Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine time to union of extra-articular distal tibia nonunions based on fracture type and fixation methods: intramedullary nail (IMN), plate osteosynthesis (PO), and external fixation (EF)., Methods: This retrospective chart review included all patients who presented at a Level I trauma center with AO/OTA 43A & distal third 42A-C fracture nonunions between 2008 and 2014. Fixation methods were recorded and patient course was followed until nonunion had healed clinically., Results: Thirty-three distal tibia nonunions were included, and 29 reached eventual union (88%). Five AO/OTA fracture types were present. Mean times to union from nonunion diagnosis between original fracture types were compared (p = 0.203). Comminuted fracture types had longer times to union from nonunion diagnosis compared to simple fracture types (78 vs. 46 weeks, p = 0.051) and more revision fixations (1.5 vs. 0.5, p = 0.037). Mean time to union from nonunion diagnosis was shorter when no revision fixation was done compared to revisions (15 vs. 42 weeks, p = 0.102). Times to union from nonunion diagnosis without revision fixation were: IMN (12 weeks), PO (27 weeks), and EF (13 weeks) (p = 0.202). Times to union from definitive revision fixation were: IMN (17 weeks), PO (21 weeks), and EF (66 weeks) (p = 0.009), with EF taking significantly longer than both other methods. 21 patients (64%) underwent revision fixation. Revision fail rates were: IMN (0/6, 0%), PO (2/8, 25%), and EF (15/21, 71%). Time to union was longer in revisions that changed fixation method compared to revisions that used the same method (51 vs. 18 weeks, p = 0.030). Deep infections were also associated with longer union times (81 vs. 47 weeks, p = 0.040)., Conclusions: In this nonunion population, comminuted fracture types needed more time and revisions to reach union. Time to union was only clinically shorter when revision fixation was not performed, but IMN and PO were both successful fixation options with significantly shorter times to union than EF. Mean time to union increased even more when revision of fixation method was performed vs. exchange revision, as did nonunions with deep infections.

The surgical treatment of distal tibial fractures is still challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results associated with the use of a precontoured distal femoral locking plate as an external fixator in treating distal tibial fractures. From August 2011 to October 2012, 28 patients with distal tibial fractures were consecutively enrolled in this study. There were 9 OTA 43.A1, 9 43.A2, and 10 43.A3, including 21 closed and 7 open fractures. The precontoured distal femoral locking plate was placed on the anteromedial aspect of the tibia as an external fixator. All patients were followed for an average of 16 months. The mean surgical duration was 38 (25-60) minutes. The mean time until fracture healing was 16.7 (12-24) weeks. At final follow-up, the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score was 93 (88-100). There were no nonunions, deep infections, or implant fractures. Three patients had transient superficial pin site infection, but these did not change the clinical outcome. External fixation using a precontoured distal femoral locking plate is a reliable option in treating distal tibial fracture. The procedure is easy to perform, is less invasive, and the low profile plate can be concealed under stockings and can be conveniently removed.

The authors report the results of 1-stage external fixation using a locking plate in 116 tibial fractures (85 closed and 31 open). The patients were followed for an average of 22 months. The mean duration of surgery was 42 minutes. The mean fracture healing time was 12 weeks for proximal, 20 weeks for shaft, 14 weeks for distal, and 24 weeks for multisegmental tibial fractures. Nonunion, deep infection, and breakage of screws did not occur. External plate fixation is effective for tibial fractures and especially for metaphyseal fractures. It has the advantages of being easy to perform and less invasive, and the plate is conveniently located for removal., (Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.)

Background: External fixation of tibial fractures using a locking plate has been reported with favorable results in some selected patients. However, the stability of external plate fixation in this fracture pattern has not been previously demonstrated. We investigated the stability of external plate fixation with different plate-bone distances., Methods: In this study, the computational processing model of external fixation of a distal tibial metaphyseal fracture utilizing the contralateral femoral less invasive stabilization system plate was analyzed. The plate was placed on the anteromedial aspect of tibia with different plate-bone distances: 1, 10, 20, and 30 mm., Results: Under axial load, the stiffness of construct in all groups was higher than intact tibia. Under axial load with an internal rotational force, the stiffness of construct with 1 and 10 mm plate-bone distances was similar to that of an intact tibia and the stiffness of the construct with 20 and 30 mm distances was lower than that of an intact tibia. Under axial load with an external rotational force, the stiffness of the construct in all groups was lower than that of an intact tibia. The maximum plate stresses were concentrated at the two most distal screws and were highest in the construct with the 10 mm plate-bone distance, and least in the construct with a 1 mm plate-bone distance., Conclusions: To guarantee a stable external plate fixation in distal tibial fracture, the plate-bone distance should be less than 30 mm.

Background: The locking plates are often used for internal fixation of closed tibial fractures. The use of a locking plate as an external fixator is still controversial, particularly for closed fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of external fixation using the femoral less invasive stabilization system (LISS) plate in proximal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia., Methods: We prospectively evaluated 35 patients (26 males and 9 females) with a mean age of 42 years (range, 21 to 62 years) who presented with fresh tibial proximal metaphyseal fractures. According to the AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, the fractures were identified as type 41-A2 in 18 cases and type 41-A3 in 17 cases, including 25 closed fractures and 10 open fractures. The femoral LISS plate was used to fix these fractures, which was placed on the anteromedial aspect of the tibia as an external fixator. The mean follow-up period was 18 months (range, 13 to 22 months)., Results: All fractures healed in a mean time of 14 weeks (range, 10 to 20 weeks). There was no case of nonunion, deep infection, and loosening of screws and plates. One month after the appearance of cortical bridging on biplanar radiographs, the locking plate was removed within 3 minutes in the clinic without any difficulty. According to the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle scoring system, the mean HSS score was 91 (range, 85 to 100) and 98 (range, 93 to 100), and the mean AOFAS score was 94 (range, 90 to 100) and 98 (range, 95 to 100) at 4 weeks postoperatively and final follow-up, respectively., Conclusions: For proximal metaphyseal fracture of the tibia, external fixation using the femoral LISS plate is a safe and reliable technique with minimal complications and excellent outcomes. Its advantages include ease of performing the surgery, use of a less invasive technique, and convenience of plate removal after fracture healing.

Objective: To share our preliminary clinical success and failure with using an external locking compression plate (LCP) for proximal tibial fractures, further refine the indications for this procedure and review relevant published reports., Methods: The current study reports two cases of proximal tibial fracture treated with external LCP as the second stage of a two-stage treatment. One patient was a 59-year-old man with a closed proximal tibial/fibular fracture caused by falling on ice while getting out of his car, and another patient was a 42-year-old male smoker with right comminuted proximal tibia, tibial plateau and proximal fibular fractures. The outcomes were evaluated by radiographs and weight bearing status., Results: In the first case, the fracture healed uneventfully whereas the second case required further open-reduction with internal fixation because correct alignment could not be achieved with an external LCP., Conclusion: Correct alignment of proximal tibial fractures followed by use of an external LCP can achieve favorable outcomes., (© 2014 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical application of combined fixation in the cervical spine using posterior transfacet and pedicle screws. Ten patients with cervical disorders requiring stabilization were treated from May 2006 to December 2008. The operative details varied depending on indication, the need for decompression, and the number of levels to be included in the spinal construct. Radiographic analysis of the fusion was performed after surgery. A total of 23 transfacet screws were inserted at or caudal to the C4/5 facet. A total of 21 pedicle screws were placed. All patients underwent operative treatment without neurovascular complications. Fusion was achieved in all patients. When performed appropriately, the method of using posterior transfacet screws in the caudal cervical joints combined with pedicle screw fixation in the cephalic cervical spine is reliable and deserves more widespread use., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Posterior pilon variant ankle fractures (PPVF) are a unique subtype of posterior malleolar fractures which have been a source of controversy and confusion in recent years. There has not been a thorough literature review previously written on the topic. Database searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from inception until June 2023. The key words included "pilon variant," "posterior pilon variant," and "posterior pilon" fractures. Outcomes were evaluated by union time, rates of delayed union, nonunion, malunion, and complication. A total of 15 articles relevant to surgical repair of pilon variant fractures were included in the literature review. The unique mechanism of injury has been reported to involve both rotational and axial forces, leading to involvement of the posterior and medial aspects of the distal tibia. Pilon variant fractures can be suspected by several characteristics on radiographs and have a high confirmation rate via CT images. Multiple systems have been proposed to classify this fracture pattern, but there is no consensus on the ideal classification system. Surgically, direct fixation has shown better short-term clinical outcomes versus indirect fixation or no fixation. PPVF have a distinct fracture pattern involving the posterior and medial columns of the distal tibial plafond, and results from a mechanism intermediate to rotational and axial forces. These fractures are more severe than tri-malleolar fractures due to increased rates of articular impaction and incongruity. Future classification systems should focus on joint surface area and the tibial pilon column involved to avoid confusion with less severe posterior malleolar fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur remain a challenge to treat due to variations in both patient- and fracture-specific factors. This study was designed to analyze the outcomes of different subtypes of periprosthetic distal femur fractures based on the Su et al. classification system. Thirty-six patients were classified with Su et al. system. All Type I and II fractures were managed with a locking plate. Most Type III fractures were managed with locking plate, while two were managed with long-stem revision arthroplasty due to evidence of implant loosening. Outcomes were measured and analyzed based on healing time, revision rate, and complication rate. Of the 36 patients, 30 (83.3%) achieved acceptable fracture union, while the remaining 6 (16.7%) experienced either delayed union or non-union. Type I fractures showed a significantly lower healing time than Type II and III fractures managed by locking plate. Delayed union was present in the Type II group, while non-union was recorded for two Type III fractures. Need for revision was more prevalent in fracture Types II and III. The Su et al. system of classification for periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur matches the clinical outcomes of this study and would seem to be useful in the approach to the treatment of these fractures. The majority of these fractures can be managed with locking plate with reasonable results. However, if the implant is loosened in Type III fractures, revision arthroplasty is suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Concerns have been raised about screw breakage within the tibia or fibula, referred to as intraosseous breakage. The purpose of this investigation is to analyze the technical aspects of syndesmotic screw placement in multiple anatomic breakage locations. A retrospective analysis of over 1056 patients who underwent syndesmosis fixation was completed. Demographics, screw length, width, number, height above the tibial plafond, angle, breakage location, and breakage location on the screw were collected and analyzed. Intraosseous (IO) screw breakage (91 screws, 68 patients) was more common than clear space (CS) breakage (28 screws, 18 patients) (P = < 0.001). Within the IO group, screw breakage within the tibia (60 screws, 52 patients) was more common compared to fibula breakage (29 screws, 24 patients) (P = < 0.001). Increased BMI and the use of multiple screws were associated with IO breakage (P =.007) and CS breakage (P =.012), respectively. Increased screw angle and age were associated with fibular IO breakage (P =.021, P =.036) when compared to other IO breakage locations. Screw angle and placement showed no significant differences between compared groups (P =.629, P =.570). Syndesmosis screw breakage, overall, occurred more commonly in an IO location. When compared to IO breakage, the use of multiple syndesmosis screws is most associated with CS breakage. Increased BMI is associated with increased IO breakage when compared to CS breakage. Patients with IO screw breakage within the fibula had increased age and placed at a higher angle when compared to other IO breakage locations. No other factors related to screw placement, including the height of placement, were found to be significantly associated with location of screw breakage. • Syndesmosis screw breakage, overall, occurred more commonly in an IO location. • When compared to IO breakage, the use of multiple syndesmosis screws is most associated with CS breakage. • Increased BMI is associated with increased IO breakage when compared to CS breakage. • Patients with IO screw breakage within the fibula had increased age and placed at a higher angle. • No other factors related to screw placement were found to be significantly associated with location of screw breakage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Many syndesmosis screw fixations do not achieve success at the first attempt. Currently, there are no data available to evaluate revision of syndesmosis screw failure. Methods: A total of 160 consecutive patients who underwent syndesmosis screw fixation from 2014 to 2016 were reviewed. The current study focuses on 13 of 160 patients who underwent revision surgery and analyzes reasons, methods, and outcomes of syndesmotic screw revisions. Results: Thirteen out of 160 patients had revision surgeries. Incidence of recurrent diastasis was 92.3%. Seven out of 19 screws had broken. Two patients had screw loosening, 9 patients underwent early weightbearing, 1 patient developed osteomyelitis, 1 patient developed osteoarthritis, and 1 patient had fibular nonunion. Eleven patients underwent removal, 3 patients underwent clamp reduction, and 4 patients underwent fibular osteotomy. Six patients experienced good reduction with 0/10 pain, 3 patients experienced good reduction with some pain, 1 patient experienced poor reduction; 1 patient developed osteomyelitis and subsequent 7/10 pain; 1 patient underwent fusion with 5/10 pain, and 1 patient experienced medial malleolar mal-union with 3/10 pain. Conclusion: It was found that the main reason for syndesmosis revision was reoccurring diastasis. Most patients ultimately experienced good reduction and were able to ambulate, despite some residual pain. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ankle fractures involving syndesmosis disruption cause severely unstable joint conditions. Traditional invasive operations put certain patient groups at an increased risk of infection. There is limited literature discussing the outcomes of minimally invasive fixation of severe ankle fractures including syndesmotic injury, as clinicians may be tempted to treat these difficult cases with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted on patients treated at a level one trauma center. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on presence of diabetes and/or obesity (body mass index ≥30.0 kg/m2). Those with either comorbidity were defined as high infection risk patients and placed in a comorbidity group. Patients were further divided into subgroups based on the operation's invasiveness; either traditional ORIF or percutaneous cannulated screw fixation.Results: Comorbid patients (N = 67) were more likely to sustain Weber C fractures compared to noncomorbid patients (N = 43) (59.70% to 37.21%, P = .019). Additionally, patients receiving minimally invasive fixation procedures experienced fewer infections than those receiving ORIF (0 vs 11 incidences, P = .01), without effect on union rates, fracture reduction, pain, need for revision surgery, or time to full weightbearing.Conclusions: Diabetic and obese patients are at an increased risk of experiencing severe ankle fractures. The use of minimally invasive fixation methods can reduce the risk of postoperative infection without sacrificing other surgical outcomes, even with fractures involving syndesmotic injury.Levels Of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level III: Retrospective comparative study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To report and evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing definitive treatment for distal femur nonunion after initial treatment with a locking plate. Methods Fourteen patients who had undergone definitive treatment at an academic Level 1 trauma center from May 2007 to December 2013 for distal femur nonunion were identified from a fracture database. Thirteen of them were female; the average age was 65 years (range, 50-84 years). Ten patients had sustained their injuries in falls at ground level, and four in motor vehicle accidents. Twelve patients were obese (body mass index ≥30), 10 had diabetes, none were current smokers, and one had an open fracture classified as type IIIa according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification system for open fractures. The fractures were classified according to the AO classification system for distal femur fractures; there were three type 33-A1, six 33-A2, two 33-A3 and three 33-C3 fractures. Methods of definitive treatment involved open reduction and internal fixation ( ORIF) revision, medial plating, bone grafting and the use of other biologic materials. Results Eight of the 14 patients (57%) achieved union during follow-up. Definitive treatment for nonunion involved ORIF revision in 11 cases. Three patients who did not undergo ORIF revision were treated with iliac crest stem cell autografts, bone graft substitutes or recombinant human-bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rh- BMP-2). Other treatments included rh- BMP-2 (12 cases), iliac crest bone autograft (five), iliac crest stem cell autograft (two), crushed cancellous bone allograft (three), CaSO4 and tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitute (two) and demineralized bone matrix (one). The average time from definitive treatment to union was 19 weeks (range, 12-51 weeks). Two of the 11 cases who underwent ORIF revision had medial plates added to improve biomechanical stability and prevent varus collapse. This was also performed in one patient with a grade III open type 33-C3 fracture and one with a closed 33-A2 fracture. Five study patients had comminuted fractures. Two had type 33-A3 and three type 33-C3 fractures. Both patients with 33-A3 fractures and 2 two with 33-C3 fractures had persistent nonunion at the end of follow-up. Conclusions Definitive treatment of distal femur nonunion after initial treatment with a locking plate had a low rate of success in this study, suggesting that this procedure is ineffective as a definitive treatment for distal femur nonunion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The role of each surgical approach on the outcomes of pilon fractures has not been investigated in a systematic review.Methods: This systematic review was conducted with a thorough literature search on PubMed using the keywords ("pilon" OR "plafond") "fracture." Only articles written in the English language that have been published within the past 15 years and discussed the surgical approach were considered.Results: A total of 733 patients were included in this review. All the fractures were either OTA Type B or C fractures: 157 were Type B and 576 were Type C. Anterior and medial approaches have some of the best results in the literature with respect to complication rate. The posterolateral and anteromedial approaches have markedly higher complication rates.Conclusions: The anterolateral group had the largest number of patients-comprising one third of the entire study population. The anterior approach had one of the lowest complication rates with a patient base that had a high proportion of OTA Type C fractures. The medial approach produced a low complication rate over a larger patient base that had a higher proportion of OTA Type B fractures.Levels Of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV: Systematic review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: The halo skeletal fixator provides the most rigid type of immobilization of all the orthoses that stabilize the cervical spine. Sometimes with older patients (>70 years old), the pin penetrates the cortical and cancellous bone of the skull and enters the intracranial space, which can result in serious complications such as brain injury, infection, hematoma, and loss of cerebrospinal fluid from the subarachnoid space. Currently, there is a lack of relevant literature that examines these concerns. Purpose: To evaluate the thickness of the outer table, diploe, and inner table at the anterolateral and posterolateral pin insertion areas of the skull in elderly cadavers by using computed tomography (CT) scans. In addition, insertion torques at the four standard pin insertion areas was determined by applying halo pins at incremental torque in an effort to suggest safe torque levels for the anterolateral and posterolateral pins. Study Design/setting: A human cadaveric anatomical and biomechanical study relating to thickness and insertion torques at standard pin areas in the elderly. Patient Sample: Twenty-one elderly cadaveric skull specimens. Outcome Measures: Thickness of cortices (tables) and diploe of skull and insertion torque at halo pin insertion areas. Methods: Aquarius Image software at the CT scanner's TeraRecon Aquarius Workstation was used to make the necessary skull thickness measurements at the pin insertion areas. Six, 8, 12, 18, and 36 inch lb of torque were used to determine penetration of the pins through the inner table at each of the four locations (two anterolateral and two posterolateral). Results: The mean anterolateral thickness was 7.36+/-1.57 mm. The average thickness of the outer table, diploe, and inner table were 2.24+/-0.44 mm, 1.52+/-0.41 mm, and 3.59+/-1.70 mm, respectively. The mean posterolateral thickness was 9.47+/-1.12 mm. The average thickness of the outer table, diploe, and inner table were 4.32+/-0.92 mm, 1.88+/-0.35 mm, and 3.27+/-1.21 mm, respectively. No pin penetration was seen at the traditional 8 inch lb of insertion torque in both the anterolateral and posterolateral pin insertion areas. Eighteen inch lb of torque resulted in penetration in 90.48% (19/21) and in 85.71% (18/21) of specimens in the left anterolateral and right anterolateral pin insertion areas, respectively. No penetration was seen even at 36 inch lb of torque in 80.95% (17/21) of the cadavers in both the left and right posterolateral pin insertion areas. Conclusions: The current study supported previous research that 8 inch lb of torque is safe for application of halo pins in the elderly. The posterolateral skull is thicker and stronger than the anterolateral skull. The safe maximum torque is 8 inch lb for anterolateral pin insertion area and 18 inch lb for the posterolateral pin insertion area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A response by Hui-lin Yang and colleagues to a letter to the editor about their article "Fluoroscopically-Guided Indirect Posterior Reduction and Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Fusion" is presented.

Background: To compare biomechanically metal screw fixation to suture-button or bioabsorbable screw fixation for ankle syndesmotic injuries.Methods: A literature search of the comparison studies in Pubmed and Google Scholar was conducted. The biomechanical outcomes of interest were syndesmotic stability in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes as well as torque and rotation at failure.Results: A total of 11 cadaveric studies were included. In the suture-button group, coronal displacement (MD 1.72mm, p = 0.02) and sagittal displacement (MD 2.65mm, p = 0.0003) were increased relative to the metal screw group. In contrast, no difference was found with axial rotation (MD 0.35 degrees, p = 0.57). Bioabsorbable screws exhibited equivalent failure torque (MD -3.04Nm, p = 0.53) and rotation at failure (MD 3.77 degrees, p = 0.48) in comparison to metal screws.Conclusions: Suture-button provide less rigidity when compared to metal screw fixation. They afford flexible syndesmotic micromotion which may more closely resemble a physiological state and be helpful for ligament healing. Bioabsorbable screws demonstrate similar mechanical strength properties to metal screws. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: An anatomic and radiographic study of placement of sacroiliac screws.Objective: The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the risk of partial cut-out of sacroiliac screws from the sacral ala slope via inlet and outlet view.Summary Of Background Data: The partial cut-out of sacroiliac screws from the superior surface of sacral ala can jeopardize the L5 nerve root, which is difficult to identify on the pelvic inlet and outlet views.Methods: Computed tomography images of 60 patients without pelvic ring deformity or injury were used to measure the width (on inlet view) and height (on outlet view) of the sacral ala. The angle of the sacral ala slope was measured on lateral view. According to the measured parameters, the theoretical safe trajectories of screw placement were calculated using inverse trigonometric functions. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a sacroiliac screw was placed close to the midline on both inlet and outlet views, including posterosuperior, posteroinferior, anterosuperior, and anteroinferior regions to the midline. The incidence of screw partial cut-out from the superior surface of sacral ala was identified.Results: The measured widths and heights of the sacral alas were 28.1 ± 2.8 and 29.8 ± 3.1 mm, respectively. The average angle between the superior aspect of the S1 vertebral body and the superior aspect of the sacral ala was 37.2 ± 2.5 degrees. The rate of partial cut-out of the screws from the superior surface of sacral ala slope was 12.5% (5/40) in posterosuperior, 0% (0/40) in posteroinferior, 70% (28/40) in anterosuperior, and 20% (8/40) in anteroinferior.Conclusion: To avoid the risk of partial cut-out from sacroiliac screw placement, more precise description should be added to the conventional description: the sacroiliac screws should be placed at the inferior half portion on outlet view and at the posterior half portion on inlet view.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]