired older adults (mean age = 71.2 years [SD = 4.7 years], 61% women, 42% APOEε4 carriers, 52% Aβ positive)., Measurements: Global cognitive performance (Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite) was assessed over an average 5.4 year follow-up period (SD = 2 years). Cortical Aβ and functional connectivity (left and right frontoparietal control and default mode networks) were estimated from fMRI and PET, respectively, at baseline. Covariates included baseline age, APOEε4 carrier status, years of education, adjusted gray matter volume, head motion, study group, cumulative treatment exposure, and cognitive test version., Results: Mixed effects models revealed that functional connectivity of the left frontoparietal control network moderated the negative effect of Aβ on cognitive change (p = .025) such that stronger connectivity was associated with reduced Aβ-related cognitive decline., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a potential protective effect of functional connectivity in preclinical AD, such that stronger connectivity in this network is associated with slower Aβ-related cognitive decline., Competing Interests: All authors confirm that they do not have conflicts of interest pertinent to this manuscript.

Despite the important role that attending to novel events plays in human behavior, there is limited information about the neuroanatomical underpinnings of this vital activity. This study investigated the relative contributions of the frontal and posterior parietal lobes to the differential processing of novel and target stimuli under an experimental condition in which subjects actively directed attention to novel events. Event-related potentials were recorded from well-matched frontal patients, parietal patients, and non-brain-injured subjects who controlled their viewing duration (by button press) of line drawings that included a frequent, repetitive background stimulus, an infrequent target stimulus, and infrequent, novel visual stimuli. Subjects also responded to target stimuli by pressing a foot pedal. Damage to the frontal cortex resulted in a much greater disruption of response to novel stimuli than to designated targets. Frontal patients exhibited a widely distributed, profound reduction of the novelty P3 response and a marked diminution of the viewing duration of novel events. In contrast, damage to posterior parietal lobes was associated with a substantial reduction of both target P3 and novelty P3 amplitude; however, there was less disruption of the processing of novel than of target stimuli. We conclude that two nodes of the neuroanatomical network for responding to and processing novelty are the prefrontal and posterior parietal regions, which participate in the voluntary allocation of attention to novel events. Injury to this network is indexed by reduced novelty P3 amplitude, which is tightly associated with diminished attention to novel stimuli. The prefrontal cortex may serve as the central node in determining the allocation of attentional resources to novel events, whereas the posterior parietal lobe may provide the neural substrate for the dynamic process of updating one's internal model of the environment to take into account a novel event.

Objective: To investigate whether frontal lobe damage in humans disrupts the natural tendency to preferentially attend to novel visual events in the environment., Methods: Nine patients with chronic infarctions in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and 23 matched normal controls participated in a study in which subjects viewed repetitive background stimuli, infrequent target stimuli, and novel visual stimuli (for example, fragmented or "impossible" objects). Subjects controlled viewing duration by a button press that led to the onset of the next stimulus. They also responded to targets by pressing a foot pedal. The amount of time spent looking at the different kinds of stimuli, and the target detection accuracy and speed served as dependent variables., Results: Overall, normal controls spent significantly more time than frontal lobe patients looking at novel stimuli. Analysis of responses across blocks showed that initially frontal lobe patients behaved like normal controls by directing more attention to novel than background stimuli. However, they quickly began to distribute their viewing time evenly between novel and background stimuli, a pattern that was strikingly different from normal controls. By contrast, there were no differences between frontal lobe patients and normal controls for viewing duration devoted to background and target stimuli, target detection accuracy, or reaction time to targets. Frontal lobe patients did not differ from normal controls in terms of age, education, estimated IQ, or mood, but were more apathetic as measured by self report and informants' judgments. Attenuated responses to novel stimuli significantly correlated with degree of apathy., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that DLPFC injury selectively impairs the natural tendency to seek stimulation from novel and unusual stimuli. These data provide the first quantitative behavioural demonstration that the human frontal lobes play a critical part in directing and sustaining attention to novel events. The impairment of novelty seeking behaviour may contribute to the characteristic apathy found in patients with frontal lobe injury.