Search

Epidermal inclusion cysts are common epithelial cysts of the skin. The latter classically originate from progressive cystic ectasia of the infundibular portion of hair follicle. Therefore, these cysts are usually found in hairy regions and rarely in glabrous skin such as the palms and soles. The etiology of glabrous epidermal inclusion cysts appear to be different from that of those located in hairy regions. It has been suggested that implantation of epithelial cells into subcutaneous tissue, such as during trauma, is most likely the pathophysiologic basis. Epidermal inclusion cysts on the palms and soles are often misdiagnosed, leading to improper treatment. Therefore, we report a rare case of an epidermal inclusion cyst of the heel after minimally invasive surgery of a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture., (Copyright © 2018 The American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Calcaneal fractures are notoriously difficult to treat and wound complications occur often. However, owing to the rare nature of these fractures, clinical trials on this subject are lacking. Thus, biomechanical studies form a viable source of information on this subject. With our systematic review of biomechanical studies, we aimed to provide an overview of all the techniques available and guide clinicians in their choice of method of fracture fixation. A literature search was conducted using 3 online databases to find biomechanical studies investigating methods of fixation for calcaneal fractures. A total of 14 studies investigating 237 specimens were identified. Large diversity was found in the tested fixation methods and in the test setups used. None of the studies found a significant difference in favor of any of the fixation methods. All tested methods provided a biomechanically stable fixation. All the investigated methods of fixation for calcaneal fractures seem to be biomechanically sufficient. No clear benefit was found for locking plates in the fixation of calcaneal fractures; however, a subtle mechanical superiority might exist compared with nonlocking plates in the case of fractures in osteoporotic bone. Several of the techniques tested would be suitable for a minimal invasive approach. These should be investigated further in clinical trials., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Calcaneal fractures are uncommon and have a substantial impact on hindfoot function and quality of life. Several surgical treatment options are available; both in surgical approach and type of operation. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcome and quality of life following ORIF and primary arthrodesis. Furthermore, predictors of worse functional outcome were explored., Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study was performed in patients with surgical fixation of a calcaneal fracture with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Patients received ORIF through the 1) Extended Lateral Approach (ELA), 2) Sinus Tarsi Approach (STA) or 3) primary arthrodesis via STA. Participants were presented a questionnaire containing demographics, the AOFAS hindfoot scale, Foot Function Index, SF-36, EQ-5D and patient satisfaction., Results: In total 95 patients participated in this study. The three groups were comparable regarding patient characteristics. A median score of 74.5 points on the AOFAS hindfoot scale and 11.9 on the FFI was found for the entire group. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with ORIF of primary arthrodesis. Patients scored a median of 49.0 on the Physical Component Scale of the SF-36 and 55.4 on the Mental Component Scale. On the EQ-5D patients scored a median of 0.8 points. Again no statistically significant differences were observed between the three subgroups. Socio-economic status was the only statistically significant predictor of worse functional outcome (β: 4.06, 95% CI: 0.50-7.62) after multivariable analysis., Interpretation: Good midterm outcomes following in terms of functional outcome and in quality of life are observed. We observed no statistical significant difference in functional outcome between patients with ORIF and patients with primary arthrodesis. The only predictor of worse functional outcome is a lower socio-economic status., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate whether the sinus tarsi approach (STA) allows for a similar anatomical reduction of the posterior talocalcaneal facet as the extended lateral approach (ELA) and compare the rate of postoperative wound complications., Design: Retrospective., Setting: Level 1 trauma center., Patients: All consecutive patients from 2012 to 2015 with a closed displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture Sanders type II and III surgically treated with the ELA (N = 60) and the STA (N = 65)., Main Outcome Measurements: Wound complications, timing of surgery, operative time, length of postoperative hospitalization, and reduction of the posterior facet and calcaneal body., Results: Incidence of wound complications, time to surgery, postoperative duration of hospital admission, and number of hospital admissions because of wound complications were significantly different between the ELA group and STA group. There was no significant difference in restoration of calcaneal anatomy with either approach. Importantly, the STA was performed in a median duration of 105 minutes and the ELA in a median of 134 minutes, accounting for nearly half an hour difference in operating time (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: The largest benefit of the STA was found in the significant reduction in wound complications and operative time, where time to closure may have accounted for the latter difference. This difference was without a compromise in reduction. Additional studies comparing functional outcome, especially rates of subtalar arthrosis, will be needed to determine the long-term benefits of STA., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The standard operative treatment of Lisfranc fracture dislocations currently consists of open reduction and transarticular fixation. Recently, bridge plating has been used more often. Using joint spanning, the reduced fracture dislocation is temporary stabilized to minimize articular damage. The present study describes the outcomes of patients treated with bridge plating after tarsometatarsal fracture dislocations compared with transarticular screw fixation. A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with an isolated tarsometatarsal injury who had been treated operatively from June 2000 to October 2013 were included. The primary functional outcome was measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score and the Foot Function Index. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction, which was measured using the EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire and a visual analog scale. A total of 34 patients were included. Bridge plating was used in 21 patients. In 13 patients, Kirschner wires or transarticular screws or a combination were used. The median follow-up period was 49 (interquartile range 18 to 89) months. The implants were removed in 10 of 13 patients in the transarticular group and 17 of 21 patients in the bridge plating group. The incidence of wound complications was comparable in both groups. The median American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score was lower in the transarticular group (77 versus 66). The Foot Function Index score was 18 in both groups. Patient satisfaction was 90% in the bridge plating group and 80% in the transarticular group. Bridge plating for Lisfranc injuries led to at least similar results compared with transarticular fixation in terms of functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether the prevention of secondary damage to the articular surface leads to less post-traumatic arthritis and better functional outcomes., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The most important goal of surgical management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is anatomic correction. This reduction is usually stabilized using plate and screw osteosynthesis. In addition, Kirschner wires (K-wires) can be used to maintain the surgical reduction or stability of the construct. In the present study, we evaluated the frequency and type of use of additional K-wires and subsequent migration in the surgical management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The data from 279 patients treated surgically from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2014 in a level 1 trauma center using an extended lateral approach were analyzed after 1 year of follow-up. All postoperative radiographic images were reviewed to identify the cases in which K-wires were used. Data on the number and type of K-wires used, K-wire location, and K-wire migration found on follow-up imaging studies were collected. Of the 279 patients, 69 K-wires had been used in 49 (18%) patients. A total of 25 (36%) lost (buried), 38 (55%) bent, and 6 (9%) unmodified straight K-wires had been placed. Overall, in 4 (5.8%) of 69 K-wires, secondary dislocation was seen. One (4%) of the lost, 3 (50%) of the unmodified, and none of the bent K-wires showed secondary dislocation. K-wire migration was seen in 5.8% of the cases. None of the bent K-wires and only 1 of the lost K-wires had migrated in the present study. These 2 techniques are preferred when using K-wire fixation in the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The use of unmodified straight K-wires should be discouraged., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lisfranc injuries represent a wide spectrum of different injuries at the tarsometatarsal joint. Not all types fit the currently available classifications. This case illustrates a rare subtype of a Lisfranc injury, with a dislocation of the entire first ray. It is presented to create more awareness for midfoot injuries. This article reviews the literature and provides recommendations for the treatment of similar cases in the future., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

For ankle fractures, in general, several studies have been published on immobilization (e.g., cast or boot) versus early motion after surgical treatment. However, no studies have been performed to determine the best aftercare strategy for surgically treated patients with ankle fractures with concomitant acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. The aim of the present review was to compare the functional outcomes of ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury treated with a cast or boot versus early motion. We performed a systematic review using the electronic databases from January 1, 2000 to September 1, 2012 of the Cochrane Library, PubMed MEDLINE(®), EMbase, and Google Scholar. The included studies were those in which ankle fractures with acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries had been treated with 1 or more syndesmotic screws, with a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months and at least 25 patients included. The functional outcomes, measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society Hindfoot scale, Olerud-Molander Ankle Scale, and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment, were compared. A total of 9 studies were identified with a total of 531 patients. The number of included patients ranged from 28 to 93. The mean follow-up period was 12 to 101 months. Of the 9 studies, 3 used an early motion protocol (195 patients) and 6 (336 patients) a protocol of immobilization for at least 6 weeks. For the American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society Hindfoot scale, the mean scores for immobilization were 86 to 91 points and for early motion, 84 to 89. For the Olerud-Molander Ankle Scale, the scores for immobilization were 47 to 90 and for early motion, 46 to 82 points. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score for immobilization was 11 and for early motion ranged from 12 to 27 points. No apparent differences could be detected in the published data considering the functional outcomes between immobilization versus an early motion protocol in ankle fractures with acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries treated with a syndesmotic screw. However, level 1 and 2 studies on this subject are lacking., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)