Search

We report the results of a 14-center collaborative study of genotype-phenotype correlations in 318 fragile X families; these families comprised 2,253 individuals, 1,344 of whom carried a fragile X mutation and 693 of whom had a typical full fragile X mutation. This study demonstrates that direct DNA diagnosis establishes the genotype at the FRAXA-FMR-1 locus. There was a significantly higher prevalence of "mosaic" cases among males who carry a full mutation (12%) than among females who carry a full mutation (6%); the mosaic males had a larger expansion than did the mosaic females. Mental status of premutated individuals did not differ from that of those with a normal genotype. Both the abnormal methylation of the FMR-1-EagI site and the size of the expansion were highly correlated with cytogenetics, facial dysmorphism, macroorchidism, and mental retardation (MR). Among female carriers of a full mutation, those with MR had significantly larger expansion than did those without MR. Among 164 independent couples, 3 unrelated husbands carried a premutation that suggests that the prevalence of fragile X premutations in the general population is approximately 0.9% of the X chromosomes. Our data validate the use of direct DNA testing for fragile X diagnosis as well as for carrier identification and support and complete the established relationships among the DNA results and the cytogenetic, physical, and psychological aspects of the disease.

We analyzed the FRAXAC2 and DXS548 microsatellites in normal and fragile X chromosomes from Sweden and the Czech Republic in order to investigate a possible founder effect for chromosomes carrying a fragile X mutation. We report a much stronger linkage disequilibrium between the marker haplotypes and the disease in Swedish fragile X chromosomes than in Czech and most other previously studied Caucasian populations. Two haplotypes accounted for 64% of Swedish fragile X chromosomes and for only 14% of normal chromosomes. Neither of these two haplotypes was found in Czech chromosomes, but the most common Swedish fragile X haplotype is the same as that reported to be predominant in Finnish fragile X patients. Linkage disequilibrium was observed in the Czech fragile X chromosomes but the haplotypes were more diverse and similar to those observed in other Caucasian populations. The most prevalent Swedish fragile X haplotype was traced back from affected males to common ancestors in the early 18th century. This indicates an apparently silent segregation of fragile X alleles through up to nine generations. The geographical distribution of the two major at-risk haplotypes in Sweden suggests that they were present among early settlers in different parts of the country.

Twenty-two members of 18 families with autism have been examined for the presence of mutations and abnormal methylation in the FMR-1 region at Xq27.3. All patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria of infantile autism. A characteristic pattern of insertion and methylation were detected after Southern blot analysis in 7 autistic individuals expressing the fragile site at Xq27.3. Normal DNA patterns were observed in 15 autistic boys cytogenetically negative for the fragile site. The results indicate a lack of involvement of the FMR-1 region in infantile autists negative for fragile X expression.

Chromosomes carrying the mutation causing the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome have been shown to have an unstable DNA sequence close to or within the fragile site. The length variation is located within a DNA fragment containing a CGG trinucleotide repeat which is unstable in both mitosis and meiosis. We have used the probe StB12.3 from the region to analyze the mutations and the methylation patterns in 21 families segregating for the fra(X) syndrome. Among 40 fra(X) males all showed an abnormal pattern. The normal 2.8 kb band was absent in 36 individuals and replaced by a heterogeneous smear of larger size. The remaining four were shown to be "mosaics" with the presence of both mutated, unmethylated and mutated, methylated fragments. We found four normal transmitting males, one which was a great-grandson of another normal transmitting male indicating that the pre-mutation can remain stable through two meioses in the female. In nine fra(X) positive females the abnormal pattern consisted of a smear, usually seen in affected males, in addition to the normal bands. Five of these females were mentally normal. Of clinical importance is the prediction of mental impairment in females. We suggest that this is not made by the detection of the full mutation alone, but rather by the degree of methylation of the normal X chromosome. Our results suggest that difference of clinical expression in monozygotic twins may be correlated with difference in methylation pattern. Six out of 33 fra(X) negative females at risk were diagnosed as carriers. Our observations indicate that molecular heterogeneity is responsible for variable expression of the fra(X) syndrome in both males and females.

The fragile X syndrome locus, FRAXA, is located at Xq27. Until recently, few polymorphic loci had been genetically mapped close to FRAXA. This has been attributed to an increased frequency of recombination at Xq27, possibly associated with the fragile X mutation. In addition, the frequency of recombination around FRAXA has been reported to vary among fragile X families. These observations suggested that the genetic map at Xq27 in normal populations was different from that in fragile X populations and that the genetic map also varied within the fragile X population. Such variability would reduce the reliability of carrier risk estimates based on DNA studies in fragile X families. Five polymorphic loci have now been mapped to within 4 cM of FRAXA--DXS369, DXS297, DXS296, IDS, and DXS304. The frequency of recombination at Xq26-q28 was evaluated using data at these loci and at more distant loci from 112 families with the fragile X syndrome. Two-point and multipoint linkage analyses failed to detect any difference in the recombination fractions in fragile X versus normal families. Two-point and multipoint tests of linkage homogeneity failed to detect any evidence of linkage heterogeneity in the fragile X families. On the basis of this analysis, genetic maps derived from large samples of normal families and those derived from fragile X families are equally valid as the basis for calculating carrier risk estimates in a particular family.

The fragile X syndrome is the most common cause of familial mental retardation and is characterized by a fragile site at the end of the long arm of the X chromosome. The unusual genetics and cytogenetics of this X-linked condition make genetic counseling difficult. DNA studies were of limited value in genetic counseling, because the nearest polymorphic DNA loci had recombination fractions of 12% or more with the fragile X mutation, FRAXA. Five polymorphic loci have recently been described in this region of the X chromosome. The positions of these loci in relation to FRAXA were defined in a genetic linkage study of 112 affected families. The five loci--DXS369, DXS297, DXS296, IDS, and DXS304--had recombination fractions of 4% or less with FRAXA. The closest locus, DXS296, was distal to FRAXA and had a recombination fraction of 2%. The polymorphisms at these loci can be detected in DNA enzymatically digested with a limited number of restriction endonucleases. A strategy for DNA studies which is based on three restriction endonucleases and on five probes will detect one or more of these polymorphisms in 94% of women. This strategy greatly increases the utility of DNA studies in providing genetic advice to families with the fragile X syndrome.

A new RFLP marker U6.2 defining the locus DXS304 was recently mapped to the distal long arm of the X chromosome. In the present study we report the results of genetic linkage analysis of 13 fragile X [fra(X)] families that were informative for the new marker. Analysis of the recombinants for F9-FRAXA, DXS105-FRAXA, DXS98-FRAXA, DXS52-FRAXA, DXS15-FRAXA, and F8C-FRAXA, places DXS304 distal and near to the FRAXA locus. Combined with results from previous studies, our results support the order Xcen.-F9-DXS105-DXS98-FRAXA-DXS304-DXS5 2-DXS15-F8C-Xqter. Close linkage was observed between DXS304 and the disease locus with a peak lod score of 5.12 at theta = 0.04 from the present study and, with a peak lod score of 17.45 at theta = 0.035 when our data are combined with published data from 2 other studies. The present study confirms that U6.2 is useful for prenatal diagnosis and carrier testing in families affected by fra(X) syndrome.

Diagnosis of carriers of the fragile-X mental retardation gene is hampered by the paucity of tightly linked DNA markers. Recently, 2 new DNA markers RN1 (DXS369) and U6.2 (DXS304) have become available. Both markers are tightly linked to the fragile-X locus, but their location relative to the fragile site was not known with certainty. We have tested these new markers in a multipoint linkage analysis of 26 fragile-X families typed for DXS105 as a proximal marker and DXS52 as a distal marker. Our results establish the order DXS105-DXS369-fra(X)-DXS304-DXS52, which is in agreement with physical mapping results.

Diagnosis of the carrier status of the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome was made in 2 unrelated women who did not express the fragile site. Both were related to several individuals with a typical fra(X) phenotype and the marker X chromosome. A restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) approach was used with probes that flank the fra(X) locus (FRAXA). The loci used for risk calculations of the fra(X) genotype were DXS98 and DXS105 on the centromeric side and a recently characterized locus, DXS304, on the telomeric side. Coincidence correction for the distances between marker loci and FRAXA was made according to the Kosambi function. The DNA marker test gave the risk for one female to be a carrier of 99.7-99.9%. In another family a female was excluded from being a carrier with a probability of greater than 99.7%. The DNA marker U6.2, defining the locus DXS304, has increased the reliability of DNA based diagnosis of carrier status for females-at-risk. It is concluded that DNA analysis can serve as a valuable complement to chromosome analysis in families informative for the more closely linked flanking markers.

We report on 12 prenatal diagnoses performed between weeks 10 and 13 on normal women with a well-documented family history of the Martin-Bell syndrome. Seven were obligate and three were potential carriers. One male and 2 female fetuses were found to be fragile X [fra(X)]-positive. The diagnoses were confirmed in fibroblasts or lymphocytes after interruption or postnatally. In one fra(X)-negative female fetus, the analysis of linked DNA markers indicated that most probably she was a heterozygote. Reexamination after birth gave a fra(X)-positive result. Hence this was a case of a false-negative prenatal fra(X) result. The occurrence of false-negative cytogenetic results represents a common problem that limits the sensitivity of prenatal diagnostics in the Martin-Bell syndrome. A study of linked DNA markers can improve the reliability of negative cytogenetic results in first trimester prenatal diagnosis. In case of doubt, the chromosomes could be reexamined after fetal blood sampling.

A new DNA probe, U6.2, defining locus DXS304, was recently shown to be closely linked to the fragile X locus (FRAXA). It is polymorphic with a number of different enzymes, all of which are in complete linkage disequilibrium, which suggests an insertion/deletion type of polymorphism. Using the method of Sanger, we have sequenced 1,102 bp of the cloned U6.2 fragment. Analysis of the sequence showed there was a long direct repeat of 121 bp and two long inverted repeats. The first was 19 bp long, and the second was a palindromic invert of 20 bp. Such repeats could promote recombination in this region and could have been involved in the suggested insertion/deletion event that created the polymorphism detected at locus DXS304. Long fragments were observed using pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), but no length variations were seen. The sequence of U6.2 will be useful in developing a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assay for the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) detected at locus DXS304 which should assist with carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome.

A new cloned DNA probe (U6.2), which recognizes polymorphisms near the locus for the fragile-X syndrome, was isolated. No recombinations were observed between the probe and the disease locus, although recombinations were observed with several other probes known to be located close to the fragile site. The locus defined by the probe, DXS304, cosegregated with the fragile-X phenotype in 29 informative meioses (zeta = 4.97, tau = 0.00). The degree of polymorphism at this locus and its proximity to the fragile-X locus makes it useful for carrier diagnosis and as a new starting point for attempts to clone the gene responsible for the disease.

A new polymorphic DNA marker U6.2, defining the locus DXS304, was recently isolated and mapped to the Xq27 region of the X chromosome. In the previous communication we describe a linkage study encompassing 16 fragile-X families and using U6.2 and five previously described polymorphic markers at Xq26-q28. One recombination event was observed between DXS304 and the fragile-X locus in 36 informative meioses. Combined with information from other reports, our results suggest the following order of the examined loci on Xq: cen-F9-DXS105-DXS98-FRAXA-DXS304-(DXS52-F8 -DXS15). The locus DXS304 is closely linked to FRAXA, giving a peak lod score of 5.86 at a corresponding recombination fraction of .00. On the basis of the present results, it is apparent that U6.2 is a useful probe for carrier and prenatal diagnosis in fragile-X families.

The fragile-X mental retardation syndrome (FRAX-MR) is one of the most prevalent X-linked diseases. In affected males and in a proportion of carrier females a fragile site at Xq27.3 [fra (X)] is detected when the lymphocytes are cultured under conditions of thymidine deprivation. The fra (X) analysis can be used in the diagnosis of only 56% of carrier females (13, 14) and prenatal diagnosis by this method is not always feasible, thus making genetic counselling of affected families difficult, and sometimes impossible. We have analysed FRAX-MR families using RFLP and four DNA probes from Xq27-Xq28. Estimation of the recombination fraction indicates that the proximal probe F9 is not significantly linked to the FRAX-MR locus while the three distal probes F8, DXS52 and DXS15 show linkage. These probes could be used in the diagnosis of FRAX-MR in those families that do not show evidence for recombination. Used in conjunction with the fra (X) analysis, the segregation studies with these probes should improve the genetic counselling of the FRAX-MR syndrome and should be useful for the genetic and molecular analysis of this unique disease.

The fragile X syndrome, which is the most common cause of inherited mental retardation, poses important diagnostic problems for genetic counseling. The development of diagnostic strategies based on DNA analysis has been impaired by the lack of polymorphic markers very close to the disease locus. Here we report that the polymorphic probe U6.2 (locus DXS304) is much closer to the fragile X locus than all the previously reported markers. A recombination fraction of 0.02 between DXS304 and the fragile X locus was estimated by multipoint linkage analysis (confidence interval 0.002 to 0.05). Our data suggest that DXS304 is distal to the fragile X locus. This marker thus represents a major improvement for carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis in fragile X families.