Search

Background: A broad range of systemic complications has been described to occur in patients with open major fractures. Various causes have been claimed to play a role. We therefore surveyed a nationwide trauma registry to assess risk factors associated with closed and various types of open femur fractures., Methods: This was a cohort study in a nationwide population-based prospective database. Inclusion criteria for selection from database are as follows: individuals with femur fracture, age 16 years or older, and survival until primary admission. Main groups included closed and open femur fracture. Patient demographics, injury severity (New Injury Severity Score), surgical fracture management, length of stay, and systemic complications (e.g., multiple organ failure [MOF], sepsis, mortality) were collected and statistically analyzed using SPSS statistics. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to stratify subgroups for the degree of open soft-tissue injury according to Gustilo and Anderson., Results: Among 32,582 documented trauma victims (January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2010), a total of 5,761 met the inclusion criteria. Main groups: 4,423 closed (76.8%) and 1,338 open femur fractures (23.2%). Open fractures subgroups were divided into I° (334, 28.1%), II° (526, 44.3%), and III° (328, 27.6%). Open fractures were associated with an increased risk of prehospital hemorrhagic shock (p = 0.01), higher resuscitation requirements (p < 0.001), MOF (p = 0.001), and longer in-hospital (p < 0.001) and intensive care stay (p = 0.001). While New Injury Severity Score values showed a minor increase per subgroup, the prevalence of MOF, sepsis, and mortality multiplied with the degree of open soft-tissue injury. Especially patients with Type III open femur fractures received mass transfusions (28.2%, p < 0.001), and mass transfusions were identified as independent predictor for sepsis (odds ratio [OR], 2.393; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.821-3.143; p < 0.001) and MOF (OR, 2.966; 95% CI, 2.409-3.651; p < 0.001). Our data also indicate an increased mortality in patients with open femur managed outside Level I trauma centers (OR, 1.358; 95% CI, 1.018-1.812; p = 0.037)., Conclusion: Open femur fractures are associated with higher in-hospital complications related to incidence of MOF, associated intensive care unit stay, and hospital days when compared with closed femur fractures. For prevention of in-hospital complications, prompt hemorrhage control, surgical fracture fixation, cautious blood management, and triage to a Level I trauma center must be considered., Level of Evidence: Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level II.

Background: This study describes a modified classification and management protocol for perineal soft tissue injuries associated with pelvic fractures., Methods: A total of 11 patients with perineal soft tissue injuries associated with open pelvic fractures were studied retrospectively. The patients were classified into three types based on the area of defect: type A (urogenital zone), type B (anal zone), and type C (both urogenital and anal zones). Each type included the following subclasses: A1 (without urethra injuries), A2 (with urethra injuries), B1 (without anorectal injuries), B2 (with anorectal injuries), C1 (with types A1 and B1), C2 (with types A2 and B1), C3 (with types A1 and B2), and C4 (with types A2 and B2). The management protocol was planned according to the individual classifications. Protocol A1 (for type A1) involved skin graft or myocutaneous flap transplantation. Protocol A2 (for type A2) involved the same protocol combined with urine diversion. Protocol B1 (for type B1) involved skin graft or myocutaneous flap transplantation. Protocol B2 (for type B2) involved the same management combined with fecal diversion. Protocol C involved the correspondent protocol used for each subtype of type C., Results: Out of the 11 patients, there were 5, 3, and 3 cases of types A, B, and C, respectively. One patient died due to sepsis, and the wounds of the remaining patients healed well. No anal incontinence had occurred., Conclusions: Perineal soft tissue injuries associated with pelvic fractures can be classified into three types, and the management protocol can be planned according to the classification., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Background: Management of the severely injured lower limb in children remains a challenge despite advances in surgical techniques. Models that predict the risk of lower limb trauma patients are designed to provide an estimation of the probability of limb salvage. In this study, we validate Mangled Extremity Syndrome Index (Mangled Extremity Severity Score [MESS]) by measurement of its discrimination in children., Materials and Methods: From September 2009 to 2010, we collected the hospital records of all children who presented with lower extremity long bone open fractures. The inclusion criteria were I grade, II B, III C open fractures, severe injury to three of four organ systems, and severe injury to two of four organ systems with minor injury to two of four systems that require surgical interventions. Severity of limb injury was measured using MESS. Patients were followed up for 1 year. The discrimination of MESS model in differentiating of outcome in patients was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operator characteristic plot., Results: We evaluated 200 children referred consecutively to our center. The mean MESS in the amputation group was 7.5 ± 1.59 versus 6.4 ± 2.02 in the limb salvage group (p = 0.04). Amputation rate was 7.5% (n = 15). Percentages of skeletal/soft-tissue injury was different between groups (p = 0.0001). Children in the amputation group showed more tissue injury compared with limb salvage group. The best clinical discriminator power was calculated as MESS ≥ 6.5 (sensitivity = 73%, specificity = 54%)., Conclusion: We assumed that patients with a high risk of amputation can be identified early, and specific measures can be implemented immediately by using MESS with threshold of 6.5., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The successful management of open extremity injuries continues to represent a surgical challenge requiring a structured and multidisciplinary treatment concept. The treatment strategy depends on specific parameters, including the overall injury severity, life threatening trauma components, the degree oft soft tissue injury, the ischemia time, the contamination of the wound as well as the age and accompanying diseases of the patient. The treatment of fractures with a high-grade open soft tissue injury is guided by the severity of soft tissue damage including neurovascular damages, type of the fracture, overall state of the patient and is based on a clearly defined reconstructive algorithm sequentially employing initial wound treatment (debridement), stabilisation of the fracture and soft tissue coverage. The initial wound management includes radical and serial debridements and vessel reconstruction, followed by the gradual reconstruction of bone, tendons and nerves and a subsequent plastic soft tissue coverage.The sequential and priority-orientated implementation of these treatment steps is decisive for the long term outcome, which ideally results in an regular healing of bone and soft tissue without the presence of infection and good regain of extremity function.

Local muscle flaps for covering pretibial defects have been widely replaced due to the establishment of microsurgical procedures. The intention of the following study is to examine the results of soft tissue covering using local muscle flaps and to find out if its application is still indicated. At our level 1 trauma center 21 patients with III B open tibial fractures were treated with a local muscle flap to repair the soft tissue injury in the proximal and medial part of the lower leg. At the late follow-up after the average of 29 months all soft tissue defects and fractures were healed. Except of slight swelling under full weight stress no obstruction of blood circulation could be verified. 14 patients rated their functional outcome as good to excellent. In view of our results we consider local muscle flaps a suitable alternative to the free myoplasty for situations in which a more elaborate surgery is not feasible in due time, e. g. patients with acute brain edema, organ failure or lack of compliance.

The mangled extremity severity score (MESS) is a scoring system that can be applied to mangled extremities and help one determine which mangled limbs will eventually come to amputation. The MESS is a graduated grading system based on skeletal and soft tissue injury, shock, ischemia, and age. The records of 37 patients having sustained 43 open fractures or mangled upper extremity injuries, seen and treated at the University of New Mexico's Regional Trauma Center between April 1987 and September 1990, have been reviewed. All nine extremity injuries with a MESS of greater than or equal to seven were amputated, and 34 of 34 with a MESS of less than seven were salvaged. Nine Grade IIIC and six mangled extremities were identified in our study. Five of these Grade IIIC and four of the mangled extremities with a MESS of greater than or equal to seven were amputated. All Grade IIIC or mangled extremities with a MESS of less than seven were salvaged. In conclusion, the MESS is an early and accurate predictor for identifying the extremities that may be best treated by amputation.

Recent reports using the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) suggest that a score of > or = 7 is 100% accurate in predicting the need for amputation of severely injured lower extremities. To further evaluate the value of the MESS in predicting amputation, specifically with respect to type IIIB and type IIIC (Gustilo and Anderson) open fractures of the tibia, we retrospectively evaluated 24 patients with these injuries. A significant difference (p = 0.001) between MESS values of 13 salvaged (6.36 +/- 0.35 SEM) and 11 amputated limbs (6.36 +/- 0.54 SEM) was found. A MESS value of > or = 4 was most sensitive (100%); a MESS value of > or = 7 was most specific, and a MESS value of > or = 7 was found to have a positive predictive value of 100%. Subsequently, we addressed recent criticisms of the MESS by including nerve injury in the scoring system and by separating soft-tissue and skeletal injury components of the MESS. We modified the MESS with a score called the NISSSA and applied it retrospectively to our cases. After careful statistical comparison we found both the MESS and NISSSA to be highly accurate (p < 0.005) in predicting amputation. The NISSSA was found to be more sensitive (81.8% versus 63.6%) and more specific (92.3 versus 69.2%).